- Видео 64
- Просмотров 170 193
Jeffrey Petro
Добавлен 24 июн 2009
Hi there: I’m Jeff, and I'm a musician, composer, and a bigtime techie nerd. I've been doing this a while, and I’m here to discuss music and technology.
On my channel, you'll find discussions about music gear, technology in general, and of course, my signature Top 11 and Top 13 lists. I love a bargain, and if you’re on a budget, you can count on my channel providing good advice about ways to save money on music gear and other technology.
Whether you’re new to being a musician, recording in a home studio, and using all this great technology, or you’re a more experienced aficionado, you’ll find helpful advice, honest opinion, and education.
Subscribe today and join me on a journey into the world of music and technology.
On my channel, you'll find discussions about music gear, technology in general, and of course, my signature Top 11 and Top 13 lists. I love a bargain, and if you’re on a budget, you can count on my channel providing good advice about ways to save money on music gear and other technology.
Whether you’re new to being a musician, recording in a home studio, and using all this great technology, or you’re a more experienced aficionado, you’ll find helpful advice, honest opinion, and education.
Subscribe today and join me on a journey into the world of music and technology.
IS A ROLAND XV 88 A CHEAP JUPITER 8
When I look at a Roland XV-88, I can't help but feel, it's one of the best older keyboards for the price.
128 voices, multiple onboard effects, sampled sounds, plus a synth engine with multiple resonant filters and so much more...
It's not without its faults. The real hammer-weighted action is my favorite, but the hammer-weights degrade over 15 -20 years and have to be replaced.
regardless, it's all metal construction, other than the under-carriage and it sounds great used for any era of music.
0:00 Intro
1:50 How good of a synthesizer is an XV-88
2:51 XV-88 advantages over a Jupiter-8
3:34 XV-88 voice architecture
4:42 Patch architecture (5 elements)
5:18 Patch elements 1 & 2 (Oscillators)
9:01 Pa...
128 voices, multiple onboard effects, sampled sounds, plus a synth engine with multiple resonant filters and so much more...
It's not without its faults. The real hammer-weighted action is my favorite, but the hammer-weights degrade over 15 -20 years and have to be replaced.
regardless, it's all metal construction, other than the under-carriage and it sounds great used for any era of music.
0:00 Intro
1:50 How good of a synthesizer is an XV-88
2:51 XV-88 advantages over a Jupiter-8
3:34 XV-88 voice architecture
4:42 Patch architecture (5 elements)
5:18 Patch elements 1 & 2 (Oscillators)
9:01 Pa...
Просмотров: 485
Видео
WHY GEAR SPECS ARE ANNOYING, AND WHAT IS PUFFING?
Просмотров 15716 часов назад
How manufacturers of music gear can make gear features vague in their advertising. Includes a generic discussion of gear specifications, and tips to be a better consumer of music gear, and all goods and services. 0:00 Intro 0:52 Puffing explained 2:12 How puffing can affect you 4:18 Full MIDI implementation example 5:31 Mixing console example 6:54 What can you do? 7:42 Jeffie 1000 example 9:14 ...
TOP 11 LIST: THE CUTEST LITTLE CLASSIC SYNTHESIZERS
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.14 дней назад
Here is "a" list of some of the cutest little classic synthesizers. I did mix in one more modern synthesizer just for fun. 0:00 Intro 1:07 List starts 16:06 Closing info
TOP 11 LIST: THE SCARIEST LOOKING KEYBOARDS
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.21 день назад
I already made a top 11 list of keyboards that have excellent industrial design. Here, I'm looking at the opposite. It's a top 11 list of the scariest keyboards. Some of these keyboards have good industrial design, but they look ominous. 0:00 Intro 0:58 List starts 11:52 A quick story about my PC
COMPOSING TEMPLATES- WHAT THEY ARE AND HOW TO USE THEM
Просмотров 44728 дней назад
An overview of my composing template. How I use it and what it can do for you. 0:00 Intro 0:45 What is a composing template 3:04 The origin of my template. 3:45 My template demo in Cubase 11 24:05 Closing You'll find templates for Logic Pro and Cubase Pro at the URL below: spitfireaudio.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/18246201891741-DAW-Templates-for-BBC-Symphony-Orchestra
MORE INPUTS AND OUTPUTS FOR YOUR AUDIO INTERFACE ON A BUDGET
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.Месяц назад
Tips and advice on how to get more analog audio inputs and output on your audio interface ...on a budget. 0:00 Intro 0:40 My recomendation & basic operation 1:12 Prices of the MKI, MKII, MKIII 2:15 Specifications for all models 3:17 MKI specifications with pics 3:53 MKII specifications with pics 5:00 MKIII specifications with pics 6:38 Other specifications for all models 8:14 MKII internal jump...
$5000.00 MUSIC SOFTWARE CHALLENGE
Просмотров 358Месяц назад
If you were starting a new studio, and a rich aunt gave to $5,000.00 to buy studio music software, what would you buy? Take the challenge and post your list in the comments, after you've watched the video for the rules, and I'll give you my list too. It's time to see what people would really buy. Let's hope they are being honest. 0:00 Intro 0:40 The rules 2:21 My list: Number 1 3:04 My list: Nu...
$5000.00 KEYBOARD AND SOUND MODULE CHALLENGE
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.Месяц назад
if you were starting a new studio, and a rich uncle gave to $5,000.00 to buy keyboards and sound modules, what would you buy? Take the challenge and post your list in the comments, after you've watched the video for the rules, and I'll give you my list too. It's time to see what people would really buy. Let's hope they are being honest. 0:00 Intro 0:38 The rules 2:57 My list: Number 1 4:09 My l...
IS THE CLASSIC ANALOG MARKET TANKING ?
Просмотров 5 тыс.Месяц назад
A look at trends in the classic analog synth market and determining if the market is tanking or getting ready to tank. 0:00 Intro 0:33 Why I think prices are softening 2:47 The sub $1,000.00 Juno-106 3:24 Five reasons why the market is softening 7:20 Summary
MODERN OVERHYPED/OVERPRICED KEYBOARDS
Просмотров 11 тыс.2 месяца назад
Viewers have been asking for this for a while, and I had planned to do it anyway. It's sure to be controversial, but it's not just a list with the good, the bad, and the ugly of the keyboards. On this list, I also tell you why the keyboard made the list. 0:00 Intro 1:14 The list starts 17:16 Wrap-up
ULTIMATE LAPTOP HINGE REPAIR AND KEYBOARD REPLACEMENT TOO
Просмотров 2642 месяца назад
This is what I believe to be the best hinge repair option on a laptop computer. I also give advice on buying and replacing a laptop keyboard. Sorry, I'm getting over a very bad cold, I sound nasally, and I clear my throat a bunch of times. 0:00 Fixing the hinges 0:36 Getting the bezel off 1:34 The kit I purchased with machine screws/bolts 2:24 Washer recommendation 3:11 Sharp edge concerns 4:13...
SHOULD YOU USE HARDWARE EFFECTS OR JUST DO IT ALL IN THE BOX?
Просмотров 3502 месяца назад
Perhaps it's old school to use hardware effects in music production, or perhaps you are missing out. If you haven't tried it, maybe you should. Hundreds of top pros can't be wrong. 0:00 Intro 0:23 Interesting story 4:05 Benefits of hardware effects 4:38 Benefits of doing it in the box 6:58 Something to consider
DOES YOUR BAND NEED A CONTRACT OR MOU?
Просмотров 802 месяца назад
Playing in a working band is fun, and it is hard work. Even if you have no goals beyond playing local venues, it may be time to get serious and consider a contract or MOU. 0:00 Intro 0:45 DISCLAIMER 1:05 Contract 1:16 MOU 1:51 What an MOU can do for you 4:36 ...firing Jimmy from the band 6:06 What an MOU won't do for you
SONGWRITING ORGANIZATIONS: ARE THEY WORTH JOINING?
Просмотров 1452 месяца назад
Useful information related to songwriting organizations. Also, information about song pitching services and "pay for play" services. 0:00 Intro 0:19 What is a Songwriting Organization 0:53 What they offer and cost 2:42 Song screenings 5:05 Works in Progress (WIP) 6:42 The Apple Hypo 8:13 Perseverance!!! 9:20 Professionalism- always 11:09 John B. 12:00 Pay for Play 13:23 Song pitching services 1...
MUSIC GEAR MARKET EIGHTIES ANALOG GRAB BAG
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.2 месяца назад
A variety of synthesizers from the eighties with at least one very odd instrument. 0:00 Intro 0:32 Akai AX60 3:52 Akai AX73 6:34 Akai AX80 12:59 Korg Poly-800 MKI & MKII 19:59 Korg Polysix 26:38 Korg Mono/Poly 32:25 Korg Poly61/61M 38:26 Kawai SX-240 42:30 Roland SH-5 46:08 Realistic/Moog MG-1 55:00 Stylophone S-1 59:16 Closing
SYNTH LORE: KORG WAVESTATION SERIES OF SYNTHESIZERS
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.2 месяца назад
SYNTH LORE: KORG WAVESTATION SERIES OF SYNTHESIZERS
MUSIC GEAR MARKET RACKMOUNT MULTI-EFFECTS PROCESSORS
Просмотров 7603 месяца назад
MUSIC GEAR MARKET RACKMOUNT MULTI-EFFECTS PROCESSORS
TOP 11 LIST: BEST LOOKING KEYBOARDS
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.3 месяца назад
TOP 11 LIST: BEST LOOKING KEYBOARDS
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: MOSTLY EIGHTIES DRUM MACHINES
Просмотров 7133 месяца назад
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: MOSTLY EIGHTIES DRUM MACHINES
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: EIGHTIES ROLAND ANALOG SYNTHESIZERS
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.3 месяца назад
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: EIGHTIES ROLAND ANALOG SYNTHESIZERS
SYNTH LORE ALESIS QS SERIES SYNTHESIZERS + QUIZ
Просмотров 8983 месяца назад
SYNTH LORE ALESIS QS SERIES SYNTHESIZERS QUIZ
TOP 11 LIST: THINGS I COULD NEVER SELL
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.3 месяца назад
TOP 11 LIST: THINGS I COULD NEVER SELL
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: DIGITAL SYNTHESIZERS JULY 2024
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.4 месяца назад
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: DIGITAL SYNTHESIZERS JULY 2024
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: SAMPLERS JULY 2024
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.4 месяца назад
MUSIC GEAR MARKET: SAMPLERS JULY 2024
14 VOCAL SAMPLE LIBRARIES FOR YOU TO CONSIDER
Просмотров 2584 месяца назад
14 VOCAL SAMPLE LIBRARIES FOR YOU TO CONSIDER
TOP 11 LIST: SELECTED HARDWARE EFFECTS FOR YOU TO CONSIDER
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.4 месяца назад
TOP 11 LIST: SELECTED HARDWARE EFFECTS FOR YOU TO CONSIDER
TOP 11 LIST: BARGAIN AND INTERESTING HARDWARE SAMPLERS
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.4 месяца назад
TOP 11 LIST: BARGAIN AND INTERESTING HARDWARE SAMPLERS
I think we live in wonderful times when we have such abundance of electronic musical instruments. The more options, the better for the customer. And having all the synthesizers and keyboards features in this video, we can truly appreciate the products from Roland, Korg, Yamaha, and Kawai. When it comes to the Moog Minimoog Model D reissue, you can't really put a price on a reissue of a classing. It looks great, it feels great, and assuming you have good speakers that can handle all the frequencies, it sounds great. Sure, it's limited, but the playing experience on the Minimoog is very good. I have tried the Polybrute 12, and I must say it's very nice, except that I'd prefer the mod wheels to be in place of the Morphee. That Morphee controller is just too out there for me. For the same price as the Polybute 12, once can get a Montage M7, which really an amazing synthesizer, and very beautifully made, with a great keybed feel. The super knob stick like a sore thumb, but it is what it is. Nothing is perfect. Now, the Nord instruments. I think they are quite good actually. The Nord Electro 6D is nice, great keybed. The Nord Lead A1 is a very good synthesizer. Sure, it would've been better if it had a 5-octave keybed, but if you just wanted to play basses or solos, the Nord Lead A1 is very good. I don't think the Nord Lead was originally design to be a lone keyboard. I think it was always though as a synthesizer addition to other keyboards in the setup. Once again, I applaud all the companies that have the courage to produce synthesizers these days, where the customer base is as demanding and opinionated as it is stingy. As I said, great days for the customer mean challenging days for instrument manufacturers.
My XV-88 was a great synth until the keys started breaking.
This synth reminds me VERY MUCH of my Roland FA06, 3 oscillators, TVR, very deep and I definitely fooled people with sounds for playing Genesis and ELP. Very capable as well, and can do all the modern type sounds as well. I replaced it with the MODX7+.
Great Video I think Juno G has same possibilities (and also same for sampled sounds) even without using sofrware .
Thank you. I have an XV-3080 with the SRX 07 Ultimate Keys expansion board.
Great video, nice tutorial, but I think the title must change..
Great demo, I never knew about this keyboard. That software editor is great!!
My pleasure. Thanks for the comment.
What I know (I have also been using synthesizers since the late eighties) is that all Rolands are actually close together. I don't use any Roland anymore, I don't like it. Personally, Korg had the most individuality, although the newer ones such as Monologue and Minilogue are hipster things so not my thing.
Appreciate the comment.
THANK YOU! All your videos are great and useful for manny sound designers and voicing members. Subscribed !
Thanks for subscribing, I appreciate it and your comment.
Roland are notorious for hiding amazing synthesis engines behind lacking front panel controls, the JD-Xi is a case in point. If you can be bothered to use the editors it is amazing what you can get out of these things. Thanks for the great tip!
I have gotten so used to Rolands Menu Synths since the Beginning of 2000 so i actually prefer the the Menu diving over using a Editor and it has gotten better and easier with the newer Layouts. The shift button is your friend on the Roland JD-Xi if you want to quickly move between the The Oscillator, Filter and Envelope Section/view. The MC-101 Is also layed out to be very friendly and quick to use if you want to make your own sound and it has some Nice button tricks that are easy to learn and as soon as they are in your muscle memory you will make sound faster on the unit compared to Clicking Back and forth to get to the different sections in a Editor. The MC-101 doesn't have a option to save Presets in the Traditional way so you have to save the sounds you make as Clips. The + side of the Preset/Clip saving method is that it also contains all the Settings for that patch so it will sound the same when it is loaded in a new Project and if you have a 16gb or a 32gb SD Card you won't have to worry about running out of User Preset/Clips Compared to synths that usually have between 32-256 user Presets.
You are welcome and thanks for the comment.
Bet you a pint the Waldorf Blofeld does more and costs less;-). Apart from the keybed. And encoders. And outputs. And glitches.
The Waldorf Blofeld is a great Synth if you only use it as a 1 Part Synth and not for multitimbrality. The Roland SH-32 and the Blofeld are 2 great examples of synths that are built wtih a Cpu that can't keep up with their promised Specs.
Defo! It's been time for a mk2 Blofeld since 2018ish. I think they mostly nailed the VA OS...just needs more horsepower and a few tweaks(higher resolution wavetables and adjustable envelope curves etc)
LOL, you made my day. Thanks for the comment.
Good list! I believe synth nerds like us ;-) overrate the uniqueness of those analog monsters we've grown up with. 99% of music consumers really don't care if that gorgeous pad came from a Juno-60 or from a free plugin that came with your DAW. Same goes for all the hardware fx in your list. My 2 cents ;-)
Exactly. Thanks for the comment.
About osmose expressive e, as an owner of Korg Kronos x88, hydrasynth 49, I bought osmose as a second instrument on Kronos, I assure you that it is not a banal instrument at all, what it offers to the musician is extraordinary. In terms of expressiveness it is unique, I use it in a folk group and it gives me great satisfaction, I don't regret having bought it at all, Apart from osmose I agree with you on the other instruments you mentioned
I appreciate what you are saying. Thanks for the comment.
Yes. The dreaded DX9 - what a mistake that was. If only I’d known, but I was young and stupid. Ended up in a dumpster around 2001 😞
That's sad. Appreciate your comment, sir.
@ thank you. Really like your channel. The lack of touch sensitivity (and operators) was the DX9’s downfall. It could do the “we are the world” bell sound, but not the famous DX7 bass…. In 87, the only way I could stomach it was to run it through a smallstone phaser pedal and tons of reverb to try to make it sound analog. Should’ve just bought a 106. Oh well. 🤣 - Learning experience I guess
Lots of common sense. One thing I disagree with is using Behringer for comparisons in price. I've been playing keys for 57 years and buying synths, lots of them, for the last 39 years. Been using Behringer products for over 20 years. My record of dependable high-quality products from Behringer is so bad, that I refuse to buy any more. When you make it cheap, and it is cheap and stops functioning in just 2 years, that is not a price/value you can use in any comparison. Instead of comparing the Moog Mini to a Behringer ModelD, it would be more honest to use the Roland Boutique version of the Mini, the SE-02. One reason I research and watch all video reviews of high dollar synths is to see if I can recreate the same sound these high dollar ones do with a combination of the 18 synths in my studio today. Most the time the answer is yes plus more, two synths can normally do much more than any single synthesizer when layered together. Your effects statement is good for all synths, not just the 3rd Wave. I have discovered, with the great effects we have today, that sound design has become 50/50 design + effects...FOR RECORDING ONLY. Effects are less important with a stage synth. Old technology, and reproduction of it can only be for nostalgia, I don't understand this huge (seemingly) demand for old analogs. Just because you have the money today and can buy what you could not 35 years ago? Nearly every choice in 2024 synths today is better than 35 years ago. I want the features and parameters to design great new sounds today, it would be extremely difficult to design something new on a Juno 106 today. I never buy used synths, electronics have a limited life, and I want all I can get. To buy a 35 year old synth that today's synths can do the same or better doesn't make any sense to me...or you. We agree on about everything.
Love the t-shirt. Buckaroo Banzai fans need to organize Seems to me the t-shirt is perhaps the most polarizing of modern culture lithography.
Indeed. I'm a big fan. I have a couple of BB t-shirts. Thanks for the comment.
No Mellotron? - I know, technically not a synth, but the first ever “sampler”. Quite influential IMHO
Yeah, I considered it, but I left it off. A lot of people have asked about it. I should have included it. Thanks for the comment.
@@JeffreyScottPetro can’t be easy to make a list like this. If you’d said “synths” instead of “keyboards”, it would be a whole different thing. Otherwise seemed spot-on 🍻
WASP, Oscar, and so many great Novation Synths (especially the Peak and Summit with their Oxford Oscillators) came from the late great Chris Hugget
I’ve been gigging on an off with my QS6 since 1996, and will only give it up for a Minty fresh QS6.1
A lot of people don't realize how affordable and great the QS series is. Thanks for the comment.
Ending esq-1; thia was the first monster keyboard I owned. Ir was a bit temramental, which probably why I originally sold it. I still daydream about that keyboard.
It's still a great synth. Appreciate the comment.
Why are you doing the 666 sign in the thumbnail
I thought that was the OK sign.
I have a D-50, and I want a D-20 and a D-70, the 70 is the oddest of the ducks and that’s a lot coming from Roland, and I have no issue getting a cheap faulty one and working on it (I can do electronics), its just its own thing, the JV/XP series is alive and well, the D 50 has its own recreation, and I feel the 70 will never be shown love, that’s why I want one
Agreed. Sometimes the curiosities get no love until they are collector items. Thanks for the comment.
Frequency Response: 30 Hz to 20 KHz Harmonic Distortion: Less than 1% Intermodulation Distortion: Less than 1% Output Noise: Better than -90dB Input Impedance: 600 ohms Input Sensitivity: 0dBV Maximum Output Level: +24 dBm Output Impedance: 10K ohms Crosstalk: Under 60 dB Weight: 10 pounds 👈😆only non-misleading spec
Does the Jeffy have 12000 Watt PMPO?
It's a "Full-Featured" device.
I agree 100% with everything you said. In fact, if somebody follows your advice, they should never buy Roland gear ever again. Or Yamaha gear. Or Korg. Or..
This is gold
Thanks, I appreciate the support.
listening to the description makes me think they took the idea of the D-70, stripped out a bunch of features and slapped them into the Rhodes 760. Same keybed, same 6 sound multi-timbral setup. Less affects a heck of a lot less user patch spaces. My guess is the ribbon cables that curl around either end of the keybed got damaged. Once the carbon contacts under the clear plastic bars that clamp the two carbon contact sets together usually crack and once they are broken it's likely you'll never get them back together. Let me know if you want some help looking for the actual issue.
I still have my SM-58 (with on-off switch) that I purchased some 45-50 yrs ago from a music store in Sioux City, IA. ! The music store is gone but my SM-58 lives on!
Yeah, they are well-made. Thanks for the comment.
Ah, the VL1 - here's a strange little detail.....because you can input your own sounds (to a limited extent) I used to put people's phone numbers in, and as bizarre as it seems, the sound produced quite often reminded me of the personality of the person who's phone number was inputed.....a dear friend of mine had a WASP, another had a SOURCE, I had a Poly800.....and the real bonus?....because you could run it on batteries, I could bring it in my car. My wife would drive and I'd play a soundtrack.....
That's some fun stuff, thanks for sharing.
As the proud owner of a Yamaha AN1x, indeed a beautifully sounding and powerful instrument: yeah, it looks like a dog. As I said before, I like colour in a synth. There are too many black keyboards and modules. So I like the colour of the Nords. But the controls, yes, those suck. But this is a cost-saving measure - even though Nords aren't exactly cheap to begin with. They can put everything on one PCB, and if the mod wheel and pitch... whatever that wooden thing is, are on the same PCB, it'll have to stay on the left. One thing, though, about that PC. I have its bigger brother, the 16-core 3950X, with a mere 32 GB of memory, and it's just such a beast. And yours is getting slow?! OK, I haven't done hundreds of tracks in my DAW, so I can't speak from experience. Maybe it's because I'm from a time where 64 kilobyte of memory was a lot. 🙂
I'm from that time too. I have an episode entitled "Composing Music in 1986 with an Atari Computer." It had 128K of RAM. I was thinking of getting a 5950X, but I am capping on my memory, since I use a ton of massive sample libraries for orchestral composition. I could just stream more from the SSDs and not load so much into RAM. Thanks for the comment.
It's funny how so many of these were intro synths for me. I probably had almost half of the ones on this list. My first proper synth was the SH-101, and my first poly was the CZ-101. Later I got a DX100 as an intro to FM synthesis but just couldn't get into programming it. Granted I wasn't even 20 when I had all three of them, and since the DX7 was practically putting companies (Moog,, SCI, Oberheim) out of business, I was able to get a used Prophet 5 for $600 and the addiction really began. The best thing about all these (with the possible exception of #11) is they are all quite capable synths in their own right. Short of some crazy used prices and some reliability issues (I had an Octave CAT but even after a tech calibrated it multiple times it couldn't hold tuning/scaling,) they can all make usable, if not fantastic sounds and are all worth a listen.
The Casio CZ-3000 was my very first synthesizer even though you clarified it was the 101 that's trippy to me to think that we had the same first synthesizer I had no clue what I was doing with it but once in a while I could make some really cool electronic fireworks sounds with it 🎹🎚️🎧👌
Maybe I was unclear. The Moog MG-1 was my first synthesizer, followed by the Roland SH-101. I had previously said in an episode that I used to own a 3000, but I found some old pictures, and it was actually a CZ1, which is similar. Thanks for the comment.
Your anti-monosynth prejudice must be awful strong. My list would differ from yours about 70%. To include the Korg Poly 800 and exclude the Yamaha CS01? That’s like putting Tommy Lee Jones on a cutest actors list and leaving Ana De Armas off.
Korg MS-10, Jen Synthetone, Technics SY-1010, Gleeman Pentaphonic clear, Roland SH-1, Korg M500 Micro-Preset. I guess cuteness is in the eye of the beholder.
LOL. Both Jones and De Armas are great actors. I did include the SH-101, which is monophonic, but yes, usually I can't get behind a synth that is monophonic. Thanks for the comment, I do appreciate it.
@@JeffreyScottPetro Thanks for making the video. It was a fun watch. 👍
I have a Prophet 2000 and you are not wrong on that one. It's a preset machine, because programming it feels worse than a DX7 somehow. You are wrong about the System 1/1m/8 though, when you see that green glow on stage, you know what you're looking at. My #1 is the JD-800 hands down. Nothing is uglier to me
Started sceptical on this video, but man, you nailed it! 😂 Especially on the nords. I haven’t used a DI box in 10 years, but Nord is still on unbalanced out 😂 Even my old Virus has balanced out.
Thanks for the comment, sir.
The Junos & Jupiter 8 are overrated, I agree. On the contrary, the Jupiter 4 is underrated. It's easier to program, sounds more raw, and is super versatile. The only downside is the limit of 4 voices. But there is a fix to that problem. I don't have $5k to $9k to spend on a 45-year-old synth. Most people don't, so theyre going to be using software instead. Arturia only makes a Jupiter 8 VST. So if u want a Jup4 you're best option is Roland Cloud. The VSTs all sound fantastic, they just eat up a lot of RAM. The Roland Cloud Jupiter 4 allows you to change the number of voices from 4 all the way up to at least 16, enabling wider range of polyphony. Sound is all subjective, but the Jup 4 is easily the best of the Roland VSTs. The option to add extra voices just seals the deal. There's also a really cool setting that allows you to simulate an old, worn synth so it sounds a little more warm and gritty. Amazing. The D50, SH101 & 808, 909, 707 drum machines are also really great. The best combo is the Jupiter 4 and the 808 or 707. Instant Synthwave goodness. TLDR: Jupiter 4 is better than Junos or Jupiter 6 or 8. Only downside is less voices. The best (and only) Jupiter 4 VST is on Roland Cloud & allows u to add up to 16 voices for wider range polyphony. Change it to 8 voices and BOOM you've got a Jupiter8 / Juno killer.
It's a pity you've omitted DX11 which was a real diamond in the DX line. A small package like DX21, velocity sensitive keyboard with channel aftertouch, stereo output , multiple waveform oscillators, amd keyboard zoning - in 1988! There's one in Canada for just $175.
I keep forgetting that you Americans don't include tax in the display price. That just doesn't happen in Europe. What you see is what you pay. Regarding the Crumar Spirit: what makes it special is that it costs only just over $4000, when the originals fetch much more. There's currently one for sale on eBay from Italy for €8500, and another one, also from Italy, on Reverb for €6000 (down from €12,000). If you start looking at value for money: well, that's a different kettle of fish. But hey! It was designed by Bob Moog. Forgetting the Yamaha AN1x and EX5S that I bought at the end of the 1990s, I never paid more than €1000 for a synth (module), and usually a lot less. For what I paid for 18 or so 19 inch modules, you couldn't purchase two keyboards from this list. In my opinion, it can be justified to purchase one, maybe two, keyboards of over €1000. And there would have to be a very good reason for that price tag. But over €2000? Very doubtful, precisely because of the arguments made in this video. And it's not a matter of not being to afford them. I'm at a point in my life where I could purchase one of these, if I saved up for maybe a year. But they're not worth it. It'll look good on Facebook or Instagram, but like most other things on social media, it's just an illusion. Your friends are going to forget about your expensive keyboard the moment they move to the next photo or video, of somebody on a tropical beach, or a pet doing funny things.
You forgot the Yamaha CS01 and CS01-II, soundwise a bit like the SH-101, but then again not. For me that is the cutest little classic synth of all time (I'm also biased, as the CS01-II was my first "real" synthesizer, after a Casiotone)
I’d like to give honorable mention to another model from the late 90s, the Nord Modular. Part of me will always wonder how come it was only equipped with a two-active keyboard, even realizing that it probably was intended to function as a module. Definitely a cutie keyboard in my book. I’ve got a query for you, Jeffrey. Regarding the Source, which more recent synthesizer model would you consider to be its successor? Most people don’t think it was succeeded until Moog Music came out the year after Dr. Robert Moog himself passed away with the Little Phatty. I beg to differ. I think it wasn’t Moog Music who created the actual successor to the Source. I think it was Studio Electronics who did that when they came out with the third iteration of the Analog Tone Chameleon modules, the ATC-X.
Regarding a Source successor, not a clue. Sorry, but I appreciate your comment.
YES!!! I was saying to my spouse, "He better mention the DX100!" and you nailed it! I had the bigger version, the 61 key DX27 with breath controller but later realized I wanted the DX100 and really wish Yamaha would reissue it. Absolutely adorable! Thank you!
You are welcome. Thanks for the comment.
I have paid my OSCar 2k$ a few years ago. Never pay 9k$ for a OSCar!
You got a really great deal. They are true collector items now. Thanks for the comment.
I love the aesthetic of the Oberheim ObxA the Jupiter 8 the Juno 60 but my fav would be the Sequential Circuits Prophet T8
Ah, yes, the Prophet T8. I'm a fan of the T8 sound and looks, though not of the complicated optical sensors for the polyphonic aftertouch which can fail quite often. I'm not a fan of wood as a material in classic synths, but the T8 and the Memorymoog both do it with class and style. Thanks for the comment.
AW man! okay let's say i forgive you for not mentioning the CS01 because you stated you hate minikeys and dont like mono synths, but it has it's caracteristic sound.... nice vid as usual
Thanks for the comment.
Some nice picks. My school had a Wasp and a CZ101 both of which I would borrow and take home for the weekend. They also had a DX100 but wouldn't let me steal it. And I still have my first synth, a Poly800II (reverse keys) which I bought a long audio cable for so I could prance around the room using it as a keytar 🎹 😁 Kept thinking about an Octave Cat, but ended up getting the Odyssey FS Kit new which is sonically better and cheaper.
Thanks for sharing and the comment.
Don't take me wrong, I value your comments, but I wouldn't buy any of these keyboards in a 5 dollars garage sale. I enjoyed your video 😅
No worries. I appreciate your opinion. Thanks for the comment.
Great video, nostalgia ain’t what it used to be! Keep doin’ it!
Thanks... Appreciate your comment.
The CZ-101 is also multitimbral. It was a favorite of Craig Anderton's.
There are plenty of cute ones, though many fall into the same toy-like category as the VL-1. For example I would go with Casio SK-1.
Everyone wants the SK1. Its prices are starting to come down finally again. I can't understand why Casio doesn't make a modern one with 8 channel polyphony, storage, effects, midi, etc. It would probably sell crazy like the Yamahas did.
I was waiting for DX100, and lo, there it was at #1! The Yamaha CS-01, VSS-30, and PSS-80 are pretty cute, imo.
I love the DX100. I should have purchased one when they were cheaper. Thanks for the comment.
@@JeffreyScottPetropossibly missed the Casio SK-1?