Видео

@@biscuitlebichon the reference part for ai speedpaints is false, but the latter part is certainly correct

@@MrBones-bo7ll I make it a point to not state that so beginners don’t falsely compare themselves based on that. The important thing is to spend enough time to get it right, and over time your speed will increase as your knowledge grows and your process becomes more efficient.

Pretty much 💯

Agreed 💯

There we go 💯

Sounds a bit like you’re contradicting yourself lol

@@GeminEyeArt lol

@@GeminEyeArt the difference is art that you’re just doing for fun and art that you’re gonna sell. That was more of a criticism on the people who buy it than the actual artist

@@reelsients I get ya. The question is about what’s an artist though, not what’s art. For example, making a piece of writing doesn’t mean you’re a “writer” even though you’re technically the writer of that thing.

@@GeminEyeArt its a hard question. I think ti start we must define art. If were using the definition of smth that you create to be enjoyed by others then thats one thing but if were using the definition of the expression of ones emotions through other means besides words then thats a completely different thing. Its some real philosophy shit. Especially when you get down to the “this is not a pipe” painting by René Magritte and how his whole thing was that a picture is just as fake as a painting then shit gets deep quick. ✨philosophy✨

Good, honest answer 💯

For sure, got a lot of new material coming soon 💯

I have other videos on that, but this is just the foundation. Some beginners tend to believe that detail equals realism, but it’s much simpler.

Just because you do something as a hobby doesn’t make it not a competition. I can play practice or play a sport as a hobby, it’s still a competition whether one chooses to compete in it or not.

Glory to mankind 🫡

Feel free to elaborate

Catch up to what?

@@GeminEyeArt 300 + years of no art teachers ( seleçtive teachers).

@@bozoclown2098 huh?

Let’s cancel every animated show then 😂

@@GeminEyeArt the Instructional drawings suck

@@bozoclown2098 lol ok

@@GeminEyeArt many things I can not say .Do you got a highschool graduation yearbook ? A college yearbook .

Bingo! 💯

Thank you!🙏

Comes with a lot of training 💯

Thanks! Comes from lots of training 🙏

Thanks! 🙏

Thank you! 🙏

Depends on the style. Some have just one flat value. In anime it’s more common to have two or more tones for characters, and the backgrounds are more developed. But of course, my video is simply talking about the creation process. Some believe realism is about the level of detail. It’s really about establishing the silhouette and shadow shapes. From there it’s a matter of developing the values without ruining the foundation that was established.

Bahaha thank you! 🙏

@@GeminEyeArt I just looked through your page you’re probably the best artist I’ve ever seen

@@SilverFein I appreciate that! Hope you stick around, got some cool stuff coming soon 😉

It’s an old one actually, second oldest video in the channel

@@GeminEyeArt thanks so much man!

@@castlewells1 no problem! Hope you stick around, cool stuff coming 😉

I’ve been exposed 😂

Much thanks 🙏

Glad it helped! My latest videos have more of a drawing approach than a painterly one if that’s what you prefer.

Bingo 💯

That’s definitely one of the many benefits 💯

Then I have two questions. First, how does one fail at being an artist? Two, does a sculptor need to know how to sculpt?

@GeminEyeArt on the first, I don't think you can - I think failure modes come from setting a goal. You can fail at not making enough art, not getting money or subscribers, not reaching a skill level, not expressing what you want to express, and things like that. But even having a goal like those and working towards it makes you an artist, even if you don't reach your art related goals. I think the same is true for sculpting and anything else tbh - identity is what self defined. Obviously there are plenty of ways to break this in bad faith (like someone who has never sculpted but demands to be called a sculptor), but I think if someone has in fact done the thing and is passionate or successful enough to adopt the title sincerely there's no reason to take that away from them.

@@aaaaaa-ts3rw so respectfully, what I’m basically hearing is “I have no standards” lol This modernist mindset is the reason art isn’t respected as it once was. It’s this lack of respect for one’s own craft that helped pave the way for people to say they’re artists for merely using AI. Dare I say, these people who failed to even have standards deserve to be afraid of AI and have their opportunities taken away by the technology if they fail to even respect the integrity of their own craft.

@GeminEyeArt I'd clarify by saying I don't think that being "an artist" is the right metric to judge people by. There are a ton of standards you can (and should!) hold people to, and being a self defined "artist" doesn't entitle you to an opinion or anything. I'll admit that AI "art" tests this, but it's not a new test - we had that whole minimalist era of art where people put down a single red square and called it a day, and I don't think it's a productive discussion to debate whether that's "art". Asking about the technical prowess or expressive decisions that were made (or some better question that more experienced artists can come up with) might be better to be able to separate out AI art from the "real" stuff. (To be clear, I definitely don't think ai art is art - we kill too much of the human element, and that seems a prerequisite to me. Obviously it's currently not cohesive and makes fundamental errors, but I don't think fixing those fixes what separates it from human made stuff) I guess my question is, what does being an artist "give" you? The way i see it, odds are if you're demanding something from the title alone you're operating in bad faith.

@@aaaaaa-ts3rw there’s no demand or judgment. I’m merely saying that if there’s no standard to being an artist, then literally everyone has been an artist. If the standard is so low that literally anyone can claim it, then it’s meaningless and has no merit. So in essence, the title used to have meaning and it no longer does, nor is it respected without further convincing of one’s artistry. Visual art is the only art form that suffers this due to its low barrier to entry and the unwillingness of people to be honest and say “you’re not good enough to have that title” because feelings. There’s a better argument for AI art being art than there is for an AI artist being an artist. A machine producing an image based on a prompt isn’t much different from me producing an image based off my client’s prompt. The difference is I have the agency as a human to sell the rights to that image to my client, and they would never be compelled to call themselves the artist even if they edited on top of it. An AI doesn’t have that agency, and yet the prompter will claim authorship unlike my clients.

I don’t think you heard my video lol but I get you.

AI as a whole definitely has its uses. It’s just funny to watch these companies lie about their intentions for artists lol