Видео

I enjoyed this v. much, thank you. There are so many contested opinions when one takes a 'deep dive' into even relatively modern military kit but this was a nicely balanced overview. My own area of interest is the post-war para smock. My 1970's service coincided with the withdrawal of the Denison and the issue of the DPM. There are some interesting tales about that process. 🙂 Possibly, I might have been one of the 'final few' regular recruits issued a Denison at Depot although I believe that TA units used up the surplus for a few years after 1977. I own several post-war Denisons, including the one I was originally issued with. I swapped out a totally knackered army surplus one for the 'new' DPM when the change occurred and kept my own Denison although wearing them at work was forbidden. Back in those days Denisons were as cheap as chips and worn by just about everyone on building sites!

Is there a list of contract numbers and their corresponding dates?

I love the denison smock its icon.

Wikipedia tells me that the camouflage pattern was developed by a Major Denison.

I bought a smock as a teenager in the '60 from a deposal store in Woking, Surrey. I mostly wore it for fishing. It has the wool collar, four patch pockets with buttons and the beaver tail with pop studs. The camo has a brush stroke look. I'm not sure it's WW2 origin. It might be later than that. What's more, I still have it.

Good effort. I don't want to disparage you but I'd lose the completely era inappropriate music and try to record the sound with something other than a gramophone.

Get the book "Denison", it calls out many of the errors you have made. Eg Windak was an officers smock. Zero evidence it was an early version. Only Brigadiers & above were seen wearing them. Early camo versions were hand painted but later "1st patterns" were roller printed. And had wool cuffs. And tail did not press stud onto the back. 2nd pattern (buttoned cuff" were only printed. Any with full zips were tailored usually using sleeveless oversmock zippers.

You repeatedly state that they are not well made, you obviously never had an '85 pattern Para smock issued to you lol. Nice video.

I still have my Denison smock as issued to me in the sixties a bit worn but still hanging in there.

Jolly good show old chap.

Winston Churchill was so ahead of things.

Fall Schirm Jäger

A bit of constructive criticism. Next time you do a video, please improve the lighting. Could hardly see the features you were talking about !

Is there an English language PDF version of the Swedish Army manual available ? If so , do you have a link for it ?

I hope you can help me out. Years ago I bought a British Army Style Aluminum mess kit at Surplus store. It came with a two snap pouch. On the larger pan, it has the markings FMI over M\54 which during my research I discovered that it was Swedish Markings. I subsequently saw one for sale on E-bay. During all my research, I cannot find any history about these mess kits and the Swedish Armed forces. Do you have any knowledge about them?

멋진 영상 최고 훌륭합니다. 좋은 푸드 컨테이너입니다.

ah, the fabled LK70! i wonder how many wishlists around the world feature that beautiful thing? nice overview, thank you. 👍🏼✌🏼🖖🏼

This is a great video with some mess kit information thanks for sharing

No external pockets = no good.

Everything is made in China now in the Swedish Army!

i can also add that the frame can be used as platform for carrying ammo. We converted the wooden box for 7.62mm ammo to contain belts for maschinegun, thus turing it into a one man weapon

Try it on, why don't ya! More informative if you huff a couple of miles fully loaded before passing judgement ;-)

It is no longer used as a backpack. Now it is used to carry ammunition to Carl Gustaf. There is room for four fastened to the frame if it is used.

The strap on the back that you didnt know what is was for, - we used it for securing an axe with the axehead secure under thetop lid and the shaft through the "handle" as you called it.

I have a Slovakian jacket. The magazine pockets are good for a plastic water bottle and the large one holds a field book.

Later pattern without the dots

Great video .. I'm still wearing my DPM underpants ! 😜😜💪💪

Very good explained and compared! Thank you sir 👍

I've just finished lining an Mtp smock with Dpm, reversible as needed.🤘🙂

Pant beautifu

Pant. ?

Beautifu

I was issued this piece of kit in the Royal Guards in April 2008. Quite good stuff! I recall that as a recruit in those late spring and early summer months, I had a hard time seeing the point in such a large pack, as I never used any cold weather or rain clothing. I suppose the guys who started in December had a different experience though!

For a long time in the 70's & 80's Danish kit was like hen's teeth - they destroyed all surplus/returned kit to prevent it being used by eastern bloc infiltrators.

I like the design of the Bergen. it's a bit like the Alice packs the US army used to carry. I have 2 of the medium size and one large size. they are old but still work very well. thank you for showing the Danish one. very nice. Dwayne

Lindo,beautifu

After the Falklands tactics and training changed, and a new uniform was needed to reflect those changes. Troops were already wearing jungles and windproofs in Sennybridge training areas because they dried faster. The 68 pattern was expensive, so finding something cheaper was also sought. A colourway was dropped as the MOD found out they didn't own the rights to the print method or possibly even the actual design when they changed manufacturer. Sizing changed to metric. Ten years off rubbish design and manufacture followed until "95 came out. All sorts of cloth and material tried, including rip stop, and the DPM got darker and darker with fewer colour ways and more simple patterns. No "dots" nor edge highlights. Some was dreadful. Where as the early DPM was often thought too light coloured, the later patterns were too dark turning almost black when wet. For the UK and Europe the 1970's DPM works very well in the woods and fields. Later DPM never worked as well, and a radical change to MTP was welcomed.

AWESOME VIDEO!

Why don’t the wives understand how great all these jackets are. Not to mention valuable and extremely well made and awesome. I guess they naturally have that flaw not being able to see quality

I’ve still got 2 brand new jackets and 2 trousers, brand new size 9, good gear as long as it’s dry!

I think DPM is the most attractive camouflage ever created- I wore the US woodland camo when I served, but the DPM is a much more softer natural looking camo the blends well in the correct environment. They even have it in desert shades as well. great video.

I never served. I was an army Cadet late 80 into early 90 and remembered the variation. I thought it was just because we got old worn hand me downs in various states of wear ie washed, ironed, faded, it was really obvious at twilight with some kit almost glowing in the dull light.

Pants?

Beautifu

I really preferred the 68 pattern which was a better quality jacket but the trousers took forever to dry. The 84 pattern was poorly designed and manufactured and required a lot of modifications to even make it useful. That said the windproofs were great especially private purchase ones which there were several companies making in the 80s . I personally much prefer DPM over MTP .

I always think the original 68 pattern is the most effective DPM, even now.

Was issued 2 smocks and 2 pairs of combat trousers 1982.Non of them matched ,some were lighter shades or much greener.The style was to wear the jackets short and tight by fastening the bottom drawstring and tucking the skirt inside,prefered wear with it, was a pair of narrowed lightweight trousers ,the camo ones were very heavy to wear and slow to dry out,the lightweights dried much quicker.Finally a pair of german para boots were highly prized as opposed to the leaky dpm boots and archaic puttees,if you could get them. Hoods were never issued and even if issued would never have been allowed to wear them as they inhibit visibility.

I remember the 85 issue, and it was terrible, was only fit for guard duty, in the field we all preferred a sas windproof and tropical trousers instead, at least they didnt stay wet, the quality and fit was not as good as the pervious issue, just like the previous issue there were a lot of variations in the pattern, some were smaller and crisper, like the smock I was issued in basic, the pattern was noticeably smaller and darker than anyone else's, so much so the brown was almost purple, back in '85 it must have been towards the end of the previous issue as some blokes got the previos kit, and one bloke with huge feet ended up with DMS boots and puttees instead of the O-11 boots, his boots didnt fall apart like mine.. but thats another story, it wasnt uncommon to see some DPM had the black part of the pattern shifted, this appeared to be variation by the different manufacturers, it came without any lining for the smock but the trousers were still lined during my time, but in truth blokes used to cut the lining out of the older smocks anyway as they dried quicker and were easier iron without it, the seams were awful and the trousers used to always split under the crotch, the only thing good about it was it was easy to iron and the internal front pockets were easy to dump mags down, but the front chest pockets seemed to be deliberately designed for things to fall out of them if you bent over to pick something up... but saying that smokers used to take advantage of the FFD pouch on the back of the right arm.

Thanks, very informative and well done video. I am a collector of british militaria of the cold war era, and found your explanation while browsing around. Very detailed and useful. Thanks again.

very good camo pattern, familiar to the US woodland BDU pattern. I have a few items that have DPM and they also come in the lighter tan desert variation.