Our 5-cylinder Volvo-engined Ford S-Max hits the dyno!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 фев 2025

Комментарии • 118

  • @tichwykes
    @tichwykes 17 дней назад +14

    Always loved the sound of a five pot motor going back to the days of the Audi Quattro in the eighties

  • @raulsanchez4950
    @raulsanchez4950 17 дней назад +10

    Man, i like someone also had a VTS180, im going to sell mine to get a Mondeo ST220, i really like your dyno runs, you explain a lot of the engine and how the testo works, keep it in that way 👍

  • @jncg2311
    @jncg2311 16 дней назад +7

    A good inline 5 is a friend for life. They all seem to have a bit of a reputation for lasting well. I have an old Passat, mainly, no, pretty much exclusively because the 5 cylinder engine in it is a peach, makes glorious noises, is at the same time quite fast enough to be amusing and surprisingly economical to run. It feels like it'll last forever. It probably will actually.

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  15 дней назад +4

      VAG and 5cyl? Basically a Grp B Quattro then!

    • @alouisschafer7212
      @alouisschafer7212 9 часов назад

      The Volvo 5 Cylinders both petrol and diesel are some of the most mechanically reliable engines ever made.
      Only thing to look out for on them is the timing belt.

  • @mazdaman1286
    @mazdaman1286 17 дней назад +15

    should be pretty useful , a few Police forces had them . I used one for a weekend , rather quick , rather thirsty for a people carrier , surprised a few people.

  • @gillscorner794
    @gillscorner794 17 дней назад +4

    Glad you weren't saying piss off to the craziness, it's what we like about your channel

  • @SteliosBen302
    @SteliosBen302 17 дней назад +4

    I had a focus ST with that same engine, made nearly 260bhp on a dyno run - loved the sound it made along with the pops and bangs from the twin exit exhaust. The S-max version was often overlooked but equally as tuneable

    • @timbo19751975
      @timbo19751975 17 дней назад +2

      Not the same spec of engine sorry

  • @AnonymousWaz
    @AnonymousWaz 17 дней назад +3

    Best looking people carrier. Not really a big claim, but legit none the less. Great soundtrack.

  • @garrytalbot3456
    @garrytalbot3456 16 дней назад +2

    I drove one for work purposes. EU08VGC. It replaced a Mondeo St220 that was rammed. Very quick for what it was and surprised a lot of people especially as diesels were being adopted and people initially thought that was what it was.

  • @GentilsGarage
    @GentilsGarage 17 дней назад +1

    Great to watch. The S-Max is still a car I would love to own.

  • @TW-80
    @TW-80 17 дней назад +2

    my 08 plate mk4 Mondeo with the same engine pulled 210 on the 1st run. I then had it modded a little (sports cat, exhaust and induction kit) it finally pulled 281bhp and 431Nm torque. I now need a new pair of front tyres once a year

  • @Japnut
    @Japnut 16 дней назад +1

    I genuinely have always fancied one of these.

  • @2008tourer
    @2008tourer 17 дней назад +4

    The fact this car is 20 years old next year is bonkers to me.
    Also 210 HP after all these years is definitely not bad!

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  16 дней назад +1

      It doesn't seem right, does it?

  • @bondbug73
    @bondbug73 17 дней назад +1

    Sounds great. I have to turn the volume down a bit to stop the rattling plates falling off the Dresser. Power to the Max! ✊

  • @GoldenCroc
    @GoldenCroc 17 дней назад +1

    Not too shabby.

  • @timbo19751975
    @timbo19751975 17 дней назад +5

    These are basically the 2.5t ( or lpt ) spec engine as used in the xc70 2.5t - i.e **small turbo**, which was rated by volvo at 210hp. This is why they make strong torque from no rpm and run off a cliff at 5k. It is **not** the same spec of hardware as a focus st etc for instance.. At 140k and good servicing, this engine is hardly run-in.

    • @deafyboy86
      @deafyboy86 16 дней назад +3

      @@timbo19751975 That is not correct, this is NOT the LPT engine used in V70/XC70, it is in fact the same exact engine used in Focus ST. The code if in a Volvo would be B5254T3. This is an RNC white block, the 210hp LPT engine was an RN block. RNC only came in the turbo 2.5 220hp and non turbo 2.4 170hp variants.

  • @exgtt2061
    @exgtt2061 17 дней назад

    Sister owns an early TDCI with the proper slush box auto (non powershift) and it goes well, solid feeling cars. The interiors feel well built 👍 good cars.

  • @MattBrownbill
    @MattBrownbill 16 дней назад

    I've had 5 and 6 cylinder Volvos. The 6 is a lot smoother, but the variable valve timing on the 5 I had makes it quite a beast.

  • @SterkeYerke5555
    @SterkeYerke5555 17 дней назад +2

    8:18 Your Xantia Turbo CT's have (or should have) peak torque between 2500 and 3500 rpm. It's quite common on turbocharged petrol engines, though most spec sheets only show the lowest rpm at which peak torque is available.

  • @michaeltalbot7363
    @michaeltalbot7363 17 дней назад +1

    Another great video. Just out of interest, I would like to know how much you want for the S-Max?

  • @RichieRouge206
    @RichieRouge206 16 дней назад

    I had a V50 T5 with this exact engine and can confirm what a torque monster it was! The acceleration from 50-70 on the motorway was just nuts and a party trick I found was you could start off in 6th gear from rest (admittedly slipping the clutch a little to get moving) and it would easily go all the way to top speed (on a private road obviously) and it would potter around town in 3rd gear with no fuss whatsoever. Brilliant engine and have a V70 now. The noise is just the best - and I do love a good V6 and V8. I also had an Focus Mk1.5 ST170 and found it hugely disappointing and slow. Definitely not 170bhp. I had a Mk1 1.8 Focus Zetec which felt much nicer and lighter to drive.

    • @Mr330d
      @Mr330d 16 дней назад

      I also had a mk1 1.8 focus and for what it was it felt rapid I had 150bhp diesels that were slower

  • @Batesandrw
    @Batesandrw 14 дней назад +2

    The S max done very well. I’d like out my car on your dyno. 😊

  • @tomcockrem5606
    @tomcockrem5606 16 дней назад

    I also had a C4 VTS180, and before that a C4 loeb, absolutely loved them to bits but they did definitely drive like a bathtub on wheels

  • @petem6226
    @petem6226 16 дней назад

    Wahey! Cheers Rich!

    • @petem6226
      @petem6226 16 дней назад

      Also, mine is also a June 2006, but it has traction.

  • @mehrzahl2219
    @mehrzahl2219 17 дней назад +2

    In the Volvo world this is the least wanted 5 pot, because it has thinner cylinder sleeves than the 2.3 T5, which is really a peach.

  • @timleech
    @timleech 17 дней назад

    Blimey 10 years! I remember that day.

  • @KompressorPete
    @KompressorPete 16 дней назад

    Love it!
    Maybe try without Air filter and so om? Just for Fun😊
    And put that TVR on 🙏

  • @Birmingham_racing
    @Birmingham_racing 16 дней назад

    Would love one of these just for the sound

  • @mclouj
    @mclouj 16 дней назад +1

    That's a great car. I had a mk4 Mondeo XR5 with the same engine and it was a delightful cruiser, burbly on the overrun with an aftermarket exhaust. Got surprisingly good fuel economy on the gallop too.

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  16 дней назад +1

      I think a Mondeo with this engine would be lovely. What's an XR5? We never had that over here, but sounds a lovely nod to the old Ford XR models.

    • @mclouj
      @mclouj 16 дней назад +1

      @@UPnDOWN RUclips deleted my original reply because I added a link to some pictures.
      XR5 was the top trim with the 2.5T for the Mondeo in Aus until around 2013, when they switched to the Ecoboost 2L and just called it Titanium again. We also had the XR4 (Fiesta ST 2L), the Focus XR5 (Focus ST) and the Falcon XR6 and XR8s with corresponding cylinder numbers.
      From memory I think the XR5 Mondeo was identical to the UK Titanium 2.5.

  • @EdgyNumber1
    @EdgyNumber1 16 дней назад +1

    You need Shell VPower to make the most of that engine. Its tuned to use it. Standard fuel won't cut it.

    • @OH2023-cj9if
      @OH2023-cj9if 15 дней назад

      The ECU adjusts for normal fuel, but you get slightly less power. It's unnoticeable.

  • @evlo8059
    @evlo8059 17 дней назад +5

    I was kinda wondering if by any chance you have a SM?

  • @veedubgeezer
    @veedubgeezer 17 дней назад

    I do love my S-Max

  • @Sid3300
    @Sid3300 17 дней назад +2

    It's funny that a people carrier is the quickest car on the board at the moment. It's making what the book figure is on my Saab weirdly. You gotta get a Focus ST with the same engine on there to compare, Tasty Classics has one 👀

  • @SoWereDoingWhatNow
    @SoWereDoingWhatNow 17 дней назад

    Great sleeper spec.

  • @KarelBeelaertsvanBlokland
    @KarelBeelaertsvanBlokland 17 дней назад

    DRive the 200HP manual S-Max Ecoboost. Fast & practical car especially on long distances through Europe.

    • @veedubgeezer
      @veedubgeezer 17 дней назад

      Unfortunately we only got the unreliable PowerShift gearbox version of the 2.0 Ecoboost.

  • @robertsedgwick1629
    @robertsedgwick1629 17 дней назад +2

    people put the smax wings & bumper on galaxys to give themselves a G-max!

  • @indecisiveauto
    @indecisiveauto 17 дней назад +1

    Superb engines. One note for you though - to get peak figures you do need to run them on 98ron fuel - will run on 95 but not optimally.

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  17 дней назад +1

      I bet if I did it again with super it'd be no different 😄

    • @indecisiveauto
      @indecisiveauto 17 дней назад +1

      @UPnDOWN or will the question nag you quietly, persistently for the rest of time? 🤣 - I believe (though I don't have any imperical evidence) that you need a good chunk of 98 in there for the car to pick up the fuel octane difference and make the adjustments - never really noticed the difference in any of my Volvo's on the road tbh and I've had three different variants of that 5 cylinder block in various cars.

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  12 дней назад +1

      Sounds like a bit of an old Volvo myth to me.

    • @indecisiveauto
      @indecisiveauto 12 дней назад

      @@UPnDOWN well I guess you'll just have to wonder if you ever fulfilled the S-Max's full potential....forever...🤣

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  11 дней назад

      @ Mmmm...yeah I don't think I will 😄

  • @liamkelley123
    @liamkelley123 17 дней назад +1

    I'd love to see a vauxhall insignia 2.0 cdti do a dyno run I have one but its mapped to a quoted 215bhp and 460nm but I'd love to see the real figures

  • @duckler699
    @duckler699 17 дней назад +2

    whats your opinion on the preface lift mrk 6s with the old euro 3 1.4s with the 89hp sigma over the euro 4s 79hp in the 1.4?

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  6 дней назад +1

      I've no idea to be honest!

    • @duckler699
      @duckler699 6 дней назад

      @UPnDOWN the euro 3 model was slammed by bad gearing then the euro 4 model was slammed with emissions standard and made them really under powered like the 1.25s but would really cool to see the differences between all the sigma engines in terms of power numbers because the euro 3 model 1.4 had the best power bound of the all the sigma mrk 6 engines then I believe the based the 1,6 of the 1.25 engine?? If I remember correctly if not the 1.4 cuz they used the 1,4 for some other ford engine like the puma 1,7 engine ect and list goes on I really find ford sigma interesting

  • @ChrisPatrick-q6k
    @ChrisPatrick-q6k 15 дней назад +2

    The V6 Galaxy as an auto drank like a queen.
    Too right about Ford and their petrol engine power claims. ST170, ST200??? 😂

  • @davyarthurs
    @davyarthurs 16 дней назад

    Is this on super unleaded ? This may have an effect on the upper reaches

  • @Zadster
    @Zadster 17 дней назад +1

    "Area under the curve" and all that. Lots and lots of lovely driveable heft all the way to 5K. Quattro growl too. Naughty and delicious, just how I like... things. Cake. Chocolate. Engines. That sort of stuff.
    It would be interesting to put your new OBD reader gizmo onto this and look at the boost pressure and valve actuation. Because the engine looks good for just over 220 at 5750rpm, but something odd seems to be happening. I guess the valve is normally PWM actuated and is getting a little bit over-enthusiastic and over-bleeding at 5000-5500. The flatline at 5500+ looks about right, just consistently 10hp low. A worn turbo would normally just gradually lose interest in a fairly smooth way. Not that it is worth doing anything mind you. Just for curiosity.

  • @IfInDoubt..
    @IfInDoubt.. 17 дней назад

    You should try a run without the air filter 😉

  • @oscarzt1652
    @oscarzt1652 17 дней назад +2

    that graph drop off at the top end is a bit depressing

  • @danieleaton1399
    @danieleaton1399 17 дней назад

    The ford 5 pot is basically the Volvo 5 pot , brilliant engine and they were 225 so 210 is not bad going at that mileage

    • @MeefMoaf
      @MeefMoaf 17 дней назад

      Not basically, all the 5 pots ford used were made by Volvo.

    • @timbo19751975
      @timbo19751975 17 дней назад

      ​@@MeefMoaf in DNA yes - these engines were re engineered by ford to be abit shorter to fit the ford platform.

    • @MrStonegrove
      @MrStonegrove 17 дней назад +1

      @@timbo19751975 That was not specific to Ford, since over time Volvo started using Ford platforms. I think the first modified engines went into S40/V50 which was based on the same platform as the Focus. One very obvious modification is that the location of the top engine mount was changed. In the original design used in Volvo's own platforms that were devloped before Ford bought Volvo Cars, it's located right on top of the engine. Reasonably easy to change, which is good since it has a habit of going bad.
      As far as I know all of the engines were made in Skövde, regardless of if they went into a Ford or Volvo.

  • @grumpytorque8905
    @grumpytorque8905 17 дней назад +1

    Need to fit blue indicator bulbs

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  16 дней назад +2

      Hahaha! The C6 needs them more, clearly...

  • @Madpegasusmax
    @Madpegasusmax 16 дней назад

    It's always a half V10 :3 , sounds nice ...

  • @JackPriddle
    @JackPriddle 6 дней назад

    How much? I could be interested?

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  5 дней назад

      £1695ono. Needs work but is a good car underneath.

  • @deviatefishy
    @deviatefishy 16 дней назад

    What happened at 08:52 ?

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  15 дней назад

      Editing glitch. Didn't realise until it was too late.

  • @IrenESorius
    @IrenESorius 17 дней назад +1

    👍‍‍🌟👍‍‍

  • @alouisschafer7212
    @alouisschafer7212 9 часов назад

    Nothing better then a Volvo 5 Cylinder at redline.
    In my opinion Volvo peaked during the Ford Era. I have a 2007 V70 myself with the D5 Diesel. Altought if the Volvo ever dies and is not economically viable to repair i.e engine or transmission explodes my next car will be a petrol. Modern Diesels have so many issues with the emissions control systems especially the EGR that I just dont want to deal with them anymore.
    There is also the issue of random things failing on an 18 year old car like right now the coolant lines to the heater core are rotted out and the car looses coolant every time it gets driven for longer periods and there is a fuel pressure code and occasional long start and weird running at idle, most likely the commonrail fuel pressure regulator is responsible for that.
    Problem is the coolant hoses are like 100€ each and can only be bought from Volvo and they are on backorder for weeks. My garage told me no luck with getting used hoses or rigging something up with other hoses that fit. The fuel pressure regulator is 150€ too.
    It also technically needs a serpentine and timing belt + idler and tensioner job this year and the elephant in the room is the fact that it needs a complete intake cleanout on account of the EGR clogging everything and a swirl flap job and thats a big one needs all injectors pulled to take the intake manifold off.
    So it all adds up.
    Something less than 10 years old VW or Skoda with an 1.0 or 1.5 EA211 engine in it would be the perfect next car for me.
    Thats a small efficient reliable engine and in a comfy Skoda like an Octavia I see nothing wrong with that problem is they are really high in price right now.

  • @HowardLeVert
    @HowardLeVert 17 дней назад +5

    In a way, a sort of tribute to Gryph?

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  17 дней назад +4

      I can do better than that. This was filmed last weekend.

    • @HowardLeVert
      @HowardLeVert 17 дней назад +2

      @@UPnDOWN Look forward to whatever's "better than that"... :)

  • @HA05GER
    @HA05GER 16 дней назад

    I love my smax shame its the 2.0 diesel though it goes quite well and ive pushed along many of the chavs on the backroads. They handle very well for a big old bus id love to go for a 2.5 just being the age they are mine is very rotten so i assume alot of them have gone that way.

  • @ollylappage2595
    @ollylappage2595 16 дней назад

    When you replace your leaderboard... and I thought this when I saw a couple of other vids - showing in brackets the hp above or below book figure doesn't make sense to me. Wouldn't it be better to do % above or below book? Does of course require a small amount of maths 🙂

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  15 дней назад

      Agreed. The new setup will make much more sense.

  • @simonprime5541
    @simonprime5541 17 дней назад +2

    So you're happy with that !!! Lol

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  17 дней назад +2

      Not sure if I conveyed it enough...

  • @RikAindow
    @RikAindow 16 дней назад

    I just picked up a 2012 Mondeo estate last weekend for a bargain price. Why couldn't you have sold It then? Haha. Before that, I had the earlier 2007 and the diesel in that was so clattery compared to the new one so I'm not surprised they gave these a 2.5 turbo as the flagship, launch engine. It was heavily based on the Mondeo, too.
    This comes from a time when manufacturers were trying to create sporty MPV models, the pre-crossover era

  • @Master_Raven
    @Master_Raven 7 часов назад

    25 HP power losses only? Very little.

  • @pashwesty3313
    @pashwesty3313 16 дней назад

    I'd be interested in buying this? Could I contact you about it??

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  16 дней назад +1

      Sure. Email is in the bio thing.

    • @pashwesty3313
      @pashwesty3313 9 дней назад

      ​@@UPnDOWNNot sure if I'm being generally quite thick... But I couldn't find a direct email address, so I've dropped you a message on Instagram! Hope that's okay!

  • @stephenbates8370
    @stephenbates8370 17 дней назад +4

    Weak actuator maybe 🤷‍♂️

  • @brenglover72
    @brenglover72 17 дней назад

    Somebody will buy it. For the engine.

  • @GDBEnjoyer
    @GDBEnjoyer 16 дней назад +1

    Great Q cars, not many know about them, you also got the early Kuga with the same engine, awd and manual for a short period of time, very rare though especially manual!

  • @binarydinosaurs
    @binarydinosaurs 17 дней назад

    Nice. It occurred to me watching this that I've never seen a RWD car on the dyno. I assume you just drive it into the bay instead of reversing, and the that the software will be happy with the rollers being driven the other way. Be interesting to get my 2016 Passat GT on there, bet it doesn't pull 290 broken horses any more.

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  17 дней назад

      Vecki and Honda Beat both RWD. Have had loads on there but I think those are the only two vids.

    • @binarydinosaurs
      @binarydinosaurs 15 дней назад

      @@UPnDOWN Vecki on the dyno, that's my next viewing sorted :D

  • @mross302
    @mross302 14 дней назад

    The day you taste a oather car, especially a town car, then you will understand an estate car

  • @Invisibleman7
    @Invisibleman7 17 дней назад

    I too love 5 pot engines.

  • @jamesbrett6518
    @jamesbrett6518 16 дней назад

    Wot? No wet belt?

  • @alanchatfield4271
    @alanchatfield4271 15 дней назад

    Dyno it again but pull the air filter off it just for the run. The top end will come back

  • @danrkelly
    @danrkelly 17 дней назад +6

    I'm always a bit cautious around drivers with that sort of number plate format ; )

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  17 дней назад +3

      Wow, that's going back a bit!

  • @tomwinch9107
    @tomwinch9107 17 дней назад

    Gotta love a 5 pot ...

  • @andydurbs
    @andydurbs 17 дней назад

    Tax rules have changed.

  • @mikecleasby709
    @mikecleasby709 17 дней назад

    Really lovely noise off that 5Pot motor…… properly useful car too…….don’t wrap it…I’ll wear it now! 😉👍

  • @Knaeckebrotsaege
    @Knaeckebrotsaege 16 дней назад

    8:57 a people carrier that sounds like boatloads of low bitrate mp3 compression artifacts... yay
    edit: 9:42 omg it gets even worse... wth is YT or the video editing program doing to the audio jeez

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  15 дней назад

      It could be. The dyno was VERY noisy with the S-Max though - noiser than it normally is. Suspect it's the weight/tyre section.

  • @shadowjkl
    @shadowjkl 17 дней назад

    Local police has S-Max, sadly diesel though.

  • @AnyoneSeenMikeHunt
    @AnyoneSeenMikeHunt 17 дней назад +1

    Inheriting that engine was the only good thing to come out of Ford's ownership of Volvo.

  • @Pacemakertrucker
    @Pacemakertrucker 13 дней назад

    titanium x is the highest trim level bud

    • @UPnDOWN
      @UPnDOWN  11 дней назад

      Yes, but not at the time this was made (I should have clarified)