- Видео 5
- Просмотров 56 312
pizzacheeto
Добавлен 4 апр 2015
Ludwig van Beethoven: Piano Concerto No. 4, Op. 58 (Moravec)
An absolutely stunning recording of Beethoven's Fourth Piano Concerto, evident just from the opening bars alone.
00:00 I. Allegro moderato
17:17 II. Andante con moto
23:27 III. Rondo. Vivace
Ivan Moravec, soloist
Orchestra of the Vienna Musikverein
Martin Turnovský, conductor
Rec. 6-7 October 1963; Großer Saal, Wiener Musikverein
Scores used: Liszt's transcription (S. 657a/2)*, Henle Beethoven Gesamtausgabe (for the cadenzas)
* The piano part, preserved in its entirety, is delegated to the first piano. Both pianos are used for Tuttis; those in the first piano are marked and in small print.
00:00 I. Allegro moderato
17:17 II. Andante con moto
23:27 III. Rondo. Vivace
Ivan Moravec, soloist
Orchestra of the Vienna Musikverein
Martin Turnovský, conductor
Rec. 6-7 October 1963; Großer Saal, Wiener Musikverein
Scores used: Liszt's transcription (S. 657a/2)*, Henle Beethoven Gesamtausgabe (for the cadenzas)
* The piano part, preserved in its entirety, is delegated to the first piano. Both pianos are used for Tuttis; those in the first piano are marked and in small print.
Просмотров: 354
Видео
Beethoven-Liszt: Symphony No. 7 excerpt (Liszt's transcription in two versions)
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.Год назад
Here's a passage of Beethoven's Seventh Symphony which Liszt transcribed in a very unusual way (perhaps the most unusual of all the Beethoven symphonies) in his first version S463d from 1837. Liszt outright demolished the dotted rhythm of the melody in exchange for a fuller sound which aimed to, more or less, reflect the string tremolos. 0:00 - Original orchestral version (1812): Herbert Blomst...
Beethoven-Liszt: Symphony No. 9, transcribed for 2 pianos, S. 657 (McCawley/Wass)
Просмотров 52 тыс.Год назад
00:00 - I. Allegro ma non troppo e un poco maestoso 13:39 - II. Molto vivace 27:05 - III. Adagio molto e cantabile 39:10 - IV. Finale: Presto May of 1864, Madonna del Rosario, Monte Mario. After having transcribed for solo piano the first eight of Beethoven's symphonies and all but the last movement of the Ninth, an exhausted Franz Liszt could not find a way forward. In an unusual display of re...
![Prinz Johann Ernst von Sachsen-Weimar: Violin Concerto [No. 7] in G major (Bach BWV 592)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3gidigc8pBk/mqdefault.jpg)
Prinz Johann Ernst von Sachsen-Weimar: Violin Concerto [No. 7] in G major (Bach BWV 592)
Просмотров 730Год назад
0:00 - I. Allegro assai 2:25 - II. Adagio 4:38 - III. Presto This is a piece that many only know through J. S. Bach's transcriptions for organ (BWV 592) and harpsichord (BWV 592a). Prince Johann Ernst of Saxe-Weimar was a German prince who is a son of Duke Johann Ernst III. Despite the prince's early death at the age of 18, Bach has arranged at least four more works by him. At the time of his d...
Ludwig van Beethoven: Duet for 2 Violins in A major, WoO 34
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.Год назад
A short piece composed by Beethoven upon the visit of French violinist Alexandre Boucher. The manuscript is dated April 29, 1822. The score, which can be found in IMSLP, was engraved and edited by me based on the autograph manuscript housed in the Bibliothèque nationale de France. The piece was first published, with many mistakes, in 1901. Performers: Lukas Hagen & Rainer Schmidt / ruclips.net/...
None better than Ivan!
end of first movement is fantastic
Wonderfull, loved! 😍😍😍😍😍
Beethoven to 11 year old Liszt: "'You go on ahead. You are one of the lucky ones! It will be your destiny to bring joy and delight to many people and that is the greatest happiness one can achieve.” Liszt recounting the moment he met the maestro: "'This was the proudest moment in my life - the inauguration to my life as artist. I tell this very rarely - and only to special friends.'"
You forgot the fourth movement
There is no fourth movement.
@@pizzacheeto False. It's acutually a concerto in 4 movements.
@@ClassicalMusicAndSoundtracks You must be mistaken. No manuscript or recording of the work has a fourth movement - not even Bach's transcription does. This concerto might be numbered differently across different catalogues and recordings.
The biggest problem is that I don't have any friends to play with.
there's a solo piano version of this symphony check it out
50:45
I was wondering why the engraving and footnotes looked so beautiful, you engraved them yourself!
what notation software is this? I'd like to use it for my compositions, thanks!
LilyPond. If you like to listen as you compose, be wary that LilyPond does not have playback features. The score in the video was engraved in version 2.22.1, but the latest version is 2.24.2.
@@pizzacheeto thank you! :)
Liszt at his best I personally dont like Liszt but i have great respect for his deep sense of musical understanding He was so obsessed by Beethoven in moment of desperation he stated after Beethoven nothing new in the world of music.Was he right was he wrong we need an answer....
I believe what you are talking about is a quote from Schubert, who upon hearing the String Quartet Op. 131 apparently remarked "After this, what is left for us to write?"... from my understanding, this is apocryphal (I'm not sure who reported this).
Schubert too made same remark i think both were wrong @@pizzacheeto
Maybe thou shoudest try to like Liszt’s everything right now, and begin to learn his all works too.
I love listening to orchestral works in 'monochrome'. as it were. Try the 2 piano arrangement of Stravinsky's 'Rite of Spring'. It opens up new possibilities
Common timestamps, for your reference :) 00:00 - I. Allegro ma non troppo e un poco maestoso 12:41 - "Funeral march" ending 13:39 - II. Molto vivace 20:49 - Presto 27:05 - III. Adagio molto e cantabile 29:05 - Andante moderato 30:05 - Tempo I 31:43 - Andante moderato 33:53 - Stesso tempo (12/8) 39:10 - IV. Finale: Presto 39:46, 40:17, 40:32, 40:56 - Fragments of each movement 41:21 - Allegro assai. Famous instrumental part 44:14 - Presto. Callback to the beginning of the movement 44:23 - Recitativo 45:11 - Allegro assai. First variations invoking the voice 47:33 - Allegro assai vivace, alla Marcia. Turkish march variation 49:05 - Double fugue between variations of the "Ode to Joy" 50:45 - Famous choral part 51:37 - Andante maestoso 53:00 - Andante ma non troppo ma divoto 54:39 - Allegro energico e sempre ben marcato. Double fugue between the "Ode to Joy" and "Seid umschlungen" melodies 56:50 - Allegro ma non tanto 59:19 - Presto 1:00:10 - Maestoso 1:00:30 - Prestissimo (EDIT) With regards to the score: I'm planning to release it to IMSLP by Christmas break, so hopefully before 2024. Let's all celebrate this very special piece of music as we near the 200th anniversary of its premiere on May 7th, 1824. :)
thanks‼️
I’m confused, which Funeral March?
@@ShaunakDesaiPiano I've seen that part being compared to a funeral march. It is not an entirely accurate description, but the chromatic bassline does make it quite haunting.
@@pizzacheeto haunting indeed. Hey, I was thinking, you should upload more score videos of piano transcriptions of symphonies. There aren’t enough of those.
41:21 ode to joy
Thank you! I've heard the Liszt transcription for one piano. I always wanted to hear what TWO pianos can do!
Mio Dio... perchè piango così?
Astonishing performance.
Not sure I've ever heard the famous "ode to joy" section played this quickly. I like it a lot!
You could hear it at an even faster tempo in recordings of conductors who try to follow Beethoven's metronome marks. Zinman, Gardiner, Zander, Chailly, etc. - it might not be everyone's cup of tea but it opens up a new perspective!
@@pizzacheeto I'll have to check them out. Is the 80 metronome marking in the score Beethoven's? I'm actually clocking these guys in at about 85 - so they're surpassing even that.
@@christianatteberry6806 Oh, you were talking about the instrumental part near the beginning! (I thought this was about the 6/8 choral part.) Then yes, I think this recording would rank very high up there in terms of tempo for this section - possibly even faster than some of the performances I mentioned. The metronome mark is Beethoven's, and I think you're correct with this recording going over a little bit. Perhaps they thought the Allegro wasn't "assai" enough in that tempo? Haha...
Thoroughly enjoyed this
wow the second movement sounds so perfectly like it were written for the piano!!
idem pour le 3eme mouvement !
Eternal Congratulations! With a 1% of it going to Liszt. Although this piano version sounds horrible, one has to recognize that it conveniently captures the composition from the partiture for a better understanding of it, which would be very hard to do from the full partiture. I find this video ideal to follow after having heard the original symphonic version for a hundred times, and be able to read the two piano lines in real time without problems. This can explain how the orchestral music sounds like it does, and experience further admiration for the mind of Beethoven.
This 2-piano transcription is certainly a blessing! It was common to separate the scores of the 2 pianos in such arrangements but when Liszt submitted his manuscript to the publisher (Schott) he specifically requested that the two pianos be engraved on the same page (the style of which is reflected in the score used in the video). Alongside its possible usage for study, the justification can be found on the cover page of the first edition - Liszt had declared that an effective performance of the transcription may only be realized if both performers are aware of the full scope of the work. This manner of engraving was considered unsaleable and we have Schott to thank for pushing through with its printing. Extra points to Schott because when Liszt returned the proofs he noted that there were very few mistakes in the engraving!
great work. Congratulations and thanks for loading this up.
When will the imslp be available? Also, bar 205 in 4th movement has a wrong G note
Hi, thanks for reporting the error - silly mistake on my side. I appreciate it! As for the score, I can't tell yet. But I'll be replying in this thread again once I do
Thanks. I look forward to it
I have Liszt's transcriptions for Symphonies 6-9 for solo piano. That guy couldn't leave a single note to make it a little user friendlier!
Liszt never quite realized that the average customer for his published works was nowhere near as perfect at playing the piano as he was. On the other hand, why compromise? If it can be played, it should be played. ;)
@@Quotenwagnerianer I had to use my right foot in addition to my hands...
E una bergah
ode to joy starts here 50:45
41:22 I can play that too omg
Prodigy. I can't
“No transcription can make the piano sound like an orchestra.” Liszt: hold my beer.
Imo the orchestral version with the choir sounds infinitely better than this. This is as good as you can get with two pianos but it's nowhere close to the experience you get when listening to the actual symphony
@@Numberonesorabjifan relax dude. Of course it cannot sound THE SAME as the original, but Liszt sure did a hell of a job making the two piano version sound powerful. He really does use the full potential of the instrument, while writing it in away that is difficult, but playable.
@@Numberonesorabjifan No issue here - in the preface to the solo transcriptions Liszt made it clear his intentions of transcribing Beethoven's symphonies. In a time where orchestral music is difficult to access, Liszt wanted to popularize these symphonies, hoping that any effort by a conscientious transcriber - Liszt admits that his transcriptions are "mediocre" - could at least preserve some hints of Beethoven's genius. In transcribing these symphonies, Liszt cements himself as the foremost bearer of Beethoven's immortal spirit.
@@Numberonesorabjifanobviously two instruments isn’t gonna sound the same as 100+. But for two pianos this is as full of a sound as you’re gonna get.
you should check out gryaznov. his transcriptions are probably the best piano reductions in existence
Amazing performance..!! thanks for sharing
47:32 50:40 54:26 59:23
Wow! Bravo!
You don’t need orchestra when you got Liszt’s genius.
He he he ha
@@chamestb6632 grrr
… and two pianos. Also you do need orchestra to listen to the original masterpiece.
@@eldarsadykovIndeed.
I saw Wass perform Liszt's transcription of the 6th on a fortepiano at Wigmore Hall some years ago
Great!
Great performance of course This score is a bit dense though
물론
This is incredible!!!!!!!!
Here before this video blows up as it ought.
Yep me too
Awesome!
Great
Nice to see a score video of this piece