- Видео 18
- Просмотров 188 057
computeracct
Добавлен 4 сен 2010
Federer domination amazing shots
3 amazing shots from 3 of the most dominant matches from Federer:
AO 2007 semi vs Roddick - the anticipation and wristwork for the flick backhand is unbelievable
Wim 2003 semi vs Roddick - the creativity and ability to swing that forehand from below
USO 2004 final vs Hewitt - the footwork, the anticipation and speed with which he approaches the net and cuts off the passing shot. The replay gives a better idea.
As Hewitt said at the end "Too good, mate"!
P.S. Credit to the original uploaders of highlight videos on RUclips.
AO 2007 semi vs Roddick - the anticipation and wristwork for the flick backhand is unbelievable
Wim 2003 semi vs Roddick - the creativity and ability to swing that forehand from below
USO 2004 final vs Hewitt - the footwork, the anticipation and speed with which he approaches the net and cuts off the passing shot. The replay gives a better idea.
As Hewitt said at the end "Too good, mate"!
P.S. Credit to the original uploaders of highlight videos on RUclips.
Просмотров: 131
Видео
1983 Australian Open SF Wilander d McEnroe highlights
Просмотров 2,8 тыс.6 лет назад
1983 Australian Open SF Wilander d McEnroe highlights
Rafter Philippoussis US Open 1998 final
Просмотров 7696 лет назад
Compiled from the parts of the match from UBchristennis's channel.
ATP 1998 Stuttgart SF Sampras vs Krajicek part1
Просмотров 5286 лет назад
ATP 1998 Stuttgart SF Sampras vs Krajicek part1
1971 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Smith part2
Просмотров 57 тыс.6 лет назад
1971 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Smith part2
1971 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Smith part1
Просмотров 9 тыс.6 лет назад
1971 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Smith part1
1970 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Rosewall ENG part1
Просмотров 58 тыс.6 лет назад
1970 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Rosewall ENG part1
1970 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Rosewall ENG part2
Просмотров 18 тыс.6 лет назад
1970 Wimbledon Final Newcombe vs Rosewall ENG part2
Federer Hewitt Hamburg 2004 semi-final set 2
Просмотров 7067 лет назад
The second set, a more competitive one, but the result was never in doubt.
Federer Hewitt Hamburg 2004 semi-final 1st set
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.7 лет назад
The bagel in the 1st set. The Federer forehand at its finest. On a similar level as the more famous USO final later in that year.
1991 Us Open Final S Edberg vs J Courier ITA
Просмотров 9 тыс.8 лет назад
One of the finest exhibitions of SnV tennis - edberg's demolition of courier in the US Open 1991 final. Had downloaded a long time ago ( don't remember from where exactly).
federer safin hamburg 2002 finals part1.mp4
Просмотров 8 тыс.14 лет назад
IMO federer's best ever match on clay.
this is absolutely legendary. both of these guys were very special stylists. believe-it-or-not Rosewall's backhand is one of the ultimate strokes in tennis history. Rosewall was also a " lobber " , quite expert. Rosewall seems like he is having the worst day of his career.
wait until he played Jimmy Connors at both Wilmbedon and US Open ifinals n 1974. Completely overmatched in both.
Look how small the racquets are and the court is lightening quick. 😯 Today's players would cry if they played in the 70s.
Dumb comment but oh so common intake videos 70s tennis you. Today's players would have played like they did in the 70s because they would not know the future.
It's a bummer in the modern game with the racquet develpment that the net game is over! Boring to watch baseline all day long! No strategy
No histrionic. No falling to the ground. No nancy boy handshakes. Just real sportsmen of a bygone era behaving like real men.
1:28 A surprise guest umpire in the form of Adolf Hitler there
Where is part 2??
It wont be a surprise if people from 2050s look at Federer , Rafa and Novak and say the same things some of us say about these guys from 1970s
Very good comment
FUN FACT: Ballboys are your parents age now, maybe even older.
No chairs on changeovers. Water from the cooler (and Robinsons if wanted). Wooden rackets. The majority of players didn't need to play double-handed shots. No huge entourage. Yet STILL played thrilling tennis. AND could jump over the net at the end of the match. Shake hands properly. Made 'em tough, but gentlemanly in those days.
No grunting, incessant ball bouncing, histrionics or fake BS. Tennis played as it should be.
Standing in between change over with a sip of Robinsons! 😮
@heavyshift1 Or, no demands to sit down, have a ball boy/girl to fetch your towel and hold a poxy umbrella, over their spoilt 'precious' selves...
@heavyshift1 The trend of insisting that young people stand next to them with an open umbrella for 90 seconds during every break to 'protect' them from the 'weather', proves how petty and obnoxious they've become.
Newcombe was a better athlete than he was given credit for. In his era he was incredibly dynamic. I think that he truly proved his greatness when he beat Jimmy Connors in the 1975 Australian Open final. Newcombe was supposed to be past his prime and Connors at 23/24 was just heading into his best years after coming off of an unbelievable 1974. Rosewall is not the kind of player one can look good against. Newcombe kept his cool here and came through.
Serve and volley style is so booring.
So Mcenroe was booring?
Rosewall had such a slow 1st serve. Amazing he was so successful.
A time of Tennis without Benoît Paire, Kyrgios and others morons, no insults, no unacceptable behavior on court, a time of class and respect. Today too many " pros " players are only pigs who deserve to be disqualified.
Amazing how they can play such high standards with such crude tennis rackets.
How the Eff can you call the racquets crude?? Do you even know what the word means?
@@capricornmagic63 the best at the time, but there's been huge strides in technology. Today's tennis rackets are much better.
Everyone in the Centre Court galleries, Newcombe recorded later, cheered for Risewall except one person. That one person was Newcombe's wife
I wonder if there is a market today for an all wood racquet tennis tour?
is there a market today for wall mounted dial phones in your house? Dont be stupid
This is realy a GAME, not a fight.
Perfect example of way tennis fasten the court to make more rallies and tennis more physical and interesting to watch ... This serve voley game is so boring ... Like 1 shot , I win point .. 1-2 shots , win point , 1 shot you win point , 1-2 shot ,you win , totally slow and boring
Newcombe without porn stache.
it's different from today's game
Thank God technology has created the brilliant game of modern tennis. I watched as long as I could, like watching paint dry.
For real.
Exactly. The 150mph serves and 95mph backhands of today are breathtaking.
Thanks for uploading this. Beautiful. White balls. Look at the angles in the 3-3 and 3-4 games in the first set. Newk leaves several balls that are only an inch out. Kenny out-thinks Newk, gets him to volley where Kenny wants it, to get to 0-40 in 4-4 game in first set. But this can't be tennis, no 'come on's, no tantrums (Newk raises eyebrows at Kenny's ace at about 14:00), no arguing with the umpire. Kenny has his own towel in his pocket. Newk mainly slicing and spinning his serve, serving to his own next volley, as is Kenny. Stats would be interesting: error rate seems a little on the high side. Kenny runs around his backhand in the ad court to hit an off forehand at 1:30:30. Everything old is new again.
😂 Real Crap Tennis. So staid it's almost in slow motion compared to today's players & game. Why these two would both have trouble in the Wimbledon Qualifying event let alone anything else. Remember watching this Final as a young kid on a valve Black & White Telly.
Very little topspin and no topspin on the lobs due primarily to the small racquet heads.
I think Laver was the only player from this era who could consistently hit topspin backhand. That made him a formidable opponent.
1970..but it look like 2nd World war 😮😅
The court appears worn even, both on the net and on the baseline, denoting the old serve & net style of play. Today, with better rackets and faster play, it only deteriorates at the point of serve.
Is it so wrong to sit during changeovers?
Chairs were not on the courts at Wimbledon until 1975, I believe.
This was going to be a tough one for Rosewall. Except for the backhand Newcombe did everything better than Rosewall. Yes Rosewall moved better but the difference between them in that regard isn't as great as one would think. Two historically great players of their time and men of great character.
Wimbledon eluded Rosewall for ever. This particular final, Newcombe later described, in the whole of the centre court Newcombe's wife was the only who wanted him to win.
Wonder if there was some guilty conscience there in the wimbledon crowd. In 1954 they wanted the ageing drobny, a favourite, to win v the 19 yr old rosewall. Drobny did win but they couldnt will rosewall to victory in 1970
The transcript is hilarious.
When tennis was tennis, constructing points. small sweet spots on those racquets. I've played since 1971 I know.
I started playing tennis in 1975 as an 11-year-old. I stopped basically after 1983 when the newer, modern racquets came in. It became a game of power over touch even at the rec level.
@@Lava1964 I am 62, first played with a wood Donnay, then a Pro Kennex, composite and now play with a Yonex Vcore. You know I evolve with the technology such as RUclips which certainly didn't exist in 1983 yet here you are typing a comment on a computer or smart phone which also didn't exist. The ideological but ever inconsistent "purity" of guys commenting on "classic" videos such as you are always a marvel of lack of self awareness. And I am guessing nobody misses you on the courts either.
Watched tennis in the back yard with a little portable number when I was a dot. I remember it
All that was left was legitimate tennis Standing behavior during play and a wooden racket that should be standardized
The ball was livelier. It called for percentage play, unlike now.The heavy ball killed classic play.
Love that Stan Smith backhand overhead!
Players back then were more elegant than today. I love those one-handed backhands as opposed to the sissy two-handed ones.
Sissy ,😂 u are right👍
I remember when I got the prince pro and not using the wood racquet anymore Couldn’t believe how my game improved And that was just at the recreational level
You can see the big difference in pace and speed of the ball and players
serve and volley is incredibly boring
Beter than modern baseline play all day long, boring
I think it’s great.
@@HankFinkle11so do i
Just watched the first game expecting it to be rubbish. But it was fantastic! Of course, I have to make allowances for shitty old racquets with sweet spots the size of a penny, 'less than perfectly even!' Wimbledon courts and players who probably had a couple of pints the evening before. But, having done that - this is more than excellent play.
19:30 A handkerchief in his pocket, that's what makes Mr. Rosewall the best tennis player of all time.
Beauty Newk!
The great Dan Maskell commentating, I loved his voice.
Very first Wimbledon I remember (more because of Goolagong’s breakthrough than these fine gentlemen) I was 9
52 year old gentleman vs 41 year old gentleman
Wooden racquets was a totally different game. You simply couldn’t stand on the baseline and crank winners, swinging as hard as you can. The equipment wouldn’t allow it.
Gut strings, too.
I miss that.
I think I was the only person among all our friends who rooted for Stan Smith to beat Ille Nastase in the Wimbledon final the following year .
Maybe you were the only person in the whole county. They are practically the same age but Smith seemed to be at least a generation older than Nasty.
@@jeremyd1021 You mean, Smith was more mature than Nastase, who had to resort to childish behaviour and gamesmanship to upset his opponents. Smith was too cool and calm to fall for Nastase's nonsense.
@@ThefightingCelt If tennis had to rely on the dour Stan Smith for box office it would have been consigned to the dustbin of history long ago. Forget about Nastase's antics, of which there were none in the 72 final anyway, and which in his career were for the most part good humoured, and just marvel at his incredible artistry. He didn't need to resort to gamesmanship as his talent was way above anyone else's. He also was the very first player to take tennis out of the boring Aussie short back and sides era and get it on the world stage. Without Nastase and his great friend Horst Dassler tennis would have had another decade of being stuck in some fusty country club played by dullards like Smith, Reissen, Emerson, Ashe, Gorman, and yes sorry to say, that charisma by-pass, Laver too. Tennis needed Nastase, Connors and Borg so badly and thank god they came along to Bruch away the cobwebs.
@@jeremyd1021 Borg? That guy had less "personality" than any of the Aussie guys you named. He got a pass only because he was constantly playing Connors and McEnroe.
@@tnomi1965 Really? tell that to the screaming girls who invaded the centre court after his matches on his debut at Wimbledon in 1973 and in Paris in 1974, Or to the groupies who would hang around his hotel for his entire short-lived career. Or to Arthur Ashe, who famously said "Borg was bigger than tennis itself, he transcended the sport, he was like Elvis or Elizabeth Taylor or something" , Or, to all the sponsors begging to get a piece of him. He was a walking advertising hoarding on court. He played with different makes of rackets and wore different clothing on different continents, no other player ever did that. He was by far IMG's biggest client, a licence to print money. It was well known also that his appearance money was 2 or 3 times as much as Connors and McEnroe, even though it was also well known that for those kind of matches Borg played well within himself, only giving 60-70% most of the time. But don't take it from me, take it from McEnroe who said that after being a ball boy at a Borg match at the US Open, this is what made him want to be a pro, he wanted to be like Borg. .Everything about him was different, even the way he strung his rackets at a tension so high that other players trying to play with that tension could barely hit a ball. In long matches he would go through about 5 or 6 rackets as the frames just cracked under the tension of his strings and the topspin. He totally changed tennis into the way it is played today, the open stance style of play and aggressive topspin was all started by him. Maybe he was a little too European for your taste? A man who says nothing, an enigma, has a far more interesting personality than a brash loudmouth.
They seem older than current players, no ?
More mature looking.
I believe Stan Smith was 24 and John Newcombe was 27.
Playing with wooden racket bad grass great tennis. Different today The racket is forgiving