It seems Russia is getting real world experience improving not only their tactics, but electronic warfare, missile technology, and drone technology. The US and NATO are not getting the same level of real time improvements. The west has not fielded anything new in their inventory of weaponry given to Ukraine, while Russia has put in several new improvements on their anti-tank and drone-jamming technologies.
I think the wests attitude on Russian technology is 'they keep trying, poor things'. So weapons from the '70's to 00's are sufficient to counter what Russia is fielding to date
It makes sense. Ground-based radar will always be at a disadvantage. The profile of the terrain and the curvature of the ground will always limit it. Radar in the air does not have such great limitations. If the technical range of the missile is 250 km, but the range of the homing radar is 140 km, then the potential of the missile is untapped.
What surprised me is that Ukraine are quiet over the claims of shooting down of 24 aircraft that' makes me believe that it is true knowing the nonse of zelensk or his comander they could have quickly denied the claim.
The biggest mistake the Russians made was advertising this capability. I'm not saying it would be easy to counter but by advertising this capability NATO and west will proceed with plans to counter this capability. Probably with some sort of long range anti radiation missile .
@@louisbabycos106I think you don’t understand. NATO was more or less sure of the capability within week of usage. This war is full of all sorts of ELINT assets, so … almost everybody knows everything. 🤷🏻♂️
@@louisbabycos106 Total nonsense..., weapons are advertised to sell, you know nothing about the new C 500 and C 550. And all NATO countries produce even artillery shells much less than Russia..., even less than North Korea....
@@slavors63 It's balance . Yes you have to sell weapons to make weapons . Yes I get that .Having said the both the Russians and Ukrainians have had a rough go at it during this war . I probably would leave an air of mystery especially if 24 aircraft were shot down over such a short span of time . Eventually how 24 aircraft have been shot down so quickly in such a short span of time would be found out but delaying the reason how this took place would have served Russia's interest far better rather than letting it out of the bag immediately. Who knows you could get western press to ask the question to western officials ," how did Ukraine lose 24 aircraft in such a short amount of time ? " The western official could hem and has and then reluctantly say something to the effect of ,"well the Russians may have linked their AWACS to their S400 but we aren't exactly sure "
@@louisbabycos106right but they don't have captured russian equipment like russia has of nato which will help reverse engineer and help great a greater vehicle able to withstand nato equivalent
So far Russia have not exaggerated battlefield information. Not like some Western media outlets, Russian claims have been fairly accurate throughout the SMO.
Is that why the Russian MoD has genuinely claimed to have destroyed 48 out of all 20 HIMARS sent to Ukraine? Is that why, according to the Russian MoD, the entire Ukrainian Air Force and every single aircraft in Ukraine (including rusted airframes in scrap yards) has been destroyed, with another 20% of them all destroyed on top of that? Is that also why Ukraine has apparently had every single tank, IFV, and armored vehicle in its possession pre war, as well as every single armored vehicle donated to Ukraine, has been destroyed twice over? Is that why Russia claimed 6,000 dead Russians in September 2022, despite at the same time, 11k named Russian soldiers were confirmed dead through local news papers and family testimonies? For a neofascist nation that is apparently fairly accurate throughout this WAR, it sure is strange how they blatantly lie and claim literally impossible things at every opportunity.
@@ImBigFloppa Sounds like your watching Murrica Spews at 7...I haven't seen these claims in any Russian media? Seems to me if what you write is true, then Russia has copied USA MSM Spews networks.....which are generally full of shit as rule..
@@OzzyBlokePointing out that Russia’s claims that are literally impossible, are, in fact, impossible, is now coping? Seems to me the person that believes Ukraine has lost 120-240% of their entire stockpile of anything is coping.
Based on other reports I've heard during the alleged shoot downs of the 24 aircraft it was said the Ukrainian pilots had very little warning before being shot down because their radar warnings didn't activate so this combination was highly likely to have been the systems used.
@@bikechainmic WRONG, gunga din! It is Ukraine who does not have a significant air force any longer. Stay away from CNN propaganda which comes from political Ukrainian military.
Russia need to have countries that would help to bring this world to Sanity,from the Hyena of this world where the UN or the ICC is useless when it comes to violations and hypocrisy.
@@NathansHVACещё ни один враг, которого мы закопали... Не смог откопаться... Так что наши лопаты очень надёжный инструмент... Те кто сомневается, может приехать и проверить на себе...
@@alexeilebedev7462 Ты это про какого именно врага? напомню что абрамсы лопат не боятся, а самое чудесное супер оружие которое мы увидели это мясные штурмы укреп районов в лоб
Мы ещё не всё использовали и не всё попробовали...У С - 400 и А - 50У достаточно скрытых от посторонних глаз возможностей и фишек,от которых в будущем будут подгорать пуканы у всего дружного западного "коллективного Мордора".А ведь есть ещё А - 100,С - 350,С - 500,которые ждут своего часа.
@@reaality3860come on can the us fight 30+ nations no I don t think so plus Europe is expansion on Russia is the reason Mr Putin did not comite a genocide on race come on now
Because they are using different strategies as nobody has air superiority so everyone is at risk however ukraine could gain air superiority with F-16s here's how: 1. Sead ops ukraine needs good jets with long ranges good armament and long range advanced detection to suppress air defences 2. Dogfighting the F-16 is superior to most of russias fighters making it ideal for getting the advantage in the air making it easier to launch more longer range strikes at Russians 3.air defence the F-16 can also shoot down incoming missiles and jets helping keep skies clear If you see ukraine footage most combat ops are su25 launching unguided rockets from long range when pulling up after ground hugging then flaring and scurrying away
@sydneystout4003 first off yes the older 16s will not be up to the task of russias modern fighters they are better than ukraines export mig29s however they would still be beaten but more modern and some better russian fighters however they are a start and for your second statement let me introduce you to my friend the patriot missile system that has multiple Khinzhals and plenty of iskanders on its kill count and many many more russian aircraft and missiles with a big range and everything a ukrainian could ask for to defend their airspace
In fact, no one knows exactly how many airplanes Ukraine had, because there could be a lot of them in storage, plus the former Warsaw Pact countries had hundreds of Mig 29 airplanes, now they were transferred to Ukraine, as well Over 50 years, the USSR and Russia sold more than 2500 "Su", and it is possible that some countries without much publicity transferred old Su 24, Su 25, Su 27....ukraine.
I always expected long range AA missiles to be carried by AWACs aircraft... Most such planes have sufficient spare payload... & the missiles would benefit from altitude & launch velocity for faster & longer engagements.?
FULL SCALE INVASION ? Friend ...Ukraine have electricity, Internet and communications, Bridges too ...if that was Full scale invasions, this coultry could've been an INFORMATION BLACKOUT ZONE ...like a VOID.
Of course this is obviously their latest strategy as the target aircraft has no idea a missile is inbound towards its location as it is cruising in passive modecand the only radar the hostile aircraft is picking up is the A-50's radio transmissions however wheather its guiding a missile towards it they have no 2ay in knowing this...brilliant
Soviet air defences (including interceptor jets) were already sharing target data via network as far back as the 70's. In the early 80's a MiG-31 could launch its R-33 missiles at distant targets without using its own radar, relying on target data from another 31 within 200 km. The A-50/S-400 combo is just a new usage of it, until now it wasn't needed, usually it's ground providing data to air.
This is old. Russia already uses the new Berijew A-100 AWACS. The A-50 was designed 1978 and serviced in 1984 and discarded out Feb. 2024. They use the A-50 (downconfigurated) only still as Transporters. The A-100 with the brandnew chinese Stealth-Tech is in use since Nov. 2023. (!) The shotdown of one of the A-50 (one landed save) costed 100 US_War-Prisoners their Live. It was a Prisoner-Transport.
Despite media confrontation between 2 side media.. Honestly i believe with soigu couse of very rare warplane from ukraine n west on east or even central ukraina sky...
Offensive Anti-Air missions hmm new warfare and it keeps the defensive radar of the unit out the way 😜 hahaha I love how this channel admits it then makes out it can't happen American hubris
Doesn't work when you can't put the AWACS in the air. This is decades old technology. It doesn't work unless you have air superiority. Ukraine will soon have western jets, which will deprive the Russians of said superiority. US doctrine is to establish Air SUPREMACY, where the opponent cannot even put planes in the air. Russia has only lasted this long because Ukraine isn't a NATO standard force. They started with subpar Russian/Soviet equipment. Putin would be well advised not to start trouble with a real modern army like, say, Poland. He'd have to be insane to take on the US. Just talk to the few Wagner Group survivors of the party in Syria...
Not the first inovation Russia made to its S 400 system during operations in Ukraine. They also added software to specifically target the parabolic trajectory of HIMARS too, I suggested that early on in the conflict, I hope they picked it up from me!
@@ВасилийПупкин-п7у also Elon Musk is concern that Russia is able to shut down Starlink, thus is undeniable that Russia has learned tons and was able to neutralize whatever the west has thrown at it, on the other hand what the west has learned is that they aren't confronting Zimbawe, and mighty sanctions didn't work, but haven't learned how come these things happened.
And if the A-50's are unable to operate outside of Russian borders for fear of being destroyed? And of course Ukraine would be within its rights to down them over Russian territory. A more powerful approach is to use all radars, active and passive on all platforms, air, sea and land (and satellite), to create a fusion of all to determine targets. The best asset to bring down any threat can then be utilised. Also bear in mind that if a target is scanned or locked onto, it, or a close buddy can spoof, turning one target into dozens, or jam. F35's anyone?
The announced and explained operating methodology establishes greater possibility in the current war fair considering the longer engagement, discreet military knowledge sharing with Russian allies, defense equipment development capability of Russians as the way the momentum emerge. If this is true reality, US lead Nato, Eu allies will certainly push to a critical decision on an amicable settlement.
This is pure speculation, has anyone here seen the Russian specs on their layered air defense system and lived to talk about it? We really don't know the strengths and weaknesses of it, at best we provide an educated guess. Also, while many Ukrainian aircraft have been shot down, the numbers talked about here are outrageously high. Did Shiogu really say this? It's either the West saying he did, ergo, Western propaganda, or Russian wishful thinking. Only time will tell!
Mr Shoigu's claims are surely exaggerated, probably contain many cruise missiles such as Storm Shadow salvoes, and ECM generated fake targets as well. I do not however doubt the capability of the S-400/A-50 combination, or the general capability of the Russian multi-layered integrated air defence network. The reason for that is simple, I studied and served on the previous, Soviet built version of it. As far back as the 70's Soviet SAMs and interceptors were capable of using target information from a different source to engage targets. For example an S-125 launching missiles towards a target detected by an S-75, only using its own radar in the terminal phase, or if optical tracking was possible not using the radar at all. Sure, it was analogue, slow and inaccurate, but so were the potential targets, thus it worked. There used to be articles about Soviet interceptors relying on ground based radars to find targets, as a negativity, ignoring the fact that with such approach the target didn't get early warning from the radar of the interceptor itself - just as with the A-50/S-400 combination in the video.
This was supposed to have happened several weeks ago. I remember reading about it at the time. I have no way of knowing if this war is even really happening. It seems strange that 2 sides would go to war and put high visibility tape over their camo to make which side they're on more identifiable. Plus there's all the obviously faked footage of taking trenches full of the opposing side's dead. And even stranger is nobody in the comments calls this stuff out.
Thanks for your valid contribution to the discussion. It's nice to meet someone who actually worked on the old Soviet defenses and has something worthy to say. Happy Holidays!@@imrekalman9044
I'm sure the claim includes combat drones that carry missiles and any aircraft that can perform combat missions,I don't think they included suicide drones in that estimate.
I am surprised that this has only been done now..Since the main point of Awacs is to work in this style., to be a gunner for all types of weapons. I read about it 30 years ago. The Russians overslept.
Idk why someone cant understand that west collecting SSSR weapons/planes across the whole world... Thats why RU destroyed more planes that UA actually has
Russia has advanced to the point of being able to relay targeting information from an AWACS to ground based air defense systems. Western aircraft, naval assets, as well as ground units can all merge their individual views into a total battlespace picture. The system can pick from available assets, choose the best option, and fire on the target. There is a capability to even change targeting data while the ordnance is en route. This Russian 'breakthrough' is decades old technology in the west.
It isn't new to russia.. just new to have seen it put in practice in war time, something we haven't seen yet, outside of "games" from us western Playa's. ( to my understanding) Also, I think I read a while back the Aegis system is problematic/Ageing and was going to be replaced for the new millineum?
Soviet air defences and interceptors could engage targets using target data from a different source as far back as the 70's. S-75, S-125, S-200, Su-15, that era. (Source: I served on S-75, we practiced it, thankfully only in peacetime.)
they got 38 from Poland, 26 from Slovakia i think or no close to this no and this is the ones that we know about, Romania give them as well as well as Bulgaria but we dont know the numbers and some from Prague Government as well if we add those no at the ones that UA started the war with
If ukraine lost 24 in a week they would have negative planes by now its a bs claim and ukraine has maybe 100 or more aircraft left at least enough to hold off the "mIgHtY rUsSiAn AiR fOrCe"
Militaries often over-stare their successes. So it’s possible the 24 planes claim was an exaggeration. Also, some might be UAVs. But I think it is undeniable that Ukraine’s Air Force seems to be much less active than a few months ago. Meanwhile, the Russian air force seems to be more active, increasing bombings of Ukrainian positions. So it seems Russia has been having success against the Ukrainian air force.
Good luck with accurate numbers in a time of war however pre war numbers can be up to 250 aircraft and ukraine has lost a decent amount of that but if Russia killed 24 planes in 5 days ukraine wouldn't have an air force now so that's obviously false but ukraine probably has 50-100 maybe even more aircraft left just a guess though I don't know true numbers and we won't for a long long time
see how stupid, Russia is a continent meaning they are united, versus Ukraine small country and supported only with NATO ETC with less than 10 percent more or less of there military, how come you will win?
Bloody good point. Why would the west, whose only advantage is total propaganda control, allowing most westerners following the war to become huge Russian and Putin supporters? I think it's all a ruse. If Russia was the good guy they would have called out the US and the 5 Eyes Nations for releasing covid and would have warned us that the vaccine was actually a military program. I think the wars and the insane policies from the left are being done to create an excuse to replace national governments and allow a global totalitarian state to take over. Just wait until Trump gets back in.
Let's be honest, it's already been proven that the S400 has difficulty locating a single slow flying tomahawk missile. Let alone something more advanced like a fighter jet.
@@ОлегПугач-п8щ what's even funnier is that Ukraine is building cheap little drones out of PVC pipe and they're digging up all of these anti-tank mines that Russia planted at the beginning of this war. They're attaching these anti-tank mines to these cheap little drones and destroying Russian tanks and transport vehicles with them.
It seems Russia is getting real world experience improving not only their tactics, but electronic warfare, missile technology, and drone technology. The US and NATO are not getting the same level of real time improvements. The west has not fielded anything new in their inventory of weaponry given to Ukraine, while Russia has put in several new improvements on their anti-tank and drone-jamming technologies.
I think the wests attitude on Russian technology is 'they keep trying, poor things'. So weapons from the '70's to 00's are sufficient to counter what Russia is fielding to date
😂😂 the arrogance of you people as if Russia didn't land on the moon first stfu
Uh Oh
It makes sense. Ground-based radar will always be at a disadvantage. The profile of the terrain and the curvature of the ground will always limit it. Radar in the air does not have such great limitations. If the technical range of the missile is 250 km, but the range of the homing radar is 140 km, then the potential of the missile is untapped.
What surprised me is that Ukraine are quiet over the claims of shooting down of 24 aircraft that' makes me believe that it is true knowing the nonse of zelensk or his comander they could have quickly denied the claim.
That thing just fussed with the sea.
Russia now has the most significant combat experience and capabilities. Wow
The biggest mistake the Russians made was advertising this capability. I'm not saying it would be easy to counter but by advertising this capability NATO and west will proceed with plans to counter this capability. Probably with some sort of long range anti radiation missile .
@@louisbabycos106I think you don’t understand. NATO was more or less sure of the capability within week of usage.
This war is full of all sorts of ELINT assets, so … almost everybody knows everything. 🤷🏻♂️
@@louisbabycos106 Total nonsense..., weapons are advertised to sell, you know nothing about the new C 500 and C 550. And all NATO countries produce even artillery shells much less than Russia..., even less than North Korea....
@@slavors63
It's balance . Yes you have to sell weapons to make weapons . Yes I get that .Having said the both the Russians and Ukrainians have had a rough go at it during this war . I probably would leave an air of mystery especially if 24 aircraft were shot down over such a short span of time . Eventually how 24 aircraft have been shot down so quickly in such a short span of time would be found out but delaying the reason how this took place would have served Russia's interest far better rather than letting it out of the bag immediately. Who knows you could get western press to ask the question to western officials ," how did Ukraine lose 24 aircraft in such a short amount of time ? " The western official could hem and has and then reluctantly say something to the effect of ,"well the Russians may have linked their AWACS to their S400 but we aren't exactly sure "
@@louisbabycos106right but they don't have captured russian equipment like russia has of nato which will help reverse engineer and help great a greater vehicle able to withstand nato equivalent
So far Russia have not exaggerated battlefield information. Not like some Western media outlets, Russian claims have been fairly accurate throughout the SMO.
Is that why the Russian MoD has genuinely claimed to have destroyed 48 out of all 20 HIMARS sent to Ukraine? Is that why, according to the Russian MoD, the entire Ukrainian Air Force and every single aircraft in Ukraine (including rusted airframes in scrap yards) has been destroyed, with another 20% of them all destroyed on top of that? Is that also why Ukraine has apparently had every single tank, IFV, and armored vehicle in its possession pre war, as well as every single armored vehicle donated to Ukraine, has been destroyed twice over? Is that why Russia claimed 6,000 dead Russians in September 2022, despite at the same time, 11k named Russian soldiers were confirmed dead through local news papers and family testimonies? For a neofascist nation that is apparently fairly accurate throughout this WAR, it sure is strange how they blatantly lie and claim literally impossible things at every opportunity.
@@ImBigFloppalol nice cope
@@ImBigFloppa Sounds like your watching Murrica Spews at 7...I haven't seen these claims in any Russian media? Seems to me if what you write is true, then Russia has copied USA MSM Spews networks.....which are generally full of shit as rule..
@@ImBigFloppawho says how many HIMARS were supplied to Ukraine ? 😂😂
@@OzzyBlokePointing out that Russia’s claims that are literally impossible, are, in fact, impossible, is now coping? Seems to me the person that believes Ukraine has lost 120-240% of their entire stockpile of anything is coping.
Based on other reports I've heard during the alleged shoot downs of the 24 aircraft it was said the Ukrainian pilots had very little warning before being shot down because their radar warnings didn't activate so this combination was highly likely to have been the systems used.
considering ruzzia doesnt exactly have an air force anymore...seems they dont need a missile to crash these days
@@bikechainmic go back to school
🤦♂️@@bikechainmic
@@bikechainmic WRONG, gunga din! It is Ukraine who does not have a significant air force any longer. Stay away from CNN propaganda which comes from political Ukrainian military.
@@bikechainmic Western puppet crying
not necessary to use the word Soviet anymore,bit like referring to the US as the 13 Colonies.....
Fk USA tho
The comedian president is still dreaming of destroying Russia with borrowed toy machines 😂
Russia need to have countries that would help to bring this world to Sanity,from the Hyena of this world where the UN or the ICC is useless when it comes to violations and hypocrisy.
Exactly
Actually S600 will be a anti takeoff system, hitting airport while airplane is getting ready for takeoff within hypersonic missiles!
А ещё он сможет сбивать низкоорбитальные спутники!
The s300 s400 and s500 are complementary systems. The bigger the number the longer reach. But also more expensive and big.
Russians are using impressive tactics which are quite concerning to both NATO and US.
Shovel power
НАТО это и есть США. Без США они пустое место. Особенно ублюдки на острове. Вообще без армии а сколько гонору.
@@NathansHVACещё ни один враг, которого мы закопали... Не смог откопаться... Так что наши лопаты очень надёжный инструмент... Те кто сомневается, может приехать и проверить на себе...
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. NO.
@@alexeilebedev7462 Ты это про какого именно врага? напомню что абрамсы лопат не боятся, а самое чудесное супер оружие которое мы увидели это мясные штурмы укреп районов в лоб
Мы ещё не всё использовали и не всё попробовали...У С - 400 и А - 50У достаточно скрытых от посторонних глаз возможностей и фишек,от которых в будущем будут подгорать пуканы у всего дружного западного "коллективного Мордора".А ведь есть ещё А - 100,С - 350,С - 500,которые ждут своего часа.
You have to respect Russia 30+ nations plus the US I have nothing butt respect to Russia and there great leader Mr Putin
Zionist NAziTO is racism 101
Yes. We respect Putin like we do Jack the Ripper.
@@reaality3860come on can the us fight 30+ nations no I don t think so plus Europe is expansion on Russia is the reason Mr Putin did not comite a genocide on race come on now
@@somaliano99kingkonghimself75, Your reply confirms Putin is the same as Jack the ripper with nukes.
Jack the Ripper? Sounds more like Biden. Jack the Child Ripper.
Why is Ukraine crying for F-16's if none of their jets are getting shot down?
Because the F-16 is a better plane and can carry a wide variety of Nato armament. It also has better electronics such as radar
The ukies have no air force left sonny.
Because they are using different strategies as nobody has air superiority so everyone is at risk however ukraine could gain air superiority with F-16s here's how:
1. Sead ops ukraine needs good jets with long ranges good armament and long range advanced detection to suppress air defences
2. Dogfighting the F-16 is superior to most of russias fighters making it ideal for getting the advantage in the air making it easier to launch more longer range strikes at Russians
3.air defence the F-16 can also shoot down incoming missiles and jets helping keep skies clear
If you see ukraine footage most combat ops are su25 launching unguided rockets from long range when pulling up after ground hugging then flaring and scurrying away
@wouterkellerman4458 well judging by the wide amounts of su25 sorties I've seen and some mig29 sorties I think they do just not air superiority
@sydneystout4003 first off yes the older 16s will not be up to the task of russias modern fighters they are better than ukraines export mig29s however they would still be beaten but more modern and some better russian fighters however they are a start and for your second statement let me introduce you to my friend the patriot missile system that has multiple Khinzhals and plenty of iskanders on its kill count and many many more russian aircraft and missiles with a big range and everything a ukrainian could ask for to defend their airspace
If any of this was accurate it seems Russia now has one A50 AWACS less than they did to make it work.
Russian intelligence amazes me, to be honest.
I flying gripen in Sweden when this happened in Ukraine, Sweden did an analysis and I can say that they beat us without problems now
In fact, no one knows exactly how many airplanes Ukraine had, because there could be a lot of them in storage, plus the former Warsaw Pact countries had hundreds of Mig 29 airplanes, now they were transferred to Ukraine, as well Over 50 years, the USSR and Russia sold more than 2500 "Su", and it is possible that some countries without much publicity transferred old Su 24, Su 25, Su 27....ukraine.
The Russian SMO in Ukraine has greatly helped the Russian army to improve its conventional military at a very rapid speed.
Simply logic and top performant. That's Russian. And the NATO ist far behind.
I believe the Russian claims. Condemning Russian reports by virtue of Ukraine and British intelligence is laughable.
Russia ❤❤❤
Putin ❤❤❤❤
I always expected long range AA missiles to be carried by AWACs aircraft... Most such planes have sufficient spare payload... & the missiles would benefit from altitude & launch velocity for faster & longer engagements.?
FULL SCALE INVASION ? Friend ...Ukraine have electricity, Internet and communications, Bridges too ...if that was Full scale invasions, this coultry could've been an INFORMATION BLACKOUT ZONE ...like a VOID.
By some unverified claims, A-50 can aim and shoot the missiles, not just act as mid course correction.
That seems pretty big.
This plane was shoot down last week BTW.
Of course this is obviously their latest strategy as the target aircraft has no idea a missile is inbound towards its location as it is cruising in passive modecand the only radar the hostile aircraft is picking up is the A-50's radio transmissions however wheather its guiding a missile towards it they have no 2ay in knowing this...brilliant
💪🇩🇿❤️🇷🇺💪🇯🇴💪❤️
This is important, so that now they are able to differentiate which one is friend or foe
'Full scale invasion'. Lol
Let Ukraine deny the Russian claim
You didn't belive me when I said that Russians are Marsians.
I'm surprised it's not a standard part of Russian military from the get go
Soviet air defences (including interceptor jets) were already sharing target data via network as far back as the 70's. In the early 80's a MiG-31 could launch its R-33 missiles at distant targets without using its own radar, relying on target data from another 31 within 200 km. The A-50/S-400 combo is just a new usage of it, until now it wasn't needed, usually it's ground providing data to air.
I suppose Russians don't like... Euclidean
Geometry....
Their missiles... Electronic warfare..
Have their own geometry...
This is old. Russia already uses the new Berijew A-100 AWACS. The A-50 was designed 1978 and serviced in 1984 and discarded out Feb. 2024.
They use the A-50 (downconfigurated) only still as Transporters. The A-100 with the brandnew chinese Stealth-Tech
is in use since Nov. 2023. (!)
The shotdown of one of the A-50 (one landed save) costed 100 US_War-Prisoners their Live. It was a Prisoner-Transport.
I always say never ever mess with Russian people. You always gonna lose big time.
VIVA RUSSIA 🇷🇺 VIVA Putin ♥️💯🇷🇺🇷🇺💯🇷🇺🇷🇺💪🇷🇺🇷🇺 URAAAAAA
Absolutely with out question
Despite media confrontation between 2 side media.. Honestly i believe with soigu couse of very rare warplane from ukraine n west on east or even central ukraina sky...
ME GUSTARIA QUE LOS COMENTARIOS, SE PUDIERAN TRADUCIR AL ESPAÑOL. GRACIAS.
Learn english, don't be lazy.
Offensive Anti-Air missions hmm new warfare and it keeps the defensive radar of the unit out the way 😜 hahaha I love how this channel admits it then makes out it can't happen American hubris
Doesn't work when you can't put the AWACS in the air. This is decades old technology. It doesn't work unless you have air superiority. Ukraine will soon have western jets, which will deprive the Russians of said superiority. US doctrine is to establish Air SUPREMACY, where the opponent cannot even put planes in the air. Russia has only lasted this long because Ukraine isn't a NATO standard force. They started with subpar Russian/Soviet equipment. Putin would be well advised not to start trouble with a real modern army like, say, Poland. He'd have to be insane to take on the US. Just talk to the few Wagner Group survivors of the party in Syria...
Globe 🌍 USA
Definitely true. ..Ukraine is screaming for F16& F18 jets ....their AirForce is depleting...FAST
im preety shure the rf link would be directional rather than sporadic its a no brainer , longer range with less power and more stealth
If they dropped their old space satellite in the high air, that's still low👈
Russia has the Largest Airforce in the World and Strategies woth Planes
I dont think, I see the results
Not the first inovation Russia made to its S 400 system during operations in Ukraine. They also added software to specifically target the parabolic trajectory of HIMARS too, I suggested that early on in the conflict, I hope they picked it up from me!
They jammed and compromising gps coordinates for Himars rockets.
@@ВасилийПупкин-п7у also Elon Musk is concern that Russia is able to shut down Starlink, thus is undeniable that Russia has learned tons and was able to neutralize whatever the west has thrown at it, on the other hand what the west has learned is that they aren't confronting Zimbawe, and mighty sanctions didn't work, but haven't learned how come these things happened.
And if the A-50's are unable to operate outside of Russian borders for fear of being destroyed? And of course Ukraine would be within its rights to down them over Russian territory. A more powerful approach is to use all radars, active and passive on all platforms, air, sea and land (and satellite), to create a fusion of all to determine targets. The best asset to bring down any threat can then be utilised. Also bear in mind that if a target is scanned or locked onto, it, or a close buddy can spoof, turning one target into dozens, or jam. F35's anyone?
Русское оружие самое лучшее, а ВС РФ самая доблестная. За победу!
Победа будет за нами
The announced and explained operating methodology establishes greater possibility in the current war fair considering the longer engagement, discreet military knowledge sharing with Russian allies, defense equipment development capability of Russians as the way the momentum emerge. If this is true reality, US lead Nato, Eu allies will certainly push to a critical decision on an amicable settlement.
What's your opinion on Russia shooting down its own plane? Does this push the West to an amicable settlement too?
next report RBK-500
This is pure speculation, has anyone here seen the Russian specs on their layered air defense system and lived to talk about it? We really don't know the strengths and weaknesses of it, at best we provide an educated guess. Also, while many Ukrainian aircraft have been shot down, the numbers talked about here are outrageously high. Did Shiogu really say this? It's either the West saying he did, ergo, Western propaganda, or Russian wishful thinking. Only time will tell!
I bet you take in what the West media say to heart..
Mr Shoigu's claims are surely exaggerated, probably contain many cruise missiles such as Storm Shadow salvoes, and ECM generated fake targets as well. I do not however doubt the capability of the S-400/A-50 combination, or the general capability of the Russian multi-layered integrated air defence network. The reason for that is simple, I studied and served on the previous, Soviet built version of it. As far back as the 70's Soviet SAMs and interceptors were capable of using target information from a different source to engage targets. For example an S-125 launching missiles towards a target detected by an S-75, only using its own radar in the terminal phase, or if optical tracking was possible not using the radar at all. Sure, it was analogue, slow and inaccurate, but so were the potential targets, thus it worked.
There used to be articles about Soviet interceptors relying on ground based radars to find targets, as a negativity, ignoring the fact that with such approach the target didn't get early warning from the radar of the interceptor itself - just as with the A-50/S-400 combination in the video.
This was supposed to have happened several weeks ago. I remember reading about it at the time. I have no way of knowing if this war is even really happening. It seems strange that 2 sides would go to war and put high visibility tape over their camo to make which side they're on more identifiable.
Plus there's all the obviously faked footage of taking trenches full of the opposing side's dead. And even stranger is nobody in the comments calls this stuff out.
Thanks for your valid contribution to the discussion. It's nice to meet someone who actually worked on the old Soviet defenses and has something worthy to say. Happy Holidays!@@imrekalman9044
I'm sure the claim includes combat drones that carry missiles and any aircraft that can perform combat missions,I don't think they included suicide drones in that estimate.
I am surprised that this has only been done now..Since the main point of Awacs is to work in this style., to be a gunner for all types of weapons. I read about it 30 years ago. The Russians overslept.
Awacs does not work with ground missile launches
The only thing I know, they don't lie.
Export MIG29 lacks radar warning receivers.
Idk why someone cant understand that west collecting SSSR weapons/planes across the whole world... Thats why RU destroyed more planes that UA actually has
well do not believe , you do not have to.
We will not know due to its confidentiality
Briliant
Song, music theme?
Improvising To Teeth - Unlike Systematic Overhaul - No Wonder They Will Lead Any War
I believe it
Destroyed, not shot down. Most are new drones and rockets.
не точно знаю они могут быть только приуменьшены
I do beleave
Russia has advanced to the point of being able to relay targeting information from an AWACS to ground based air defense systems. Western aircraft, naval assets, as well as ground units can all merge their individual views into a total battlespace picture. The system can pick from available assets, choose the best option, and fire on the target. There is a capability to even change targeting data while the ordnance is en route. This Russian 'breakthrough' is decades old technology in the west.
Did you know that the world didn't exist before you was born,also nothing existed before you learned about it.
It isn't new to russia.. just new to have seen it put in practice in war time, something we haven't seen yet, outside of "games" from us western Playa's. ( to my understanding) Also, I think I read a while back the Aegis system is problematic/Ageing and was going to be replaced for the new millineum?
Soviet air defences and interceptors could engage targets using target data from a different source as far back as the 70's. S-75, S-125, S-200, Su-15, that era. (Source: I served on S-75, we practiced it, thankfully only in peacetime.)
RUSSIA IS GAINING A LOT OF EXPERIENCE & BECOMING EXPERTS... THANKS TO MEDDLING NATO ....
I think it's an exaggerated ukraine doesn't not have that many aircrafts flying
Yea because most were shot down
they got 38 from Poland, 26 from Slovakia i think or no close to this no and this is the ones that we know about, Romania give them as well as well as Bulgaria but we dont know the numbers and some from Prague Government as well if we add those no at the ones that UA started the war with
24 AIRCRAFT SHOT DOWN IN JUST 5 DAYS WAS CONFIRMED BY NATO. Russian claims were accurate
If ukraine lost 24 in a week they would have negative planes by now its a bs claim and ukraine has maybe 100 or more aircraft left at least enough to hold off the "mIgHtY rUsSiAn AiR fOrCe"
Since when did the yanks have a pro russian stance lmfaoo
Militaries often over-stare their successes. So it’s possible the 24 planes claim was an exaggeration. Also, some might be UAVs.
But I think it is undeniable that Ukraine’s Air Force seems to be much less active than a few months ago.
Meanwhile, the Russian air force seems to be more active, increasing bombings of Ukrainian positions.
So it seems Russia has been having success against the Ukrainian air force.
Abhi me gor nahi dera enke electronic warfare me
Can someone tell me how many aircraft Ukraine have in there inventory
Good luck with accurate numbers in a time of war however pre war numbers can be up to 250 aircraft and ukraine has lost a decent amount of that but if Russia killed 24 planes in 5 days ukraine wouldn't have an air force now so that's obviously false but ukraine probably has 50-100 maybe even more aircraft left just a guess though I don't know true numbers and we won't for a long long time
Half of the video is whataboutism.
Of course, this Russian tactic will certainly over come all the nato sponsored tactical and technical knowledge used by Ukraine.
Ukraine is not flying and the west is not giving them any airplanes.
cade a NATO foram na Libia foram nos balcãs foram na Siria no Iraque no Afeganistão não foram então vem na Ucrania hora vem NATO a mãe RUSSIA o espera
XD
❤❤
Russia 🇷🇺 is fighting with sticks and stones,,and they keep winning lol
see how stupid, Russia is a continent meaning they are united, versus Ukraine small country and supported only with NATO ETC with less than 10 percent more or less of there military, how come you will win?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
This was a report generated by Russia after the USA Patriot system shot down 6-10 Russian fighter jets
too much pro-westerner views and skepticism. Channel not for me
Бла бла бла бла
Ukraine has an air force? Where are they hiding their navy? I thought Ukraine was done, finished months ago?🤣
Russian propaganda channel!
rip usa
Is this a western propaganda channel?
Kinda, but it's less blatant than others.
@@usun_politics1033 thanks
If only we could let Ukraine borrow a awacs.maybe one based off of a buisness jet.i know there is some out there.i think the sweeds have one
And which missile would you use?
The channel seems to be working for the Russian military intelligence Agency.
You have no response. Therefore, you resort to baseless rubbish. Sad
Bloody good point. Why would the west, whose only advantage is total propaganda control, allowing most westerners following the war to become huge Russian and Putin supporters?
I think it's all a ruse. If Russia was the good guy they would have called out the US and the 5 Eyes Nations for releasing covid and would have warned us that the vaccine was actually a military program.
I think the wars and the insane policies from the left are being done to create an excuse to replace national governments and allow a global totalitarian state to take over. Just wait until Trump gets back in.
At least they have an intelligence agency, it's sadly lacking in the 🇺🇸🇬🇧🧚
Same video rename 3 times 😅 make new content
Let's be honest, it's already been proven that the S400 has difficulty locating a single slow flying tomahawk missile. Let alone something more advanced like a fighter jet.
😂😂😂
@@ОлегПугач-п8щ what's even funnier is that Ukraine is building cheap little drones out of PVC pipe and they're digging up all of these anti-tank mines that Russia planted at the beginning of this war. They're attaching these anti-tank mines to these cheap little drones and destroying Russian tanks and transport vehicles with them.
👉@@theylied1776🐷
lol @@theylied1776
Ukrainian "honesty" at it's peak:
well the ucraneians claimed they killed 700 russians in one battle and we know thats bullshit
This kind of video kills the credibility of its maker😂😂😂
Really and what do you bring to the table? What great knowledge do you have?
Russia continues to grasp at straws. Let’s not forget ongoing jamming activities and new jamming technologies.
Who is winning the war in Ukraine?
@@genejohnson8631 ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦
I would argue,using the lies and failures of all opposition. That there the only one in this conflict that isn't.
NATO:!?* Never underestimate the power of Putin
None of this is remarkable it's called the US does this all the time
No it doesn’t. USA hasn’t used a sam battery with awacs to shoot down airplanes. Only long range air to air missile from f15.
Слава России!