Видео

Thanks a lot for your comment. I really appreciate your support Felix

Thank you for your comment.Which camera exactly?

@FelixsAstrophotography down to a model it should be a nikon D80.

Thank you for your comment 😊🙏

Hi it's from the brand Olympus. I've already uploaded a video about it😊

Hi. Thank you for your comment. It's actually quite simple. In this case I didn't use a tracking mount. Therefore the exposure time had to be relatively short. I then realigned the camera every 5 minutes. At the end, the images are all combined using a program. I also have a tracking mount. This guides the telescope and follows the stars so that there are no star trails. At the end, the images are combined again using a program. If you have any further questions, just let me know. I would be very happy about a subscription.

What is the maximum video quality in which you can watch the video?

Yes, exactly. If you use an aperture of F4 instead of the maximum aperture of 2.8, for example, the stars will be sharper but you will collect less light😊👍

Thank you for your comment. Your support means a lot to me. If you know other people who are also interested in this hobby, you can recommend my channel to them. Do you also have a telescope? Best regards, Felix

I don't own these binoculars myself. But I'm very happy with my 10x50 binoculars. If I had to choose a pair of binoculars, I would actually recommend a 20x80. But you'll be happy with the binoculars you mentioned too and will be able to observe many objects. The nice thing is that you don't need a tripod.

Thanks a lot😊

The optical quality of the mirror built into the Skywatcher is better in my opinion. However, the bigger difference in my opinion is the material that was used. The Skywatcher telescope is made of much higher quality. You can definitely notice a huge difference. The focuser of the Bresser telescope, for example, is made largely of plastic, but the focuser of the Skywatcher telescope is not.

Thanks😊🙏

Thanks

Nice. Could you also see the Northern Lights?

I just looked it up. The images in total require 4.48 GB of storage.

Thank you so so much🙏

Thank you very much for your comment.🙏 I don't understand it myself too😊 Felix🔭

Yes, that is the original color. That is exactly how I captured the Nebula

@FelixsAstrophotography did you read the comment? 🤔

Yes I did. I hope I understood your question correctly. You asked if that was the original color as I photographed it, right?

@FelixsAstrophotography I asked a question, because we now have 3 different color versions. My scope gives orange/red. My camera gives red. Your scope gives purple.

I have photographed the Orion Nebula many times. When I photographed it with my lens it was green. However, most of the images are purple. In the images taken directly from my telescope the Orion Nebula was purple too.

Thank you

I used a single exposure time of 1 minute. The maximum exposure time also depends on the light pollution. Taking two exposure times of different lengths is definitely recommended and helpful for this object. However, I had no problems with 1 minute. I would definitely recommend not using the maximum aperture of F2 or F2.8. If you have any further questions, please contact me.

@@FelixsAstrophotography thanks a lot :) i will try 1mn then and see the short exposure for the core. Probably 15 sec and blend if it appeared burned. Its appreciated

If you want to choose one of the two and you want to observe planets, I would rather take the 150/1400. A telescope that I would definitely recommend would be a 200/1200 dobsonian telescope, for example from Skywatcher

Hi. Thank you for your comment. I can do that. I will publish it in the next few days. This afternoon I want to upload a video about some tips for astrophotography Felix

@FelixsAstrophotography Look forward to seeing image not stacked 👍👍

Hi. In deep sky astrophotography we use images for stacking😊

Wow.Thank you so much I really appreciate your support 😊 🙏

😊

Which galaxies did you photograph?

@@FelixsAstrophotography i could only identify two : Andromeda and triangulum Most of them were faint and small. I could tell they were galaxies because of elliptical shape, but they were not clear. And some of them appeared red too

Hi. Of course, that depends on where you are on Earth. I could have said that. I can currently observe both objects well with binoculars

It's because of light pollution. Go to a hill far from city

You are absolutely right. There is actually no laser built in.😊🔭

Hello, I currently have 2 cameras, the 2000d and the 600d. I will soon sell the 2000d and buy a Canon Eos 6d instead.😊 Which cameras do you own?

​@@FelixsAstrophotographyJust have Canon d2000 looking at another one with a flip screen to attach to a telescope 👍

Hi Felix, I use a 600d (unmodified) and a 650d (modified). They are both great at ISO 800. The 650d is great for H-alpha imaging with an Astronomik 12 nm filter to capture areas of the sky like the Cygnus region, especially with a Samyang 135mm lens. Clear skies!!!

Hi. I currently really like using the 75-300mm lens. Thank you for your comment.😊 Maybe I will also test the lens you mentioned

Hi. Thank you very much for your comment. I will definitely take a look at the camera. I am currently looking for a new DSLR anyway😊🔭

I'm really happy that you like my videos😊 Thanks a lot🙏 Felix

You are absolutely right. I really hope that I can photograph the Northern Lights here a few more times

Hi. Thank you for your comment. I would definitely choose the Canon EOS 600D. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask me. I would be very happy about a subscription. There will be another video about the Canon EOS 600D in the next few days.

@@FelixsAstrophotography thank you for the respond and also seen the new 600d video. Now I am considering getting a 2000d for 400 euro instead of a 600d for 250 euro; I know that the 2000d is better but they are not that far off, so maybe I should go with the 600d? Also the 600d has a flip screen which is helpfull.

Yes, you are absolutely right. The display on the 600d is really very helpful. However, the 2000d has significantly less noise. That is a very difficult decision.

Hello. To be honest, I only know the first two lenses by name. I don't own any of the three lenses. However, I know a few people who use the Sigma 14mm lens. I've heard a lot of good things about the Sigma lens.

Yes, exactly. I photographed this with my telescope

Yes, the lens fits the Canon EOS 2000D. The important thing is that you buy the version for Canon EF. I can absolutely recommend the lens and I am absolutely happy with it.😊📷

Get FujiFilm GFX50S medium format camera with 63mm lens.