Видео

Life saver🙏 thank you sir

Thank you @ATPL Tips !! This helped me so much! Your videos are so helpful. I watched your videos on polar stereographic charts as well and made so much sense and was so easier afterwards. Would love to see you make more videos. Kind regards all the way from South Africa

How can i contact you fro some classes please

Great video

Went to diamond in 2017. Been flying the 737 since 2018. Henrik, Tommy, Phillip and Jesper were fab. Couldn’t recommend them highly enough!

How much is it cost?

thank you!!

Absolutely brilliant! My missus is a genius, and it took her a while to get Altimitery, so I was panicking; however, after watching this video, and I'm not that bright, I got it! That is an excellent explanation. Thanks for making such a great bunch of videos!

👌

I’ve a trick for the 2nd question from True Altitude . We don’t really need to solve the mos question as per the formula! It’s already given that the air temp is ISA+15. So we know that the conditions are warmer than ISA and TA should fall higher up from the indicated altitude/ QNH altitude of 30210ft. Only 1 option is good that it is greater than QNH altitude. Option b.

👌👌

Great video

Cleveland Crest

Dayna Stravenue

Why in the last exercise you have to add the difference between QNH and 1013 to the altitude ??? In the last exercise, you subtract it when QNH <1013. Best regards!

Drew River

Kunde Drives

Stehr Brooks

sorry but I don't understand when pu plus or minus on temperature correction or still pressure correction could you please explain me

Morissette Mountain

Bailey Port

Meaghan Freeway

Melba Gateway

Kuvalis Rue

Lamont Streets

Vandervort Spur

I think I need to point out that the word "Elev" shouldn't be level with the minus sign or else the result would give an erroneous and ridiculous number. That is, the division sign should be the one with the Elev above it. Just saying.

Great stuff mate. I wish you would do more videos like this for other subjects

Another BIG thanks from Spain

Amazing video

Thank you so much, Tom.

Thanks for the class

Wow! I'm no pilot, in truth I dislike flying, but will be going from Orlando to the Baltics next week. Have previously gone to Amsterdam a few years back. I seem to recall that we skirted the east coast of the US, Canada then up over or near Iceland then southerly over Ireland to finally get to Amsterdam. I never really understood this concept. it just seems our brain tells us that the straight line is the shortest distance between A and B. Flat plane is evidently the mistake we make. I guess I'll get out a golf ball and a sharpie tomorrow and try to make some sense of it. Need to chew on it a bit, but great job by the author he is obviously a professional. Trust your pilots, they are ultimate professionals and know exactly what they are doing!

Very helpful indeed! I'm doing my CPL in South Africa right now, and our groundschool instructor has been using a lot of your material for our General Navigation lessons. Very much appreciated!

18:00 Example shows again that your method based on Hight above the ground is wrong and 4% method is good approximation to real situation. I showed you example of how it is in previous videos

I’m having a crisis, I thought RLT is always at a constant angle and that the GCT is constantly changing…. Bristol and atplq taught me that way… what’s right? Please help hopefully last time and I’m done my fellow air cats

Your Method 1 is wrong and may lead to very dangerous mistakes. The Method 2 takes in account decreasing between isobars starting from see level which makes absolute sense from physics perspective. Why would you calculate correction based on “H. A. S.”?! What kind of physics is behind that? Can you explain? At such small elevation it’s already 5% deference between results. But let’s say we at high terrain airport. Airport elevation 3000’ and ISA-30’. You will correct MDH200’ by +24’ according to your Method 1 and if you will go to that “corrected” minimum in IMC, you will find yourself 160’ below the ground because the correction using Method 2 is 384’. Or I got it wrong ?

I'm studying to GNAV and You help me a lot. Thank You :)

Why did you say, that GCT is curved towards pole on norther hemisphere, and on southern contrary? Man from CAT3C-channel said sth completely contrary - that GCT is curved tovards equator.

So at the last question is it A or D?

Very well compiled video series.. You have simplified all of this crap in the most simplest way.. Can't thank you enough.. Amazing!!

Very helpful. Thank you

great clarification, thanks for all the effort!

Thanks❤

Your videos really makes me enjoy ground school!

On stage 1; Did you get 30, because of the temperature drop at 2 deg up to FL150? Great explanation as always!

in the 5th question where GC a to b is 47 deg ..... why are you considering the convergency value and not conversion angle . also the question asks GC b to a so why are you showing the value of RL a to b as the answer?

Thank You man ! After 15 hours going through questions, i finally understand it

hi there you've been so much help! thank you and i appreciate your effort!

God sent you here..