Imagine going on air to call footballers "good for nothing." If you have that much contempt for the individuals you pay to see, then what is the point of you going to games or watching it on tv? Jordan was giggling at the comment like a school girl because it is the same kind of sentiment he has.
People want the correct decisions not to hear a referee explain how they got to the wrong decision. An explanation of the decision does not justify whether it's right or wrong. An explanation is a good start I suppose to provide clarity and reasoning behind referring decisions but it needs to go further. We need to hear the full dialogue between the on field referee and VAR officials. This has been working very well in Rugby. You can actually hear the full conversation between the referee and the VAR on how the decision was analyzed from multiple angles and and a judgement was made based on those angles. In a lot of cases the VAR leaves it up to the referee to make the call
Get rid of the failed experiment!!!! All of this pointless effort for what??? They're making more problems than they're solving! At this rate it's just going to be about ref's and not foobtall players.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Imagine going on air to call footballers "good for nothing." If you have that much contempt for the individuals you pay to see, then what is the point of you going to games or watching it on tv? Jordan was giggling at the comment like a school girl because it is the same kind of sentiment he has.
From no VAR to this in one round..
Communication is good but until the ref's are trained better or they allow ex players input into decisions it will still be useless.
All Elite Simon = Top LAD Proper Clobber 💯 Facts
Sir Lord Spectre and Sir Lord Simon Jordan = top LADS Proper Clobbers 💯 FACTS 👌
@GamerFrisco Sir GamerFrisco = Top LAD Proper Clobber 💯 Facts
People want the correct decisions not to hear a referee explain how they got to the wrong decision. An explanation of the decision does not justify whether it's right or wrong. An explanation is a good start I suppose to provide clarity and reasoning behind referring decisions but it needs to go further. We need to hear the full dialogue between the on field referee and VAR officials. This has been working very well in Rugby. You can actually hear the full conversation between the referee and the VAR on how the decision was analyzed from multiple angles and and a judgement was made based on those angles. In a lot of cases the VAR leaves it up to the referee to make the call
It's one thing making ridiculous decisions being faceless but its another making them when your face is on a giant stadium screen.
I like the fact that the situation will occur again in EPL...
We’ll see what the outcome would be from those clowns called pgmol
Get rid of VAR ruining the game. Stopping play every 2 minutes. They will have robot refs next. Joke.
Fan entitlement? Who is paying the money Simon?
Get rid of the failed experiment!!!! All of this pointless effort for what??? They're making more problems than they're solving! At this rate it's just going to be about ref's and not foobtall players.
Jim: They do it in rugby
Simon: Rugby is different
Jim: I agree
What?! 😂😂😂 just shows Jim is always looking to create an argument
It's his job.