Cribbage with J
Cribbage with J
  • Видео 9
  • Просмотров 122 507
Finding the best playing/pegging hands | Cribbage Strategy
I wrote a program to run a Monte Carlo simulation of 1 million cribbage hands, in an attempt to find the best playing/pegging hands.
This site validates my pone-to-dealer pegging ratio of 60%:
www.cribbage-play.com/cribbage_hands.shtml
Просмотров: 2 767

Видео

Should Double Runs Always Be Kept? Here's The Answer | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 9 тыс.3 года назад
In this video, the cribbage rule-of-thumb of "always keep a double run" is put under a mathematical microscope to determine whether it is fact or fiction. Music: "Random Selection" Composer: Pascal Tatipata
What You Need To Know About Cribbage Flushes | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 7 тыс.3 года назад
In this video I show the likelihood of getting a dealt a hand containing a flush, and why 18,395 hands represent nearly 90% of the 20 million possible Cribbage hands. The information in this video was adapted from the excellent book Cribbage Discards by Anthony Myers: www.amazon.com/dp/1389645894
Expected Average vs. Board Position: The History of Daily Cribbage Hand | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.3 года назад
In this video I show my analysis of 4,844 cribbage hands from the history of dailycribbagehand.org, what can be learned from this data, and how it can improve your Cribbage success. Daily Cribbage Hand www.dailycribbagehand.org/ "Cribbage Discards" 3rd Ed. - Anthony Myers www.amazon.com/dp/1389645894 "Play Winning Cribbage" 5th Ed. - DeLynn Colvert www.amazon.com/dp/B07JC48RCM/
Troubling Cribbage Hands - Ep. 2 | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.3 года назад
Episode 2 of Troubling Cribbage Hands, a series looking at the most commonly featured hands in the history of Daily Cribbage Hand (www.dailycribbagehand.org/) www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2021/01/08 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2018-11-18 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2017-04-22 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2016-11-02 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php...
Troubling Cribbage Hands - Ep. 1 | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 5 тыс.3 года назад
Episode 1 of Troubling Cribbage Hands, a series looking at the most commonly featured hands in the history of Daily Cribbage Hand (www.dailycribbagehand.org/) www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2020/10/09 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2019-05-10 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2017-04-19 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php?date=2016-11-25 www.dailycribbagehand.org/show.php...
Take Your Cribbage Game To The Next Level: A Quick Guide to the 26 Theory | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 36 тыс.3 года назад
A short overview the Theory of 26, and how it can improve your Cribbage success. Recommended reading: Play Winning Cribbage (5th ed.) by DeLynn Colvert: www.amazon.com/dp/0692136185/ The 26 Theory - 6-part series: www.cribbage.org/NewSite/tips/colvert10.asp blog.cribbagepro.net/2012/11/cribbage-strategy-and-board-position.html?m=1
One Thing EVERY Cribbage Player Should Have | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 32 тыс.3 года назад
This is a fantastic reference book for anyone interested in cribbage www.amazon.com/dp/1389645894 #cribbage #cribbagediscards
How To Make The Best Discard Choice For ANY Cribbage Hand | Cribbage Strategy
Просмотров 26 тыс.3 года назад
In this video I show how to calculate the optimal discard pair for any six card Cribbage hand, using basic math and probability, and a concept called "Expected Average". www.amazon.com/dp/1389645894 - Cribbage Discards: The mathematically best discard pair for every Cribbage hand www.cribbageforum.com/Discarding.htm - Cribbage Forum: An excellent source of information on Cribbage strategy, incl...

Комментарии

  • @alienrocketscienceshared8454
    @alienrocketscienceshared8454 7 дней назад

    But this does not help you play different. It only tells you the advantage points, not hownto get there.

  • @DanielBeaver
    @DanielBeaver Месяц назад

    Thanks, this was a very clear explanation.

  • @camc5483
    @camc5483 Месяц назад

    This seems like it's being over thought. The goal is to get as many points as possible, every hand, and as many net points when it's the opponents crib. It's nice to count first when you only have a few points to go, but it doesn't always work out that way. If every player is playing their cards right, this theory is moot. I don't understand how it gives an advantage.

  • @Ryan98063
    @Ryan98063 2 месяца назад

    I play crib for 3 hours every day I'm not working. And I mean every day

  • @dankudlicki1030
    @dankudlicki1030 3 месяца назад

    Okay, im just starting, how do you make those decisions/calculations within 3 seconds?

  • @bluzharpin20
    @bluzharpin20 4 месяца назад

    Thank you for this excellent explanation!

  • @davidhilton1054
    @davidhilton1054 4 месяца назад

    I just got a crib flush last night and I almost couldn't believe my eyes. In cribbage, I find flushes to be alluring because they are relatively strong in Poker, but I always remind myself... I'm not playing Poker!

  • @fancen
    @fancen 6 месяцев назад

    simple

  • @rogerkearns8094
    @rogerkearns8094 6 месяцев назад

    I chose AJ.

  • @Jenjenn0710
    @Jenjenn0710 6 месяцев назад

    Save the As and the 7s 7+8=15

  • @yesnomaybe1220
    @yesnomaybe1220 6 месяцев назад

    Do you take pegging into account? I am only four minutes in.

  • @zacharygarland
    @zacharygarland 6 месяцев назад

    Great video. I seen at the 7:02 mark that dealer got to 120 points. I think this could be a rule in my area I live in only. But if you peg 120 you are in the sh*t hole as we call it. And the only way to win is to peg the point to win. Your points in your hand won’t count if the hand is played through and you can’t manage to peg the point.

  • @missusmoon3867
    @missusmoon3867 8 месяцев назад

    Love this book!

  • @jeffkitterman7191
    @jeffkitterman7191 8 месяцев назад

    Sometimes you keep your best counting cards- does your book cover that

  • @vsquare5653
    @vsquare5653 9 месяцев назад

    Just bought the book on Amazon. Thank you.

  • @superdow1000
    @superdow1000 11 месяцев назад

    To keep things practical, would be interesting to know the top 10 double runs that should be broken up on the dealer side and the top ten on the pone side. Also as mentioned below, one intangible to consider is the pegging value of the hand held....eg., the magic 11 can often result in extra points if retained.

  • @badnewsbears2868
    @badnewsbears2868 11 месяцев назад

    so would this be used mostly in a study situation or do you do all these calculations in real game scenarios

  • @sdrawkcab190
    @sdrawkcab190 Год назад

    I think you could have gone a step further in the research and compare how many points you'd be losing on average for always keeping a double run. In the example hand you gave, you're only giving up 0.63 points by keeping the double straight, and that's only when you're dealing. So on average that's only a 0.32 point mistake. It'd be interesting to see if that's consistent amongst the hands, or if there are specific ones where you'd be missing out on 2 or 3 points on average.

  • @Cuendillar777
    @Cuendillar777 Год назад

    Pretty sure you are double counting your 5 card flush hands and triple counting your 6 card flush hands with the way your are doing the math. Either way, interesting video.

    • @Cribbage_with_J
      @Cribbage_with_J Год назад

      I'm interested to know what you think the math should be

    • @itselith
      @itselith 26 дней назад

      I was thinking the same thing. When using the choose function you’re counting how many hands have *at least* 4 cards of the same suit. Within that ~20 million hands you’ll already have any hands that happen to have the other one or two cards in hand also match the same suit included in your count. Doesn’t change the argument much at all, just pushes you closer to a 1/10 chance for a flush but the same point still stands. Great video!

    • @Cribbage_with_J
      @Cribbage_with_J 25 дней назад

      ​@itselith Appreciate your kind words and similar to the other comment I left, I would like to understand where you think the math is incorrect. So here's a breakdown: 6-card flushes: We calculated the number of ways to get 6 cards all from the same suit. These are entirely distinct and cannot overlap with any hands with fewer than 6 cards of the same suit. 5-card flushes: We calculated the number of ways to get 5 cards from the same suit and 1 card from a different suit (39 choose 1, which is choosing one card from the other three suits). Since we're explicitly selecting 1 card from another suit, there is no overlap with the 6-card flush hands. These hands are distinct as well. 4-card flushes: Here, we select 4 cards from one suit and 2 cards from other suits (39 choose 2). Again, this cannot overlap with the 5-card or 6-card flushes, because we're specifically choosing 4 cards from one suit and the rest from different suits. [*If the calculation for selecting the 2 cards from the other suits was 48 choose 2, now this would introduce the possibility of selecting cards of the flush suit. But using the 39 choose 2 calculation mitigates this error and any potential overlap] Each case-4, 5, or 6 cards of the same suit-describes a distinct combination, and the calculations were structured in a way that prevents double counting. So, the math is correct, and there's no double counting of hands.

    • @itselith
      @itselith 24 дня назад

      ​@@Cribbage_with_J Ah, I was getting confused with how the choose functions were interacting to prevent double counting, you're right. My brain tried to shortcut by doing [13 choose 4] and then [48 choose 2] which would allow the 4, 5, and 6 card flushes to be counted in one equation but ends up overcounting because you've lost the guarantee that the [4 choose 1] is only counting the examples with matching suits for the 5 and 6 card flush cases. You could try to divide all that stuff off if your goal was one equation but it would get messy really fast, the way you did it is much simpler for the same result. Sorry for the confusion!

  • @rogerhughes4128
    @rogerhughes4128 Год назад

    It’s not too hard to count up the points in the hand, and see that discarding the 6,9 or the 2,7 are both equally attractive options for scoring. I’m seeing 15-4 and a pair for 6 getting rid of the 2, 7 to the pone’s crib, and the same in hand, while also a 2 point bonus to my crib, salting away the 6, 9. I can do that kind of figuring and I’m no math whiz. I guess I’m wondering what would make this a troubling hand. And also what percentage of players do we think are hitting the math hard with expected averages? My guess is approaching zero when looking at casual players, if there are very many of those these days. A minority of local club type of players? (Maybe a vast minority?) Most people who travel to a tournament? Is it worth traveling to a tournament if you aren’t conversant in the stats? How long would it take a normal person to be reasonably conversant with expected averages, and might your time be better invested learning sabermetrics or playing the ponies? Nice videos for people interested in getting better at cribbage, thanks. 😀

  • @Chewy_GarageBandDad
    @Chewy_GarageBandDad Год назад

    We’re both striving at the beginning of the game to either separate ourselves from each other or as the non dealer…limit the separation. Middle of the game strategy is to maximize your 3 hand to 1 hand situations. Obviously at about the 100 ish area you want the 3 hands and obviously the closer you all are to the 121 out, you would rather be the first to count. It’s certainly not cathartic or revolutionary. It’s sort of like me placing one foot in front of the other, calling it a step and writing a book called theory of walking.

  • @ArsLonga1967
    @ArsLonga1967 Год назад

    To put it simply for those that need it, when you have the crib try and score 16 and over total (pegging, show & crib) and try and keep your opponent under 10. When you don't have the crib try and score 10 and over total ( pegging & show) and try and keep your opponent under 16.

  • @Chewy_GarageBandDad
    @Chewy_GarageBandDad Год назад

    I'm so glad I found your channel.... But, that "if you remember back to math class.." comment cracked me up. I took algebra 4 times..LOL So, I can spit the quadratic formula or even pythagorean theorem. It wasn't a 'I cant do it' thing... its was a 'I dont like school thing.' This was early 80's also. Love what you are doing.

  • @Diego-wy4zo
    @Diego-wy4zo Год назад

    An old friend of mine did 20 years in the can, man oh man he is one helluva card player and when it comes to crib he wins 97.5% of the time. Currently he back incarcerated on a parole violation and isn't allowed to play crib because he used the crib board to hit another inmate over the head with and that is against the rules.

  • @jordanrutherford1
    @jordanrutherford1 Год назад

    You made the volume low so the old timers can’t hear - give use young bucks a chance at learning strategy and winning lol

  • @1969EType
    @1969EType Год назад

    So, I like this book…in the abstract. But, I don’t understand its application as a practical matter. There are over 18,000 possible Cribbage hands. How can a human being be expected to learn every “best discard” of 18,000 possibilities? Surely we would not sit down for a serious match with the book and consult the book on every hand? Not disputing the logic or the accuracy of the information, I just don’t know how to cram all of this in my memory…

  • @cottydry
    @cottydry Год назад

    Curious if there is any cribbage software that helps you learn theory of 26 by playing the computer. Something that gives hints when board position is critical so you can better learn playing offense/defense.

    • @rogerhughes4128
      @rogerhughes4128 Год назад

      Just check out where you both are located on the board. Check out the Colvert book for more information.

  • @TK-ni1pl
    @TK-ni1pl Год назад

    I use this book when I have free time. Deal out a hand decode what the best discard is and then look it up. I keep score to see how well I do. After doing Tis for a few months my game has vastly improved

  • @613trapman5
    @613trapman5 Год назад

    I will give away 4 points to the crib knowing there are 5 cards that could help me if I get my cut. I gamble it and most of time I do good! as long as your decent on the play in, you wont be sacrificing too much

  • @jorgenhalolo
    @jorgenhalolo Год назад

    I've just started looking at your videos and really like your clear explanations, thanks! I would like to watch them in the appropriate order, but are having some problems finding the suggested (chronological?) order. Can I suggest that you add an episode number at the beginning of each episode title 😊

  • @jollygrapefruit786
    @jollygrapefruit786 Год назад

    A 5 up your sleeve 😂

  • @ollieplayscribbage
    @ollieplayscribbage Год назад

    Thanks for sharing your computations and nicely explaining your methodology. Here's a couple other factors that you might want to think about for future computations. First, in a game we choose 4 cards from 6, which means that not all 4-card hands are equally likely. For example, 5TJQ is far more common than A38K. (An easy heuristic is: the more points a hand is worth, the more common it is.) In your loop, you could factor this in by weighting each hand by is score. Second, it seems a little strange to average over the dealer and pone. What if some hands really like going first and some hands like going second? Maybe it would be useful to know if there are any patterns for hands that are particularly good for the dealer or non-dealer. Third, (you mentioned it already but) a strategy for hands might be good to simulate and give more accurate values. On average, the dealer + non-dealer score from the play is closer to 5 than 4 (I think it's actually way more). If you don't want a hard-code strategy, you could use strategies that have variable parts like a 'prefered playing order' for each hand, or even some NNs or trees. But as you said, the optimal pegging strategy factors in what your opponent is most likely to have and that requires distilling a lot of information. Finally, maybe this was bait, but you said something about the non-dealer never leading a 5... I can't help myself! There are lots of times the non-dealer should definitely lead a 5 for safety. E.g. 5TJQ, if you lead the 5 and the dealer makes 15 with one of 9 remaining Ts, Js or Qs then you get your points back and avoid a lot of traps. Anyway, thanks for the very nice video.

    • @Cribbage_with_J
      @Cribbage_with_J Год назад

      Thanks for the comment Yes I mention "the non-dealer should never lead a five", but only as an example of a personal rule that someone might have. I didn't mean to suggest this is my own personal rule, or that it's a rule that everyone should follow. So yes, this is perhaps something I could've articulated a bit better in the video. But the point - and this ties into your comment about adding strategy into the simulations - is that this becomes extremely nuanced. As I mentioned in another comment, I didn't introduce any strategy into the simulations because I didn't want to influence the results with my own personal playing tendencies. I also don't believe there are any strategies in cribbage that are 100% applicable in every possible situation (even though I think expected average is a good strategy to employ most of the time), so this video represents just a purely numeric analysis, and a very brief one at that! Introducing situation-dependant strategy would take considerable effort to program, and the computations I've done here are only scratching the surface of what is possible. Also, www.cribbage-play.com/cribbage_hands.shtml claims the average total playing/pegging points in a given round is 5.6 . My figure is lower because my calculations don't factor in strategy.

  • @ollieplayscribbage
    @ollieplayscribbage Год назад

    Nice video. Looks like an interesting way to learn about discard averages. I'm curious to know if the book says much about flushes and how it recommends you use it. I'm also very curious to know how it compares to other tools, like C. Liam Brown's analyser. I suspect for experienced or improving players this book might be a bit of a red-herring since, in a real game, finding the best discard relies on the scores. But very cool to highlight it nonetheless

    • @Cribbage_with_J
      @Cribbage_with_J Год назад

      Thanks for the comment. Lots to unpack here. First, this specific version of the book doesn't cover flushes (which occur only 11% of the time) but I see the author has published an expanded version of this book which apparently does cover flushes. Second, C.Liam Brown's analyser is a great tool but I believe it's configured around a slightly modified methodology than the book (which itself is based on the cribbage theory outlined by Michael Schell). I haven't compared the differences between the two though. Personally, I prefer the book over online tools because to me a book is less obtrusive than using a device. The book may also be faster, and cribbage is a tactile game, and the book lines up better to that in my opinion. And lastly, yes you're correct - optimal discarding strategy involves consideration of board position (i.e. current scores). But as highlighted in my video on Daily Cribbage Hand, expected average is favored ~75% of the time across streets 1, 2 and 3, so what this means is, if you use expected average as a sole strategy (i.e. maximizing points), you're probably going to do just fine. Great comment, thanks

  • @osoyoosforever9643
    @osoyoosforever9643 Год назад

    Your videos are helpful and clarify some strategies. I wonder if there is an easy way to quickly calculate or approximate expected averages when playing ? It’s a lot of mental math otherwise 😢

    • @Cribbage_with_J
      @Cribbage_with_J Год назад

      The Addition Method outlined by Michael Schell is something that you could look at, here: www.cribbageforum.com/YourCrib.htm#addition . This "quick and dirty" method can be used to evaluate tricky discards by adding the hand value together with the expected value of the two-card discard, to give a general idea of which discard option is better. So it's certainly easier than calculating the expected averages, but this method does require having a good understanding of average crib values. Something to consider

    • @osoyoosforever9643
      @osoyoosforever9643 Год назад

      Thanks for the counting tip! I’ve read that before and will review again. The star method is an effective simple guide.

  • @Ebinsugewa
    @Ebinsugewa Год назад

    awesome idea! though it seems really really surprising that the highest incidence of ‘optimal’ strategy winning out is only 75%. assuming relatively decent players voting i would expect that to be much much higher. although the hands shown are ‘tricky’, it doesn’t seem that hard for a good player to pick the best option frequently. did you happen to think about that too at all during your analysis?

  • @Cribbage_with_J
    @Cribbage_with_J Год назад

    A volume-boosted version of this video can be viewed here: ruclips.net/video/AhT3fEONy2c/видео.html (I'm a slow speaker and recommend viewing at 1.5x speed)

  • @TwoBuckToll
    @TwoBuckToll Год назад

    Love the video. Something that would be interesting is the highest and lowest possibilities of your hand. That would help in certain situations, like I need to swing for the fences to go out before my opponent.

  • @CEverly
    @CEverly Год назад

    Wow keep the double run....mind blowing. lol

  • @Geoff_G
    @Geoff_G Год назад

    My thought is with that hand, it almost doesn't matter where on the board or what the score is. The only factor is whether you are dealer or not. The only time it could possibly matter is if you are opponent and you are both three or fewer points from the end so you hold with the idea you need to peg out before the dealer.

  • @Geoff_G
    @Geoff_G Год назад

    You are correct. it's definitely not a 100% rule. If you hold a 5, 10, J, J, Q, 2, and it is your opponent's crib, you need to look at net total points. To keep your double run, you would have to discard the 5 and 2 to your opponent's crib. Any hand that contains a 5 is guaranteed to have at least 2 points. That means your double runs 8 points are dropped to a net of 6 points. If you instead discard the 10 and 2 or Q and 2, then you keep 8 points, but there is no guarantee that your opponent's crib has points. There are other times, too, but this is a hand I was faced with tonight. Lucky me, the cut was a king, and I had thrown the 10 and 2, resulting in 16 points for me. Alas, neither J matched for the additional point. Good video

  • @kristoforgolden379
    @kristoforgolden379 Год назад

    I'm sorry but this is useless information. You wanna be the dealer...ok that's never a certain thing. Obviously you wanna be counting first if you're less than 10 out...but you can't just make that stuff happen.

  • @osoyoosforever9643
    @osoyoosforever9643 Год назад

    Its complex and hard to get working but I do agree that with the final position you can win the game from, 10 points back from 121 as non dealer and 16 points back as dealer. If you get there then you have a statistical higher chance to win the game, my experience is either situation will give you probably 10-20% higher chance to win. This is always my goal, to end in either of these positions as a dealer or non dealer and it works for me. Also, and maybe its partially due to this, if you start as the dealer you will end up with at least a 30% higher chance to win. Luck has a lot to do with it but if I start as a dealer or get into that final right position on the last hand at all cost I can win more games than just relying on luck.

  • @ianmasters4783
    @ianmasters4783 Год назад

    This theory is hard to understand on paper thanks for the upload

  • @stuckinchaselandia6427
    @stuckinchaselandia6427 Год назад

    Im sorry but it's not rocket science. You just need cards to make the most points. Strategy doesn't count for a lot in this game. Dealer is luck. The up card is luck. and as a consequence the crib points are luck. The only strategy if knowing the cards to discard. And to a very lesser extent, the order in which you play you cards.

    • @cottydry
      @cottydry Год назад

      I disagree. The more you play cribbage you'll realize there's a tremendous amount of strategy involved. In many games it can come down to the wire and squeaking out a few extra points along the way and being in the position to count first will make all the difference. You're actually strategizing three unique phases. Maximizing your hand /crib, your discard strategy, your play (which can be full of traps). Then there's the strategy of optimizing board position and knowing when to toggle from offense to defense. There's also the strategy of throwing away net points to enhance your own crib potential or kill your opponents crib. The best players are constantly estimating probabilities and knowing if they're running ahead of the curve or behind in board position. Cribbage is a brilliant balance of luck and strategy and you'll never stop learning the nuances of the game. I've been playing cribbage for many years and there's still a huge amount to learn. There's no greater feeling than when the game is down to the wire and your strategy (vs. luck) to get you over the finish line is successful.

    • @rogerhughes4128
      @rogerhughes4128 Год назад

      Outside of chaselandia, it is viewed as a game of strategy

    • @jeffkitterman7191
      @jeffkitterman7191 8 месяцев назад

      One bad careless decision with counting to 31 is frequently the losing factor

    • @Kpotter8390
      @Kpotter8390 Месяц назад

      Sometimes it's just the cards.

  • @gregpalmer3831
    @gregpalmer3831 Год назад

    Makes no sense to me.

  • @HuddleAroundGames
    @HuddleAroundGames Год назад

    This is something I'm still trying to get better at. Board position is something I need to work on. Love your stuff!

  • @juliannevanderhoop3459
    @juliannevanderhoop3459 Год назад

    so what if I am under by one on each ccz?

  • @Noah-qh4ds
    @Noah-qh4ds 2 года назад

    My gfs family is a big cribbage family. This is going on the Christmas list for them!

    • @jollygrapefruit786
      @jollygrapefruit786 Год назад

      Cribbage is a great game for bonding. I play it with my grandpa all the time. I find it's a great neutral setting to open up friendly conversation while also having something to distract from any potentially awkward pauses in dialogue.

  • @Dsiman654
    @Dsiman654 2 года назад

    Great video! I'm wondering about the best ways to put this information in practice while actually playing the game and recognize these situations when they come up. Are there any noticeable patterns to look out for among the small percentage of hands where it's optimal to break up the double runs? Like certain numbers where it's more common, or a certain amount of potential 15s to make it worth it?

    • @Cribbage_with_J
      @Cribbage_with_J 2 года назад

      Good question. Revisiting my original data, on the surface there doesn't appear to be any discernible patterns among the small percentage of hands, but a quick analysis shows the most commonly occurring card values to be 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. For certain hands, the optimal discard might be pretty apparent. For example: 5-5-5-5-6-7... for both dealer and non-dealer, the optimal discard is 6-7 for obvious reasons of keeping four 5's in hand. Other hands might be a bit more nuanced; for example: 3-7-7-7-8-9... the optimal discard for both dealer and non-dealer is 3-9 which breaks the double-run but ultimately results in the most net points. As dealer, some folks might be inclined to keep the 7-7-8-9 and discard 3-7 to their own crib, and while not a bad play (as I would argue 7-7-8-9 is a better pegging hand than 7-7-7-8), 7-7-7-8 has a slightly higher average hand value. Here's another: 3-4-4-4-5-8... is the optimal discard 4-8 or 5-8? According to the math, as dealer, it's 5-8 but only by a small margin - close enough that I wouldn't fault anyone for discarding 4-8 but mathematically 5-8 is better, even though it breaks the double-run. Here's a neat discarding resource that could be helpful: cliambrown.com/cribbage/?data=3H4C4D4S5H8DY. There's also the Myers book that I did I video on. Both excellent resources for discarding but perhaps not so practical while actually playing. I'll dig a bit more into this. In the meantime thanks for watching

    • @Dsiman654
      @Dsiman654 2 года назад

      @@Cribbage_with_J Interesting. So mostly middle cards it seems, which makes sense. Thanks for the reply! I appreciate the resources too. I just found your channel yesterday btw and watched all your videos, they're all very informative and I like the way you present the information! I think the trickiest part about it all is how to practically apply it in-game. Of course there's a lot of math and certain ways to calculate optimal discards, but it's not like you can go through it all while playing. But that's part of what makes the game fun, I think! I know it's been awhile since your last video but if you get around to it, I'd also love to see a video that focuses on pegging strategies. Like which cards are best for it, what to do in certain situations, setups, best practices and things to avoid, etc.

    • @Cribbage_with_J
      @Cribbage_with_J 2 года назад

      Here's another resource: www.cribbageforum.com/SchellDiscard.htm . Depending on your level of ambition, the addition method might be something to consider. Personally, I find that noting specific tricky hands I get dealt and looking up the optimal discard after the game (either on C. Liam Brown's site or via the discarding book) reveals patterns that, over time, can be learned and then applying that knowledge when a similar hand appears in the future. Pegging strategies - my last video started to delve into some of that, and I had some ideas I wanted to try to explore. But I don't know if I've been beaten to the punch: www.amazon.com/dp/1086039858/. I should check this out. Thanks for watching and for the kind words.

  • @georgeburdine5660
    @georgeburdine5660 2 года назад

    Cribbage, luck of the draw, and fiercely manipulative with your cards,make for one of the best 2 man games ever. IMHO.