Видео

@@williambo5989 for something like that I’d take it off of eye detection. Then depending on the size of the group and distance from them I’d go with a higher f-stop for a larger depth of field. Set your focus point to someone in middle of the group. If you’re pretty close and it’s a large group f6 would be to open of an aperture. Try something like f11-16

@@BrentTouchstone thank you learn new stuff

@@raynagrace230 Thank you for the kind comment! They keep me moving forward!

@@atat935 I’m glad you enjoyed it! :) These scenic adventure videos are my favorite to make. They don’t perform well, but I like making them and knowing people enjoy them helps to motivate.

@@carolinemanley9797 That’s awesome! I’m glad you found the video helpful.

@@josefmusil2307 I’m still playing with it and liking it a lot. Masking is kind of where I’m having issues, I miss being able to intersect, add and subtract different mask. I’m still learning though. I also miss the object select mask tool where you can paint your object. However, I have really liked the edits I’ve done since buying the program.

@@mokhan4748 You’re welcome!

Thank you! K&F concept putter variable nd filter nd2-nd400 (1-9) stops… they make the same ND with a quarter stop black mist that I like a lot too.

@@codenamegrimlock7510 glad I could help!

@@jordontester7813 Thanks. I haven’t noticed any issues myself, but I went back and read the manual and you are correct it says to turn off peripheral ileum in C-Log so that’s what I’ll be doing now. Hope you found something in the video useful.

@@MODESTYXO205 That’s a tough one. I do love Canon, but I used a Sony A7iiis as a DP on a friend’s film and I did really like it. If I were doing mostly films I’d really look into that fx3 it looks amazing. If I was mainly doing RUclips content with some short films every once in a while I’d look into that zve1. For the price difference you could get a nice piece of glass to go with it too.

@@bankytechs Thanks

@@codenamegrimlock7510 If you have AF on and it’s not working at all I would do a system restore and try it then. If it’s still not working after that I’d send it in for repair.

@ thank you 🙏🏾 my next question is how do you do a complete factory restore

@@codenamegrimlock7510 In the yellow tabs in the menu there should be a reset camera option. I’ve never used the 1Dx but that’s where it has been on all my other canon cameras.

@@lifelike8418 Thank you! I’m glad the video helped.

@@502yousef You’re welcome!

@@craigcarlson4022 Thank you!

@@TTYLIG You’re Welcome!

@@ghalibsworld No, definitely not. I’m loving that lens.

@@GremHopkins I’d have to try it for myself to see. What I’ve heard is the 1.4 is great on a really good lens like an L-series, but not so much on cheaper lenses. I haven’t heard a lot of good things on the 2x concerning sharpness. If I could borrow either I’d certainly give it a shot though.

@ From what I saw on youtube people say ef extenders are not that great, while rf ones are quite a bit better

@@amitkrupal1234 Thank You!

@@Narwhal.creator Sweet!

@@prithaaash7340 R10 : RF 100-400 5.6-8

@@cameraprepper7938 That’s certainly a viable route.

@@Rupertcockapoo I have no doubts about the quality of that lens on the R8. The thing I’d be concerned with is the reach. 500mm is one of my favorite focal lengths for bigger critters but for birds you might find yourself wanting a little more.

@@aranelchanThe Canon 200-800mm is listed as weather resistant. This lens is listed as weather sealed equivalent to an L-Series lens. You had me double guessing myself, but that’s what I remembered and going to the canon site just now confirmed that.

@BrentTouchstone Ah, I was recalling without checking. But when I check, the Canon Europe website states that the RF 200-800mm has "dust and moisture resistance equivalent to our pro L-series lenses". Of course, since Canon doesn't provide IP ratings or anything similiar, we don't know for sure without possibly destructive testing that one L lens truly has weather sealing equivalent to another L lens!

@@henrysteadman963 I’m glad you liked it! Thank you!

I plan on doing a deeper review of this lens however I don’t shoot a lot of portraits anymore. It’s something I may try though.

I’ve only used the EF version of that lens and it’s been a while, but I would say I’m happier with this on the R8 then I was with that on the 6D.

I agree completely!

The video comparison was 2.8 and the train-yard pics were taken at 2.8 as well. I think the photo comparisons were f8. I can check back when I’m with my computer again. I’ve been real busy, sorry for the delayed reply.

@@dps6198You do you :) I’ve done that many times myself. This is a lens variant I’ve been waiting for though.

not a bad idea 👍

@@xberel09 The L-Glass its sourced straight from Canon site same as the weather sealing, the two main reasons I bought the lens. I agree about the sharpness with primes. The color render is really great with this and the focus breathing or lack of for video is amazing. Thanks for the comment.

Your welcome

@@theaudiofool5475 R8

@@oldirtyjedi I don’t understand it either. I was excited enough to preorder. It’s odd but hey this has been my best performing video now 😀

@@BrentTouchstone congrats!

@@Victor-Brax Neutral with no modifications

@@jakebauer7453 I know. It’s weird. I keep going back to Amazon to see what other users are saying and last I went it was still just one review. I want to do a more in-depth video once I spend some more time with it.

@@golosbezdoka You are correct. The 35 was not quite as bright. The colors were a little bit duller too. That was the biggest surprise to me. I’m glad you like the review. Thank you.

@@LawrenceFoster-i7j awesome! thanks!

They did great!

@@IanSAbraham I’ve never used that lens. I wish I could say and there’s not really any comparison videos that I’ve been able to find. Sorry

Damien Bernal in french...you can use subtitles !

It's as good as my 24-70 2.8 on my R5. Much smaller too. I love it.

@@roberttheinen4767 I know. That peated stuff is pretty good!

@@yuituitun I’m glad you like the video. I’ll definitely be reviewing this lens further once I get some more time with it. Thank you!

@@mhabuoi I’m using it on the same camera and so far I’m happy too.

@@pedror9486 Thank you. I have not had that chance. I can try. It might take me a bit. I live in a small town and go to bed at 8 like an old man, lol.

@@BrentTouchstone Hopefully you’re able to, after seeing your photos in daylight, definitely a good lens have, but if it will perform well low light, even better. Thanks again!