Видео

He hit the rock with his forehead.

Facts aren't cruel, they're just facts.

Worse than Acid religion is.

They know it’s not cruel it’s the title that gets you all talking

"Faith is the acceptance of ideas without without sensory evidence or rational proof ". -Nathaniel Branden-

Dawkins believes he is picking low hanging fruit but he forgets or he never knew that there is more to his mind than intellect and there are other approaches to reality than our usual patchwork of concepts being thrown at each other. It seems that most people are as delusional as Dawkins seems to be because they feel or perceive that words are as real as the reality they point to and don't even realize it but at the same time they can understand intellectually that words are not real.

Dr Zakir Naik was Mist infront of this simple inventory...

How is this cruel? 😂

Either you believe or you think.

Being well spoken and sincere didn't make the gentleman's position any less delusional. Dawkins handled him very politely and with sound logic. Any cruelty is in the private perception of any third party observer of their own making.

It's admirable how patient he was with an idiot who claimed to have met Jesus

What Dawkins said is not really true because many of these lands became Christian

Perfect

Christ is King

One of the most painful things for intelligent people, is to figure out how to respond to good-hearted dumb people, where the truth will shatter them. I don't envy Dawkins predicament, here.

Oh, yes... so "cruel" not to indulge people with delusions. So "cruel" to beg for sanity. So "cruel" to point out the absurdity of a twit's mind.

What's "cruel" about Dawkins' response? He told the truth and put that deluded fool in his place.

Dawkins has an opinion only as he has no proof or evidence the person is alucinating.

There's nothing cruel about the truth. The man was clearly deranged and in need of psychiatric help.

Was that Christian, Ken, who phones or used to phone into live radio discussions? No matter the subject, he'd turn it into his personal belief in the Lord Jesus Christ. It was as boring as it was predictable. An excellent response to say the deity worshipped largely depends where and when the believer was born and raised. It never ceases to amaze me the inventiveness of the human mind; able to conjure up thousands o different gods and belief systems ever since humans felt the need to believe in some sort of supernatural power. Hats off to the human imagination!

"Met..." 😂😂

The phrase is not "cruel", it's "brutally honest".

Theist: asks stupid question Dawkins: gives a polite, honest answer Creationists: That’s so mean! 😭😭😭 🙄

God is a cruel caprice being, starving for drama, and horror show that why created this paradigm, and has not heal my broken neck

Seems like reality to me and he even acknowledges his sincerity. He just does not share the same belief. Nothing rude or cruel about it.

RICHARD DAWKINS IGNORANCE. 1. This video clip: The most prolific preponderance of non-sensical crap spoken by a professor in less than 2 minutes in the history of of the world. Dawkins has no clue what spiritual regeneration and the born-again experience for Christians means. Has anyone ever explained to Dawkins the role and value of the Holy Spirit in the life of Christians and converts, i.e., to convince of sin, righteousness and judgment? 2. Dawkins should chew on the term, 'God has no Grandsons" (book by Mr. Pentecost, David du Plessis). In contrast to Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam etc. Christians are not born Christians in Christian households. Being born in a garage does not make one an automobile and God has no grandsons. Devout, born-again Christians become Christians due to a personal encounter with Jesus Christ.

In Yoga which is the science of the soul. God EXIST .God is a spirit, soul being, spirit is a point source of conscious energy. God is NOT a Muslim or Christian or Hindu and NEVER wrote the Koran or Bible or Hindu books.

Cruelty!?! No just pure no nonsense rationality.

What a ridiculous title to put on this video.

You get one life and this is what you do with it, such a shame.

When I was 19 I was just as delusional as that gentleman , but when the bad acid trip wore off I was back to my old self in a day or two.

How was Dawkins cruel? Need I point out all the nasty vitriolic attacks theists make against atheists regularly? That we support tyrannical regimes. That we are immoral and depraved. That we are all liars who know God exists and secretly worship Satan. Need I go on?

If you watched this video, you have probably been a victim of the clickbait title. There is nothing cruel about Dawkins's answer, but by falsely stating it was a cruel answer, probably 100 times as many viewers clicked on it to see what Dawkins said that was cruel.

“Met the risen lord”. No, you’ve never actually had a conversation with Jesus and you’ve never see him.

Life is cruel. Dawkins tells people to accept the harsh reality of life. I wish the god he believes really exists. Unfortunately the evidence for a compassionate God who cares about others is very less. Near death experiences does not prove that God exists. People see weird things. Even people who are highly educated and who Know that evolution is a heartless process and we are not special and evolution does not have any purpose still believe that there is a compassionate God who hears to their prayers. It is unfortunate we cannot get somethings. Dawkins will be extremely happy if there is a Compassionate God who cares about us. But he knows such a god does not exist. I suffered from such pain after I read the chapter on evolution when I was kid. I cannot describe it. We cannot get somethings and should accept the harsh realities of life and should be kind till we are on this planet.

Dawkins fanboys, who made him wealthy BTW, are always hilarious to observe and listen to. Watch the interview with Ben Stein where Dawkins stammers and says it is possible that life was created by aliens, but there's no way it was by God. 1 - Life comes from nothing, yet has never been observed to do so. 2 - Complex lifeforms came from single-celled organisms has never been observed, and there are no two, three, or five-celled organisms existing to this day or in fossil records. 3 - Time and chance don't work for evolution, but work against it. Mankind has bred large and fierce dogs or the cutest and tiny lap versions from the grey wolf, along with massive draught horses and miniature ponies, cattle, and other livestock from their sources, but no new genes have been observed to be created on Earth. Therefore, evidence points to that it requires life to create life, along with energy and matter. Energy and matter alone, cannot create life. The day mankind creates a human clone without natural sexual reproduction or in vitro fertilization overwhelmingly concludes that once again, it takes an intelligent creator(s) to create life that couldn't do it by itself while coming from nothing or a rock.

I really like the part where he was cruel.

If your man is so secure in his belief, why would it matter what Dawkins thinks?

Dawkins was right, the geezer is hallucinating

Dawkins always answers in the same way.

I see we've redefined "cruel." That was sincere, honest, respectful, patient, kind, thoughtful, gentle, and merciful.

Dawkins is right, he was very likely emotionally primed to believe the things he believes

He gave an opinion and all you gays who love him went gaaaaaay

Psychosis!!!🤪🤪🤪

You are a mad,scottish,psychotic,Jesus worshipper...want a gold medal?🏆

That little bald Irish dude must be a massive narcissist. he really thinks the Being who created the entire universe would have _ANY_ interest in dealing with him? As a fellow human, I'd have zero interest in his likes/dislikes, behavior, and his private thoughts. i guess the architect of the Universe has nothing better to do?

You can't invite someone to stamp on your toys then complain when they do it.

Jesus Christ is... is... is... Dwayne Johnson!!!

It's a wild argument to give a Scottish person who's following a religion that came out of first century Jerusalem, but go off Dawkins.

I think he was being kind.. he would otherwise have said that the human mind is very susceptible to self gratification instead of halucination