Видео

In lamen terms please????? Sheeesshh

California? I guess my mind is made up now. Thanks.

I'm now more confused 😕

This seems like a solid unbiased view on Prop 207. Liked!

Beautiful plant is a gift. Especially for our amazing vets and random population with ptsd/anxiety. It's beautiful medicine and has always been there. Sorry it's not a corporate synthesized pill with a stamp of bayer or pfizer with their super addicting popper demons. Yes on 207!!!!!

Right. I want to hear from those affected what their opinion is.

There is 93 years between the invention of the typewriter and manned space flight.

Is their any polling on how popular this proposition is?

Speaking too soft

Thank you for the non-partisan video. I'm a Republican voting no on 306. No single party should control 6 of 7 appointments to an* election commission. I trust Trumpublicans but they won't be around forever.

Thanks for the info and keep up the good work!

Your videos have been very helpful. Thanks!

no and hair cuts just for the minimum cost 30 dollers

let do it

Thank you for breaking down the propositions!

The map behind you reminds me of Paul Joseph Watson

its sounds good but in reality its going to make food to go up in price thus making inflation. What about the people that didn't get a raise but everything around them gets more expensive and so at the end of the day they are getting paid more but everything else goes up and making the raise less appealing .

Hey sir ! Then y did my employer say my pto(vacation time ) is now my sto combine into one to cover this bullshit law? Since pto is not mandatory

This Prop actually sounds better than the minimum wage increase, cuz there more potential benefits

Kinda sorry for the MOVEMENT that this didn't pass in AZ but the law was totally flawed, the lack of testing needs to stop. Also there isn't enough freedom of entry into the industry and many of the few owners that have licenses are downright EVIL! Not sad for them one bit.

Check out part 2 of my series on why im voting #YESon205 !!! 25,000 people a year die of WHAT?!?!?! ruclips.net/video/Vf1IbagUtCE/видео.html

Insys Corp, donated $500,000 against Prop 205..... why, because they're developing their own synthetic marijuana and want to stifle and competition before they get their drug on the market. Think about that if you're against legalization.

I hear the kids smoking pot argument so often but I cant help but think maybe parent's should be teaching there kids right from wrong. Kids can get there hands on liquor way easier than bud even In Colorado simply because there is way more places that sell booze than pot. On the other side of the coin people acting like it will fix all out problem's or fix our school's are just flat out wrong. The goverment says they will give all kind's of taxes to school and they never get them. However even if this is the case we cannot continue to arrest people and ruin there lively hood by giving them a felony for a plant.

Voting against Prop 205 is supporting organized crime and the failed "War on Drugs", see "Fast and Furious". The War on drugs has always been nothing more than a tax devouring failure which in itself has been a financial predator on American Citizens. "Failed War on Drugs: Fast, Furious and Fueled by the U.S." By Amy Goodman www.democracynow.org/2011/6/15/war_on_drugs_fast_furious_and_fueled_by_the_us

Great Explanation!!

am I the only one that noticed that the text said 206 at the beginning?

I wonder how Prop 122 is related to the legalization of recreational marijuana? In Colorado and Washington state, I understand they have legalized even though under Federal law it is still illegal. In other words, if I would like to legalize marijuana, I should vote FOR Prop 122?

No comments yet Thanks so much for these videos. They are well made and informative. As an average working class person I find useful information about these prop.s in common language bafflingly absent. So this is a big help. Nice job.

thanks for you take on this, however I believe there are a lot of other factors to consider. 1. why are they not eligible for the phase 1 trial in the first place, 2. they are terminally ill and looking for the miracle cure, so the emotions that go into the decision to try "anything" are not always unbiased, 3. do these patients sign the informed consent that the people on the phase 1 trial do now? 4. if the drug hastens their death who is liable? 5. if the side effects are really horrendous, again who is to blame. 6. what is to stop "cowboy" providers from using these patients as "lab rats". Anyone involved in a clinical trial has to have training on protecting human subjects, it cries back to the Tuskegee experiments or any experiment on a vulnerable population. 7. Who is making the money off these drugs? Sorry Preston for all the questions but this is a topic that upsets me. To watch patients on a phase one trial is not always fun, plus sometimes they go in with false beliefs that the "miracle" cure is in that treatment. The people who meet criteria for phase one trials are terminal, in a vulnerable place, with pressure from their families to continue treatment, sometimes from providers and I feel sometimes they are boxed into a corner to do things that sometimes they really would prefer not too.