Is there a way to run appium tests for windows desktop apps without manually establishing RDP session, right now the way I do is RDP into the machine and then run the tests, without RDP connections test will fail. Any suggestion on how to achieve this? Thanks
Hey there, thank you for the great tutorial. however, can we automate the Windows App installing process? (I mean click on the "exe" file then next, next ...) thanks!
All do respect, it doesn't seem the guy presenting this did a good job presenting. Too many times in the video we here "Well, ooops, close enough...". Would expect a lot better or more polished presentation.
With all due respect - doing a demo video, where the trainer is unable to write a simple test, not following standards (e.g. make sure you start from the same point) is a pure fail. And this is official Microsoft video :( Reminds me of the Tosca basics training I received few years ago, which failed on the 1st screen and afterwards the trainer tried to modify the pre-build example - ending up in huge failure and 1.5 hours of wasted time watching a desperate trainer from pre-sales team to keep his reputation...
It should actually find "TimerValueText" (23:18) but they are both surprised that it didn't ...hmmm. What should I say then, when even they don't know.
Yea, I wouldn't be surprised if the next one were named WTF. But, in all seriousness, the reason why most of these have not taken off like WinForms did is primarily because there are so many different frameworks, script languages and development tools being released.. and released often.. across vendors today thereby saturating the market. As a result, technology managers and developers cannot settle and **mature** on a few solid tools. And when they try to settle, something else is released with a lot of hype.
I really like the idea of live code. You guys didn't cut the errors during the demo. It seems real life =D
finally somebody not using mac
well, it's microsoft who made it, so what do you expect-
This is how which is a NATIVE WINSOWS APP bruh
+1. Cool windows app ui testing based on Webdriver. A real step forward in desktop testing. Experienced software QA engineer.
Is there a way to run appium tests for windows desktop apps without manually establishing RDP session, right now the way I do is RDP into the machine and then run the tests, without RDP connections test will fail. Any suggestion on how to achieve this? Thanks
When will this be available for WinUI 3 apps?
It's been one year almost and there seem to be no progress on stable release yet.
UWP is dead, all energy is going into WinUI3 and Project Reunion ... and this is great news. Death to UWP
hi , how to handle splash windows ? I am always getting current window closed issue
can we use these concepts to automate win32 apps like word,onenote etc?
When I saw how he was placing brackets I was gonna cry.. I'm not the only one in the world then! ^_^
Hey there, thank you for the great tutorial.
however, can we automate the Windows App installing process?
(I mean click on the "exe" file then next, next ...)
thanks!
May I get this project code? does it publish on github?
What Windows application do you recommend to start automation tests for an intermediate level?
Is there a way to switch window handles in winappdriver?
How is this different compared to automating the same scenario with existing MSUIA framework?
the code is just more fancier, and probably saves you scan optimization hustle.
room design is fine
Is the WinAppDriver available in Docker?
All do respect, it doesn't seem the guy presenting this did a good job presenting. Too many times in the video we here "Well, ooops, close enough...". Would expect a lot better or more polished presentation.
With all due respect - doing a demo video, where the trainer is unable to write a simple test, not following standards (e.g. make sure you start from the same point) is a pure fail. And this is official Microsoft video :(
Reminds me of the Tosca basics training I received few years ago, which failed on the 1st screen and afterwards the trainer tried to modify the pre-build example - ending up in huge failure and 1.5 hours of wasted time watching a desperate trainer from pre-sales team to keep his reputation...
It should actually find "TimerValueText" (23:18) but they are both surprised that it didn't ...hmmm. What should I say then, when even they don't know.
They have the same tutorials though :D
I'm starting thinking that all MS tech named in 3 letters ("WCF", WPF UWP ....) are all doomed
Yea, I wouldn't be surprised if the next one were named WTF. But, in all seriousness, the reason why most of these have not taken off like WinForms did is primarily because there are so many different frameworks, script languages and development tools being released.. and released often.. across vendors today thereby saturating the market. As a result, technology managers and developers cannot settle and **mature** on a few solid tools. And when they try to settle, something else is released with a lot of hype.
worst UI decision to not allow UWP applications to launch from its executable, like normal programs.