Design Optics Fast
Design Optics Fast
  • Видео 19
  • Просмотров 80 132
Relay Lenses
There's an important trick to designing relay lenses especially when the chief ray angle at the image plane is high. You have to pay attention to how the exit pupil of the primary lens is matched to the entrance pupil of the relay lens. We go into gory detail!
0:00 Introduction
02:10 Cute Corporate Jingle
02:17 What could possibly go wrong?
07:34 Aperture of the Relay Lens
10:09 Pupil Imaging with a Field Lens
11:42 Designing the Relay Lens
14:20 Designing the Field Lens
18:53 Combining the Primary, Field and Relay Lenses
20:49 Summary
Просмотров: 3 558

Видео

Quick Wins: Landscape Derivatives
Просмотров 1 тыс.3 года назад
A one minute summary of the 16 minute video on Landscape Derivatives See ruclips.net/video/1rC7mULKB7A/видео.html for the full thing!
Landscape Derivatives
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.3 года назад
The humble Landscape Lens is one of the most widely used optical systems in the world. This video shows how it can be modified to provide good imaging for a variety of applications. Watch this first: How to Optimize the Landscape Lens with Zemax OpticStudio ruclips.net/video/YN6gTqYVYcw/видео.html 0:00 Intro 00:46 Jingle 00:53 The Reverse Landscape 04:45 Adding an Aspheric Surface 07:40 Vignett...
Quick Wins: Summary of Optimizing the double Gauss Lens with Zemax OpticStudio
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.3 года назад
A one minute summary of the 19 minute video for the truly time crunched.
Optimizing the double Gauss Lens with Zemax OpticStudio
Просмотров 3,8 тыс.3 года назад
The double Gauss lens is a key design, and we discuss some important design constraints as well as how to use High Yield Optimization to provide design for manufacturability. Introduction: 0:00 Cute Corporate Jingle: 0:39 Setup: 0:47 Optimizing: 6:03 Review: 9:52 High Yield Optimization 13:42 Summary 17:52 Zemax and OpticStudio are trademarks of Zemax LLC, www.zemax.com
Quick Wins: How to Optimize the Cooke Triplet with OpticStudio
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.3 года назад
A 1 minute summary of the 16 minute 'How to Optimize a Cooke Triplet with OpticStudio' video, for the truly time-crunched
How to Optimize the Cooke Triplet with OpticStudio
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.3 года назад
We continue to study the Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems by using Zemax OpticStudio to design a Cooke Triplet lens. Contents: Introduction: 0:00 Cute Corporate Jingle: 0:35 Setting up the System: 0:42 Optimizing the System: 6:15 Bonus-Productionizing: 11:52 Summary 16:13 Zemax and OpticStudio are trademarks of Zemax LLC, www.zemax.com
Quick Wins: Optimize the Color-Corrected Landscape Lens // OpticStudio
Просмотров 4713 года назад
A 2-minute summary of a 9 minute video on optimizing the Color-Corrected Landscape Lens using Zemax OpticStudio. Part of the 'Optimizing the Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems' series. Not sure what happened to the audio quality, it sounds like I'm underwater! 00:00 Start 00:03 Edit the Template 00:08 Optimize 00:15 Analysis 00:34 Glass Selection 01:08 Summary of the Summary for the truly impatien...
How to Optimize the Color Corrected Landscape with OpticStudio
Просмотров 2 тыс.3 года назад
This video shows you how to use Zemax OpticStudio to optimize the second of our Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems, the Color-Corrected Landscape Lens 00:00 Start 00:06 Introduction 00:40 Shameless Corporate Branding :-) 00:49 Setup 01:33 Optimization 02:00 Analyze 03:27 Glass Selection 06:17 Specification 07:11 Summary 08:24 Summary of the summary for the truly impatient Zemax and OpticStudio are...
Quick Wins: A Summary of "Optimizing the Landscape Lens using Zemax OpticStudio"
Просмотров 6643 года назад
A 3-minute summary of a 20 minute video on optimizing the Landscape Lens using Zemax OpticStudio. Part of the 'Optimizing the Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems' series. 00:00 Start 00:03 Specification 00:17 Setup 01:00 Easily Scalable Template 01:10 Optimization 02:00 Analysis 02:31 Summary of the Summary for the truly impatient Zemax and OpticStudio and trademarks of Zemax LLC, www.zemax.com
How to Optimize the Landscape Lens with Zemax OpticStudio
Просмотров 5 тыс.3 года назад
This video shows you how to use Zemax OpticStudio to optimize the first of our Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems, the Landscape Lens 00:00 Start 00:10 Introduction 00:46 Specification 02:40 Shameless Corporate Branding :-) 02:49 Setup 07:20 Saving the Landscape Template 08:00 Optimization 14:26 Analyze 17:50 Summary 20:27 Summary of the summary for the truly impatient Zemax and OpticStudio are tr...
Bonus video: UI Tweaks in OpticStudio
Просмотров 9063 года назад
I like to tweak the OpticStudio UI for specific projects, and as I'm writing the Optimizing the Basic Shapes Series right now I htought I'd show how I customize the UI for best productivity and also for best viewing via RUclips. Zemax and OpticStudio are copyright of Zemax LLC www.zemax.com
Quick Wins: Where Do You Start in Imaging System Design Summary
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.4 года назад
No sound or captions, video only. Here's a 3 minute summary of my 20 minute video on Where Do You Start with Imaging System Design. View the whole video at ruclips.net/video/hKb_mH76VG0/видео.html Zemax and OpticStudio are registered trademarks of Zemax LLC. www.zemax.com/
Quick Wins: The Auxiliary Optics Used with the Basic Shapes Summary
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.4 года назад
No sound or captions, video only Here's a 2:43 summary of my 20 minute video on The Auxiliary Optics that are used with the Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems. View the whole video at ruclips.net/video/RN2w7deEKRg/видео.html Zemax and OpticStudio are registered trademarks of Zemax LLC. www.zemax.com/
Quick Wins: Basic Shapes Imaging Part 1 Summary
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.4 года назад
No sound or captions, video only. Here's a 1:49 summary of my 20 minute video on The Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems. View the whole video at ruclips.net/video/RhIRUtR0l6I/видео.html Zemax and OpticStudio are registered trademarks of Zemax LLC. www.zemax.com/
Where Do You Start? Basic Imaging System Setup in Zemax OpticStudio
Просмотров 25 тыс.4 года назад
Where Do You Start? Basic Imaging System Setup in Zemax OpticStudio
Part 2: Auxiliary Optics for the Basic Shapes
Просмотров 5 тыс.4 года назад
Part 2: Auxiliary Optics for the Basic Shapes
The Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems: Part 1
Просмотров 11 тыс.4 года назад
The Basic Shapes of Imaging Systems: Part 1
Welcome to DesignOpticsFast!
Просмотров 5 тыс.4 года назад
Welcome to DesignOpticsFast!

Комментарии

  • @ifeanyichukwuOkonkwo
    @ifeanyichukwuOkonkwo 13 дней назад

    Thanks for this video. It is really insightful!

  • @tgepl2069
    @tgepl2069 24 дня назад

    I also have to thank you for this. It is a lot of fundamental and subtil concepts which are packed in this 20 min + videos.

  • @norcal5040
    @norcal5040 25 дней назад

    I'm sure you're probably getting tired of hearing this, but thank you! I've been through the Fundamental Optical Design book, Coursera's/UC Boulder's online certificate program, pencilofrays, Jena lectures, just about every RUclips video I could watch on this stuff, forums, and your videos have been, by a very large margin, the most helpful. It's insane how advanced optical engineering is, but you manage to cherry pick exactly what is important, and share it in a way anyone can understand. For me, I think we both know, I still don't know lens design, but I feel your videos have put me in a position to at least start on lens design, encounter those road blocks, figure out how to overcome those obstacles, and learn how you're supposed to. This is in stark contrast to what usually feels like being taught an entire language, with all the nuance, and having no idea it's for communicating. Just a breathe of fresh air watching these videos, kudos to you man! Hope you're enjoying your retirement!! You deserve it.

  • @AnthonyJRobotics
    @AnthonyJRobotics 3 месяца назад

    Great video. Thank you very much! Am I correct to say that if the lens I'm designing only concerns a very narrow field of view, then it is ok to use a simple relay lens e.g. an achromatic pair?

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 3 месяца назад

      It could be. Look at the chief ray angle to see how quickly the rays diverge from the image plane. It's the chief ray rather than the field of view: a telecentric lens may not need a field lens but could still have a wide field of view

    • @AnthonyJRobotics
      @AnthonyJRobotics 3 месяца назад

      @@marknicholson5508 Thank you!

  • @bea722000
    @bea722000 4 месяца назад

    Great videos to connect optics knowledge with a software. Thank you for sharing back your knowledge. Please kindly post : when is part3:Mobile phone lenses coming. Also Please cover A- Telecentric lenses along with use of features in Zemax system explorer like how to correctly setup AFocal system, telecenteric lens... B- please have video on Optimization tab features what each means and C- please go through Analysis tab on what each features mean. Thank you so much

  • @susasassasah2379
    @susasassasah2379 5 месяцев назад

    Hi,Mr Mark Can you help me please to check my system correctly?

  • @susasassasah2379
    @susasassasah2379 5 месяцев назад

    🎉amazing 👏

  • @utube321piotr
    @utube321piotr 6 месяцев назад

    Wow, outstanding videos, and what I was looking for. Thank you for sharing, my photography and lens understanding journey just got some better "illumination".

  • @francisfrancis4219
    @francisfrancis4219 10 месяцев назад

    With the likes of an air spaced doublet, do you actually need the large refractive index difference between the air and the glass? Or might you be able to use an intermediate index optically transparent medium like an immersion oil or Canada balsam to help reduce reflections? Perhaps a balsam type cement would also mechanically secure required placement.

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 10 месяцев назад

      Well, add an index-matching layer between the elements and it becomes a cemented doublet, not an air-spaced doublet. But the power of a surface is (n2-n1)/R, so yes making n2 = 1 and n2 ~1.5 gives you a lot more power than using intermediate values

  • @francisfrancis4219
    @francisfrancis4219 10 месяцев назад

    Is there readily available software to make lenses on a CNC machine (similar to how freeform spectacle lenses can be made)?

  • @AlexanderMarchenko-y1z
    @AlexanderMarchenko-y1z 11 месяцев назад

    thank you for the videos! is it possible to download these sketches in high quality somewhere?

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 11 месяцев назад

      I'd just do a screen grab of the final page. I don't have these in higher than HD resolution anyway, so a screen grab will be as high a resolution as it gets.

  • @yolklab
    @yolklab Год назад

    wonderful! thank you very much

  • @dairaoptical
    @dairaoptical Год назад

    sir if the object close to lens or object as a self luminous components like an LED then which type of aperture will use ?

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 Год назад

      You can use all of the available types, but since the object is so close to the pupil you should use cos^3 *apodization* of then pupil to correctly describe the illumination across the pupil.

    • @dairaoptical
      @dairaoptical Год назад

      @@marknicholson5508 you make me happy by replying thank you so much sir can i ask more question ?

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 Год назад

      @@dairaoptical sure. Just post here.

  • @dehualiu2966
    @dehualiu2966 Год назад

    waiting for your wide angle lenses tutorial

  • @物理学就是上帝
    @物理学就是上帝 Год назад

    Listen man. Getting taught by the ex-CEO, completely free, as an undergraduate student in applied physics, is of immeasurable value. A big thank you!

  • @rishabdasgupta3073
    @rishabdasgupta3073 Год назад

    Thanks for the video mark!

  • @qingfengli6981
    @qingfengli6981 Год назад

    Thank you very much for such a great video! Waiting for a similar one talking about the condenser lens ;)

  • @AvijitPrakash
    @AvijitPrakash Год назад

    Hi Mark, Thanks for the wonderful video. Can you please do a video on the design of microscope objective lenses?

  • @seongjunpark7742
    @seongjunpark7742 Год назад

    Thank you for wonderful lecture!! Hope you post again

  • @dehualiu2966
    @dehualiu2966 Год назад

    Hope you can post more videos like this!

  • @INCYTER
    @INCYTER Год назад

    Such a great video. Thank you!

  • @broadcastblk
    @broadcastblk Год назад

    Welcome back after 2 years!🎉 Great video. Thanks for the explanation!

    • @INCYTER
      @INCYTER Год назад

      You were missed, Mark!

  • @roniansiew3319
    @roniansiew3319 Год назад

    Well done!

  • @AvijitPrakash
    @AvijitPrakash Год назад

    Very helpful. Thank you! very much

  • @alexiseymery3441
    @alexiseymery3441 Год назад

    Thank you very much for your video! It's very helpfull!

  • @DeepakKumardthepok
    @DeepakKumardthepok Год назад

    Hi sir, Can you please share all the slides provided in summary part of the video, it will help us to practice in real life and follow your notes step by step. Thanks !!

  • @alien0013
    @alien0013 Год назад

    Hi Mark, this is a great video not only in the main substance but also in the nifty tricks.. I just watched this video but I'll watch all of your videos for sure. I also have a specific question re cooke triplet. Is it possible to design a cooke triplet with about 100x demagnification, let's say taking object size of 20 mm and making it 0.02 mm. The design does not have to be necessarily compact. I'm just wondering if there is a principle problem with this much magnification power. As far as I can tell, for cooke triplet to work, it needs to somehow have some symmetry in power of the lenses and this would make it not a good design for high magnifications. Thanks!

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 Год назад

      It's always a question of what the performance specification is. Cookes are a good choice for mid-field (say 40 degree field). Best bet is to try it...if it outperforms our spec try two lenses instead ion three, if it underperforms try maybe a Tessar (make the rear lens of the Cooke a doublet)

  • @anilkumaryadav4357
    @anilkumaryadav4357 Год назад

    Is there any constraint which tries to restrain the desired fov in the given detector size or at image surface? If any can you suggest the operand. Thanks.

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 Год назад

      Sure. Use REAY to have the desired image height on the image (or any other) surface

  • @anilkumaryadav4357
    @anilkumaryadav4357 Год назад

    If softwares like zemax can optimise and give rise to best possible lens then why one need to add multiple lenses why can't we work with single lens as the ultimate goal is to have proper focus?

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 Год назад

      Hi Anil. The point is that a certain shape can only do so much with a given field and wavelength range. If you need more than a single can give, you have to provide more degrees of freedom. These can be extra surfaces, or aspheric coefficients, or maybe diffractive surfaces. Within the Basic Shapes series I'm keeping to spherical optics and showing how any why more complex shapes give better performance

    • @anilkumaryadav4357
      @anilkumaryadav4357 Год назад

      @@marknicholson5508 Thanks. It was helpful to understand.

  • @SuperChloroplast
    @SuperChloroplast Год назад

    Hi, I am new to Zemax, I just got a job ( first after my PhD) as an optical engineer working with microscope designs. Question: (1) what fits better to my new profession Zemax or Zemax OpticStudio or maybe there are the same; (2) which tutorials I should watch at the beginning - any suggestions? thanks

  • @wagnernascimento2819
    @wagnernascimento2819 Год назад

    This series is amazing, would love to see more of it. I've been always curious on how a focusing system is designed for a lens to be able to used effectively at landscape and portrait distances.

  • @michacwika7798
    @michacwika7798 Год назад

    You didn't explain how was the merit function prepared

    • @anilkumaryadav4357
      @anilkumaryadav4357 Год назад

      Mostly this is prepared automatically based on the constraint selected in merit function wizard. But if you want to add more constraint to your design you have to be clear what optimization you require in your design like what is the target value one is looking for and what will be weightage to that constraint while optimising. But yeah it will be better if we can get an example from MARK himself, It will be helpful. Sir please consider it for a new video.

  • @viorelnegoita
    @viorelnegoita Год назад

    Hi Mark, thanks for these videos. Did you post Part 3: Mobile Phone Lenses? Thanks

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 Год назад

      Not yet...that one is coming. I really need to sit down and do more of these...

    • @viorelnegoita
      @viorelnegoita Год назад

      @@marknicholson5508 These videos are excellent, please continue. Thank you.

  • @thiagoc.
    @thiagoc. 2 года назад

    So, as I understood it, the number of rings is set to 5 because the optimizer can use higher degree aberrations to compensate for the lower ones, and for this reason, an attempt to control the aberrations manually would not be as efficient as when done by the automatic optimizer. Thank you for the video. It's really appreciated!

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 2 года назад

      It's my pleasure, thank you. The optimizer is reducing the RMS spot size, and the question is, how many rays do we need to trace to get an accurate representation of the RMS spot? Grids of fixed size suffer from sampling issues, and so you find yourself tracing more rays than needed. Gaussian quadrature works by fitting the rays traced to a polynomial of fixed order, so that as long as this order is higher than the highest radial order of the pupil then we can guarantee that we will accurately measure the RMS spot. In general, n rings will compute the RMS wavefront or spot of a system where the highest order aberration is r^(2n-1). We optimize the RMS spot size to be as small as possible, rather tan optimizing the aberrations directly.

  • @josehelderfacundosevero9589
    @josehelderfacundosevero9589 2 года назад

    Dear Mark, very nice videos. I watched them all and learned a lot. Don't you have plans to make some videos about tolerance?

  • @timzz8897
    @timzz8897 2 года назад

    such an underrated channel.

  • @paolodomingo3571
    @paolodomingo3571 2 года назад

    fantastic overview! thanks! just discovered your channel! as a young aspiring optics designer this is a real treasure trove!

  • @红袖先生
    @红袖先生 2 года назад

    Excellent series,Hope you can update more videos!!!!

  • @jacekwojtanowski2922
    @jacekwojtanowski2922 2 года назад

    Mark, what's going on? Why no more tutorials? Will you be back?????

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 2 года назад

      Don't worry, I have a few more in the pipeline :-)

  • @sunilchaubey7429
    @sunilchaubey7429 2 года назад

    Beautifully described.... Nice to see you here Mark

  • @samizhr4096
    @samizhr4096 2 года назад

    Mark, I am grateful for your guidance. Such a great series in optics and practical design. this is the third time I watch all of your videos. hope to see more coming soon. Thank you !!!

  • @weirdtechresearch
    @weirdtechresearch 2 года назад

    Great help for beginners like me!

  • @weirdtechresearch
    @weirdtechresearch 2 года назад

    Very nice videos

  • @dfperrault
    @dfperrault 2 года назад

    I was not able to reproduce your results after optimization. I think I reproduced your original file accurately. Any suggestions. Can you look at my original file?

  • @INCYTER
    @INCYTER 2 года назад

    What wonderful insights. Thank you!!

  • @joaquingomez1086
    @joaquingomez1086 2 года назад

    Please a video optimizing the Tessar lens

  • @anoopvarghese9310
    @anoopvarghese9310 2 года назад

    Hi Mark! I tried to make magnifying lens with the lens data on your video but the radius of the 3rd surface keeps changing to "Infinity" after I give the value -180.11|F. Why is that happening? Please help me.

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 2 года назад

      Make sure you have put a glass on that surface

    • @anoopvarghese9310
      @anoopvarghese9310 2 года назад

      @@marknicholson5508 I gave exactly the same values as in your data. Could you please tell me what was the aperture setting you gave? And also what is the value for F/# for Radius of surface 3?

  • @rerewewrwrwrw
    @rerewewrwrwrw 2 года назад

    I am really grateful that a channel like this exists, for an amateur hobbyist this really accelerates my understanding for experimentation. Lots of nagging questions answered in one. I hope you do more!

  • @himansupattanaik1902
    @himansupattanaik1902 3 года назад

    Thank you for such a great initiative. I would like to zoom lens design with off-the-shelf lenses. How to start with the chosen lenses and how we can substitute a different lens to have a better performance. Or in general optimization of imaging systems with off-the-shelf lenses.

    • @marknicholson5508
      @marknicholson5508 3 года назад

      Thank you very much. The general method for designing with off-the-shelf lenses is to design the best possible system the way I describe in this series, and then swap out lenses for off-the-shelf lenses of equivalent power. Note however that OTS lenses tend to come in fairly limited shapes, mainly plano-curved or bi-curved. This generally means you need more lenses in the system than you would if you used custom lenses. I'll be covering this in 2022.

  • @jaredvancor7227
    @jaredvancor7227 3 года назад

    This video and the next one are part of "extra materials" in an Optics Studio training I am doing. You do an amazing job Mark, this videos are excellent! Thanks so much for your contribution to my learning! Looking forward to watching the rest of your videos.