Nancy Fraser - The Significance of Rosa Luxemburg for Contemporary Social Theory

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 дек 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @jeffmoore9487
    @jeffmoore9487 8 лет назад +2

    At 31:00 Nancy sounds pretty sure that: When contrasting the "inside - outside" vs her "near ground - far ground" descriptions of the realms of capitalism, "Capitalist society is normatively differentiated encompassing a determinant plurality of distinct but interrelated social ontologies".
    Really? I can't argue with that!?

  • @rosaluxstiftung
    @rosaluxstiftung  10 лет назад +3

    The significance of Rosa Luxemburg for Contemporary Social Theory.
    Videoaufzeichnung des Vortrags von Nancy Fraser auf dem internationalen Workshop "The Accumulation of Capital" am vergangenen Wochenende.

  • @cristinaximera9663
    @cristinaximera9663 3 года назад

    No outside to capitalism: agree.

  • @cristinaximera9663
    @cristinaximera9663 3 года назад +1

    Turning Marx back from the feet to the head? Remind you that it was Marx who suggested that capital is not "just economy", but the base for the entire capitalist society in all its aspects. I don't see the benefit at all of turning the hierarchy of enabling condition and mere phenomenon around by "separating economy from polity"etc.

  • @milascave2
    @milascave2 8 лет назад +3

    This dosn't seem to have that much to do with R Lux.

  • @rfvtgbzhn
    @rfvtgbzhn 2 года назад

    22:12 does she mean Alan Woods? Because I never heared of Alan Wood, but Alan Woods is a distinguished Marxist theorist.

    • @JoBalDez
      @JoBalDez 9 месяцев назад

      Ellen Meiksins Wood

  • @datsfunnie5271
    @datsfunnie5271 10 лет назад +3

    Oh my God You talk so well AND look so good!

  • @VenugopalanKMcpiml
    @VenugopalanKMcpiml 6 лет назад

    Brilliant !
    "Primitive Accumulation" (Rosa Luxemburg ) revisited to be contextualized and put in perspective in the Marxist and feminist frameworks

  • @lorincowell6944
    @lorincowell6944 3 года назад

    The Jan Patocki version.

  • @rodericksloan1255
    @rodericksloan1255 9 лет назад +6

    Here we go more talking heads talking garbage most folks just want a roof and food to eat and be happy.

    • @marialauraweems7553
      @marialauraweems7553 9 лет назад +13

      roderick sloan Funny, that's exactly what Rosa Luxemburg was talking about.

    • @mcmxli-by1tj
      @mcmxli-by1tj 8 лет назад

      YES, THAT'S ALL THEY WANT, BUT IT'S NOT EASY TO PROVIDE.

  • @darkon4431
    @darkon4431 10 лет назад +3

    Wath Nancy F call Division is an other name of Alienation, wich is present in every form of social system, capitalist or communist, religious or atheist, so all those theory are wrong. The roots of Alienation go far deeper, it is an ontological problem. No system will replace courage and conscience.

    • @tymanung6382
      @tymanung6382 Год назад

      Marx wrote of objective economic social
      structure alienation = workers objectively lost, or never had, workers control of immediate production of physical
      (+ service?) products, so they subjectively feel powerless.

  • @gustavfraser4919
    @gustavfraser4919 5 лет назад +1

    Fake Fraser