This cop needs fired if they believe a person's name has anything to do with an investigation no name will have anything to do with a crime if this is what cops train to these training facilities need shut down
Dude acted like a child. He decided to talk over the police and not listen to them instead of having an actual conversation. And his little threats about suing which everybody always threaten, but never follow through.
@@HJKampeThe thing about a free society is we are not obligated to talk to anyone we don't want to. Once the demand for ID was made, his 4th amendment right was violated. No crime was committed, so no right to demand he turn over his papers. Every time your ID gets run through the system is not to your benefit, it's not simply for their paperwork. The fact he was released by the sergeant shows the cops overstepped their authority. You are free to obey anyone you want, and surrender your 4th amendment right to be secure in your paperwork, but that's your choice, not an obligation
An argument does not constitute a crime; therefore, the cops were wrong and the guy was in fact unlawfully detained. I hope he does pursue legal action.
You would think but the courts will come up with something to make sure the cops are protected. They don’t ever let the cops be in the wrong because it makes them look bad so they’ll come up with some BS.
Yeah, he will take money from the taxpayers and the cops don’t care, because nothing will happen to them. That’s why this will never ever ever ever end.
No way that getting his ID will tell them what happened or whether he's guilty of anything in this situation. No reasonable articulable suspicion... No ID Tyrant!
Unfortunately, they don't have to recognize the constitution. Ever since the organic act of 1871, the USA became the US corporation and is and has been anything but UNITED. Some courts will at least act like there's still a constitution but, in case you haven't noticed, most don't.
The fact that a police department makes up that a call for service is justifiable reason to ID everybody is EXACTLY what is wrong with law enforcement and tyranny in this country. They swore an oath but their department makes and happily agrees to policies to violate our rights. Amazing.......
"They swore an oath" to their Freemasonic Jesuit god "Lucifer" to harass, alarm, distress and extort the "public" at every opportunity! "Matthew 5:34-37 34 But I tell you, don’t take an oath at all: either by heaven, because it is God’s throne; 35 or by the earth, because it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, because it is the city of the great King. 36 Do not swear by your head, because you cannot make a single hair white or black. 37 But let your ‘yes’ mean ‘yes,’ and your ‘no’ mean ‘no.’ Anything more than this is from the evil one."
That was GOD level conduct by this informed and free citizen who committed NO CRIME! This man was educated and armed with information because of these first amendment videos! Thank GOD for this movement!!!
Unlawful ARREST. Out of policy search of a male arrestee by a female, when a male cop was also present. Female cop admits "It's not a crime". A supervisor that arrived and changed the arrest to a detention. A supervisor that attempted to waffle, gaslight and lie his way out of the facts by presenting HIS interpretation of the law in order to deflect the inevitable court case. Well played. Keep calm. Gather all names and evidence. Film everything. Don't get crazy with cops at the scene. Save it and get crazy with cops when you put them in the dock of the court. A simple Letter Before Action demand for $5,000 should get a quick result. If they want to defend it, hire a lawyer and demand more money and a written apology from the cops concerned and from the PD (looks great framed and on the wall).
@@truman5838 I posted $5,000 because a low amount is more likely to be paid out compared to $20,000.... but hey, everyone can have their own idea of what they want.
He said feelings enforcement..... I love it. Sean was one of the first auditors I heard use this. T.T.A. smoothly says this, too. Love people learning from these.
*Even the sergeant got it wrong. Texas penal code 38.02 says you have to provide ID if you've been LAWFULLY ARRESTED. Not because they're investigating a possible this or that....LAWFULLY ARRESTED!!!*
They can’t force him to participate in their investigation you have the right to remain silent. But they take you standing up for your rights as being hostile and uncooperative. This is disgraceful.
They hand cuffed him without a crime. They searched him without consent. They tried to get id without a crime. Crime, crime, crime. Those officers need to lose their jobs. Do not put them out in public till they know the law and people's rights.
There needs to be a "national auditors union" that gets it's support from the public if you want to stop this kind of policing on a national scale. The auditors need to come together as an organization, so that they can lobby congress to put an end to qualified immunity and unconstitutional policing.
I love how him watching first amendment audits helped this guy in this situation. It’s amazing. Watching audit videos has taught me so much. I wish more than anything I knew my rights like I do today 5 years ago when i was illegally detained, had cops walk in my house and take all my weapons because someone who I’ll never know that had something against me called the cops and said I threatened them with guns and these cops pulled me over at my house for “rolling a stop sign” and somehow turned that into trying to search my car, putting me in handcuffs in my driveway, saying I’m not allowed to own guns with a misdemeanor on my record from 10 years ago which is 100% false and scared me into thinking if I didn’t give them my guns, they would get a warrant based off the threat that was made and I would get 5 years for each weapon. So they gave me the option to go to jail while they get the warrant or let them take the weapons and they would let me go. So I let them go in my house, in my safe and take my Glock 19, AR15 and my 1911. I wasn’t charged with anything. My god if I knew then what I know now I would have bodied them cops. I would have told them write me the ticket for rolling the stop sign and I’m not answering any questions related to anything else and I’d still have my guns today because they had no legal grounds to take my weapons. Idk if I even rolled the stop sign in my neighborhood. I probably didn’t, they just used that as an excuse to have a reason to pull me over. $5,000 in guns sitting in friggin lockup over me getting my rights violated because I didn’t know them. The funny part is, at first when they pulled me over and kept asking me 72 times to search my vehicle that was parked in my garage and I told them no a million times, they kept asking me if i had weapons on me and I obv could tell this was way more than a traffic violation because there was 8 cops out front of my house asking me questions about guns. So the first thing that came to my mind was maybe something happened and my car matched the description and they had the wrong person because i was just so confused because I didn’t find out that someone called in and lied saying I threatened them until way after the fact. So in the moment I was mind blown. And at the time I lived in parkland FL 5 mins from where that school shooting happened a year prior so when I asked them why they keep asking me about guns the cops literally said “well I’m sure you heard about the shooting that happened at the school last year so we just wanna make sure everyone is safe.” And I literally asked the cop so what are you gonna do? Go knock on everyone’s door in parkland and ask them if they have guns? I knew that didn’t make any damn sense. It’s the same type of line they use when they say “with everything going on in today’s world blah blah blah”. Fuckin crooked cops man. Citizens need to know their rights. If all citizens knew their rights, we would hold the power but because we don’t, the cops are in charge and they know that. Everyone needs to get educated and that’s what these videos have done for me so if that same situation happened again, I would know exactly how to handle it and I would have either had them doing the walk of shame, or they would violate my rights and I’d have a fat lawsuit. But they wouldn’t be stepping foot in my house and taking my firearms, that’s for damn sure.
Thank you for showing this video. You teach us our rights when you audit public state offices. So it’s good to see how to handle when cops are out of line when doing there duty
I'm a former deputy sheriff, and he's right. When a traffic stop occurs for speeding, you can't ask for ID from passengers. Many do. This "we ID everyone" line is bogus. If the passengers give it up without complaining, so be it. If they complain, you drop it.
In Texas we aren't REQUIRED to provide personal identifying information UNLESS we are placed under arrest. We Don't have to identify even if legally detained ONLY if placed under arrest for committing or reasonable suspected of committing a crime.
@@Eagle8i just realized that he made a big mistake and could have been arrested for "failure to identify" by providing a false name at 12:00 mark by saying his name was good citizen so if they wanted to at that point they could have legally arrested him. In Texas you don't have to identify unless under arrest but it is a crime to give a false name if you decide to talk while being detained or investigated by police. But these cops obviously don't know thier laws at all so they probably not even aware that when he said that that they at that point (after they ran the name of course) could have legally arrested him. Best to not speak unless your required or people can get themselves in trouble with the slip of the tongue. 🤦♂️
@@yt_hatescrime_data4301 If a person has NOT committed a crime but is arrested in Texas for giving the name "GOOD CITIZEN", I would recommend they get a lawyer.
@@rlee2189 But it would be a legal arrest. Now if he had simply said "you can call me good citizen" then it could easily be argued he was not trying to provide a name. But when the officer asked his name he replied "good citizen". Im not saying it wouldn't be ridiculous for them to arrest him for that because i believe it would be. Im just stating it would be completely within the legal interpretation of 38.02. Thats all. 👍
If the handcuffs are on, you're under arrest,. They may say that you're only detained with them but you're not really. As for this case, it's open and shut. Those cops egos just cost them 10s of thousands of dollars, with no qualified immunity.
Ego won't allow it. Especially if you're a female not to be sexist or anything but female cops are the worst. They escalate because they want to be boss.
Mrs Tyrant officer need a little education. See how the other officer started backing down when he was telling them his right and that they were violating his 4th amendment. But Mrs Tyrant did care.. what a total beach!..
It still amazes me that law enforcement officers are ignorant of the law concerning identification. Fourth Amendment protects citizens property, person, papers, and effects from unreasonable searches or seizures; without a probable cause warrant signed by a Magistrate. Terry v Ohio reduced the probable cause standard to reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime. Plus, law enforcement officers attempted to compelled him to testify against himself. Fourth Amendment protections are nation wide, and apparently law enforcement officers need to be educated on the law.
This isn't ignorance: it's malicious.That's why they put him in cuffs then try to negotiate to get him to comply. They know they can't legally take him to jail.
THE TYRANT TERMINATOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR i feel him, watching auditors gives me empowerment, that i didn't have b4. S/n i just watched another page highlight your page. (When you stood your ground against 11 thick blueline gang)
Cops: "Sir youre going to jail" Civilian: "why?" Cops: "because someone called the cops on you" 😂😂😂😂😂 😂 American law enforcements IQ is like a 12 year old kid
the youngest cop on scene the Sargent knows his job better than the jokes that caused this, it seems away. i guess the two patrol officers will stay patrol officers untill they retire or get caught enough to get fired or catch a case. the icing on the cake is the famous line have a good day after they tried to ruin your life .
This is a great example of what no answering questions looks like. This guy knew he didn’t do anything wrong and didn’t answer many of any questions and was put in the back of the police car as a coercive and threatening tactic.
State statutes that are in violation of the federal Constitution are irrelevant! You must consent to them and he obviously wasn't consenting. So all that nonsense the Sargent was saying is irrelevant! He was just trying to smooth everything over. Thank to 1st amendment auditors like TTA folks are waking up! Keep up the great work my brother!
I love that he kept it politically correct stating his given rights as a human being. I admire him for while in the process letting her know, since she interrupted his conversation that she was not untitled to inject herself into, that not only should she shut the fuck up yet she's also dismissed.
If he was impeding their investigation by not showing ID, that tells me there investigation was still on going. How are the cops going to ID a man that they don't know if he has committed a crime until they conclude their investigation.
Well done, I watch a bunch of 1A auditors and learned a ton and this guy handled that situation perfectly. Thanks for sharing this man! U.S. Constitution above all
Good man standing up for this rights. But I really applaud his family. They followed his lead. They immediately understood the man's wishes and they did NOT fold to the cohesion and attempted intimidation from these tyrants and traitors. They could easily have given up his info expecting that would get him out of trouble. HE KNEW BETTER. And they supported the husband/dad. LOVED THAT.
@@TTA42800 Thanks, TTA, I appreciate your comment. I've seen videos where the driver (man) is tucked away in the cruiser because he won't give up his rights. He didn't do anything wrong but would not talk. Then the wife/girlfriend is next with the cops harassing her AND she gives it up. Doesn't waste a minute giving up the man's ID. SHE was SITTING right there when he refused. I swear, if my wife or girlfriend gave up my ID to the police she would be my EX. Someone you can not depend on, not count on, that would go against my wishes, will not sit next to me for the rest of my life.
I'm an Australian living in Australia and even I know that as soon as the cop opened his car door it was a Fourth Amendment violation. Until they have to pay the lawsuit themselves they won't care about the people's rights.
The cop literally admitted on camera that they don't ID when they have a suspicion of a crime, they do it for notes. Then she doubled down and said there was no crime. Hopefully he has money for a lawyer, and then money for a federal civil rights lawyer to sue them.
The cop admitted, on camera, "It's not a crime" and then continued to lie and bully the female while the guy who was unlawfully arrested sits in the cop car in cuffs. I'm getting so tired of seeing these cops over reach like this. They need to be held accountable.
Thats right! Ignorance is no excuse for the law, and as much as "authorities " try to push that, it does go both ways. If they get caught breaking the law... they should get punished
The cops are sooooooooo use to running everyone they come into contact with. If you have a warrant, that will give them the court time to collect a minimum of 4 hours of court overtime.
Choosing to remain silent, does not constitute impeding an investigation. It can constitute self imcrimination. No ID..is secondary to an arrestable crime.
My question is how does getting ID's help with determining who is or isn't at fault? Never understood that. Get the stories, determine who is at fault then get ID(s) from who is a fault and get ID as needed if someone is pressing charges.
Just saw your woodstock dmv vid on 'here's the deal'. Thank you for persistently fighting for my rights and even for the rights of the ignorant officers who violate your rights. Im glad to be a subscriber. We can take our country back from modern day policing. But it won't happen without awareness. Thank you for putting your work online. One day I'll live in a community where I respect and honor the police. So far after 4 decades on Earth I haven't experienced that.
Section 38.02, Penal Code, is amended by adding Subsections (b-1), (b-2), (d-1), and (f) and amending Subsection (c) to read as follows: (b-1) A person commits an offense if the person: (1) is an operator of a motor vehicle, as defined by Section 32.34, who is lawfully detained by a peace officer for an alleged violation of a law. KEY PHRASE IN THE LAW "WHO IS LAWFULLY DETAINED BY A PEACE OFFICER FOR AN ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE LAW"
Many of the powers that shouldn't have made it their business in removing sympathy, and empathy to ENFORCE LAW through FEAR/INTIMIDATION. Luckily for the so-called powers, they get CONSENT from people who mistakenly BELIEVE they are on the side of RIGHT.
Say “I invoke my 1st, 4th and 5th Amendment rights. Please provide me my lawyer” Speeds things along. You only have the rights you verbally invoke. The cops will get qualified immunity. Telling them you will sue is not invoking your rights and judges will have cops backs.
They have no RAS for even a detainment. They need an OBJECTIVE FACT that would lead a reasonable officer to believe the person is involved in criminality. (Not a random person’s heresy report of something that MIGHT BE, POSSIBLY BE a crime).
That's what people have to tell the cop's. They think they only need R.A.S. (Reasonable Articulable Suspicion) but forget they also need a S.A.F. (Single Articulable Fact) of said R.A.S. for a detainment.
This cop needs fired if they believe a person's name has anything to do with an investigation no name will have anything to do with a crime if this is what cops train to these training facilities need shut down
Time to defund the police, use the money towards educating the public.
This is a racist prejudice low down ignorant state
This guy deserves an award. Like the first, FIRST AMENDMENT VALOR AWARD!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA.
He wasn't sure, but he did what he herd watching you guys thanks bro
Justice is coming.
Abolish qualified immunity
I'SADUMBASS
Dude acted like a child. He decided to talk over the police and not listen to them instead of having an actual conversation. And his little threats about suing which everybody always threaten, but never follow through.
@@HJKampeThe thing about a free society is we are not obligated to talk to anyone we don't want to. Once the demand for ID was made, his 4th amendment right was violated. No crime was committed, so no right to demand he turn over his papers. Every time your ID gets run through the system is not to your benefit, it's not simply for their paperwork. The fact he was released by the sergeant shows the cops overstepped their authority. You are free to obey anyone you want, and surrender your 4th amendment right to be secure in your paperwork, but that's your choice, not an obligation
An argument does not constitute a crime; therefore, the cops were wrong and the guy was in fact unlawfully detained. I hope he does pursue legal action.
You're absolutely right
The gentleman will deffo sue these morons!!!!!
👍👍
You would think but the courts will come up with something to make sure the cops are protected. They don’t ever let the cops be in the wrong because it makes them look bad so they’ll come up with some BS.
Yeah, he will take money from the taxpayers and the cops don’t care, because nothing will happen to them. That’s why this will never ever ever ever end.
No way that getting his ID will tell them what happened or whether he's guilty of anything in this situation. No reasonable articulable suspicion... No ID Tyrant!
You're absolutely right
"It helps with our report". So when do we citizens start getting a paycheck from the police department for helping them do their job?
“ when we are called, what we do is get everybody’s ID” they say this with a straight face. Here in lies the problem!!!
The constitution trumps their little codes, or infractions, or any other BS
Exactly
@TTA42800 stop telling people this....its going to get someone hurt
No it doesn't. Frauditors, sovcits and lens lickers don't understand how laws work.
Cops kill people on a daily regardless @@bonecrusher7297
Unfortunately, they don't have to recognize the constitution. Ever since the organic act of 1871, the USA became the US corporation and is and has been anything but UNITED. Some courts will at least act like there's still a constitution but, in case you haven't noticed, most don't.
The fact that a police department makes up that a call for service is justifiable reason to ID everybody is EXACTLY what is wrong with law enforcement and tyranny in this country. They swore an oath but their department makes and happily agrees to policies to violate our rights. Amazing.......
Well said
"They swore an oath" to their Freemasonic Jesuit god "Lucifer" to harass, alarm, distress and extort the "public" at every opportunity!
"Matthew 5:34-37
34 But I tell you, don’t take an oath at all: either by heaven, because it is God’s throne;
35 or by the earth, because it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, because it is the city of the great King.
36 Do not swear by your head, because you cannot make a single hair white or black.
37 But let your ‘yes’ mean ‘yes,’ and your ‘no’ mean ‘no.’ Anything more than this is from the evil one."
Dude had a situation at the fast food joint and an argument or what ever but no laws was broken….good one James…
Oh yeah I remember he learned from watching the auditors ….they was tripping until the supervisor had to defuse the situation
That was GOD level conduct by this informed and free citizen who committed NO CRIME! This man was educated and armed with information because of these first amendment videos! Thank GOD for this movement!!!
Definitely 💪🏾
Unlawful ARREST.
Out of policy search of a male arrestee by a female, when a male cop was also present.
Female cop admits "It's not a crime".
A supervisor that arrived and changed the arrest to a detention.
A supervisor that attempted to waffle, gaslight and lie his way out of the facts by presenting HIS interpretation of the law in order to deflect the inevitable court case.
Well played. Keep calm. Gather all names and evidence. Film everything. Don't get crazy with cops at the scene. Save it and get crazy with cops when you put them in the dock of the court. A simple Letter Before Action demand for $5,000 should get a quick result. If they want to defend it, hire a lawyer and demand more money and a written apology from the cops concerned and from the PD (looks great framed and on the wall).
@@colinpryor4290 $5000 !?
Hell nah! $1000 for every Minute Illegally Detained !
@@truman5838 I posted $5,000 because a low amount is more likely to be paid out compared to $20,000.... but hey, everyone can have their own idea of what they want.
If your god is real, why doesn't she prevent stupid $#!+ like this before it happens ?????
The fact that it took so long for the supervisor to take the handcuffs off tells us how bad he is in his job.
Shameful
The woman cop needs to be fired for sure. Wow
For sure
He said feelings enforcement..... I love it. Sean was one of the first auditors I heard use this. T.T.A. smoothly says this, too. Love people learning from these.
Definitely 💪🏾
He also said "copsplaining." They also tried to conspire with his family for their 4th Amendment violation efforts.
*Even the sergeant got it wrong. Texas penal code 38.02 says you have to provide ID if you've been LAWFULLY ARRESTED. Not because they're investigating a possible this or that....LAWFULLY ARRESTED!!!*
I saw this video about a month ago and watched it about 3/4 times since. About to watch it for the 5th. This guy is so raw you can feel it.
"Honesty, Integrity and Community Trust " crazy how they had none.
Love when the police say “We don’t know if there is a crime” AFTER they have already arrested someone 🤦🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
😂😂😂 I clicked on it so fast thinking it was you. Even had my popcorn ready.
They can’t force him to participate in their investigation you have the right to remain silent. But they take you standing up for your rights as being hostile and uncooperative. This is disgraceful.
This video is a perfect example that 1A audits are making a difference. Thanks for sharing TTA.
Agree 100%
Great observation
You're absolutely right and welcome 🙏 I got you 💪🏾
They hand cuffed him without a crime. They searched him without consent. They tried to get id without a crime. Crime, crime, crime. Those officers need to lose their jobs. Do not put them out in public till they know the law and people's rights.
You're absolutely right
There needs to be a "national auditors union" that gets it's support from the public if you want to stop this kind of policing on a national scale. The auditors need to come together as an organization, so that they can lobby congress to put an end to qualified immunity and unconstitutional policing.
I love how him watching first amendment audits helped this guy in this situation. It’s amazing. Watching audit videos has taught me so much.
I wish more than anything I knew my rights like I do today 5 years ago when i was illegally detained, had cops walk in my house and take all my weapons because someone who I’ll never know that had something against me called the cops and said I threatened them with guns and these cops pulled me over at my house for “rolling a stop sign” and somehow turned that into trying to search my car, putting me in handcuffs in my driveway, saying I’m not allowed to own guns with a misdemeanor on my record from 10 years ago which is 100% false and scared me into thinking if I didn’t give them my guns, they would get a warrant based off the threat that was made and I would get 5 years for each weapon. So they gave me the option to go to jail while they get the warrant or let them take the weapons and they would let me go. So I let them go in my house, in my safe and take my Glock 19, AR15 and my 1911. I wasn’t charged with anything.
My god if I knew then what I know now I would have bodied them cops. I would have told them write me the ticket for rolling the stop sign and I’m not answering any questions related to anything else and I’d still have my guns today because they had no legal grounds to take my weapons. Idk if I even rolled the stop sign in my neighborhood. I probably didn’t, they just used that as an excuse to have a reason to pull me over.
$5,000 in guns sitting in friggin lockup over me getting my rights violated because I didn’t know them. The funny part is, at first when they pulled me over and kept asking me 72 times to search my vehicle that was parked in my garage and I told them no a million times, they kept asking me if i had weapons on me and I obv could tell this was way more than a traffic violation because there was 8 cops out front of my house asking me questions about guns. So the first thing that came to my mind was maybe something happened and my car matched the description and they had the wrong person because i was just so confused because I didn’t find out that someone called in and lied saying I threatened them until way after the fact. So in the moment I was mind blown. And at the time I lived in parkland FL 5 mins from where that school shooting happened a year prior so when I asked them why they keep asking me about guns the cops literally said “well I’m sure you heard about the shooting that happened at the school last year so we just wanna make sure everyone is safe.” And I literally asked the cop so what are you gonna do? Go knock on everyone’s door in parkland and ask them if they have guns? I knew that didn’t make any damn sense. It’s the same type of line they use when they say “with everything going on in today’s world blah blah blah”.
Fuckin crooked cops man. Citizens need to know their rights. If all citizens knew their rights, we would hold the power but because we don’t, the cops are in charge and they know that. Everyone needs to get educated and that’s what these videos have done for me so if that same situation happened again, I would know exactly how to handle it and I would have either had them doing the walk of shame, or they would violate my rights and I’d have a fat lawsuit. But they wouldn’t be stepping foot in my house and taking my firearms, that’s for damn sure.
No one reading all that
How did it help him? He got put into handcuffs into the police car because he couldn't control his emotions.
@@HJKampe you need to rewatch it again then
So did you get your guns back yet ????
@@randya103I read all that....
This guy nailed it!!!
Definitely
This is why I appreciate what you do!! It teaches me my rights
Thanks alot..I got you
You shouldn’t rely on someone else to teach you your rights. But to observe them play out on camera is always a good way to make it stick .
TTA, stay safe out there. Don't do any audits tomorrow, not worth driving in bad weather. Keep up the good work!
Thank you, I will💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾
Thank you for showing this video. You teach us our rights when you audit public state offices. So it’s good to see how to handle when cops are out of line when doing there duty
Glad it was helpful!
I'm a former deputy sheriff, and he's right. When a traffic stop occurs for speeding, you can't ask for ID from passengers. Many do. This "we ID everyone" line is bogus. If the passengers give it up without complaining, so be it. If they complain, you drop it.
That wasn't a traffic stop. He didn't have to show ID.
In Texas we aren't REQUIRED to provide personal identifying information UNLESS we are placed under arrest.
We Don't have to identify even if legally detained ONLY if placed under arrest for committing or reasonable suspected of committing a crime.
Agreed! The 1st crime was never established. I D refusal, of course, is a secondary offense.
@@Eagle8i just realized that he made a big mistake and could have been arrested for "failure to identify" by providing a false name at 12:00 mark by saying his name was good citizen so if they wanted to at that point they could have legally arrested him. In Texas you don't have to identify unless under arrest but it is a crime to give a false name if you decide to talk while being detained or investigated by police. But these cops obviously don't know thier laws at all so they probably not even aware that when he said that that they at that point (after they ran the name of course) could have legally arrested him. Best to not speak unless your required or people can get themselves in trouble with the slip of the tongue. 🤦♂️
The supervisor doesn't even know the 38.02 code about failure to identify. 🤦♂️
@@yt_hatescrime_data4301 If a person has NOT committed a crime but is arrested in Texas for giving the name "GOOD CITIZEN", I would recommend they get a lawyer.
@@rlee2189 But it would be a legal arrest. Now if he had simply said "you can call me good citizen" then it could easily be argued he was not trying to provide a name. But when the officer asked his name he replied "good citizen". Im not saying it wouldn't be ridiculous for them to arrest him for that because i believe it would be. Im just stating it would be completely within the legal interpretation of 38.02. Thats all. 👍
"Its not a crime...so we will take him to jail because he isnt bowing and bending over for us!"
The education that man got from RUclips empowered him... All of the auditors out there your making a difference... 💪😎
Over policing at its finest. Defund the police!
If the handcuffs are on, you're under arrest,. They may say that you're only detained with them but you're not really. As for this case, it's open and shut. Those cops egos just cost them 10s of thousands of dollars, with no qualified immunity.
He's a BOSS and his family held him down the way they should have.
Power and pride will always lead to corruption! It blows my mind how hard it is for people to apologize when they know they are wrong!
Exactly
Ego won't allow it. Especially if you're a female not to be sexist or anything but female cops are the worst. They escalate because they want to be boss.
Try talking to any church members
@@whylie1555 What the F are Talking Church For!?? Lol
@@whylie1555it's a human condition. Come on man, you can be better that that yourself ‼️
Mrs Tyrant officer need a little education. See how the other officer started backing down when he was telling them his right and that they were violating his 4th amendment. But Mrs Tyrant did care.. what a total beach!..
Shameful
"It's not a crime." EXACTLY, which is why no identification is required.
She went in his pocket. That's not a terry frisk. that's a 4th Amendment violation.
you cant take anyone to jail minus a crime... these officers are such ahuge liability to their department
It still amazes me that law enforcement officers are ignorant of the law concerning identification. Fourth Amendment protects citizens property, person, papers, and effects from unreasonable searches or seizures; without a probable cause warrant signed by a Magistrate. Terry v Ohio reduced the probable cause standard to reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime. Plus, law enforcement officers attempted to compelled him to testify against himself. Fourth Amendment protections are nation wide, and apparently law enforcement officers need to be educated on the law.
This isn't ignorance: it's malicious.That's why they put him in cuffs then try to negotiate to get him to comply. They know they can't legally take him to jail.
Lying is ignorant, they know the law.
THE TYRANT TERMINATOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR
i feel him, watching auditors gives me empowerment, that i didn't have b4.
S/n i just watched another page highlight your page.
(When you stood your ground against 11 thick blueline gang)
"There was no crime, but we're gonna take you to jail, because you won't answer questions."
This will be an expensive lesson for them to learn, but they aren't our GD masters, they work for us.
Cops: "Sir youre going to jail"
Civilian: "why?"
Cops: "because someone called the cops on you"
😂😂😂😂😂 😂 American law enforcements IQ is like a 12 year old kid
😂😅
the youngest cop on scene the Sargent knows his job better than the jokes that caused this, it seems away. i guess the two patrol officers will stay patrol officers untill they retire or get caught enough to get fired or catch a case. the icing on the cake is the famous line have a good day after they tried to ruin your life .
38.02 38.02 38.02 38.02!! Damn, Texas cops need to learn this. It ain't that hard!
My God people, idiocy is running rampant in the cop department. It has won!! We are surrounded by cops who don’t comprehend the law!!!
He was not pat down but was in fact illegally searched. Officers hands went into his pockets.
This is a great example of what no answering questions looks like. This guy knew he didn’t do anything wrong and didn’t answer many of any questions and was put in the back of the police car as a coercive and threatening tactic.
Late night posting , gotta love it .
Seriously getting to the point that if you're out and about then wear a body cam at all times.......
And just like that a new first amendment auditor is born.😂😂😂 We just witnessed this man’s origin story 🦸🏻♂️
TTA the work you're doing is causing change for the better. Appreciate what you do keep doing God's work. God bless brother
Thanks alot..and God bless you as well 💪🏾
The normal American citizen has had ENOUGH of how these punks with badges and guns treat us EVERY DAY.
For sure
State statutes that are in violation of the federal Constitution are irrelevant! You must consent to them and he obviously wasn't consenting. So all that nonsense the Sargent was saying is irrelevant! He was just trying to smooth everything over. Thank to 1st amendment auditors like TTA folks are waking up! Keep up the great work my brother!
I love that he kept it politically correct stating his given rights as a human being. I admire him for while in the process letting her know, since she interrupted his conversation that she was not untitled to inject herself into, that not only should she shut the fuck up yet she's also dismissed.
The nice officer is literally saying, you can’t lie to us however we can legally lie to you. Make that shit make sense!!
If he was impeding their investigation by not showing ID, that tells me there investigation was still on going. How are the cops going to ID a man that they don't know if he has committed a crime until they conclude their investigation.
Well said
This is why people don’t like cops 😮
It must be in police oath to NEVER apologize to the citizens after they have been wrongfully detained and arrested
Well done, I watch a bunch of 1A auditors and learned a ton and this guy handled that situation perfectly. Thanks for sharing this man! U.S. Constitution above all
I would like to know what on his drivers license will tell them what happened between two individuals in a parking lot….
Exactly
Good man standing up for this rights. But I really applaud his family. They followed his lead. They immediately understood the man's wishes and they did NOT fold to the cohesion and attempted intimidation from these tyrants and traitors. They could easily have given up his info expecting that would get him out of trouble. HE KNEW BETTER. And they supported the husband/dad. LOVED THAT.
You're absolutely right
@@TTA42800 Thanks, TTA, I appreciate your comment.
I've seen videos where the driver (man) is tucked away in the cruiser because he won't give up his rights. He didn't do anything wrong but would not talk. Then the wife/girlfriend is next with the cops harassing her AND she gives it up. Doesn't waste a minute giving up the man's ID. SHE was SITTING right there when he refused. I swear, if my wife or girlfriend gave up my ID to the police she would be my EX. Someone you can not depend on, not count on, that would go against my wishes, will not sit next to me for the rest of my life.
We need to start bringing class action lawsuits against departments for the false advertising the stencil on the side of our cars
Police favorite phrase, "Here's the Deal" lol
He is not required to help your investigation!
I'm an Australian living in Australia and even I know that as soon as the cop opened his car door it was a Fourth Amendment violation. Until they have to pay the lawsuit themselves they won't care about the people's rights.
The cop literally admitted on camera that they don't ID when they have a suspicion of a crime, they do it for notes. Then she doubled down and said there was no crime. Hopefully he has money for a lawyer, and then money for a federal civil rights lawyer to sue them.
“You have to ID yourself - that’s the law”. NO!
Another happy, soon to be rewarded client for these educational auditing videos.
Qualified Immunity is one Hell of a Drug.
Absent a detainment/arrest for a crime he does NOT have to ID. They said it themselves: "we just want his ID for our notes".
The cop admitted, on camera, "It's not a crime" and then continued to lie and bully the female while the guy who was unlawfully arrested sits in the cop car in cuffs. I'm getting so tired of seeing these cops over reach like this. They need to be held accountable.
Serious props to this man, and also his awesome family for knowing just what to do, and for their steady photography
When a cop says the last thing they want to do is put you in jail they're lying
Thats right! Ignorance is no excuse for the law, and as much as "authorities " try to push that, it does go both ways. If they get caught breaking the law... they should get punished
The verbage changed to respect the freedom of movement and the ability to travel.
The cops are sooooooooo use to running everyone they come into contact with. If you have a warrant, that will give them the court time to collect a minimum of 4 hours of court overtime.
Tyrants aren't bothered if they are sued. It doesn't hit them in the pocket and they aren't disciplined.
Choosing to remain silent, does not constitute impeding an investigation. It can constitute self imcrimination.
No ID..is secondary to an arrestable crime.
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. Not assumed guilty. Period.
If we the people don't stand for something, we'll fall for nothing.. Power to the People
My question is how does getting ID's help with determining who is or isn't at fault? Never understood that. Get the stories, determine who is at fault then get ID(s) from who is a fault and get ID as needed if someone is pressing charges.
Love this guy. Educated af and does his homework
Just saw your woodstock dmv vid on 'here's the deal'. Thank you for persistently fighting for my rights and even for the rights of the ignorant officers who violate your rights. Im glad to be a subscriber. We can take our country back from modern day policing. But it won't happen without awareness. Thank you for putting your work online. One day I'll live in a community where I respect and honor the police. So far after 4 decades on Earth I haven't experienced that.
Love it stand your ground now get the public hazard Bonding malpractice policy numbers of all those corporate agents.
A late upload? Ayyy perfect before bed lol
Section 38.02, Penal Code, is amended by adding
Subsections (b-1), (b-2), (d-1), and (f) and amending Subsection
(c) to read as follows:
(b-1) A person commits an offense if the person:
(1) is an operator of a motor vehicle, as defined by
Section 32.34, who is lawfully detained by a peace officer for an
alleged violation of a law.
KEY PHRASE IN THE LAW "WHO IS LAWFULLY DETAINED BY A PEACE OFFICER FOR AN ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE LAW"
Many of the powers that shouldn't have made it their business in removing sympathy, and empathy to ENFORCE LAW through FEAR/INTIMIDATION. Luckily for the so-called powers, they get CONSENT from people who mistakenly BELIEVE they are on the side of RIGHT.
The answer to the cop saying we don't know that sir. Is you go on what you know,not what you don't know.
Dude should have stopped ALL talking as soon as the cuffs went on. He is now a crime victim, and anything he says can only help the criminals.
That's crazy, I hope he sues them
Me too
Thanx for what you do Patriot.
Say “I invoke my 1st, 4th and 5th Amendment rights. Please provide me my lawyer”
Speeds things along.
You only have the rights you verbally invoke. The cops will get qualified immunity. Telling them you will sue is not invoking your rights and judges will have cops backs.
I am waiting for the video where a cop says to a citizen "I apologize for arresting you and violating your civil rights".
8:37 - What does it say on the cop car?
"Honestly, integrity & Community Trust."
Legend has it these cops are still trying to find one of these 3.
🤣🤣
They have no RAS for even a detainment. They need an OBJECTIVE FACT that would lead a reasonable officer to believe the person is involved in criminality. (Not a random person’s heresy report of something that MIGHT BE, POSSIBLY BE a crime).
That's what people have to tell the cop's. They think they only need R.A.S. (Reasonable Articulable Suspicion) but forget they also need a S.A.F. (Single Articulable Fact) of said R.A.S. for a detainment.
Talking to the police is like arguing with a 3-year-old toddler who has a gun.
The female cop said it on camera that there was no crime and still demanded ID. Both cops should be held accountable, but we know how that works.
She says "it's not a crime" she has no immunity. Game over. She's a school bus driver now.
Exactly
Realistically, the worst that happens is she resigns, lawsuit settles with taxpayer money and she gets a job two towns over.
She’s already had to change states. She came from Oklahoma.
TTA!✌🏽💯✊🏾🇺🇸