Видео

1:58 - that's sus

We really do not need mutilated versions of any language. Seriously

Oh yeah I remember how many things Benjamin Franklin dod

If you want a perfect reform that would work in our imperfect would - just use shavian as Japanese uses furigana. Modern English spelling isn't really far from hieroglyphs with phonetical elements.

whats crazy is than often became "ofn" but i actually pronounce the t in often so that isnt very helpful. not to mention, im pretty sure there is a difference between "se" and "see" after all in the word "section" "se" is like "seh" and not "see"

I wasn't able to watch it live but i really enjoyed the recording !

Personally I think PE is much better than CE. Just the fact that "playwright" isn't written like it should be read "plirit" is a great improvement.

So "who" becomes "ho" rather than "hoo", and "trublsm" is supposed to be "troublesome" and not "troublism"? Also, nobody's gonna read "rytly" as "rightly", but as "ritly".

4:03 He didn't remove Y, he made it so that Y can only be a consonant and it can't be a vowel.

w is mostly related to gb, which is a labialized velar consonat, it is never mainly labial and it never was.

Some people and perhaps even whole dialects do in fact pronounce the d in handkerchief. I personally don't, but I do actually pronounce the -chief like the word chief. Keeping 'hand' as a whole in the spelling also helps by showing it's hand + kerchief, as opposed to say, neck + kerchief. Sign → Syn is crazy, many native English speakers would pronounce Syn like Sin. This is especially true when Siyn is right there as an option, preserving legibility. Who → Ho is also… baffling G becoming J is also wild in a lot of those examples, that's not even close to reasonable.

Some people don't consider ŋ to exist in English. They consider it to be a consonant cluster like 'nc' in cancel.

How about some minor tweaks that no one will spot at first glanse? Kuietly dropping some letterz who'z soundz are already produced by otherz while maybe adding þose who could make writing eazier? Anyway, i wiš you all þe best and pleaze don't fiht about it in þe comments

You should do a video(s) on Shavian and Quikscript!

As a Sri Lankan, I disagree with Apandahs' reform on the English Alphabet. its blatantly stupid, Sinhala Letters and Words are so damn hard to Write & Pronounce. 5'3 looking ass should be in Prison for what he did

"/ai̯/" and "/au̯/" are spelt differently because, in most dialects (including General American and Standard Southern British), they have different starting positions, with "/ai̯/" being closer to [ɑi̯] or [ʌi̯] and "/au̯/" often being more front [æu̯] than the standard symbols suggest. I recommend Geoff Lindsey.

review jan Misali’s fun riform reform

Conlang critic:Emilian Vowels Hard:a e o i u eu Soft:ya ye yo yu Consonants Hard:p t k f s h ts Voiced hard:b d g v z dz m n l Soft:py ty ky fy sh hy tsh Voiced soft:by dy gy vy zh dzh my ny ly y Other:ks ps(used in Greek loanwords)

Fixing the Argentine Spanish alphabet! Before: C(e/i)=s G(e/i)=x After: C(e/i)=ch G(e/i)=dj Based on Esperanto diacritic(C=ts) Argentina is Italian!

Jhope's phonetic alphabet Diacritics indicate sound change Long vowels:acute(instead of aa,ii,oo,ee,uu) Palatalization:acute(instead of sh,zh,ch,ny)

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog in Jungkook's English alphabet! Za kwik brawn foks qymps ova za lejzi dog Sounds like a mix of German and British😂😂😂

If Jungkook spelled the keyboard... Dzhweuhrtuhooeeorp Ahsdfghyuhkle Zungtchvbunm

X makes a ng sound Q makes a dzh sound Question=kwescan Extra,Exact=ekstra,egzakt

Jungkook's reformed Phonetic English Alphabet Aa(ah) Bb(b) Cc(tsh) Dd(d) Ee(eh) Ff(f) Gg(g) Hh(h) Ii(ee) Jj(y) Kk(k) Ll(l) Mm(m) Nn(n) Oo(oh) Pp(p) Qq(dzh) Rr(r) Ss(s) Tt(t) Uu(oo) Vv(v) Ww(w) Xx(ng) Yy(uh) Zz(z) Jungkook's English alphabet Qyxkuks Ixglic Alfabet

Fixed Korean spelling Jungkook X Jeongguk O

CC's Reform Review List: Number: Reform (Commenter; Episode) Episode Seven: Deseret Alphabet (@beansclox; Episode Five) Episode Eight: Portuguese Spelling Reform of 1911 (@Lenapolitainn; Episode Five) Episode Nine: Shavian Alphabet (@beansclox; Episode Four) Episode Ten: Quikscript (@GregWeidman; Episode Five) Episode Eleven: Anglish (@shruggzdastr8-facedclown; Episode Four)

Nice 👍🏼

When the imposter is sus 😳

If you are an English reformer getting confused or stacking again and again in the same situation, then why not look into other languages that are scientific and have been tested over thousands of years? Yes, my boy, I am suggesting Sanskirt alpha bat, in which you can find or make all the sounds in the universe, e.g. for sh, shaa, si, se ...we have this many letters. श श्क श्ख श्ग श्घ श्ङ श्च श्छ श्ज श्झ श्ञ श्ट श्ठ श्ड श्ढ श्ण श्त श्थ श्द श्ध श्न श्प श्फ श्ब श्भ श्म श्य श्र श्ल श्व श्श श्ष श्स श्ह श्ळ ष ष्क ष्ख ष्ग ष्घ ष्ङ ष्च ष्छ ष्ज ष्झ ष्ञ ष्ट ष्ठ ष्ड ष्ढ ष्ण ष्त ष्थ ष्द ष्ध ष्न ष्प ष्फ ष्ब ष्भ ष्म ष्य ष्र ष्ल ष्व ष्श ष्ष ष्स ष्ह ष्ळ स स्क स्ख स्ग स्घ स्ङ स्च स्छ स्ज स्झ स्ञ स्ट स्ठ स्ड स्ढ स्ण स्त स्थ स्द स्ध स्न स्प स्फ स्ब स्भ स्म स्य स्र स्ल स्व स्श स्ष स्स स्ह स्ळ

I was surprised at how bad BF's proposal was. I have my own which creates a one-to-one correlation between phonemes and graphemes and keeps things simple. I call it 7M Phonemic English. It gets rid of all digraphs, maintains compatibility with cursive writing and uses simple, easy-to-write letters. It only adds 8 more characters to the existing 26 because some characters are reassigned to different speech sounds. I keep as many existing glyph-sound associations as possible. Diphthongs are spelled out (eg 'late' becomes 'leεt'). Notice that the word is not made longer by doing this.

Might I recommend looking into the Initial Teaching Alphabet?

SO. Am I correct in saying pear would be spelled per under SR1? That seems like an issue. I like DUE though.

Please do mine next. Momuspellîng: Propósal - Normal Ææ - 'a't'e' Ðð -'th'e Khkh - lo'ch' Œœ - l'oo'k Uu - 'u'p Ww - t'oo' Yy - m'y' Ʒʒ - vi's'ion Jj/Dʒdʒ - 'j'u'dg'e Cedilla - for words like circle/ cheff Acute - emphasis Grave - schwa Circumflex - long Breve - semivowel Diæresis - no compound •Dyagraphs: ar, ch, er, gh, igh, ir, ng, or, ph, qu, th and wh all stæў normal, •Acçents arè optĭonal, •Nĭw cḧäracters can be substitĭwtèd by exístîng w̆onès, •Spelling wœd bê alterèd às littl às possibl untíl it is clôsè enóuf tò ænў dyalect, •increméntal refórm wœd bê ĭwsèd. Sampl text: Ðæt quick beiʒè fox jumpèd in ðè æir ôver iich thin dog. Lœk ôw̆t, Y shôw̆t, for hê's foĭlèd ўw àgǽĭn, crêǽting cḧæos. Or: Dat quick beige fox jumped in de air over iich thin dog. Loek owt Y showt, for he's foiled yw again, creating chaos.

I think that my system is better and improves efficiency quite a bit more. It's called 7M Phonemic English. It has 34 graphemes including a glottal stop. Dipthongs are spelled out. We should look to the children when assessing intuitiveness. They will spell 'was' w-u-z. In their minds the 'u' makes the Schwa/Strut sound. There are numerous short words that function this way: 'mud, dud, lug, jug, but, shrug, mug, tug, hug, nut, rut, drug, rug, cut, etc.) I really don't understand to predilection that phonologists have with chasing after any glyph other than the 'u' for this sound.

I think I can help with some of the oddities in Franklin's system that you bring up. Hopefully, this helps: @ 5:38 How? It isn't. Sheridan (1753) suggests /ɐi/ or /ɒi/ (he says it's the price vowel (we'll get to it) but with a more open mouth and sharper glide). Johnson (unhelpfully) says it's pretty similar to how the individual letters sound (so a diphthong, but we don't know what sort of o he's on about). but it looks like Franklin is describing something like a triphthong. Judging from how he wrote it, perhaps /ɒɪi/, or similar? Personally, I think it was possibly a clumsy attempt to just write /ɒi/, or something similar. @ 5:45 Here mid-18th century dictionaries help a lot (many come with pronunciation guides): Mid-18th Century "standard" (read: middle and Upper-class Southeast England) pronunciation of the upper one was basically either /ʌi/ or /əi/--the latter was the conservative pronunciation. The House phoneme was--based on what Sheridan states in 1753-- this: /ɒʊ/ (older speakers perhaps still had /ɔʊ/). The former lines up perfectly with what Franklin is writing here. Actually, the table should overall, look like this: a, ɑ, ɛ ɪ, ʌi (or əi) , ɒi, e: ʊ, u, ɒʊ, o: The cut vowel was /ʌ/. Johnson also supplies ə or ɨ for cases like the e in "chicken"; Franklin likely didn't distinguish between them and the cut vowel in his proposal, hence some of the spelling used. As to the choice of IPA letters: the "all" vowel was described as being similar to the Dutch a, which was not the same as the a in "hat", which was described as being like the Italian a. Italian--mercifully--changed relatively slowly, so the a then was as it is now. Dutch has both a's, so that suggests Johnson (who goes into the specifics), is describing a back vowel. Comparison with older and newer descriptions of English then provides evidence that this was a rounded back vowel--at least for the long version; the short version might have been unrounded (or it might not have; we don't know if vowel length was the only true contrast). I know that the earliest RP recordings have unrounded pronunciations if Simon Roper is any clue. The resulting accent is...well, it's not like any modern dialect of English. It sounds modern--like something you could imagine being used on the streets today--but you wouldn't know exactly where he's from. However, a lot of people say it sounds Irish or Scottish (the latter due to the pronunciation of r: every description before 1750 favors the alveolar trill as the standard, with two allophones.) Look up A.Z.Foreman's reading of the Declaration of Independence: that's the closest I can find to what Franklin's getting at.

Haha, democracy, riiiiight

yay another video. i kind of want to share my english respelling in this comment. im calling it a respelling rather than a reform because its really for personal use and for fun. It is a basic phonetic respelling that uses the latin alphabet so it is not super intressting. It is biased on one accent however as something i use personally i like it this way. It is based on Dr Geoff Linseys SSB. Now here is the alphabet. A a /a/ Á á /ɑː/ B b /b/ C c /t͡ʃ/ D d /d/ E e /ɛ/ É é /ɛː/ F f /f/ G g /g/ H h /h/ I i /ɪ/ Í í /ɪː/ J j /d͡ʒ/ K k /k/ L l /l/ M m /m/ N n /n/ O o /ɔ/ Ó ó /oː/ P p /p/ R r /ɹ/ S s /s/ T t /t/ U u /ɵ/ Ú ú /ɵː/ (rarely used but it exists) Ul ul /u/ (used for words affected by l-vocalization) V v /v/ W w /w/ Y y /j/ Z z /z/ Þ þ /θ/ Ð ð /ð/ Ŋ ŋ /ŋ/ Ȝ ȝ /ʃ/ or /ʒ/ (i couldnt think of another letter for the other sound) Ǝ ǝ /ə/ Ǝ́ ǝ́ /əː/ Diphlongs aw /aw/ áy /ɑj/ ey /ɛy/ iy /ɪj/ ow /ɔw/ óy /oj/ uw /ʉw/ ǝw /ǝw/ Q and X are can be used if it appears in the name of something or the normal spelling (jank i know but replacing with <kw> and <ks> is fine as well) and the make the sound <kw> and <ks> respectively. for example box -> box exam -> igzam question -> qesjǝn (the u is not carried over) quiche -> kiyȝ Now an example I used ChatGPT to generate the original sentance Original: Golf is a game where players use clubs to hit a small ball into holes on a big grassy area. People play on a course with 9 or 18 holes. The aim is to get the ball in each hole using the fewest hits possible. Players use different clubs for different shots, like a driver for long shots and a putter for close ones. It's a game that needs skill, patience, and a good eye for distance and direction. Many folks enjoy playing golf because it's a fun way to spend time outdoors while testing their skills. Respelling: Gowf iz ǝ geym wé pleyǝz yuwz klǝbs tǝ hit ǝ smul bul intuw howz on ǝ big grásiy ériyǝ. Piypul pley on ǝ kós wið 9 ó 18 howz. Ðǝ eym iz tǝ get ðǝ bul in iyc how yuwziŋ ðǝ fyuwist hits posǝbul. pleyǝz yuwz difrǝnt klǝbs fó difrǝnt ȝots, láyk ǝ jráyvǝ fó loŋ ȝots and ǝ pǝtǝ fó klǝws wǝns. its ǝ geym ðat niydz sgiw, peyȝǝns, and ǝ gud áy fó disdǝns and direkȝǝn. Meniy fǝwks injoy pleyiŋ gowf bǝkoz its ǝ fǝn wey tǝ sbend táym awtdóz wáyul testiŋ ðé sgiwz.

can you make a video about the “unifon” neography for english please

can i request the Unifon Alphabet

Will you try to make one?

Here's your citation for 0:14 (Martin Gardner, "The Unexpected Hanging", 3rd edition, 1991, page 45): "The man who has broken more previous dissection records than anyone living today - he is the world's leading expert on such problems - is Harry Lindgren, an examiner of patents for the Australian government. He has studied all types of dissection, including plane figures with curved outlines and three-dimensional solid forms (so far as I know, no dissector has yet explored the higher dimensions!), but most of his attention has been focused on the polygons."

These problems would be avoided if the reforms had a sound to symbol corrispondency like italian (i know in italian it s not perfect but it s very predictable, for example the letter c)

I don’t get why a lot of spelling reforms want to get rid of the “ph” digraph. If anything we should just regularize consonant+h always being a digraph and get rid of exceptions like “ghost”, because I really don’t think it would be hard or confusing for learners of English.

do robwords' reform