Видео

Glad ur doing pretty good with ur channel don’t give up and stop

I understand his dissatisfaction with the piece, as it seems a forced composition. It was also a competition entry-on a deadline I believe. It is not the artist with relaxed mind we like to see, following his fancy, but rather in a workhorse mode.

But whats the name???

ruclips.net/video/MyCreufWpNo/видео.html

Im on the verge of freaking death except i am not yunchan lim

If you think this is 'contemporary music in a nutshell' you either have a very blinkered view or very limited experience of contemporary music.

Bro the start 😂😂

It is unknown because it is bad.

Could you add details of the piece to the description? (It is the Fantaisie for piano and orchestra L.73, composed 1889/90.)

Piece name?

Thank you for uploading this gorgeous piece! The sound sensations are incredible. This is a beautiful concerto. The piano solo in itself is awesome but backed up with orchestra --it's very lovely.

2 things : 1) this is not a concerto. It is a Fantaisie ! Debussy did not conceive this piece as a concerto (he was far away from the « concerto » thing). Scales and arpeggios does not mean concerto, the piano is not written in a soloistic manner, but it is a « part » of the orchestra. 2) he actually got a chance to play it in his lifetime ! But for various reasons it was never premiered.

Debussy wasn't just an impressionist, he wrote some excellent late Romantic works and this is one of them.

Fantaisie for piano & orchestra Timing 20 minutes

フォーレのファンタジーOp.111の方が好きです。

To me, it sounds a bit cinematic (almost as if it could accompany some Disney cartoon). I recognize some elements which come back in other Debussy pieces.

1) I’ve heard of it; and 2) Is this actually Argerich? It’s not her recording with Barenboim.

Only a little less boring than the more recorded'more programmed Ballade Debussy wrote. Maybe when it was new its perfumed atmosphere,languorous melodies that feel like afterthoughts meant something to nonmusicians. Ive heard it many times and always and I Do Mean always find something bettah To DO!

I remember first hearing this piece when I was a teenager, it was in a CD I borrowed from my grandma. It was Zoltan Kocsis's performance of this, included in the "Greatest Pianists of the XX Century" series. Like most of the pieces that I loved back then, I listened to it dozens (if not hundreds) of times, and it's lodged in my subconscious forever. Nowadays, though, my go to recording of this piece is Aldo Ciccolini's.

It’s underrated because it’s not a good piece. Sorry.

Interesting Sound World.

Why was the orchestral reduction not included?

8:26 - What happened there? Why is there a glitch in the recording?

It's too short to qualify as a concerto. It could in theory be a slow movement of a piano concerto. Debussy either disliked or hid sonata form, which made him generally averse to long works.

It's interesting to me that you say that the Fantaisie is "underrated" and that people "haven't heard of" it. I've been familiar with it since I was a teenager. A friend of mine played it for a competition and won with it -- played it with our very excellent youth orchestra. I've heard it performed at least 2, maybe 3 times by different pianists and orchestras live, and have 2 recordings of it. It may not be as well known as other French works for piano and orchestra, but it isn't underrated or unknown.

This is Fantasie! So officially not defined as concerto by him. Fantasie pour le piano et orchestre!

Stop saying underrated

This sounds like Debussy, but also it doesn't. My guess is that it is an early piece.

During some bars it "smells" a bit like Rhapsody in blue. Beautiful piece. Loved it.

So what is the official name of this work?

Know this piece very well. This performance is a bit slow to my liking. If you like the music however check out Fauré’s Fantasy Op. 111 which makes a great companion to this.

Stupid ass clickbait. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Why do so many pianists play trills that way? It sounds like hiccups

What is this rubbish ?

Thank you for sharing this piece. I got back into Ravel recently, after many months of just Rach, and thought about Debussy as well, but the pieces I know didn't have great pianism, like Rachmaninoff concerto's or even the Ravel piano trio. This piece is just what I needed to get back. It sounds wonderful, not too Debussy-ish, and definitely sounds like a big concerto to me 😅. I don't usually comment, but this is too big of a discovery to me. Thank you.

IYLTYL _Noches en los jardines de España_ G. 49, Manuel de Falla.

What is the name of the piece? You didn't tell us!

1:20 Just a hint of something that was so far ahead of it's time it makes your ears perk up. This little bit of just a few seconds sounds like it would fit in a 90's sitcom theme. It's like seeing Fred Astaire coincidentally hitting a form of proto fortnite dance for a moment.

Level 1: Hummel G major Concertino op 73 Level 2: Haydn D major concerto Hob XVIII Level 3: Mozart conerto C minor K 491, Shostakovich concerto no 2 Level 4: Mendelssohn G minor concerto Level 5: Schumann concerto A minor Level 6: Grieg concerto A minor Level 7: Beethoven Choral Fantasy Level 8: Ravel G major concerto Level 9: Brahms concerto B flat major, Yellow River concerto, Tchaikovsky concerto B flat minor Level 10: Rachmaninoff D minor concerto no 3 Level 11: Bartok concerto no 2 （Bleedy）

Just saying... the gap between level 4 and 5 is huge 😭

I think it should be called. “The Emperors New Clothes”….

Thaikovsky? 💀

☠️💀

Level 6 is more along the lines of Barber, Busoni, Feinberg 1, and these sorts of things. Alkan is closer to 5 than 6. Tchaikovsky is also a a good bit easier than Rach 3 imo

Sonic clusters with a side of pointillism. Works for me! Must now listen to the complete #4. Finnissy is new to me.

Lets see about that

I've heard people saying before today that it's a chimpanzee bashing the piano randomly.

Finnessy rolling in his bed (not dead yet) seeing this list

The Yellow River Concerto doesn't seem very difficult from your excerpt

Although this is music, compositions such as this always leave me with the impression that some composers feel they must write a piece that is ridiculously hard for a performer to play in order for it to be valid. Quite simply, anyone can write a piece such as this. It is extremely mechanical, and the process, although it takes time, is fairly easy to do. Composers of music such as this are probably focusing more on the sonorities of the piece or instrument played. I'm not knocking the style, per se, but, for example, it's too easy for a composer to simply blot out a page with notes and not be singularly expressive. There are too many "also rans" in this arena. Look at Jackson Pollocks' paintings - really look at them. Study what he did. It wasn't just a random splattering of paint. There are layers of color, each meant to signify an artistic point. Sure, anyone can splatter paint on a huge canvas, but would it appear original or would it be a Pollock knockoff ? Listen to Webern's pieces - he worked extraordinarily hard to ensure that his work was his and his alone.