Видео

( ﾟДﾟ) The human body is burly, gnarly and surly like a fractal.

( ﾟÅﾟ；) It's intelligently designed that if you master evolution it just makes you a baby doctor.

( ´ﾟдﾟ) We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.

(　 Д )　ﾟ　ﾟ Consciousness is the particle and wave double slit experiment. The cones and rods of your eyes preserve the particle and wave duality so your vision don't look like a flat screen television. It's supposed to be a violation of physics but it is the only exception in the whole universe.

!!(⊃ Д)⊃≡ﾟ ﾟ The universe was created in 1976. It is too hot to make a universe at the time of the big bang. It can be created at anytime. God is slow and easy. A human can do a lot with their lifespan. I got the hunk. God got the chunk. Everyone else can have the rest. That is song spirit of ''76 by The Alarm.

(゜ロ゜) This is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.

(ToT) the human body is burly, gnarly and surly like a fractal.

( -д-) It's intelligently designed that if you master evolution it just makes you a baby doctor.

( o´ｪ｀o) We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.

( ；∀；) consciousness is the particle and wave double slit experiment. The cones and rods of your eyes preserve the particle and wave duality so your vision don't look like a flat screen television. It's supposed to be a violation of physics but it is the only exception in the whole universe.

(/_;)/~~ The universe was created in 1976. It is too hot to make a universe at the time of the big bang. It can be created at anytime. God is slow and easy. A human can do a lot with their lifespan. I got the hunk. God got the chunk. Everyone else can have the rest. That is song spirit of ''76 by The Alarm.

(..) this is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.

If you could accelerate Casimir effect radiation fast enough and smash it together then it might produce something from nothing.

This video randomly showed up in my feed and I found this surprisingly interesting Thank you for your insights

I am tired of scientists telling me that I am not really here , don't see the world and there is nothing real but collapsing wave functions to be calculated. Pure bull.

fire the camera person!

One single consciousness, manifesting itself in different forms.

Lawrence needs a brain transplant

Schrodinger ex. dT divisor "time reversal" orchestrates memory 4 bil years later in maze-solving protozoa -- "consciousness" started there.

Universe/world does not exist, but EDWs are: Gabriel Vacariu (Philosophy, Bucharest University): since 2002/2005 on this topics, Cognitive Neuroscience (mind-brain, self, consciousness, emergence), Physics (quantum mechanics, general relativity, spacetime), Philosophy/ontology: Gabriel Vacariu article in Synthese (2005, USA), Springer (2015 Germany) “Illusions of human thinking” + PhD thesis 2007 FREE (UNSW, Australia) + my 6 books 2008-2023, all English, FREE my webpage, filosofie, UB or Internet (researchgate, academia, philpapers) ruclips.net/video/IzhiC2Me-wo/видео.html ruclips.net/video/zx1puEMLLvI/видео.html ruclips.net/video/uPof5bRDfas/видео.html

Nice presentation, i would argue that the reason why the result is important is not just that itnis inconsistent with Galileo, thats pretty much down to whether you consider the effect to be background dependent or not, if it is just environmental, like a wind you experience by running through air, then its pretty meh. The thing that shows an inconsistency without relativistic physics, whether it is a material artifact or something fundamental, is the ability to both meaaure the speed of light on a round trip, directly, and to. Measure the strength of electromagnetic forces directly. If one can change while the other does not, then there is some trouble, either they both change together, which would result in some strange physics abscent more things changing along with it to make it unobservable, or one changes compared to the other and the formula for the speed of light just isnt correct in that frame, either way it is an issue with the theory, abcent some for of relativistic transformation properties, i think he went a bit far a bit fast woth the implications of that, but can't fault him for not being perfect, he did push stuff forward, and general relativity is a jewel to be sure.

they finaly found the missing mass. it was the packing foam in the telescopes empty box

HOOSIER,of Indiana

HOOSHIER,of Indiana

so smart hes an idiot

The Universe is infinite. It has no beginning and no end. This guy is wrong.

What's wrong with thinking about Palestine ? Einstein did refuse the presidency of israel, so he did think about Palestine and still changed physics ...

Pardon the context of this letter - it wasn't written for that purpose. I might say that Scientists could go on strike until the prospect of war is completely removed. ----------- Dear Gentlemen, I have to object to your cynacism, today, unless it is geared toward the inaction of the Scientific Community. You've pointed out several glaring issues, about the misinformation of climate change, that have been the end result of decades of inaction, over several other topics. I must point out one of these to you before I continue; and this has to be direct. Black holes have to be shown as impossible, and the fraud of them, destroyed. People who have evangelized them have either done so, knowingly, or un-wittingly. The existence of a singularity can either be mocked, moderated, or cast aside by "non-believers"; but not this part. The particle theory of forces implies the existence of the Graviton. Each, and every, particle, by Einstein's theory of relativity, must obey the speed of light. Since light particles - photons - cannot escape the black hole, it stands to reason, that no other particle could otherwise do so. The implications of this are that the force of gravity, itself, would not be felt by anything on the exterior of the black hole. Now, I've done my due-dilligence shopping around this cure to Fermilab, CERN, LIGO, and ITER, as well as YT evangelists - being completely shunned. The implications, of such a fraud, alone, cannot be overstated. How far, has the human species, truly come, in our understanding of the universe? Well, being at the end of my rope, I feel that this is a better forum, for such a discussion. Given that this happened, I can only speculate as to what other Scientists have felt about the issue - especially Stephen Hawking. But, I'll try to belabor this some other time. My next gripe is about climate change misinformation - the 1 degree. A single degree can come from a lot of places; and requires evidence placed against a mathematical model for a physical system. Such a model for the IPCC's supposed ice- core samples was never shown, found, or explained. So, I'm going to take the liberty of introducing one disproof, using sublimation, which I'm sure everyone here can understand and appreciate - while showing that the supposed 1.5 degrees can creep in very easily. Disproof: Water, when frozen, will release gas particles, causing air bubbles to move. (citation required)* Now, the model, of the entire earth's climate, has never been agreed on by the APS (American Physical Society). They even had a labor movement about it at Physics Today Magazine, if I remember correctly.* Such a model would have 10 degree uncertainties for any piece that it had. Trying to extrapolate the carbon-dioxide "average" from an ice core at the very top of the globe is suspect, at best, but entirely fraudulent, when no model can be derived as to the global average; and data is being extrapolated backwards using supposed CO2 averages. No real movement found. The only possible way to get an average of the global climate is using a grid of points, starting at sea-level, through the outer atmosphere, and dense enough to capture and eliminate error on the order of the sensitivity of the apparatus. Here's a brief illustration of the principle to show how easily error creeps in. Data Model: Gaussian (aka "noise", or "white noise") Sensitivity: 10^-6 (sensitive satellite apparatus, typical electronics) Measurement Error = Std. Dev. = Sensitivity Total Error = Sqrt(Sum_i((Measurement Error_i)^2)) where i:[1 to N] Average = 1/N * Sum_i(Data Point_i) where i:[1 to N] So here: what would the { # Points, Total Error }, look like, for our satellite? Here's a table: { 10^3, 3.16e-5 } { 10^4, 1.00e-4 } { 10^5, 3.16e-4 } { 10^6, 1.00e-3 } { 10^7, 3.16e-3 } Supposing that the atmosphere varied near the sensitivity of our apparatus, how far would one have to travel before feeling a 10^-6 degree change? Let's examine a table of values for the number of points required for a 3D mesh extending through just the Troposphere: { Troposphere Only 20km } { Mesh Size (km), Number of points, Instrument Error } { 1000 km, 10201, 1.01e-4 } { 100 km, 1020144, 1.01e-3 } { 10 km, 102014400, 0.0101 } { 1 km, 10201440000, 0.101 } { Troposphere, 0-20km } { Stratosphere, 20-50km } { Mesosphere, 50-85km } { Thermosphere, 85-600km } { Exosphere, 600-1e4km } Surface Area of Earth: 510,072,000 km^2 Quickly, one can see that the measurement, or instrument error, approaches the limit of 1.5 degrees, given just the inner Troposphere, and a single kilometer mesh size. Students of climate would've stopped searching as soon as they came to realize that their measurements were not being accounted for, in terms of instrument error, where they had to produce a "real physical model".* I would hope that you, Gentlemen, can agree, that we have to do something about Their inaction. People are running scared, on corporate social media, until they have to face the music, about real problems, about Science. I won't say more about this; but Fermilab and I have a reckoning. I'll be taking this outside, with them, very soon; and I think they could use some new journalism.

It actually ACTUALLY starts at 22:02

You can't take yourself seriously if you take Lawrence Krauss seriously.

im agnostic i dont think it matters if there is a god guys like krauss annoy the ever-living shit out of me because their arguments are so transparently ideological motivated and self-refutational that they descend into absurdity if the universe can come from nothing, then why cant god come from nothing

Atheism is dead and its over !! Most atheists simply cannot answer the followings - Nothing is nothing, You never get something from nothing, never get rational mind from non-rational, never get life from non-life without intelligence. Scientists are clueless on the origin of life (abiogenesis). Even if you create life in a lab then surely that requires top students, scientists & technology out there. The evolutionary theory is true imo However, human beings are special ! Please explain the origin of a complex cell, explain mathematical laws of physics,scientific laws,complex chemistry,complexity in biology, explain consciousness etc. Universe is incredibly fine tuned and the only way out for the atheists is the multiverse theory but that too must have had a beginning with fine tuned constants. Look multiverse is just a theory and there is ZERO evidence.You cannot go beyond the event horizon of this universe so scientists are permanently cut off from viewing or getting any sort of data from another universe/multiverse therefore rely on metaphysics to explain reality that requires faith just like theists who believe in God! I always ask the atheists "WHERE DID THE MATHEMATICAL OR NATURAL LAWS CAME FROM? LOOK SCIENTISTS FREQUENTLY WRITE THESE COMPLEX MATHS FORMULAE ON THEIR BLACKBOARD" and that requires the highest of intelligence ! Oh by the way quantum vacuum is not nothing ! You cannot go into infinite regress. Universe and everything we perceive is dependent (contingent) and it can only be explained by an eternal, independent and necessary being.

At 25.06, when the photo is taken, is it not a case that: the camera's 'shutter' speed is so slow, compared to the speed of light, that light has sufficient time to reach the camera imaging plate?

Really enjoyed listening and learning many of things from Mr. Krauss. Thank you very much for sharing. Wish there was many more to come to watch lol. Could listen to this guy forever haha

The content is a cut above the rest. Keep setting the bar high!

Just tell her Lawrence, you cannot "observe" a particle.

The correct definition of a Law is a pattern, a regularity. If you have Nothing you don't have any laws. "Empty" space is not empty, it has energy and virtual pairs of particles bubble out of these energy fluctuations, not in and out of existence, (bad use of language again) but in and out of the MANIFEST. Also zero is balance not absolute absence! There are so many levels of poor languaging going on with Lawrence that it is mind bending on how this shizz flies...my problem is not with his maths or even with his modelling, it might turn out to be right or wrong, there are several competing theories going on right now...my problem with Lawrence is with how he twists concepts he barely understands...absolutely appalling!

I guess you didnt have parents. Man some intelligent people can be so stupid

Great talk, not spoiled by Krauss's usual political comments. Yes, Science and Scientific American have gone downhill in the past 30 years. Science is full of unreadable graphs and Scientific American is no longer written by scientists.

The idea of a creator is totally illogical. If you use the logic that the Universe must have been created by a creator. You cannot abandon this logic when asked who created rhe creator ? Therefore despite our difficulty in imagining it the only logical possibility is that it all started from nothing with no creator possible.

this has become his job rather than his passion, sad to see

Krauss is nothing but a propaganda-spewing parrot. Just read a textbook. You will get the same information.

He loves to talk about this expansion of the universe and inflation and makes extreme claims off of that but never mentions the hubble tension.. Professional salesman folks.

Referring to a quantum measurement as an observation or needing an observer is what threw the woooo crowd a bone.

That phrase 'I don't know' just don't exist anymore. When I ask somebody something that they don't know they just make something up instead of saying 'I don't know'.

Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. two devices “laser tape measure with fixed fixation at 1,000,000 meters” and “Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 250000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 84/84/84 cm, and the weight is 24 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe❤.

Talking heads.......until this can be tested nothing but conjecture

Let's test his ideas.....lol

So protons are also filled with "virtual particles" also? I thought that was just the QV... how did this get figured out? Also aren't particles almost never standing still? So are they saying that the virtual particles inside of a... "regular" particle move around/are localized within (and independent of the outside Q-vacuum), or do they remain static/in place as the particle moves through space (independent of it)? This all just seems counter to what (I had thought) they originally said virtual particles were... And now he's off on an unprompted rant about religion. After saying "if you could create a universe, isn't this the way you'd do it?"... the man's clearly got some internal hangups he needs to deal with because it's very unnecessary for the audience especially if they're actually trying to understand something.

Sooooo was the Ptolemaic model right? Did we lose the meaning of the concept of "being the center" throughout time? playing telephone? If any point in the universe is the center, maybe the Greeks were aware of a concept we've forgotten?