Видео

3 Year old video and it still holds up. Still MSFS 2024 will have more accurate trees and this type of comparison will be even more realistic. Can't wait for that release later this year!

msfs litterally used google streetview to make scenery like this because theres no way the trees and other scenery matches up PERFECTLY if im wrong i owe u 200 dollars

Cool comparison ideas. What "zoom" setting do you have set in msfs2020? Zoom at 80,90 or 100? FOV

Now use parallax, waterfall, and black rack's volumetric clouds vs ksp2.

This game is insane. I really got surprised watching both real life and the flight simulation!

And now for a performance comparison 😂

what gpu

waited for the opportunity to build micro apparats, but received 2 tons of graphonyum

If Mort from Madagascar was on the wing of that plane, lol.

6:14 Is that M6 in the background?

Nice! Is this with or without google maps mod?

Dang, I seriously can’t tell the difference!

The native colors in fs2020 are way more saturated 😪

Kerbal space program 2 sounds and looks more inmersive, like so vivid, i cant wait till they add the rest of the updates like Science

Now do it again with the custom Gatwick scenery added... :-D

how did he get the timing perfect

Tell me why the water looked more real on the game than the real life😮

Is that a duct tape on Wings??

Simulator looks more realistic.

BUTTER!! Love it :)

Wow

When the simulator Is more realistic than the real life:

Oh yeah it is

a330s seemed to be designed to have the ability to kiss the ground at landing. All a330s that have seen are just so nice to watch when landing.

the sim got all the right ground telemetry but the colors, textures, buildings and trees are mostly wrong.

It’s fantastic game 👍

"butter"

I prefer FS. Real life one is not that realistic in my humble opinion.

Welcome to Luton

google earth look better

ironically, the airport details are worse in the simulation but the world details are spot on, if not even better

Pretty soon we won't have to board a real airplane ... ever.

Real life is a bit more turbulent as always.

Really laggy. I sure hope it is a old graphics card. I would hate to spend $2K on a decent graphics card and see lag.

Microsoft, stop trying so hard with trees.. just green blobs!

It used to be if it was blurry and you couldn't make out things in the distance it was a simulator... now it is the other way around.

When they are side-by-side like that it's surreal, it makes the MFS footage look even more real. Especially when the real footage is obscured by fog or glare, the clearness of the sim footage makes you think that's the real one.

Room for improvement yet super impressive at the same time 👍

Camera motion is important role here

This flight simulator looks more real than real life.

Ok fine. Now do a bug comparison.

Bruh they look the same

Oyun daha gerçek aq

I wonder why the terrain looks so good but the plane engine looks like something out of Doom 3

Real life: has all sorts of trees MS flight simulator: to me every tree is a pine tree

Phill Spencer - "Are we living in simulation? "

Thé flight simulator is more realistic

simulator looks better😊

words cannot describe how much I want kerbal space program 2

Even if you don't take into count the destabilization effect of the camera, there is the same destabilization in reality than in the simulator. That's not counting the hum of the engines at startup. The sound of the brakes (the audible strobe when braking at a certain point. A lot of things. About the simulator ... Well boring when flying, even if about 5 years ago. A good video with all the difference in one small clip.