Видео

Good job!You are doing great.

Why does Ratau always have to be the person to explain everything so that the lamb understands?! 😂 Even in the game it self he teaches the lamb how to fight and rescue followers! 😅

OMG! That poor crown is DONE! The crown’s therapist is going to need a therapist!!! 😂😂😂

WHEEZING OH MY GOD

what dies it mean

The crown looks so D O N E ❤

HELP

YOU SHOULD HAVE TOOK IT

For a first short thats really great! (Love you‘re Videos btw)

So proud of being the catalyst for this, this is wonderful

This will never get old, thank you for this masterpiece

The longer the audio went on, the more perfect it became. This is them and it's canon.

FUSION OF BROOKLYN 9 9 AND CULT OF THE LAMB!

when new

I love the COTL fandom. The use of this audio is fantastic. Hahahaha I enjoyed this well done!

I know other people have explained the problem, but i still wanna paraphrase for clarity's sake. You pick one door out of three. The door that you pick has a 1-in-3 chance of having a car behind it. That means that there is a *_2-in-3_* chance of either door that you did *_not_* pick having a car behind it. So if the game show host opens a door that you did *_not_* pick, the only doors that are left are the one that you *_did_* that has a 1-in-3 chance, and the door that you did *_not_* pick, which has a 2-in-3 chance. Thus, switching statistically gives you better odds. Another way to illustrate the principle is if out of 100 doors, you pick one, and the host opens 98 dud doors, leaving you with the one you picked and the one the host chose to leave unopened. The latter door would have 98-to-1 odds of having a car behind it.

Everyone should know that the host will always open only one door before opening any other door, and this door must be: (1) not hiding the prize, (2) not chosen by the contestant before the opening. 1. The contestant will choose door (A). 2. The host will open door (B) immediately after the contestant has chosen door (A), revealing a goat behind this door. 3. Door (C) remains unchosen by the contestant and has not been opened by the host. 4. This implies that either the car or the other goat could be behind door (A) or (C). 5. The contestant has the right to switch their choice to door (C) or stick with the original choice, which is door (A). 6. For some unclear reason, the video host advises switching from door (A) to door (C) to increase the chances of winning the prize (the car). 7. No one will switch between the goats and the prize after the doors are closed and ready for selection or choosing. Based on the above data, I will present the following methodological observations: 1. Your assumption that the host knows for certain that he will choose the door that does not reveal the desired prize is a form of coercion that directly negates the existence of a choice for the contestant. If there is no choice, it means there is certainly no probability for the contestant! This means that the total of the choices regarding the doors = 1 + 1 + 1 - (1) = 2, which means the contestant must initially assume that the total of certain probabilities is 1/2 + 1/2. 2. It is important to note that the host opening the door or revealing the cards happened before the contestant executes the choice to reveal what is behind the door he chose. The doors were not opened simultaneously; each door-opening action occurs sequentially, not all at the same time instantaneously. 3. The principle of your answer was based on your assumption that, since the host will assist the contestant by revealing the wrong door, this leads to an additional 1/3 increase in successful probabilities, which will be added to the correct probabilities and removed from the wrong probabilities by the same percentage (all from the host's perspective, not the contestant's perspective). 4. Based on point #3, you implicitly assumed that the host intends to help the contestant by hinting that I (the host) will assist you by opening a door you did not initially choose. Therefore, you, the contestant, should change your choice to the door that you did not choose and that the host also did not open. In other words, if you, the contestant, do not understand that I am hinting to you (without any clear evidence or explicit proof) that you should abandon and change your choice, you will lose. Therefore, your solution and answer is not convincing at all. According to you, the success is based on trial (not necessarily random) and the probability of 2/3 success is not based on mental math at all.

Best thing I have ever seen in my life

Perfection

Thanks for the subtitles my hearing isn't great!

Kevin and Raymond are so Narinder and Lamb

i cant! the bishops watching is so funny

3:03 Why does Aym has the "my honest reaction to this information" face it does look funny tho

The key to understanding it is that the host will always pick a door that is not the prize, and the original probability is maintained at 1/3, so you just took 1/3 of the options and are left with the 2/3

Oh my gosh I love this so much, this is going to become one of those youtube videos I love so much that I watch it like every couple months 😭❤

This is the best game community ever omg

Iv probably watched this like 7 times now

I love this. Thank you for making this.

Sad but this fits so well

*BOOONE!!!*

I say no, because If it's not my door that was opened, the chance is still there. If you removed the open door it's 50/50, but if you include it, then you know one of the results, thus only 2/3 are mysteries. Either way, I'd keep

In case your wondering its from Brooklyn 99 on Netflix

😂😂😂😂

the second I saw the title I knew it was going to be the Brooklyn 99 audio and i love that

Omg the couch scene is so cuuute!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😊😊😊😊🥹🥹🥹🥹😍😍😍🥰🥰🥰😚😚😚😋😋😛😛😝😝😜😜🤪🤪

i no wonder sounds so familiar this conversation come from Brocklin NINE NINE , still very fun ^^

iunno why you decided to subtitle it but I'm very glad you did because it's nice :3

I actually tested this with a friend then ChatGPT. It seems like the Monty hall problem is correct. I used to be the 50/50 guy.

I guess leshy lost the bet 1:27 😂😂😂

What IS the math answer

I know it's not the point of the animation but just as a little math tip; if you're stumped on something to do with probability, just test it 10--20 times and write down the results. It'll take a good 10-15 minutes but it's arguably better than spending a day confusing yourself over nothing, and it doesn't actually tell you WHY the answer is correct, just that it is. You still have to figure out the "why" yourself.

From certain angles doesnt make it sound any less normal 😏🤣

2 things i want.. instead of the Lamb being called the lamb for story and personalization as you play as the last Lamb..make the lamb its own character and give him a name and have it be Lambert.. i usually love the fact the character is left so ambigues that it has no true name as you play it but here.. i want the lamb to be lambert. Second.. instead of the goat and the lamb wich is fun with your friend if u play but i rather want it to be Narinder and the lamb because it somehow grew om me through these cringy videos.. probably because im late to the party and as i formed my bond with the game i saw these videos so they are now part of my first experiences with it. I never even thought of them fitting together until the end of the game where he is a grumpy cat that is a little angry up it makes sense to have the coldhearted yet compassionate and friendly little lamb cheer him up wich also makes it look like theyd be a good couple.

The information lost is that the host here is what matters. Its not about basic chances its about the fact that you atleast know the host refused to open that door. U dont know this information for the other doors making that last door a viable option. There is a 50/50 chance that he refused to open that door due to it being a winning door wich u could seperate as another 50/50 or see as a opportunity that he might have refused the other door due to it being a black door while not having that extra 50/50 chance to the other door. Its like rolling 2 dice where individually they dont give u any chance extra as every single dice is its own opportunity yet considering u get redo chances of rolling the dice it does increase your chances of landing om the correct number. Just looking at the 3 doors it woudnt change anything based on what door you pick it changes based on what door the host doesnt pick. It os an extra 2/3 chance that the door that the host didnt pick is because of it being the winning door. Its also includes psychological sense instead of basic chance based math as the host wont open the door that the car is in.test

I love how at 2:43 Kalimar being deaf cannot hear anything and the other one's a mute since his throat's cutters so he can't say anything, not like it matters though.

This is an absolute delight

Usually, I don’t care for ships much at all, but somehow you and you’re animatics and small details like how Nari’s 3rd eye is almost always hooked onto the lamb have actually made me like their dynamic, especially the way in which you portray it. So good job, and I love how you brought in Nari’s final phase face thing for when he gets mad in the Monty hall problem.

they just need to bone

"you called it funky cats and their feisty stats." Fits so much better X'D

I LOVE THE SUBTITLES 😂♥️🖤♥️🖤🖤♥️♥️🖤♥️🖤♥️🖤♥️🖤♥️🖤♥️🖤♥️🖤♥️🖤AND AYM AND BAL