The Global Warming Policy Foundation
The Global Warming Policy Foundation
  • Видео 14
  • Просмотров 212 415

Видео

Europe's Net Zero Rebellion - Speech by Dr Benny Peiser
Просмотров 29114 дней назад
Europe's Net Zero Rebellion - Speech by Dr Benny Peiser
GWPF's Dr Benny Peiser talks to Jonny Gould about the energy transition
Просмотров 4085 месяцев назад
GWPF's Dr Benny Peiser talks to Jonny Gould about the energy transition
2016 Annual GWPF Lecture - Matt Ridley - Global Warming Versus Global Greening
Просмотров 7149 месяцев назад
Matt Ridley delivers the 2016 Annual GWPF Lecture at the Royal Society, London 17 October
2017 Annual GWPF Lecture - Tony Abbott MP - Daring to Doubt
Просмотров 1759 месяцев назад
The Honourable Tony Abbott MP delivers the 2017 Annual GWPF Lecture in London, 09 October. www.thegwpf.org/publications/tony-abbott-daring-to-doubt-2/
2015 Annual GWPF Lecture - Patrick Moore - Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide
Просмотров 3729 месяцев назад
Patrick Moore delivers the 2015 Annual GWPF Lecture London, October 2015 Read transcript: www.thegwpf.org/publications/patrick-moore-should-we-celebrate-carbon-dioxide-2/
2014 Annual GWPF Lecture - Owen Paterson - Keeping The Lights On
Просмотров 679 месяцев назад
Rt Hon Owen Paterson MP delivered the 2014 Annual GWPF Lecture at the Institute of Mechanical Engineers Read more: www.thegwpf.org/publications/owen-paterson-keeping-the-lights-on/
2013 Annual GWPF Lecture - John Howard - One Religion is Enough
Просмотров 929 месяцев назад
2013 Annual GWPF Lecture The Honourable John Howard, former Prime Minister of Australia "One Religion Is Enough" London 5 November 2013
2012 Annual GWPF Lecture - Professor Fritz Vahrenholt - Second Thoughts of an Environmentalist
Просмотров 1369 месяцев назад
Read more at www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2012/10/Vahrenholt-2012-Annual-GWPF-Lecture.pdf
2023 Annual GWPF Lecture - Lord Frost: Not Dark Yet, But It's Getting There
Просмотров 3,8 тыс.11 месяцев назад
Lord Frost gives the 2023 Annual GWPF Lecture on the question, is Net Zero compatible with mass prosperity?
2011 Annual GWPF Lecture Cardinal George Pell One Christian Perspective on Climate Change
Просмотров 631Год назад
In his GWPF lecture, Cardinal Pell questioned the morality and costs of imposing heavy financial burdens on households and families, in particular the poor, in the name of saving the planet and in the hope of curbing the rise of global temperatures.
2018 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Richard Lindzen Global Warming For The Two Cultures
Просмотров 85 тыс.2 года назад
2018 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Richard Lindzen Global Warming For The Two Cultures London 8 October 2018 Institution of Mechanical Engineers
2019 Annual GWPF Lecture - Prof Michael Kelly: Energy Utopias and Engineering Reality
Просмотров 32 тыс.2 года назад
2019 Annual GWPF Lecture Prof Michael Kelly FRS FREng Energy Utopias and Engineering Reality London, 11 November 2019 Institution of Mechanical Engineers Read the full transcript here: www.thegwpf.org/prof-michael-kelly-energy-policy-needs-herds-of-unicorns/
2021 Annual GWPF Lecture | Steven E Koonin | Unsettled
Просмотров 88 тыс.2 года назад
Professor Steven E. Koonin, New York University, and former Under Secretary for Science in the US Department of Energy, gives the 2021 Annual GWPF lecture on 'Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters'. London, Tuesday 16th November

Комментарии

  • @larrysiders1
    @larrysiders1 Час назад

    The $Billionaire Globalist's lust for more Power is the only issue here. The Western Oligarchy has the Wealth and Power to buy and control everything and almost everyone. They control Academia & Science & they Control the MSM Press...and these Institutions are totally Corrupt. They lie freely about everything. They are NOT invested in Democracy... which stands in their illegitimate PATH TO POWER.

  • @Punhenen
    @Punhenen 5 дней назад

    Thanks

  • @janmyklebust3915
    @janmyklebust3915 10 дней назад

    Shadowbanning...? Very few saw this.

    • @peterjames424
      @peterjames424 10 дней назад

      I did wonder about the lack of comments after 3 days!

  • @jerzymaciolek3871
    @jerzymaciolek3871 13 дней назад

    Populus - has programs - that promise everything that the street wants to hear

  • @williambaikie5739
    @williambaikie5739 13 дней назад

    Always nice to hear good news for a change.

  • @JamesHawkeYouTube
    @JamesHawkeYouTube 22 дня назад

    "Fossil fuels" is a strategic misnomer. Obviously, oil is not made of decomposed squashed dinosaurs and prehistoric foliage deep in the ground. A perfectly natural occurring substance that Earth produces - like water.

  • @JamesHawkeYouTube
    @JamesHawkeYouTube 22 дня назад

    Any true scientific hypothesis must start with an observed natural phenomenon. What is the observed natural phenomenon?

  • @shadowshow701
    @shadowshow701 2 месяца назад

    Excellent

  • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
    @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 3 месяца назад

    See Lindzen's talking points utterly destroyed at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: RICHARD LINDZEN. Then check out how 22 of his fellow MIT atmospheric scientists publicly rebuked him, at CLIMATE CONTRARIAN GETS FACT-CHECKED BY MIT COLLEAGUES.

    • @jamemswright3044
      @jamemswright3044 2 месяца назад

      Climate disinformation is a great name for that website. This talk is actually an explanation of how the greenhouse effect actually functions. Have the misinformation website REBUKED that?

  • @JustTakeAMoment
    @JustTakeAMoment 3 месяца назад

    Climate change is real, the cause is unknown as the Earth's atmosphere has changed forever and a day.

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 3 месяца назад

      The cause of climate change is totally known. Eleven separate studies confirm the scientific consensus, a consensus publicly endorsed by every scientific institution and academy of science on earth. By contrast, Richard Lindzen has been profoundly debunked in the scientfic literature, which you can see for yourself at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: RICHARD LINDZEN.

  • @jvds1360
    @jvds1360 3 месяца назад

    This man should be awarded a nobelprize, if not the nobelprize committee would have been corrupted with billionaires money, too.

  • @markparenteau2395
    @markparenteau2395 3 месяца назад

    2018. Love his insight on the mental state of elites.

  • @mrunning10
    @mrunning10 5 месяцев назад

    Very disturbing FACT about all the MAGA moron climate conspiracy deniers, they don't CARE that Koonin was PAID by British Petroleum to write his horseshit denial book and do these "lectures" and speaking engagements and "interviews" promoting denial. We are fucking doomed...

    • @JamesHawkeYouTube
      @JamesHawkeYouTube 22 дня назад

      lol and all the pro climate change loonies have not been paid?

  • @careyjamesmajeski3203
    @careyjamesmajeski3203 5 месяцев назад

    “Begs the question” does not mean “*raises* the question.” The phrase, “begs the question” refers to vicious circular reasoning, viz. assuming the truth of the conclusion of an argument in one of its premises, and is hundreds of years old. This convention of misusing the phrase is getting increasingly common and is a trademark of pseudo-intellectual journalism. This must be stopped. There’s no excuse for this profound lack of literacy.

  • @izzyplant8428
    @izzyplant8428 5 месяцев назад

    Incompitent globalist Labour, do anything to subvert Clause?? No chance.

  • @izzyplant8428
    @izzyplant8428 5 месяцев назад

    Labour has an agender!!! BUT IT DOES NOT CONSIDER British W/C. THEY ARE AN EXPENDABLE ASSET.

  • @izzyplant8428
    @izzyplant8428 5 месяцев назад

    Love oil and gas UK.

  • @johnl5316
    @johnl5316 5 месяцев назад

    See Princeton Professor of physics, William Happer, on the fact that CO2 has reached its saturation point and can thus no longer have any notable effect on temperature

    • @kiter9271
      @kiter9271 5 месяцев назад

      Absolutely. His latest paper provides the math (p. 25): arxiv.org/pdf/2303.00808.pdf

  • @johnl5316
    @johnl5316 5 месяцев назад

    4:20 "It begs the question",,,, Incorrect usage.. to beg the question means simply to RESTATE the question as if it were an answer...Example: When will business pick up? an answer that BEGS THE QUESTION is "When the economy picks up. ...The economy and business are the same, so the answer simply BEGS THE QUESTION: it RESTATES the question.. He should say RAISES THE QUESTION

  • @johnl5316
    @johnl5316 5 месяцев назад

    good....

  • @mabaldini
    @mabaldini 5 месяцев назад

    Great lecture, thank you for sharing this

  • @patbelcher1591
    @patbelcher1591 5 месяцев назад

    Sounds like some climate nut sabotaged the sound. Classy!

  • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
    @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 5 месяцев назад

    See Lindzen's talking points utterly destroyed at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: RICHARD LINDZEN. Then check out how 22 of his fellow MIT atmospheric scientists publicly rebuked him, at CLIMATE CONTRARIAN GETS FACT-CHECKED BY MIT COLLEAGUES.

    • @JustTakeAMoment
      @JustTakeAMoment 3 месяца назад

      So you're making a lot of money too😂

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 3 месяца назад

      Lindzen is part of the fossil fuel industry's marketing juggernaut. He admitted in a Harper's Magazine interview years ago that he took funding from the fossil fuel industry, and it's documented that he has taken payments from OPEC, Western Fuels, and Peabody Energy. Check out how he has been debunked at the Skeptical Science website before trying so hard to appease your confirmation bias. I've never taken a penny for anything I've ever posted on these forums, by the way. Nothing. NADA. Zilch.

  • @user-tl8em6vo2n
    @user-tl8em6vo2n 6 месяцев назад

    Этот оратор, задал много вопрос о явлениях и доказательствах потепления, но не на один не ответил. Просто сказал это не доказательства.

  • @MrFuckwit999
    @MrFuckwit999 6 месяцев назад

    GWPF are oil industry shills, but if tell people what they want to hear, they will believe it, sadly.

  • @mudball47
    @mudball47 7 месяцев назад

    Earth’s atmosphere is Nitrogen (N2) - 78.084% ,Oxygen (O2) - 20.9476%, Argon (Ar) - 0.934%, Carbon dioxide (CO2) 0.0314%. 75% of the 0.0314% is from natural causes. That means .007825% is man made. That is less than 8/1000 of 1 percent. The sky is falling……………….

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 6 месяцев назад

      You are a science math physics radio-chemistry heat-transfer IGNORAMUS. Only question remaining regarding manmade climate change is what fucking oil lobby you from? ExxonMobil or Shell or BP?

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 4 месяца назад

      Wow, percentages! And all fucking WRONG. Here: sustainabilitymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/original-1024x530.jpg How much ENERGY is absorbed by this co2? This co2 that would normally still be UNDER the GROUND if it weren't for man.

  • @libation14221
    @libation14221 7 месяцев назад

    Excellent lecture.

  • @scottapreston1
    @scottapreston1 7 месяцев назад

    The amount of blatant false interpretation and selective data is stunning and irresponsible.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 7 месяцев назад

      Spot On. Why and how? Koonin was PAID by British Petroleum to write and "promote" his book. All the while, the final end result? Preservation of TRILLIONS in revenues generated by selling US fossil fuels. It's THAT simple. Koonin is HORSESHIT. How does this happen? A denial book is checked by lawyers for SLANDER, NOT the fucking SCIENCE. Koonin is laughing at us all the way to the fucking BANK. @billmattson2001

  • @brucenassar9077
    @brucenassar9077 7 месяцев назад

    well informed greta will tell you what to think but first buy her books mansions and jets are not cheap

  • @redweed4018
    @redweed4018 7 месяцев назад

    I'd like to hear Neil Tyson or Brian Cox debate this man, but it won't happen

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 7 месяцев назад

      Because Neil and Brian don't debate a propagandist from an oil lobby.

    • @ahriman1608
      @ahriman1608 3 месяца назад

      He had a lot of debates...

    • @ahriman1608
      @ahriman1608 3 месяца назад

      @@mrunning10 why? Would be perfect to embarrass him live..

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 3 месяца назад

      Koonin is literally a fucking genius, MIT PhD. He KNOWS that what he is saying (PAID by BP by the way), is mis-direction, weather that is not climate, doubt, he is smart enough to know to never put himself in such a "debate" situation with the people (they're called Atmospheric Scientists) who DO the ACTUAL work. WE will NEVER see this. How does he do this? Easy, his audience is the MAGA minions out there, he checks their box of conspiracy, do it enough over and over (Christy, Happer, Curry, Lindzen, etc. etc.) and the lazy ignorant minions vote for politicians who keep the TRILLIONS in fossil fuel REVENUES rolling into the bank account. Literally THAT is what's it's ALL about. @@ahriman1608

  • @oliveradams8711
    @oliveradams8711 7 месяцев назад

    No one will heed the warning. The societal collapse caused by these environmental policies will happen, because that is the real purpose of these environmental policies. Societal collapse is the political aim here. Once that collapse has happened, the globalists will be able to impose upon us their totalitarian feudal system. It won't be long now...

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 7 месяцев назад

    Earth's greenhouse effect is the model of a system always in saturation. A system in saturation can not have any more effect with the addition of more of its active elements. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth’s surface is entirely absorbed by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface to add 10°F (5.55°C) to earth's average temperature. After 20 meters from the surface there is no more radiant greenhouse energy. Its further heat transfer is by convection i.e. molecules bumping into each other. This is high school taught science. The United Nation's IPCC science report makes it clear it is not discussing active greenhouse gas behavior when in the back of a 200 page report it declares it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20 THOUSAND meters altitude and only at that one altitude! This is a legal back stop to protect the instigators from prosecution of criminal fraud. It can be argued a reasonably high school educated person would know better than to accept the report as being relevant to global warming caused by greenhouse gases because by only sampling greenhouse gases at 20,000 meters altitude the report has made it transparent it is not discussing active greenhouse gas behavior or earth's greenhouse effect. Such legal back stops are common when misrepresenting products through vague wordings. Such items as a beverage labeled "All Natural Fruit Drink Flavor" might be discovered when reading the ingredients to have a statement "contains no actual fruit juice". Noncondensing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide can have a share in the greenhouse effect, but they can not change the overall greenhouse effect because it is always in saturation due to the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor 99-1/2% of earth's greenhouse effect is due to the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. After global warming was rising at 2/10°C per decade in the 1970s and 1980s it suddenly paused in 1991 when global warming was reported at 1.1°C and has not gone any higher than that reported temperature as of 2022 when global warming was reported at 1.1°C. Global warming has been stalled at about 1°C for thirty years prior to 2022.

  • @LuisSang
    @LuisSang 8 месяцев назад

    big oil really Steven E Koonin

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 7 месяцев назад

      Spot ON. Paid by BP to write and promote his fucking book of weather related horseshit.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 8 месяцев назад

    For all the organization fighting global warming it is hard to argue with successes! Global warming has been basically stalled at 1°C for thirty years prior to 2022! That happened even when they got the basic greenhouse gas temperature forcing premise wrong not accounting for the most well known model of a system always in saturation, earth's greenhouse effect taught in high school science that adds 10°F (5.55°) to earth's average temperature. Earth's greenhouse effect takes place within 20 meters of the surface, after which all the greenhouse radiant energy from the surface is considered to have been completely absorbed by greenhouse gases. There is no more radiant greenhouse energy after 20 meters from the surface and its further heat transfer is by convection i.e. greenhouse gas molecules bumping into each other. The United Nation's IPCC science report in the back of some 200 pages in an obscure paragraph is transparent it is not discussing active greenhouse gases or earth's greenhouse effect by declaring it took is greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude. This is a legal back stop to protect the instigators of the scam that human caused emissions of greenhouse gases is causing global warming from successful prosecution because it can be argued a reasonably high school educated person would recognize the report is actually not discussing active greenhouse gases or earth's greenhouse effect by only sampling greenhouse gases at 20,000 meters altitude. The is same type of false representation that takes place with a beverage labeled as "All Natural Fruit Flavors" then when reading the ingredients it states "contains no actual fruit juice" Noncondensing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide can have a share in the greenhouse effect, but they can not change the overall the greenhouse effect because is it always in saturation due to the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor 99-1/2% of earth's greenhouse effect is due to the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. After global warming was rising at 2/10°C per decade in the 1970s and 1980s it suddenly paused in 1991 when global warming was reported at 1.1°C and has not gone any higher than that reported temperature as of 2022 when global warming was reported at 1.1°C. What makes the greenhouse effect cool, wondrous and even a bit of a brain conundrum to young high school science students is even though its dominant greenhouse gas water vapor varies hugely across the earth's surface the greenhouse effect is ALWAYS in saturation. All the radiant greenhouse energy is completely absorbed within 20 meters of the surface. What varies, is much of the time all the radiant greenhouse energy is totally absorbed by greenhouse gases before it gets out to 20 meters from the surface.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 8 месяцев назад

    It should be pointed out that global warming has been stalled at about 1°C since 1991. It should also be pointed out that global warming is as of now impossible to be caused by greenhouse gas behavior. Earth's greenhouse effect is the model of system in saturation where adding more active elements to it can not cause it to have more effect. Earth's greenhouse effect from high school taught science adds 10°F (5.55°C) to earth's average temperature from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. Earth's greenhouse effect takes place within 20 meters of the surface, after which all the radiant greenhouse energy from the surface is considered to have been entirely absorbed by greenhouse gases. This takes place even when there is a little water vapor. This is why the greenhouse effect is used as a model of a system in saturation. Even though water vapor can vary greatly earth's greenhouse effect still absorbs all the radiant greenhouse energy within 20 meters of the surface. The IPCC science report makes it clear it is not discussing greenhouse gas behavior when in the back of a some 200 page science report is declares it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20 THOUSAND meters altitude. That is s legal back stop to keep protect the instigators from prosecution of criminal fraud. That because reasonably high school educated person can be argued would know better than to accept the reports as being relevant to global warming because at 20,000 meters it is not discussing active greenhouse gases or earth's greenhouse effect. The IPCC is instrumental in promoting the scam that carbon dioxide from human emissions and other noncondensing greenhouse are causing global warming. That is impossible from well known science and the fact that earth's greenhouse effect is a model of a system in saturation that can not be made to retain more temperature is well known to any high school science interested students.

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 8 месяцев назад

    The thing is with greenhouse gas behavior in the atmosphere is they are only considered active in earth's greenhouse effect. The thing with earth's greenhouse effect is it is the model of a system in saturation where adding more active elements to it can not cause it to have more effect. No matter how little water vapor there is in the atmosphere water vapor still holds earth's greenhouse effect in saturation such that all the radiant greenhouse energy from the surface is considered to be totally absorbed by greenhouse gas molecules within 20 meters of the surface to add 10°F (5..55°C) to earth's average temperature. Its further heat transfer is by convection i.e. molecules bumping into each other. The greenhouse effect is high school taught science and described as above. The United Nation's IPCC science report in the back of some 200 pages in an obscure paragraph it states they took their greenhouse gas samples at 20 THOUSAND meters altitude. This statement is a legal back stop that will protect the instigators from criminal fraud if brought to trial. It can be argued in court that the IPCC has been very transparent with their data and taking greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters is common knowledge not where greenhouse gases are active or where the greenhouse effect takes place. If you then go on to follow the report a reasonably educated reader would known they are not discussing these topics with well known science that controls earth's greenhouse effect. It is of little practical use for the study or discussion or global warming. There is no correlation between noncondensing greenhouse gases and global warming . Global warming was reported at 1.1°C in 1991 and again 1.1°C in 2022. During this thirty year end-to-end period carbon dioxide levels continues to rise in the atmosphere much as they had done in the 1980s when global warming was going up at 2/10°C per decade while during this thirty year period global warming stayed around 1°C.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 8 месяцев назад

      THIS is a fucking TEST, so pay attention! If MAN (YOU) had NOT started digging UP the CARBON from UNDER the GROUND about 400 years ago would there STILL be a "greenhouse" effect?

  • @tony3785
    @tony3785 8 месяцев назад

    Why does the IPCC omit the EMISSIVITY of CO2 in the radiative forcing Calculations? The emissivity of CO2 is 0.0017 and they use emissivity as 1. This is 500 time more than CO2 is capable of absorbing and emitting !

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 8 месяцев назад

      please post a link to this number you claim, because I think you got it very wrong and are LYING about it. You know so little regarding physical chemistry that you can't even ask a fucking SENSICAL question. "emissivity" is physical principal NOT a "capability" so that tells me you are a degreed Hair Stylist. (or a bot)

  • @Don-kr5tp
    @Don-kr5tp 8 месяцев назад

    "climate change" as preached is the biggest hoax/scam/shakedown of all time. Trillions are changing hands over an "issue" that is unproven and never publicly debated, especially in front of Congress. Dumbing down the electorate has had it's effect. Constant gaslighting and propaganda does work.

  • @andyx8440
    @andyx8440 8 месяцев назад

    Wonderful work - thank you.

  • @rgoldrich
    @rgoldrich 8 месяцев назад

    Could someone explain what Dr. Lindzen is saying with respect to balancing the sun's energy (starting at 17:54). I'm not sure how he comes up with 255 Kelvin -- which is -18 centigrade. And I'm not sure what he is saying. Is it that the earth would not heat up if its temperature was 255K? If so, why is that? Thanks!

  • @careyjamesmajeski3203
    @careyjamesmajeski3203 9 месяцев назад

    “I first came across dick some forty years ago…” I thought these guys are supposed to be conservative!

  • @timelsen2236
    @timelsen2236 9 месяцев назад

    ” on global warming, the GWPF website has a banner depicting a short-term temperature graph that suggests the world is not warming.3" so the denial continues to post several years old rubbish science denial with non-disclosed funding,meaning dark money from dirty oil and coal who's scientists acknowledge they are knowingly complicit in the destruction of Earth.

  • @mrunning10
    @mrunning10 9 месяцев назад

    Hey Koonin! What you doing with all those fucking MILLIONS in your pocket from British Petroleum you LIAR? It is a race between human moronic behavior (and greed) and the technology that can kill him. Darwin or Stupidity who shall be the victor? Currently, stupidity has won and is winning.

  • @timelsen2236
    @timelsen2236 9 месяцев назад

    It will be settled when big oil and coal money runs dry and speakers like this receiving all that blood stained money are finally silent.

    • @mrunning10
      @mrunning10 9 месяцев назад

      It is a race between human moronic behavior and the technology that can kill him. Darwin or Stupidity who shall be the victor” Current, stupidity has and is winning.

  • @kj1483
    @kj1483 9 месяцев назад

    I was just wondering why Global Warming Policy Foundation GWPF posted their own old, old annual lectures only 4 days ago, July 2023? Oh,…Joined RUclips 19 Nov 2021 … only has 11 x videos.... had a look at their web site -found offer for a free pdf book ...New book reveals dangers of irrational belief in climate doomsday A new book from the Global Warming Policy Foundation makes the startling claim that climate change catastrophism has become cultural - a secular religion. But while such claims are often made, The Grip of Culture actually sets out hard evidence to support its case. Author Andy A. West

  • @timelsen2236
    @timelsen2236 9 месяцев назад

    Google how much money he made from Big oil and coal for all of this corrupt lies

  • @timelsen2236
    @timelsen2236 9 месяцев назад

    Richard lindzen will be remembered as the destroyer of Earth and have blood on his hands from the dirty money he took a

    • @jamemswright3044
      @jamemswright3044 7 месяцев назад

      Do you have evidence or is this just slanderous attacks?

  • @timelsen2236
    @timelsen2236 9 месяцев назад

    Richard lindzen is about as trustablee as Trump dirty Cole dirty politicians

  • @timelsen2236
    @timelsen2236 9 месяцев назад

    Does he still get paid $12,000 per page for his same old garbage?

  • @timelsen2236
    @timelsen2236 9 месяцев назад

    This old fart's still hasn't he been dismissed as a quack he doesn't know anything about climate change!