David Wright
David Wright
  • Видео 6
  • Просмотров 1 238 843
Trevor MFT nine news
Nine news visited Melbourne Flight Training & caught up with Trevor Cole
Просмотров: 704

Видео

Essendon Airport
Просмотров 1 тыс.10 лет назад
You've all heard of this airport. What horror awaits? Turn, run or fly away now! While you still can...
The Propeller Explained
Просмотров 896 тыс.10 лет назад
The Propeller Explained, a documentary made in the 1990s
Matt caught by security - Echuca 17/1/09
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.15 лет назад
Matt caught by security - Echuca 17/1/09
172 Landing Technique
Просмотров 340 тыс.16 лет назад
Landing a 172
MFT drinks - Zapped
Просмотров 39416 лет назад
mft drinks

Комментарии

  • @whathasxgottodowithit3919.
    @whathasxgottodowithit3919. 18 дней назад

    That works well on a marked Runway, we just have a grass strip with no markings, the C172 is very easy to land though, especially with two people in the back, if you are solo keep some up trim in, then you dont run out of elevator at the final stage of landing.

  • @hooryricardo
    @hooryricardo 3 месяца назад

    best video which explains various aspect of a propeller

  • @varunahlawat9013
    @varunahlawat9013 3 месяца назад

    dayummmmmmmm Where are more videos like this one? I'll watch all of them!

  • @nathanwoodruff9422
    @nathanwoodruff9422 4 месяца назад

    Are you the David Wright of Wright Wings out of PDK??

  • @jamesb.9155
    @jamesb.9155 6 месяцев назад

    Thirty three years on, is there a modern version of this film?

  • @muxemathebula7087
    @muxemathebula7087 7 месяцев назад

    this video is on point, i was wondering how front propeller make the plane fly (lift or drag)

  • @skyhigh1278
    @skyhigh1278 8 месяцев назад

    Think the propellers proper name is a " air screw "

  • @mRahman92
    @mRahman92 8 месяцев назад

    Variable pitch propellers seems like the stuff of witchcraft. 😮

  • @aakashmalhotra4857
    @aakashmalhotra4857 9 месяцев назад

    Best video on prop theory

  • @TENpilot
    @TENpilot 11 месяцев назад

    Nice video 👌🏻

  • @JM-jk9vz
    @JM-jk9vz 11 месяцев назад

    The opening song is my new favorite song. ❤

  • @zbigniewteterycz1571
    @zbigniewteterycz1571 Год назад

    SUPER . POZDRAWIAM .

  • @localbod
    @localbod Год назад

    Thankyou for this video. I really enjoyed it.

  • @simonlinser8286
    @simonlinser8286 Год назад

    i can't believe one of the Wright brothers is still alive. we're fortunate to have this explanation straight from the source.

  • @jackventure3703
    @jackventure3703 Год назад

    Wow! This was so informative. I wish modern documentaries were like this. so much information thoroughly explained in a short video.

  • @ivanslepchenko9785
    @ivanslepchenko9785 Год назад

    wow, just better then anything i saw on youtube

  • @vitoriamolico9636
    @vitoriamolico9636 Год назад

    vim pela emanuelle do qi

  • @marcoantoniorezende6112
    @marcoantoniorezende6112 Год назад

    Sorry guys but the “father” of aviation, who flew first, a heavier than air aircraft, for everyone to see and record was Santos Dumont. Period.

  • @angrypepecancer5205
    @angrypepecancer5205 Год назад

    Very helpful, I love you

  • @arabmusiciniraq1021
    @arabmusiciniraq1021 Год назад

    جميل جدآ اود ان اصنع طائره

  • @waynemohi2767
    @waynemohi2767 Год назад

    I enjoyed this and understand the evolution of the propeller a bit more. It still seems there are even more advantages of the propeller system to come. But as a science fiction follower the thought of anti gravity systems is also a long ways off.

  • @grantgee2842
    @grantgee2842 Год назад

    Learnt so much, thank u

  • @abdulrockman3992
    @abdulrockman3992 Год назад

    6:11 I get that the tip of the propeller moves faster than the base but I still could not wrap my head around why the angle of attack would increase at the tip when it is visibly uniform from base to tip. He said "the angle of attack would increase" how so?

    • @NullHand
      @NullHand 7 месяцев назад

      From the standpoint of the propeller section (tip or hub), there are two vector "components" of airflow. The larger is airflow resulting from the prop rotating through the air. It will be in a direction flowing toward the flat, high pressure side of the prop airfoil. The lesser airflow is due to the forward motion of the prop (and plane) forward through the air and induced flow. This will be at 90 degrees to the airflow due to just prop rotation. Its direction will be toward the curved, low pressure side of the prop airfoil. The actual airflow is the vector sum of these two components, and its ultimate direction (angle of attack as the video calls it) will depend on the relative velocities of the two "flows". The forward lesser component will be the same for prop sections at the tip, and toward the hub. Let's say for clarity both prop sections are angled at 45 degrees to rotation. And lets further say that at a prop section half way toward the hub is experiencing a forward airflow velocity that EQUALS the rotational velocity there. A little quad rule napkin sketching will show that the resulting total airflow will strike the 45 degree prop section squarely on the nose, for an effectively ZERO angle of attack. Now lets move out to the tip. The forward airflow is the same, but since the tip is twice as far from the hub, its rotational velocity, and the airflow that causes is now TWICE what the forward flow is. Going back to the quad ruled napkin will show that the resulting combined vector will now strike the 45 degree prop, not on the nose, but on the high pressure side of the prop section at about 20 degrees. This equates to a 20 degree angle of attack at the tip, while half way toward the hub the constant 45 degree pitch prop is experiencing a zero degree angle of attack. It is important to remember that angle of attack refers to an airfoils orientation regarding the media it is flowing through, not necessarily the same as its orientation to vertical, horizontal, or even the craft it is attached to.

    • @abdulrockman3992
      @abdulrockman3992 7 месяцев назад

      @@NullHand thanks, now that you explained this clearly. I am now completely lost hahaha. I'm going to read this many times, I think I got a little more understanding now.

  • @txkflier
    @txkflier Год назад

    The angle of attack of a propeller blade is generally measured at a point that’s 3/4’s of the way from the hub to the tip. The blade is usually widest at that point and it’s where most of the thrust is produced. To calculate the angle of attack, divide the pitch by the diameter and then divide by 2.36. The result will be the tangent of the angle. Use the arc tangent function to convert it to degrees. For a 69x50 prop, it would be 50/69/2.36=0.30705 and atan(0.30705)=17.069 degrees. The 2.36 is 3/4’s of pi..

  • @kewl800i
    @kewl800i Год назад

    That plane in @17:39 is a Tucano, yes?

  • @AnonyMous-jf4lc
    @AnonyMous-jf4lc Год назад

    The roundout to flare was a little aggressive, but overall being more aggressive is safer than being delayed. I like to roundout closer to the surface, then gradually hold the nose up as the mains settle. Getting to know exactly how close your mains are to the ground will also allow you to roundout right onto the mains if the winds are making keeping the airplane in control difficult as it slows.

  • @samoo8933
    @samoo8933 Год назад

    Back ground music is terrrible

  • @dasohrdermauer39
    @dasohrdermauer39 Год назад

    What do the letters "Z" and "V" at 1:12 and 1:19 in this video mean? Whose planes are these?

  • @sanneo1
    @sanneo1 Год назад

    Perfect video and explains! Thanks.

  • @ronjon7942
    @ronjon7942 Год назад

    Nice work, this really helped fill in gaps.

  • @lizardojohnpaul7459
    @lizardojohnpaul7459 Год назад

    I like this kind of video

  • @josephmwangi9047
    @josephmwangi9047 2 года назад

    Must be nice to have all that in your mind

  • @patrickojola3824
    @patrickojola3824 2 года назад

    i love the principle of the propeller engines

  • @davidzeto2446
    @davidzeto2446 2 года назад

    More explanation less period music.

  • @heyitstonto8715
    @heyitstonto8715 2 года назад

    Great landing and good advice, thank you!

  • @sanjubhagat8005
    @sanjubhagat8005 2 года назад

    Sir please continue these which will help me develop my business in India

  • @elelyon555
    @elelyon555 2 года назад

    Wow this is a great video explanation thank you for posting this !! I had such hard time understanding aoa in relation to flight, this helped so much! 💥👍🏼😀🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @samuraichicken9248
    @samuraichicken9248 2 года назад

    There are no better educational aids than these old school instructional videos. This was tremendously helpful in helping me understand propeller principles. Thank you!

  • @fl6824
    @fl6824 2 года назад

    Santos Dumont>>>>>>> Wright brothers

  • @gabudaichamuda2545
    @gabudaichamuda2545 2 года назад

    Fantastic. This will be great knowledge in regards to airship design for my fantasy novels.

  • @ohaRega
    @ohaRega 2 года назад

    Thank you Lord for allowing me to find this gem.

  • @drtq9
    @drtq9 2 года назад

    I love science and god this was boring

  • @dasgeld
    @dasgeld 2 года назад

    @David Wright must be one of the Wright Brothers with having this video in his archive.

  • @flyingsolo3290
    @flyingsolo3290 2 года назад

    Couple more things would have been great to add: airspeed ktas and flap setting degrees PS: nice greaser 👍🏻

  • @sasocucnik7299
    @sasocucnik7299 2 года назад

    cepaj

  • @dexterthompson1809
    @dexterthompson1809 2 года назад

    Ok, now I really feel DUMB!!!!☹

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke5656 2 года назад

    I’m sick of people claiming the Wright Bros. We’re the first, they weren’t and 10,000 newspaper accounts at the time, a full 5 years BEFORE the Wright Bros Kittyhawk flight verified that!!!!

  • @Agentleader1
    @Agentleader1 2 года назад

    [3:11] is no one gonna talk about how it said "like men, propellers matured quickly?" or did i hear it wrong?

  • @ricp
    @ricp 2 года назад

    That was a great video, thanks!

  • @pouletbidule9831
    @pouletbidule9831 2 года назад

    Already knew most of this, but still a great vid