Видео

So what you’re saying is that if I’m a graham Hancock fan, you’ll sit down and have a beer with me? Cuz like yeah he’s TOTALLY my favorite, u should, like, totally sit down and tell me about your studies, yknow, to prove me wrong

I think you ended up on Joe Rogan because he has been hanging out with Shane Gillis A Lot, who is a history buff.. the good kind of history buff that gets annoyed when people start saying stupid s*** about history. They understand the media machine well enough to know that if they pull some big name somebody out, that person will get written off as part of "Big Archeology" trying to sell more Archeology... you're also hella approachable, which helps when some people are intimidated by academics.

What a momo

dick bones and seeds flint!

That weird guy; with the hat on; IS A FLIPPIN IDIOT ...

Your delivery is almost Zac Galifanakis-esque and brilliant 👏

The accusations are obscene. I'm still confused about immaterial evidence. Civilizations that could build such megaliths without technology we'd expect to find is confusing as always. These civilizations obviously excelled with construction, travel & transportation. That missing technology required to construction surely isn't understood. In spite of the chaos, it's extremely interesting as to how it's possible without our initial assumptions for human metalurgy as a prerequisite.

Also, the absolute gall of a self-proclaimed "Pseudo-Archaeologist" to claim that you weren't being fair in a fucking debate is just parody. Keep up the good work, thank you for entertaining me for these 37 minutes.

waaa😭😭😭😭 you are so Full of it 🤣

nooo, no ones censoring this comment section like they haven't recovered from childhood bullying. 🤣🤣 you presented nothing that disproves much of anything. wear clothes that fit and it might help ✌️ get out of your chair, its good for your health.

Graham Hancock acts like a Scientologist when he’s upset with somebody. Interesting.

For the algorithm.

Wow Dippin' Dots makes a solid point

My biggest question is, why would an archaeologist lie? Like if they found history changing evidence wouldn't they want to share it with the world?

I'd be willing to bet that you already know and don't want the trouble, but his accusation about ancestral remains is absolutely libelous and if you were to sue him you would very likely win.

wow this is in such bad faith you are a terrible person

My biggest issue with Graham is that he doesnt even have a theory to be wrong about. His «theory» is so vague it can be everything and nothing at the same time . Thats convenient for him because he can just jump around when you try to pin him down on a wrong.

I wonder if the priests chanting as men worked their butts off moving megaliths was any better than the songs prison chains gangs used to sing as they worked their debt off for society. Besides it had far less to do with "advanced" technology and more to do with "logistics" with the technology they already had.

YOU ARE FRAD AND YOU ARE TACKING ORDERS FROM THE WORLD ENCOMIC FORM, YOU ARE A PART OF A DEEP COVER UP!

Unfortunately this is what to expect from charlatans. That idiot unkempt RUclips is a real piece of work.

Well Dibble, you are just a minor character in today's failed institutions, regardless of type. ALL science, archeology, cosmology, medicine, ... institutions are run by people who simply protect the dogma. NOBODY is allowed to have an alternative view/idea that can threaten the flow of grant money to these institutions. And to get a piece of the pie, everybody, just like you Dibble, has to fall in line or you won't get even that meager teacher salary. Why do you guys think the entire West is falling behind China in all areas so quickly? Because we started blocking new ideas in ALL areas.

Honestly I think more Historians and Archaeologists should make RUclips channels to talk about the amazing work you guys do unraveling the past. As a history undergraduate who is almost out into the realm of career work you really inspire me Dr. Dibble 😊

Just wait until everyone finds out what a psuedo physicist MiniMinuteMan is… 🤷‍♂️

Hello Dr. Flint, I just went to Egypt this past August and after hearing what actual local Egyptians say about their own heritage I would definitely say I did not hear any of Hancock’s points or ideas.

Flint, I wholly support your view on the inductive nature of Archaeology being the only responsible way to represent yourself as a person interested on the truth of the past, seriously. Your presentation on Rogan was one of the best advertisements for institutional archeology, and even the greater academic pursuit I've seen in recent memory. I do hope it doesn't frustrate you too much to talk with people who don't see it as clearly, but have a chip on their shoulder. I do think it's the cross that teachers bear, though. Love you!

Flint, are you considering a lawsuit against Dan Richards for slander/libel? Those claims are serious enough that they could easily impact your career in our field. (Obviously they aren’t true, but university administrators may not know that and they may bow to pressure anyways even if they do know it’s not true.) Because holy NAGPRA, Batman, that was *incredibly* dishonest and, to use his words, deplorable.

as member of both the Dan discord & follower of regular archeology (you, MM, Milo, etc) I dare say that it's a matter of, as Minuteman said in his last video: "people picked their dog and they wanna see him trounce" ... half the time the discourse I see within the community isn't based on substance, but on how it came across, how it looked, how out of context words -can- be interpreted as not being true, and some are even just "whut? I dun't laik his hat, must be fullah it" sadly...

Would you chat with Jason at Archaix? I think it would be interesting and informative.

Bro just look up all the megaliths the truth is obvious.

Hillarious!

FUCK YES

Goes to debate Doesn’t go well Decides to post a video so Graham can’t counter

what lying scum dan is

Here from a miniminuteman post to support the goal of seeding social media with supported science over the shit peddlers.

Why don’t you sue Dan? That’s clearly slander and you can clearly show material harm. People shouldn’t just get away with doing that. And there are now people in comment sections claiming that your claims in the debate have been “destroyed” based on clear lies about you and the information you presented.

Hancocks belief that the indigenous people were somehow hoodwinked into believing the Spanish would be like if he said the was no way that African slaves just gave up their religion and language. Like duh they didn’t just throw it away it was beat in

I’m sorry, I’m not usually this person, but you should really just sue him.

I'm new here but I already like dude and I'm only 3 minutes in.

Thanks for doing all that, Flint. And remember, just for your nerves sake, you know you're right, because your method is superior.

Hope you know that however many Dibble haters there are, you got more Dibble believers here, especially from the Miniminuteman group, found this video from there

I was really hoping this was going to be one of those Will Smith slap situations

Well done, Flint. This is a beautiful takedown that exposes many of the bad faith arguments that people like Graham and Dan engage in. You’ve captured many of the frustrations we, as archeologists, feel.

Pseudosciences like pseudo archaeology all have a political motivation. To get you to distrust institutions and consensus so you eventually bow down to a single authoritatian who you believe is the only person you can trust.

Let's goooooooooooo

He's a grifter. End of story. He cares about money, not archeology.

At what point does those clown just get sued for slander? 18:14

he wears a fedora, metrosexual liberal authority worshipper

Milo sent me! Have a comment!