Видео

also i think the climate change theory is probably accurate but i would not put it past fazbear to kill all the bears. also theres a line saying that they were chasing after pizza trucks which Could imply scarce food?

Privileged to be the first comment and view!

"Logic doesn't apply to killing children" is a take that I really don't see enough in the FNaF theorizing community. Despite _every_ portrayal of Afton we have so far just positing that he's a madman who kills children for fun and seemingly finds a hobby out of neglecting, abusing, and even killing his own kids, people continue to try and position him as this tortured and grieving parent.

Hulk didn't throw the boulder in space. He just threw it far away faster than the speed of sound. Where do people get this space stuff from?

Dude I didn't even notice you were this small of a RUclipsr, I fully expected when I looked down to subscribe that you'd have 10s or 100s thousands of likes and thousands of subs; safe to say I was astonished when I noticed you in fact had no likes and 4 views in 12 hrs keep up the good work!

Smh, I can't believe the liberal agenda got to the crying child. He has blue tears and pronouns 😭😭😭

It is now on the Game theory Discord server

Matpat how the f**k did you get there??

Interesting indeed my friend

Interesting…

There is nothing in the games that reference an in-universe book series. The first Tales from the Pizzaplex story, "Frailty," establishes a connection between Tales and Frights through Eleanor's heart locket. If FrightsFiction were true, it would mean that the Tales series is also a fictional book series within the games' universe. since there is strong evidence that Tales is canon to the games. Either the two book series are not connected or both are canon.

stitchline confirmed

There’s also the fact that baby’s programming makes her check for the amount of children in the room and Elizabeth was the only one

Elizabeth is a character we can interact with in FNaF 4. She is alive by then.

CC or Elizabet was probably first i think "Chicka" tries to say they were the first of the Missing Children incidednt. And for Charlet it makes to much sense for her to die after CC and Elizabeth. Edit: i belive CC was first then Charlet. If Molten MCU is true then Elizabeth dies last, i personally belive Eleziabet dies before MCI

My dad… in 985! My dad! 😂

OSWALD IS A ROBOT HOW DID EVERYBODY MISSED IT Im joking this video is REALLY good once again keep it up 💪

This is so good👍 love this

This is so underatted

FIRST Great video Michael. When are you gonna do a video about the crying child being called Dave? 😉

What if the first one who saw everything is exotic butter?

Elizabeth was first 1. empty room, she's nowhere to be found for 5 days 5 DAYS why? because she's dead 2. why would the baby already be murdering? because William is a psychopath, he has no excuse for this in the Trilogy and in the movie, he only has a daughter and still kills + William accidentally kills his daughter in each of these worlds 3. we don't have anywhere else to put it + Midnight motories which is already confirmed that William is the yellow guy and runs away from the scene of the crime most likely Charlie shows that at this point he only has 1 child left Mike

Just wanted to say that I really appreciate all the support, feedback, theories etc. from everyone. Hoping to have another FNAF video covering Into the Pit finished very soon!

just found this channel by this video and just scrolling down other videos you made i can tell youre gonna get thousands of subs soon

my thoughts are that charlotte died after MCI bc we know someone was caught and convicted for the MCI. i think the convicted person was Henry and that was the "wound first inflicted on me". Or at least it could be. This could be why the Security Puppet exists too maybe??? like he made it to protect Charlotte in his absence bc he knows that he didnt do it, so the only other explanation is William in his head. William somehow gets away with it (i rlly like DPTs idea that William lied to lump CC in with MCI so that they don't suspect him as the killer) and Henry is charged instead.

The reason people need Afton to have a logical reason for what he does is because remnant changed everything. The first 3 games gave no hint that Afton was anything other than just some guy offing kids simply because he could with all the supernatural stuff being a consequence of his actions (and you can argue that the Give Gifts, Give Life minigame in FNAF 2 pointed at the Puppet being the one who stuffed the bodies in the animatronics). Then Sister Location and the books come out and instead start painting him as a robotics genius mad scientist trying to become immortal and gave him a completely different method of offing people (hyperadvanced robo minions and death traps instead of the old fashioned way). The series retconned a clear motivation onto him, so there's no longer any reason for him to be doing things that contradict or just don't advance his goal.

Why is your gameplay so dark?

Fnaf vr legit shows us susie dies first, whos chica by the way. You see its been implyed that william has killed others before and way way before as well. Plus blue prints are made to help build meaning yes baby was planned to kill kids. Plus babys pizza world wasnt made nor open around the time of freddy fazbears first opening. Also just because Elizabeth wasnt their in that room doesnt mean she isnt anywhere at all because shes dead. Plus just because the tv says 1983 doesnt mean it is 1983, it legit could be 1985 because lets be honest who would wait to get revenge for anything. But if golden freddy was able to speak to the crying child and be in the same suit what does that mean? That cassidy was already dead because we know golden freddy is 2 spirits. Hell even in the books its implyed the one who cant see at all who tortured a man from their memories died earlier.

I’m almost certain that it isn’t the case - or at least that it wasn’t Cawthon’s intent at the time - but the idea that the assumed grave behind the house in Midnight Motorist belongs to Mrs. Afton pleases me immensely.

😮😮😮😮😮😮

My thoughts were Emily died first. Her dad saying he was the first could be the the first parent to lose a child?

I really like this tbh, nice to compile the evidence in this way !

you're a funny dude, please make more of these so i have more content to consume

us clearly

The only reason people think Elizabeth is the first dead kid is the stomach mouth on nightmare fredbear which like cc would have nightmares of Circus baby with a stomach mouth if she died first BUT cc couldn't have seen it because circus baby waited until it was only Elizabeth in the room before she killed Elizabeth. Fredbear's stomach mouth can be explained by spring locks look at how the spring locks in the torso ook in the graphic novels and movie

I don't like it but Charlie has to die after mci. The combination of grave orders chicka "I was the first" and inputing the right code to unlock the mask is pretty explicit. Not quite as it's me Michael cutscene but still. I like the grave in the woods being Elizabeth's. It makes much more sense as hiding evidence than being crying child grave.

Wait I’m confused. So the missing children’s incident happened in 1985, the kid got bit in 1983, why does the crying child go later again? I think I missed something.

I wonder if Scott himself could even make a definitive timeline at this point

inchrestin.........

This was an awesome video! I’ve got to say I was so excited during that final segment of the video. I’ve been making my own theories about the timeline and in the video I made a few months ago, I came to the same conclusion that Mrs. Afton is the first to die. It was the most exciting thing to hear another living soul say that. Cause I don’t think I’ve seen someone else talk about the security breach tapes being evidence for Mrs. Afton being first to die. My theory is kinda all over the place (as one might expect) but if you’re interested in hearing another theorist discuss that final idea and run with it for a full timeline video. Feel free to watch this video. m.ruclips.net/video/3mTxibyB2HE/видео.html

Here is the thing about dual process theorys order. They are not saying the bite of 83 is not separate from the mci. Cc could have been in a coma for two years and maybe even springlocked several time segments before the mci were discovered its only that he used that entire thing to cover up the desth of his son. And earn an alibi and frame henry. He lumped cc in with the mci when he was caught despite the bite being two years earlier and he had springlicked the kid at some point between that. (Or directly as it was happening.)

A detail that people overlook when it comes to Charlotte's death is that in the FNAF 2 "Give Cake" minigame, Charlotte's eyes widen, and she cries even more when William Afton steps out of his car. I feel this could suggest that Charlotte knew exactly who William was before she got killed. She was probably aware of how evil William was which ramped up her fear of him even more. This can mean that the beef between William and Henry started way before the death of Charlotte, making Henry's statement of "A wound first inflicted on me" true, just not in the sense that Charlotte was the first child to die.

I think what I have learned from this video (and honestly any FNAF theory video) is that you can literally make ANY FNAF theory sound good, and at the same time, said theory can be contradicted by any one detail in the games/books/movie. There will always be evidence that suggests one thing is true and there will always be evidence that suggests that said thing is false.

Im sorry but your points in the beginning are lines that happened before he was thinking of SL

I’m headcannoning your last Hail Mary.

Okay, tbh I've seen only 5 seconds so far, and I already love this guy's editing style. Show him some love, yall.

New sub keep it up butter cup

Oh my god i just realized FNAF SL would 100% come before fnaf 1. the message: fired for foul odor smell being that when michael was scooped, removing all his organs for ennard to climb inside, his body was rotting.. so thats why SL must come before fnaf 1.

this would kind of make sense here.. i dont know where elizabeth would fall but C.C. Must be first Evan, Elizabeth, Charlie, "Gabriel, Jeremy, Susie, Fritz, Cassidy" thats probably how it would go and FNaF 4, FNaF SL, FNaF 1, FNaF 3, FNaF 6. Fnaf 2 doesnt count because it wasnt michael playing as the guard or any of the aftons If we were to count fnaf 2 FNaF 4, FNaF SL, FNaF 2, FNaF 1, FNaF 3, FNaF 6.

I've considered the idea that it goes Missing Children/Charlie -> Elizabeth -> Crying Child. Afton kills kids cause he's a serial killer -> he notices the possession and wants to experiment further for it so he builds the funtimes to specifically capture kids and get their remnant -> he verbally tells elizabeth to stay away but that's not enough and she gets got -> since a verbal warning wasn't enough, he then uses Psychic Friend Fred Bear to encourage Crying Child's fear of the animatronics to keep him away. Of course the biggest proof that this is Not True is that the Freddy that kills CC is supposedly Golden Freddy before he fell into disrepair. If the Missing Children were murdered first, Cassidy's body would already be inside, meaning the suit would not still be in active use performing on stage. Matter of fact, there would be no reason Fred Bear and Spring Bonnie would still be in use post creation of the Fnaf 1 animatronics