Видео

This was all on high settings.

Sir, I do not know. I wonder if it changed from the early season with updates.

This was all new to me at the time, not realizing it would make much difference, and it didn't change much at all in deathmatch on this map. After all of the "optimizations" and such, things did change, but not much. The 4070 ti was an absolutely fantastic card, and I played with similar FPS in deathmatch that I have now with the 4090, both at 1080p. What we are really seeing in the video, is the CPU constraints at this resolution. The 4070 ti would often hit 90-98% utilization on all maps, which was ideal in my opinion. However, the 7800X3D is what is limiting the FPS.

What other modes offer better FPS and performance?

Fullscreen, otherwise you wont get max fps/60hz + @@randomcsgo1337

@@randomcsgo1337 disable window mode and select the refresh rate of your monitor and you will have the smoothes experience 🙂

Pbo on , 85° -30

7800X3D. It hit 5ghz in this video, all factory settings, no PBO. It stays there in game, and never falls. Since, I have turned on PBO, and use a rather conservative -25 on the settings. I cannot tell much difference in FPS or 1% lows. Frequency and performance did not change, that I could tell in game.

How much more performance you got swapping from 10700k

For CS2, people are discovering they need a CPU that can drive the GPU. AM5 platforms with X3D chips are running much higher FPS. I recommend 5800X3D or 7800X3D, AM5 platform, 6000 DDR5 RAM. SSD is not an issue, but CPU and DDR5 is what I am using, sir.

It has always been fullscreen by default.

1080P

1% lows ranging from the max FPS have been terrible for everybody. Even the best GPU users see a large drop in certain areas, but I see them on 1440P. It makes me wonder about higher resolutions (4K), if the FPS would settle into a better range or not. Gamer Nexus did a video on CPU's, and found that all of them had a large range of 1% lows at 1080P. Not much data for anything higher than 1440P, that is actually real or reliable. With the game itself, I agree it is not optimized yet, and the closer it gets, the better it will get.

Sir, I thought everybody had the same frequency, as per AMD. In the BIOS, I am not running anything special. It was set to the normal PBO setting, in the auto setting. Recently, I have changed it to the "advanced PBO", or a more aggressive auto setting in the BIOS. I have not done anything else tuning wise, except tweak the RAM, using the 6000hz CL32 manual timings from BuildZiod (from his RUclips video). I am using a Deepcool LS720 cooler, using the paste that came with it. Not sure how long the frequency holds, but it does usually stay around 5.05ghz under game load. It could just go down from temperatures not being stable with either your CPU or GPU.

Good to know. Thx bro@@randomcsgo1337

I hit 800fps on some parts of Mirage, too. Ultra settings. The 4070ti is very impressive as a 1080p card.

The 7800X3D beat everybody up. In the Gamer Nexus video, you can use the 5800X3D vs the 5800X as a good reference to how the 7800X3D vs the 7800X will perform, and the X3D cache chips seem to be the clear winner in CS2, as per these tests and benchmarks. ruclips.net/video/8mmeQ6DGIMY/видео.htmlsi=MUrq708dU6RA5rsx&t=243

X3D is better for CS2.

the 7800x3d is the best gaming cpu on the market rn, and it still does have a performance benefit in cs2 over the 7700x. it becomes an even better option if you plan to play other games as well, which im assuming most people do.

Rivatuner, it comes as a bundle with MSI Afterburner. You need to allow 3rd party software for it to hook into the game. Very useful, but I do not focus on making benchmark videos, I just play the game.

On Mirage in Palace, I am hitting over 900 FPS on high settings in practice mode......

Doesn't go much above 700 in real games with the new updates, doesn't fall below 400. This game title really needs a proper FPS benchmark, like we had in CSGO.

Glad it helped. The maps are optimized more and more, but the FPS in 5v5 play seems to be lower of course. I still think this is a great card for 1080P.

What RAM do you have? What settings are you using for RAM clock settings? Is Vsync off? Depending on the map and action in game, it is between 400-750+ FPS. The 1% lows do fall down below 240fps, but not for long at all. As I understand, everybody is having issues with 1% lows.

@@randomcsgo1337 Im using corsair vengeance lpx 32gb (2x16gb) 5600mhz ddr5 c36 rams bro and its with xmp settings on mobo

@@sayonara1915 RAM is good. There's a LOT of variables, I'm not sure where to start. I use GPU Tweak from the ASUS website too, with only power target and GPU voltage maxed. I have zero overclocking set, but as you know it does overclock automatically in game. That still should not give that much difference. Is resizable Bar enabled? Is FPS MAX setting in game set to 0?

I use fps_max 0

yes my resizable bar enabled but i didnt change any of bios settings except the ram frequencys. I learned a week ago there is some tech called 'pbo' can be overclock cpu and do better than before. I will try this in a couple days :) And im using fps_max 400 for to not get frame drop in game :)@@randomcsgo1337

Not many options to smoke it outside Banana.

This is the practice mode already in CS2, built in.

yes, easy over 400

@@gonti4945 thanks , is that low or medium settings?

@@stephenmoon5123 like shaders, model texture on highest and other on low or medium. I get between 600 and 900fps

@@gonti4945 😀 that’s great, what ram you have, is it ddr5? If so what cl?

@@stephenmoon5123 I got g skill ddr5 6000 cl 30

I tested it on low settings, sure. It hits over 800+ FPS on areas of the map. I would say it gives about a 15-20% improvement over the high setting. Medium setting should fall between that.

the 1% lows are not something to be proud of, but it consistently stays above 400-600 everywhere. Sure, it may drop if a bomb goes off or there's a lot of stuff going on, but you can always reduce some aspect of video settings. I keep it all on high preset, and I don't turn anything down for any map. In game, it dips into the 400's, but it's usually over 500. I think that is a safe range to expect a normal game to be at.

My experience is only with the 7800X3D. It is an absolute monster on CS2. I think the X3D cache helps a lot.

Factory voltage. All factory settings used...

@@randomcsgo1337 wtf how much this gpu take w maximum ever? My 4070 without ti ON stock settings take 190 w after undervolt 130

Monitor: Zowie XL2546K (240hz). 240hz is enough for me, sir.

xddxdxdx '

Thank you, sir.

@nelzikbs9450 It depends on the monitor resolution. I am set on 1080p for some time in the foreseable future, but the 1440p and 4070ti is a good setup, I doubt I'll lose much. In practice on other games, the 4080 is roughly 15-20% better in FPS, and the 4090 is 15-25% better than the 4080.

You need to have a decent CPU to run these RTX cards at full use. If you are only using 50% of the card, it means the CPU can't keep up with the GPU.

@nelzikbs9450 It depends on the map. It can drop to 350ish on Ancient in T spawn, but other areas it has more. I have not paid attention to the FPS in all areas of all maps. I can say, I leave it on high setting and have seen the FPS drop to 240 for short periods on parts of maps, especially if the bomb goes off. All of the higher tier 40 series cards, and even the 7900XTX will drop considerably in some areas of game play, and the 1% lows (as shown by other users) can drop to even 15-55fps or so, regardless of the card you use. This game is not fully optimized yet, and it should only improve as the game developers have time to work on these areas. That being said, I experience 400-700+ FPS on high settings throughout most of the gaming experience currently. Mirage is a good FPS map, and even on high, I hit 700+ in some areas of that map during competitive play. Also, there are tests out already that show in other games (not CS2), that a 4070ti at 1080p has within 3% the same FPS as a 4090 at 4K, suggesting the experience is similar. Looking back, I may have gotten a 4080 instead, but at the time, it wasn't worth the cost. I am very happy with the 4070ti at 1080p, and I have no desire to change this card for anything else. Other notable positives about the 4070ti, is the low power consumption compared to all the other cards. I am usually around 180-240 watts total, the GPU temperature usually stays around 65-76c during game play, and never above that. The 4080, 4090, and 7900XTX use nearly double the energy usage and produce more heat in the case/room. The 4070ti cooler is the same one you will find on the 4080, it's very efficient. As far as the assembly of my PC, all of the parts are listed in the description of this video. I would install the NVME/hard drive first, as after you install everything else, it can be difficult to get to.

I have been playing real matches, too. FPS is similar. I can do another video in a couple days, sure.

The software did not hook, apparently. I didn't use the MSI software after that.

No sir, i just went straight to the X3D stuff.

@@randomcsgo1337 thank you for the reply. Was wondering how much performance % does one get from upgrading the 7600x to 7800x3d ...

@@FluqioxoDresults There are quite a few people in other game titles running comparisons between the X3D variants, especially the 5600. I think Cyberpunk is one of them. The results do show an advantage, and I personally think it is worth it going into the future.

I just wanted to give people an idea about what this CPU/GPU combo can offer, in case people wanted to upgrade for CS2.

​@@randomcsgo1337would be nice to see a cs2 video that shows max fps on 1080p and 960p low settings using esport config for maximum fps performance.

@@orion9k I got over 800FPS on all low settings on 1080p, it's on another video. I imagine then, the 1% lows aren't even close to 240hz to register. I'm not really interested in hosting any kind of channel or content, I just wanted to share what people can expect with this computer setup, if they wanted to upgrade, they have an idea what performance to expect.

​@@randomcsgo1337teşekkürler my sistem 7800x3d galax rtx 4070 ti white

I will try to get another video of the 99% (Nvidia)/ 1% lows.

My sir, I do not plan on buying and testing a new monitor. Yet.

GPU will impact more FPS in CS2 vs CSGO. In CSGO, the CPU was the deciding factor.

However, it is not yet clear what CPU/GPU combo is best. I would wait until the full release, and see what other players are experiencing.

@@randomcsgo1337 what about just csgo ? Because my 6600k isn’t good enough like at all only doing 200fps on 1024x768 all the way up to 1920x1080

@@TheConfed01 Just CSGO, it is CPU dependent. The better the CPU (higher frequency), the better the framerates.

@@TheConfed01 CS2 will replace CSGO entirely, so that is really the biggest factor in what to buy. I recommend waiting and seeing what is working best for the price, after the full release.

Good sir, I am uncertain what could be causing this. There are some differences regarding the motherboards overall, being AM4 vs the newer AM5 platforms and available lanes. Whether or not this plays a difference here, I can't be sure. There may be other settings in the GPU software.

Maybe CPU bottleneck.

ruclips.net/video/kv71XlDJ-rc/видео.html

I am not completely sure, but the 7800X3D cache is making the difference.

@@randomcsgo1337 im gonna upgrade to 5800x3d cuz im on am4, then 32gb ram and some better cooling and it should be a lot better

Top percentage is total GPU utilization, GPU percentage is GPU processor utilization, 7800X3D percentage is CPU utilization.

CSGO? I got 718 FPS on the Benchmark workshop, highest video settings, 1080p, 16:9 resolution.

CS 2 will use the GPU much more than CSGO. A LOT more GPU, if you want higher video settings.

​@@randomcsgo1337and in cs 2 in 1080p average settings how many fps would be on the processor itself, because I plan to buy such a set only in a year I would buy a graphics card, cheers

You will need a gpu regardless, unless you don't have a problem playing the game at 80-100ish fps

CS is not a "processor game" lol, it uses CPU a lot and even more because people play 4:3 but you still need a decent GPU, with a integrated graphic chip you will have low fps

It is part of the MSI Afterburner package. You can find this information on many youtube channels, just do a search for it.

Sir, I only play CSGO.