Видео

You don't like evangelicals, do you?

@russianchristianity You are not "evangelics" cos you skip parts of evangelion you don't like so to teach lies . You are protestants , you protest against teachings of Christs church , so you are heretics , sons of satan .

You got only one part right: I am not an evangelical. This is a video about them but I'm not one of them

@@russianchristianity Good !

Thank you for your support. I do my best

Depends on who you ask, could be. Their very name roughly translates as "native faith"

Tell me you haven't watched the video just read the title without actually saying it. What I said in the beginning of the video: "It would not be correct to say that it was the Christianization of Russia exactly, because there was no Russia back then. What would become Russia 500 years later, was just a conglomerate of independent lands and cities ruled by local princes. Long before Moscow was even founded, the most powerful city-state was Kiev or Kievan Rus' with the same capital as today's Ukraine."

@russianchristianity I can't tell you that I have not watched, otherwise I wouldn't have mentioned the year. But you really put it all a very interesting way! And one thing more: the source of your information! It should be under every video, otherwise you just repeat what many before you have already said!

@@russianchristianity One thing more:if I'm not mistaken you pronounce the name "Volodymyr" as ruzzians do:"Vladimir". Talking about Ukrainian ruler and pronouncing his name in ruzzia manner you give the impression that you mean he was ruzzian. A don't think I'll be mistaken if I'll say that every ruzzian hearing the name pronunced as you do would think so. That goes for "kiev ", which should be "Kyiv" an other names.

No, he was not Volodymyr and he was not a Ukrainian ruler. You can look up how his name was spelled in the earliest chronicles. Most often it was something like "Володимѣръ". I follow the conventional spelling of his name both in Russian and in English. Ukrainians and Russians nowadays are both descendants of various Eastern Slavic tribes loosely united under the name Rus'. Saying Vladimir was Ukrainian is just anachronistic.

@russianchristianity 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 That's why you are DEADLY wrong! Both :about the emergency of the languages and the pronunciation of the name! That's why I point you for your lack of CORRECT sources. To get more information about Ukrainian and their language you can try at least to look at the occupiers of the Kyiv kingdom. Take, for instance, Litvanian occupation of Kyiv kingdom and look up the dokuments written in Ukrainian! You can also travel to Kyiv any day, don't be afraid those drones and bombs, and visit Sofia church. In the basement of the church you can find writings on the walls. Ask linguists, who warked with those about how much they are simular to today's Ukrainian language! Well, you can also ask them about simularity to so-called ruzzian.I can almost swere that Ukrainians would be able to understand much of what is written on those walls,but I'm positively sure that so-called ruzzians won't! So, after thorough resurch try to analyse whether ruzzian "language" emerged from the same root as ukrainian! I feel that I have to point for you your lack of sources again by pointing for you your own ingnorens :when you say that ruzzia did not exist when the rush were baptised, how could something that did not exist suddenly have the language that emerged from the same slavonic root?!?!?! 🙄 😁 Ouu, those people, on those territories when moskovia and it's republic are now, existed, but what language the spoke?!?! 🙄 Arabs, travelling at that time to Bulgars, not Bolgars, can cast some light on it. Ibn Fadlan, Ibn Batuti... Well, if you're a Christian, so you have to understand that the truth is one of God's names! Be truthful you too. Do some more research and put more efforts if you want to teach something! And that pronunciation of the name Vladymyr, which I write as it is writen today, was writen in church-slavonic language developed by Macedonian munk for use of the slavonic speaking Christians on the brink of the millennium. Ukrainians will never say "vlAdImIr", simply because it's not how their pronunciation is!!!! 😁 The name means "the one who rules over peace" in Ukrainian "volodar myru"! For so-called ruzzians this word gives no meaning! 😁

The first rulers of Rus were also Scandinavians

Former Scandinavians, who lived for generations in eastern Rome as guardians. they hired them as muscle. Varangians they were called. noble bloodlines from the north and west all went to Constantinople to study and work

@ Yes, thanks for elaboration

It depends on the particular area. If it's predominantly inhabited by Russians, than yes. If indigenous populations, than no

A number of Catholics in Sibera too.

@ True, mostly of German origin

@@russianchristianity Yes, exactly. They were exiled there.

Because his Church is the most powerful, rich, and numerous among all other Orthodox Churches. Probably more than all others combined

Agree. The only thing you got wrong is attributing what this bishop was saying to the author of this channel. I just wanted to demonstrate what some of the ROC bishops say on public and also provided a translation. I don't share any of his opinions expressed here.

​@@russianchristianityMy apologies my friend. I was sickened when I watched it. Innocents are being killed on both sides it breaks my heart.

I wholeheartedly agree with you

Yep, he resembles him a lot

Maybe so. When there's war, everybody loses. Maybe with the exception of some industries benefitting from the sales of weaponry and the like

Thanks for sharing. Lovely that you've reacted to one of my old videos. Actually, I found no contradictions with what you are saying and what I was saying in this video.

You're ok with priests bearing arms?

I don't speak Serbian, sorry

Sure, thanks for sharing. I believe, you can always ask someone or talk to someone in private, like a church staff or a priest

Interesting. Can you share the link please?

You're right, of course it's not always the case. This kind of tension is shunned upon and the leadership speaks up against it. As for СЦ, their whole community went through harsh persecutions so there's probably less of that tension there.

Thank you. I actually did more than one: ruclips.net/p/PL_E6vr36f86b_voTtx1LK5g7B4Rft7xtE

Can you prove that?

@ Un equivocally YES ; 1 ) the Septuagint dates back to 250/300 BCE and the oldest copy is about 300 CE the Corrupt jew Masoretic text date to 900 CE ie the Leningrad codex , it is common knowledge that the NT was transferred to us in Greek and for the rest please read your Evangelion 😂😂😂😂☦️☦️☦️☦️ protestants are really dumb when reading Scripture as they only seem to read what the want the Scripture to say 😂😂😂😂😂

Why have you removed my other comment communist dog

Well, good manners apparently are not a part of your catechism. I haven't removed your comment, it's still here. RUclips messes out with comments sometimes, try different sorting. As for your comment, I don't see how it has anything to do with evangelicalism. Especially in Russia, where they use exactly the same translation as the Orthodox Church.

@ : well when you steel souls for satin don’t expect me to be nice and evangelicals read the Scripture and only understand what the want out of the Scriptures as soon as they read a chapter or vers that dose not agree with their version they they pass over it now did you read the Scriptures and do they not say what what i said and if they do repent and cry for forgiveness from him who created the Universe Amin ☦️☦️☦️

Yep, just like I said, very much recognizable but with a strong post-Soviet impact

You're right, but to be fair, there are many Orthodox believers and even priests who feel no animosity towards evangelicals. It's not systemic

It is. It has been a part of Russian culture for 150 years.

@ heretical protestant ism

Are you the one to judge?

@ no , there is only one judge . But you have betrayed that judge.

@ a very small percentage of it.

Yes, thanks for sharing. I got this from my fieldwork with Russian Baptists. However, to be fair, there have been many voices against this division, even within the leadership

Why? What's wrong with sincere believers who help people in need?

@russianchristianity Protestantism is disruption

What do they disrupt in Russia? Can you give me specifics?

Why don't you evangelise in UK. , America, these are your base. You can't convert your own people. You are coming to steal from the russian church. You sold your flock to the demon. Now you want to destroy more.

@@russianchristianity how many protestant churches are there now 30000?

No, I don't think they're the same. Simply because they're the minority in Russia and recently the state has put significant restriction on their evangelism

150 years of history. Persecuted under the Soviet regime, unprecedented underground activity, etc, etc. They are a part of the Russian history now

Are you referring to the apostolic succession, and henceforth to the Orthodox Church?

Thank you for your support

You mean the same Jews who were harshly persecuted by Christians throughout centuries?

Yes, he even saw them as allies of sort. But by Stalin's era this all ended

@@russianchristianity Yes, Stalin was somewhat different from Lenin. Sadly they were also very similar in that they were lost souls.

Some historians make an argument that Lenin is responsible for much more blood and murder than Stalin but I'm not competent enough to judge.

There absolutely is. It has been introduced in the late 1980s by the sociologist Roland Robertson. Look it up.

@@russianchristianity Just because some pseudo-academic thinks that he can introduce something so corny, does not make it correct English.

Well, it's not a part of the everyday English but widely used in social research. You might not like it but it's still a word, at the very least a professional term.

@@russianchristianity Thanks, but I speak the Queen's English and I cannot think that our late dear Queen Elizabeth would have used that word.

@@stephanottawa7890 If she discussed sociology, she would. Anyways, please, suggest a better term for the phenomenon that has both global and local features.

It does exist but the community is quite small. Here in Finland SA is much more visible.

That's sad. Have there been scandals? How prevalent is that?

Could you please elaborate?

@russianchristianity it mean church is dependant from secular powers

@@vytautasmikuciauskas222 Isn't it always in a way?

@@russianchristianity how orthodox church is structured for them yes

@@russianchristianity in case of Catholicism not so but speaking about orthodoxy yes

Isn't the whole world?

Well, not always, of course. It's after all a Church

So you haven't watched the video, just read the title

Thank you. Can you specify, who do you mean by modern Orthodox Prophets?

@russianchristianity Every sector of contemporary Christianity has active voices that deploy scripture and dreams/visions to provide warnings or directions for the trials of our day. Call them mystics or prophets, they have an uncanny ability to decipher the spiritual conditions of our era. There must be such mystics in the Russian Orthodox community, ( as there is in the Syrian, Coptic, Ethiopian, South African, Latin, Greek Orthodox Monasteries ) , and in other sister churches like those in the China Underground House Churches?

I believe, a prophet is a very particular concept in Orthodox theology. That's why I'm asking. As for active voices, startsty, etc, that's an interesting subject. I briefly mentioned it in one of my videos (ruclips.net/video/eRE5SGhlk5I/видео.html), yet you're right, more can be said about it.

Thank you for your support

Absolute true. In some of my comments I mentioned BLESSED PATRIARCH PAVLE - who was accused of cooperation with Milisevic. God glorified him

@@alexandermarkus9587 it's true. And they conveniently "forgot" to apologise to him when he also faithfully cooperated with the regime which toppled Milosevic, afterwards!

And it seems that peoples pasts, in an inconceivable situation, are being held against them too strictly possibly.

@markeedeep, because this channel is about Christianity in Russia. But I also posed the same question about Russian Baptists: ruclips.net/video/lXAhEwaxjTQ/видео.html