- Видео 148
- Просмотров 249 523
OK3D
США
Добавлен 8 сен 2020
My Models Are Available At Cgtrader
Видео
Hanomag AL 28 Military Ambulance
Просмотров 983 месяца назад
www.cgtrader.com/products/hanomag-al-28-military-ambulance
Type 4 105mm Recoilless Gun
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.5 месяцев назад
www.cgtrader.com/products/type-4-105mm-recoilless-gun
StuG III F Assault Gun
Просмотров 3266 месяцев назад
www.cgtrader.com/products/stug-iii-ausf-f-assault-gun
3.7 cm Pak 36 Anti Tank Gun
Просмотров 4857 месяцев назад
www.cgtrader.com/products/37mm-pak-36-anti-tank-gun
Ordnance QF 17 Pounder Anti Tank Gun
Просмотров 4877 месяцев назад
Ordnance QF 17 Pounder Anti Tank Gun
Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf B (P) Heavy Tank
Просмотров 498Год назад
Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf B (P) Heavy Tank
Sd.Kfz. 251/9 "Stummel" Infantry Support Vehicle
Просмотров 181Год назад
Sd.Kfz. 251/9 "Stummel" Infantry Support Vehicle
Mitsubishi Ki-46 II Dinah Twin-Engine Reconnaissance Aircraft
Просмотров 572Год назад
Mitsubishi Ki-46 II Dinah Twin-Engine Reconnaissance Aircraft
fancy shmancy
Funny cheap made in china drone beating an expensive tank
Leobrans has become reality
M1a3 *Special* Equipment Package v4
I think I'll use this vehicle in a book
Will it have the same turret ring driver port weak spot. Will it also have modern equipment on it like spall liner, middle warning, active protection, and etc.
So how can driver get inside a Tank?
I had the honor of serving on this machine back in '42.
Man this is the guy that said funny things about a commander guy that die in a t-90m
@@Donteatnuggets huh
Looks kinda good, kinda wish the US army make like this ngl
Warthunder forums do your thing!
hstvl looking ahh
Ah, so I was coming from this video? But was the tank real?
That's cool. I don't seems to be able to find any info on this piece quickly Like, it should be taken into consideration, as from what I know, recoilless gun is pretty late war weapon (although the concept has been there since the 30s)
I think there can be 2 seats for the carriage Still, it's no where near any modern anti air platform
I saw the design of a flatform that contain everything in Russian 50mm mortar, French 50mm and German 50mm. That's good since lighter mortar can be aimed at being lighter. In heavier mortal like this, disassembly ability would be a good thing since a single piece of any part is already very heavy, and mortar teams never get a good amount of shell for a small number of men.
Thank you for the model. It was nice to know Like, it was first come to my knowledge that some cannon flatforms have this circular thing under the wheel, when I see the M119 cannon. I was calling it "cannon plate" as like mortar plate. If I remember right, the M102 have something like that too. It would be quite careless to learn just from Wiki and some RUclips video, but there is just no real explain on what with that design. It's so nice that the 25 pounder QF wiki has some explain on it. And I'm still thinking on comparing this and the D30 122mm platform. D30 is of course more heavy duty of a cannon, while M102 prove to be lighter solution
People used that much pod back then? Like I know Soviet and their D30 122mm which is unique not just to the world but also to Soviet artillery system, but it takes tripod.
Okay now show us the inside
героин или мефедрон
Lol remaking the entire turret? Doubt that
Spin
Make the actual M1 Abrams 💀
а как у тя будет водитель залезать в танк
Jesus Christ they made it bigger
massive neck jam
I gonna make this tank with LEGO on my channel soon
Abrams X isn’t even out yet 😭 🙏
Cool Leobrams
Is there a way i could use this vehicle
It just looks like a leopard or merkava at this point. I guess that means theyre peak design?
Knowing americans, they will make the turret asymmetrical and find every way to make the tank look like it was put together in a backalley garage
Leopard 2's turret is actually asymmetrical if you take off the wedges. Its clear from a top down point of view. Most tanks are actually asymmetrical due to needing space for the gunner/commander in the typical four crew configuration.
Most tank turrets are asymmetrical... Plus with urban combat, honestly camo nets made of trash ain't too bad of an idea
The Abrams objectively looks better than the Leopard 2A5+.
@@kronk9418 It is better in nearly every technical aspect save for weight, too. Ergonomically I would complain about its lack of loader safety (there is no breech guard for the recoiling action trunnion-lengthwise during firing) and driver seat. Awkward entry and egress.
nice tank bro unfortunately apfspds from side
is it even an abrams anymore?
looks like abrams and merkava if they had a baby💵💵
looks more like it'd be the M1A4 Abrams or perhaps the M1A4/A5 Abrams II
🤡
Gun shield for what… lack of APS… it’s not really on point
Bisakah anda membuat desain T52
So when are they finally gonna let go of the Abrams series and make a better tank
When some guy with 200 Iq spends a year trying to make a better tank design
very long because developing a new tank is expensive and US Army recieve less budget compared to its Navy and Airforce counterpart
@ and you gotta consider that coming up with a more practical tank design is hard
Gaijin when?
I came out from area 51 with him yesterday and im sure that M1A5 Abrams is real
Make new tank ❌ Upgrade a 45 year old design for the 50 millionth time ✅
I mean, that's what russians do The difference is that they just get a t72 and put tons and tons of ERA and additional armored boxes.
If it ain't broke don't fix it. Most rifles are 60+ years old now, guys at the Navy base still have M16s
@@SeanODea25 Are you sure it's not broke though? Against militants who barely have AKs and their best AT weapons are old TOW-1s bought from the black market - sure. But against an actual semi-functional army like Russia's, or worse, China's, i strongly question how effective they would be. Also with the rise of drones, the tank desperately needs a counter for those.
@@veniaminsinitski2910 true, they at least pretend to make new stuff though, and it has a huge propaganda effect, makes the country seem like it's far more advanced than it actually is. "Oh look at our mighty, futuristic T-14 Armata, while the Americans still only use M1A1 Abramses!"
The M1 abrams is still an incredibly effective design. It can be modified easily, has good survivability, has a good gun, and has good armor. It’s mobility is great, too.
More Spaced and Active Could a CIWS be adapted ? 😂
Add stand-off ERA on the blowout panels or cage armor as lessons from the Ukraine war showed drones attacking those areas can detonate the ammo on the thinner roof armor. Whichever is cheaper I guess if you want cost saving hehe.
I feel like the Era exploding could cause shrapnel to go through the thin plate and hit the ammo, we see that with BTRs A light spall liner and some cage armor would be effective
also add jammers
A new 8.7 vehicle
Haha, don't worry, they'd never give the US something overpowered like that.
Bruh
@@4tbf616 No, they have the HSTV-L sooo
@m16-a2 HSTVL is only op with a good player controlling it, most US mains are blind only second to German mains.
@@mattseller148 Yeah, thats a skill issue tho
Merkava , leopard and abrams hybrid ?
Design wise not bad its practical, but I think this tank will be heavier than the current M1A2 Abrams variant. You could add additional trophy systems in the back of turret near the bustle rack.
“I think this tank will be heavier than the current M1A2 Abrams variant” you don’t say?
This would probably be built off the M1E3 or AbramsX concept, which is supposed to weigh about 55-60 tons This would probably weigh 70-80 tons
The design is more perfect than the Abrams X
So true
lovechild of merkava and abrams
HSTV-L met with an Abrams
Ngl. Kinda looks more like an Leapord 2A7 crossbred with an abrams.
Looks more like the merkava and the abrams to me
@@NormalHatNothingWrong resembles like Type 10
@@Distressed_Asian true, it looks like all 3 of those tanks combined