Видео

Thank you! 😄

Thank you :) yes, it is a little gem.

Thank you! Hope you are enjoying the new toy.

Great. Thanks :)

Good question! I do not have experience with iPhone or mobile photography. Glass matters much more than any camera. D80 can produce amazing images when paired with high quality glasses. I would not use it with okay lenses like 18-55 or 18-105 variable aperture lenses. D80 struggles with low light and one can see the ISO grain above ISO 400. But I do not care about the 10 megapixels. With good glass and with good lighting conditions, it produces better images than any phone cameras. Personally I would pickup a D7000(if planning to use screw driven AF lenses) or a D3000/5000 series camera. These cameras produces better images in low light than D80. Best camera is the one comes with you always and in that case, mobile phone has it's advantages. Hope this helps and thanks for your question.

Hi, nice observation. This is what we see on the top dial, which is the manual shutter. With the electronic shutter, XT1 can go up to 1/32000.

@@sibinsibin amazing, good to know!

Thanks a lot :)

vielen lieben Dank :) sehr schön. X-T1 ist immer noch eine gute Kamera.

Thanks da :)

Thanks so much!

Glad you like them!

Thanks da :)

Thank you:) yes, it is underrated, probably due to the zoom mechanism.

Thank you :)

Mine is accurate when I set the aperture on the ring. If I set it in between 1.4 and 1.6 for example, sometimes it shows 1.4 and sometimes 1.6, but it is the same with the fujinons.

Thanks a lot :) yes, true value for money. I had an XT-2, sold it and bought another XT-1 for less than half the price as I could not find any difference in image quality. Tried an XT4 from a friend, same thing with that as well. I shoot mostly still subjects and use manual exposure. XT1 is perfect for my slow shooting.

@@sibinsibin it really is. If you're not doing video, the x-t1 is just beautiful!

Thank you so much :)

Thank you :) If you have X70, it is a great addition for the wide end without adding much weight.

Thank you so much :) and I am so glad that you liked the pictures. Good luck with your photography.

Hi Atul, the 14mm pics are from Fuji X70 with a wide angle adapter. I never used the XF 14mm, though I used few other prime lenses. In my experience, optical quality is always better on primes. But the range is nice for a 15-45 and the quality is decent when closing down the aperture. If you pixel peep or look closely, 14mm wins. But the 15-45 is flexible. You need to adjust to the power zoom, which can be tricky atleast for the initial days. Hope this helps. Greetings from India / Germany :)

Thank you so much for your kind words and I am so glad that the videos are helpful. This inspire me upload new videos! Good luck with your purchase. If you like 90mm view, there is no better lens in fuji in my opinion. Portraits coming out of this lens is marvelous, though I did not upload those in the videos. Have fun with the lens :) Best regards from Frankfurt

Thank you so much

Thank you so much

Thanks a lot! yes, it is a super combination of quality and lightweight. The word "Kit" probably does not suit much to this lens :)

Thank you so much :) same here, using it almost daily basis. yes, it's amazing what this camera can produce and the camera itself is an art.

Thank you so much :)

vielen Dank :)

Thank you so much :)

Thanks a lot. Yes with the WCL-X70, it is 14mm apsc.

Thanks a lot for your kind words. Yes, this camera is a little underrated gem which can produce really amazing results. I use standard film simulation almost all the time. But for the night skies I always use RAW format and then the film simulations can not have any effect. RAW files can be processed really well compared to the JPEGs for night photos.

Thanks a lot. I live in Frankfurt:) Fuji has deep shadows by default and one tends to compensate it and ends up in overexposed skies. I use polarized filter on sunny days. Usually I shoot jpegs with shadow minus 1(removes deep shadows a bit), highlight minus 1(preserve highlights/sky details), noise reduction minus 1(or minus 2 so that the details are kept instead of getting a polished image) and velvia minus 1 or standard +1. This can be set in the camera and gives a balanced image. If required with some slight adjustments, the quality can be boosted further. If these settings can not help with a scene, switching to RAW format helps further. And the most underrated thing in X70 is the small but amazing flash(due to leaf shutter) which syncs up to 1/4000 when the camera is in manual mode. This can be useful in some situations to keep the sky details. Hope this helps.

@@sibinsibin Thank you so much for your precise explanations! going to try soon! will keep you posted ;)

@@ivanarkhipov3306 That would be awesome. Sunny days are coming :)

I did not use tripod for these photos. Blurry pictures - It could be due to the low shutter speed if you do not have IBIS in camera. As a general rule, the shutter speed should be around 1/135 with this lesn to handhold. Some can do it better and some even need faster shutter speed. Check the shutter speed on your blurry images. You can do some test by setting the shutter speed to 1/200 or shorter (to avoid hand shake) and use a single point focus(to make sure that you nail the point where exactly you wanted). Hope this is helpful.

vielen lieben Dank, Grüsse aus Frankfurt :)

Thanks a lot for your kind words. I am an amature photograher. D5100 was my first camera and I used it almost 7 years. A true value for money camera :) When paired with good glasses, it can produce wonderful images. good luck with your photography.

@@sibinsibin Thank you.

Thank you so much :)

Thank you so much :)

Thanks. yes, there is a difference, but can not recollect how it was. What I remember is that it was difficult to use with both and the overall experience was not nice. Somehow I liked the 10mm than 16mm. With these the lens is no longer a normal lens as it can focus only the very close distances.

Thanks. Yes, mostly on the sunny days to get punchy colors and contrast though I do not use it in the late evening and night shots.

@@sibinsibin thank you.

Thank you so much. I never used it with a 23mm. In general, inorder to gain more depth, the subject distance needs to increase a little more and should close down the aperture than normal. I would use f4 or smaller(f5,6, 8 etc) aperture. Do not use the it at f1,8. Hope this helps.

@@sibinsibin Thank you! Waiting for mode video uploads!

I like it a lot as it is great even at F2. It needs stopping down only to increase the depth. It is really sharp and has high contrast even at the widest aperture of 2.

Hi ! Did you use a macro extender ? It looks very close indeed...! Have you compared it with the 80 macro ?

@@sessendojichannel5397 No macro extenders were used. Some of the images are cropped a little bit. Close focus is really great on this 90mm. I do not have any experience with the 80mm so far. Thanks :)

@@sibinsibin Ok thanks...! Very impressive results... 😊 It almost look like a macro lens...

Used a polarized filter for most of the pics. Except the moon rise shot, all other shots are jpegs with shadow -1, highlight - 1, noise reduction -1 and velvia - 1 or standard +1. Then most of the images are processed in lightroom especially increasing the contrast on the tele end. Thanks.

@@sibinsibin thanks thats amazing

Thank you :) There are no shots at 400mm, it should be the ISO I guess. The 2x teleconverter does not wok with 55-200 mm lens. It works only with 50-140 f2.8, 80mm 2,8 and 100-400 mm lenses.

@@sibinsibin Thanks my error. I have this lens and the XF50-140F2.8 both are great lenses.

Thank you so much :)

Thanks a lot :)

Thank you so much :)

Thank you :)