Видео

Is the Sony a6700 better than the Sony a7iv in terms of image quality and autofocus. I already have a Sony a7lll

How much RAM and SSD can I install?

Thank you so much for this video!

Excellent, review! I love the way you chose the stroller because it was most comfortable for your child! I think many reviews forget that we are pushing these products with little people in them! Thank you

does anybody still have a working link to the vbios? i want to flash it on my Legion Y540

The form factor alone makes me go for ulanzi

just ordered mine, can't waiting to testing 😊😊

Thanks!

So wait wait.... does the crop factor applies to the aperture too? this is the first time I have ever heard of this, Im new in this photography world so, this might not say much but, from tons and tons of comparisons on YT, not one has ever mentions this, this is a huge point!!

Thanks for reviewing

What a great channel! You should keep going!😊

I love ur videos brother

The legs of the Ulanzi do not need to be adjusted, because the head can be leveled.

I am going to purchase this laptop from someone, how is this flashing done is there a tutorial?

Not worth the hastle to flash vbios for 5 fps boost...in balanced mode my gpu gets 80Watt max and in performance 85Watt even overclocking it by 160 mhz gives u maybe 3 fps more

quality video. like like like thx bro

Thanks very much for this. Im going to order the Smallrig 4221.

I just ordered the fotopro xlite 3 from AliExpress for $132. It's the same as the ulanzi except for the ball head. I'm looking for a light video for a mirrorless setup. Do you have any recommendations?

Thank you

Not many reviews of the smallrig. Thanks for the comparison. Ordered the smallrig.

2:40: "Less light will get in" ... this is actually not true. f/2.8 on APS-C lets in as much light as f/2.8 on full frame. The only difference is the DOF. Regarding low-light performance / noise, it feels like the best APS-C sensors are about two stops behind full frame sensors. This is mitigated somewhat by being able to buy a faster lens for the same or less money, and definitely lower weight. That can easily make up for one of those stops, e.g. buy a f/2.8 lens for your APS-C camera instead of a f/4 lens for your full frame camera. And advanced denoising in software like Lightroom can easily clean up remaining noise for critical shots. Basically I have found that recent APS-C cameras like the A6700 are very competitive with full frame cameras in most use cases. I agree with @SilatShooter's comment here. in fact, It seems like a secret, in that many influencers, reviewers, and even the manufacturers regard APS-C as tech for "beginners" and you should eventually "graduate" to full frame. That may have been the case a few years ago, but no longer. (Thanks for reading all of that!)

I just got my A6700 and it's an amazing camera! I also have FF and have always felt that bang for your buck, Sony APS-C offers much better value. I think for more than 90% of shooters, APS-C is more than enough for amazing results.

The A6700 will be a great second camera to complement the A7IV.

Thanks for the review man. Nicely thought. I have an a6000, a6500, and five lenses and will be adding the a6700 soon. As soon as I can convince my wife! Ha! I'm def invested in the APSC ecosystem.

I have 2x Nikon Z9 for my profissional work, just bought the A6700 and love it , what a camera 👍🏻😁

I sold my a74 last year. I just got the a6700 and it's a great little camera. Much more practical for my day to day use! Great video mate

Is that a new Viltrox 23mm? I recall the Viltrox 23mm for Sony had bigger, gold colored text on the lens. 🤔

I'm in a dilemma, I need nothing from FF except for the better low light performance. Not even better bokeh. Been using an a6000 for years and found myself very often in very dark situations. Been using the Sigma 1.4 lenses on APSC and will proabbly jump to an A7C with something like an 35 1.8. Do you know if I loose all the low light advantage if I go for F1.8-F2.8 on FF compared to the F1.4 on APSC? (My optimal would be F2.8 has better LL performance than F1.4 on APSC at ISO 6400+, forget bokeh)

Great vid mate.. Just what's needed without the RUclips "I'm a celebrity" Bloat.

for a thousand dollars I would get fullframe camera.

I have both, I really like the a74 when I do portrait work, for events like weddings I think I would do well with both, but I am very happy to use the a6700 for everyday! I really like having an apsc and a FF and sharing the lenses. I bought my lenses with both formats in mind (Sony 11mm f1.8, Sony 24mm f1/4, Tamron 20-40mm f/2.8, Sigma 56mm f/1.4, Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 GM II and Sony 70-350mm G).

got a7iv today . its insane in low light .33mp allows me to use crop sensor lens while vlogging .I think this could be the best camera in the market right now for vloggers and street photographers

The best way to settle this argument is the A7R5 VS A6700 with the 75mm 1.2. Both will be 26mp and equal in terms of IQ.

I am faced with exactly the same decision: a6700 or a7IV. I come from the a6600 and played around with the a6700 the last few days. I really don't like the evf, but the 4k 120p even in 10 bit 422. No I am trying the a7IV for the next days. Looking forward to it and how to decide since the a new A7IV was available here in Germany for 1.800 Euros some weeks ago while the a6700 starts here with 1.699 Euros.

Interesting video, yet not completely right in every aspect. The amount of light (per pixel) with an aps-c camera is the same as with a full frame camera, when they carry a lens with the same aperture. What IS different though (as you state) is the effect on the depth of field, but not the amount of light per se.

Thank you for the video. Cool looking room. Do you have a recording studio?

Got a 6700 recently, very happy with it.

Which falcam quick release system is better? F22 or f38 ?

I love both cameras, but I’m favoring a lighter setup. Sony ZVE1 gives me the lightness with a full frame. A7IV is a bit heavy. A6700 I find to be compact, but I’m missing the low light benefits of full frame.

I got the regular Watch4 44mm. I personally prefer its sleek and more futuristic vibe. Not to mention that for those who workout frequently, the lighter the watch the better. Battery lasts 2 days, give or take, and I lift weights and run 4x per week with Always On Display turned on.

Good video ,thanks. What size is your wrist ?

WOW excellent comparison, I am looking at getting a Samsung watch and your video is amazing. Great real-life info. Thank you so much

Even after more than a year of release, this was the best video I've seen about the Galaxy Watch 4 so far. And I've watched a few the last few days. 😄 Thanks for that! 👍🏼

excellent video

I want the bezel but 46mm is too big....why cant samsung just give bezel in various size options?

Hai, do u have any screen burn-in / Image retention issue when using AOD

This is the best video about GW4🎉

Thanks, helped me a lot :)

Thank You For making this Video 👍✋

Galaxy watch 4 is garbage don't waste your money.