They don't normally get the microphone levels as right as this. They gave space (really no pun intended) for the person at home to get the fullness of its scale without it overpowering the microphones. I really hope they can achieve this result again for the big rockets. The overwhelming impact it creates leaves a very strong impression on anyone who witnesses it and just for laying down a recording for history it's important.
THOSE ACOUSTIC SOUND WAVES AND RIPPLES DURING RS-25 & SRB IGNITION AND DURING ASCENT ARE INCREDIBLE ! ! ! SOME SERIOUS+INSANE ENERGY BEING UNLEASHED HERE ! ! !
It's crazy to think that years from now when we have established a fully operational base on the moon and are making preparations for the journey to Mars, we'll come back to videos like this and think about where it all began, reliving each harrowing and thrilling moment and thinking, "Man...what a time to be alive."
What I find hilarious is the fact that when a moon base is set up and even perhaps city lights on the moon...there's still gonna be people saying it was staged and fake
When I was 6 I can still remember getting out of class for the school to watch John Glenn's rocket go up in Fl. I can still see it in my mind. We were all amazed and excited! Look how far we've come.
i mean NASA sucks, this costs millions and it's just ONE launch. Imagine them doing this over and over, it's taken them two plus years to even launch one. And it costs nearly a billion dollars per one. Gonna have to hail reusable private companies instead of this garbage government NASA program.
Я столько красоты повидал в своей жизни, но настоящей красоты от запуска космического аппарата никогда не видел Это самое лучшее,что я когда-либо видел в своей жизни
@DS-lk3tx Staship. LOL. Sounds like a stupid TV show. The Saturn 5 made the ground shake. I was 3 miles away. I felt my bones vibrating. The S5 lifted off slowly. These new tockets take off so fast, like a model rocket!
Love the ultra low frequency rumble sounds you were able to deal with. A real treat for my high end headphones as they gently massaged by my skull. This took some seriously exotic and hyper expensive pro recording equipment, talent and a willingness to break a few sound tracks down in at least 10 to 20 sound tracks to tweak them and mix them back together again. Very challenging sound engineering work.
yes in terms of specific impulse although there are second stage engines like the RL10 with a higher specific impulse which is impressive given that its a 1950s design
I have to say this is one of the best videos I have seen on this! I'm glad I was able to be apart of history ! I launched this bad boy from the firing room woo!
1:18 - 1:25 SLS HOT REFUELING ? ? ? JUST CURIOUS, DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THE SLS IS BEING REFUELLED WHILE THE RS-25 ENGINES ARE UP AND RUNNING ON THE LAUNCH PAD WITH THE GROUND SUPPORT UMBILICAL'S STILL CONNECTED UNTIL SOLID ROCKET BOOSTER IGNITION AND LIFT-OFF ? ? ?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
There is something incredibly beautiful, almost poetic and very titanic about the launch. So much power, so much thrust, fire at over 3000C spewing out the back, perfectly engineered down to the last detail not to destroy itself from all that violent combustion as the SLS slowly starts picking up speed. I can't help but smile until my face starts to hurt. The space race was the best thing ever to happen to humanity within the last 100 years. The fields of science and technology surged forwards in the space race. And now... with NASA and SpaceX at the top of their game... it looks like we have another space race. Watching this makes me feel optimistic about the future. Maybe we will get out sci-fi utopia after all.
Dude I have watched pretty much every launch video and especially the pure sound., NO-ONE and I mean NO OTHER channel has come close to this level of Beautiful clear visuals combined with such throaty pure rocket sound. When those SRB Ignite .... That my friend was the money shot of ROCKET PORN .... and classy rocket porn at that. THANK YOU - THIS IS INCREDABLE !!
0:30 W-O-W ! ! ! YOU CAN HEAR THE SONIC BOOMS OF THE RS-25 HYDROLOX ENGINES AND THE DETONATION IGNITION OF THE SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS AS THEY ROAR INTO LIFE ! ! ! THE EXPELLED GASES FROM THE RS-25 ENGINES AND THE SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS ARE BEING EXPELLED AT NEARLY FOURTEEN TIMES THE SPEED OF SOUND ! ! !
My family and I have see a few rocket launches from Cocoa Beach. Nice touch adding the frogs in the background sound to get the ambiance of the area of Merrit Island!
@DigitalAstronaut You're welcome! We definitely noticed them when we were down there. We have them here in Charleston too. You did an AMAZING job with the whole video!
Amazing. However, I still have to give it to the Saturn V. The 5-pack of Rocketdyne F-1 engines can't be beat for sheer brute strength. The F-1 still, to this day, stands as the most powerful single chamber rocket motor ever produced.
Apparently their was consideration of replacing the SRBs with liquid boosters using F1-B engines but got scrapped due to the use shuttle tech requirements
Thank you! Well I have a lot more space videos on the channel, but not a ton of rocket launches. However, there's a simple launch compilation coming out Friday morning and a cinematic Space Shuttle launch video coming out in a few months. Otherwise, most of my channel is about space exploration. Hope to see you there!
Proven technology from the Shuttle era is extensively utilized in the design and construction of the Artemis rocket. The SR-25 engines are leftover from the discontinued Shuttle mission. The foam insulation on the main fuel tank is the same concept is that on the Shuttle main fuel tank. The solid rocket boosters design are from Shuttle.
@@peterresetz1960 In no way is losing two, 2 billion space craft carelessly is ok, especially when ur company barely makes enough because it subsidized by the gov. Just like with the falcon 9, starship will fail to meet the promises Elon has made. Honestly it wouldn't even matter all that much but OUR RETURN TO THE MOON is in jeopardy because of starship. Ironic since Elon stated how in his mind SLS would be holding back our return to the moon.
@@peterresetz1960 The "proven" technology from the Shuttle was thrown out the window once actual design work started on SLS. 1. RS-25 was heavily redesigned for SLS. Heatshields were replaced with ones that would withstand higher temperatures. Internal plumbing was redone and changed with a modern design to handle higher loads and stresses. Avionics and internal computers were completely replaced with a new design. The only thing that's the same is the nozzle. 2. The foam insulation material is different from the Shuttle one. The corestage uses a different material and is built/welded differently than the Shuttle's external tank. It is designed to handle higher loads. 3. The solid boosters only share the casings from the Shuttle. The motors, nozzle, avionics and insulation are a brand new design.
The sounds in space -- is that simulated or that from the vibration being transmitted thru the structure and being picked up by a microphone, e.g. by one of the GoPros attached to the end of the solar array?
It is simulated. I was going for exactly what you’re describing- what the vibration through the structure might sound like from inside the cabin. The cabin itself was pressurized, just without any of the astronauts onboard. To my knowledge, NASA hasn’t released any audio recordings from Orion- I don’t think there would have been a need for a mic on this mission
3:36 What is that smudge of light right in the middle of the screen? Looks like a galaxy but could be anything. Might have to switch to 2160p to see it clearly. The water deluge system is finely tuned. Nice launch.
Those shots from orbit around the moon are the real point of Artemis/Orion. NASA knows this route already. Look at that shot at 3:38 - NO crew-rated spacecraft has ever flown this far out before. Starship fans would do well to consider this - Starship isn't even crew rated yet, and has yet to go into actual orbital flight. I wish SpaceX all the best in their endeavor, but boasting might best be reserved for after the mission has wrapped up and crews are on the ground...
The problem is we are going backwards instead of moving forward. Even then they are having an extremely difficult time doing something that a team back in the 60’s was able to accomplish with far less technology while even building much more powerful engines. I know the Shuttle program had its problems but the success of the Shuttle program far outweighed failures. These new space craft can’t even do half of what the Space Shuttle did. At least it was able to retrieve satellites for repair, bring them back for repair, deliver satellites and one of them even had the ability to carry a lab/science module in the cargo hold. Carried more people and was responsible for building most of the I.S.S.. They should have taken what they learned from the shuttle program and built a better more updated shuttle with stronger lighter weight materials. Between the lighter weight materials and lighter weight computers and other electronics the weight savings would have been big. After all that implementation of much better management over the program. All that money wasted in all the previous programs that went nowhere could have been used to develop and build a newer and much more efficient engines.
Now that’s sheer bloody power! Unfortunately, until we can leave the planet without all that fire and hells bells, regular commercial space travel similar to getting on a plane at an airport isn’t really doable
Год назад+1
Still the BEST cinematic Launch is in Armageddon movie. ;)
Is clear that as space exploration becomes more ambitious, will b beyond any single nation's resources. There'll hafta b genuine international cooprtn outa sheer necessity .. ie; ALL of Humanity .. instead of this incessant squabbling. Imagine how much resource could b diverted away from the militaries. So exciting prospect returning 2 Moon, then onto Mars, then mining of the asteroids, then the stars! Manned Artemis 2 this yr? Art-3 in 2025?
The most powerful operational rocket in the world, at time of writing. It's much like its Saturn V forebear in that regard. The Saturn was technically not as powerful as its soviet rival, the N1. However, the N1 never flew without turning into a fireball. EDIT: Because the meaning of the second paragraph isn't clear enough, the point I was making is that the SLS is not as powerful as the Starship. However, the Starship is not, at time of writing, an operational rocket. It's an incomplete test article that keeps dying a fiery death in the upper atmosphere. If Starship becomes operational, _then_ SLS will no longer be the most powerful operational rocket in the world, and only then. The rocket needs to be operational to be considered the most powerful operational rocket, after all. Kinda in the name. But it's not there yet.
@@AndrewHillis_2024 Note that I said "operational." Starship is not operational. Starship has yet to fly without turning into a fireball. Starship is currently not even complete, it's a fuselage with engines and remote controls and cameras in it, and nothing else. That's why the launches have been referred to as "Test articles," they're not complete vehicles. That's why I made the comparison to Saturn V and N1. The N1 was more powerful than the Saturn, but because it never actually completed a flight, the Saturn remained the winner by default. Power is meaningless if you can't actually use it for anything.
@@AndrewHillis_2024starship is yet to actually achieve anything. Also having so many engines on a single stage seems like Soviet N1 levels of bad idea
@thomashayhurst6547 The N1 problem wasn't engine amount it was having those old computers manage 30 engines at once they couldn't handle it since they had obsolete even back then flight computers on the N1 keep in mind Falcon Heavy launches with 27 engines no problem at all
Imagine if they attached an 8k per eye 3D stereo cameras there, at least in a window inside, so everyone with a VR headset would feel like being next to the Moon for real.
@@GooletakesItUpItArse I am spelling it correctly. 😀 The Space Shuttle's main engines were offset from the center of mass at launch due to the addition of the giant orange fuel tank and solid rocket boosters attached to the belly of the orbiter. That offset thrust right before liftoff would push the entire launch vehicle over to the side and they would wait for it to swing back into a more vertical position before they would light the SRBs and blow the bolts that held everything down. This lean to the side and back was nicknamed the "twang."
@bluewaterboof82 your spelling is bang on! That's my issue concerning Google LLC which owns RUclips. There is also now easily available via RUclips, a full documentary from the two crew. Filmed both astronauts' reactions to the then-brand-new design Space Shuttle programme. One of the astronauts was #JohnYoung who had previously been on two #Apollo missions to the moon and #Gemini and the US space programmes. One of the astronauts who explained the phenomenon and gave the nickname "twang"
A Shuttle launch was always very impressive. But this is just as impressive and beautiful. When the SRB’s ignite . Wow.
It was basically a superpowered shuttle launch without the glider.
They don't normally get the microphone levels as right as this. They gave space (really no pun intended) for the person at home to get the fullness of its scale without it overpowering the microphones. I really hope they can achieve this result again for the big rockets. The overwhelming impact it creates leaves a very strong impression on anyone who witnesses it and just for laying down a recording for history it's important.
This is not the shuttle
@@microbeMan nobody said it was🤔
Thank you! What a compliment.
THOSE ACOUSTIC SOUND WAVES AND RIPPLES DURING RS-25 & SRB IGNITION AND DURING ASCENT ARE INCREDIBLE ! ! ! SOME SERIOUS+INSANE ENERGY BEING UNLEASHED HERE ! ! !
It's crazy to think that years from now when we have established a fully operational base on the moon and are making preparations for the journey to Mars, we'll come back to videos like this and think about where it all began, reliving each harrowing and thrilling moment and thinking, "Man...what a time to be alive."
It began in the 60's. I was there. We're just catching up.
What I find hilarious is the fact that when a moon base is set up and even perhaps city lights on the moon...there's still gonna be people saying it was staged and fake
@@thunderfox53they’ll say it’s projections on the firmament or whatever😂
@@omarbaba9892 Well that's the problem with conspiracy theorists, they are right in their perspective, no one can say anything to change their mind.
I was 12 when Artemis 1 launched
When I was 6 I can still remember getting out of class for the school to watch John Glenn's rocket go up in Fl. I can still see it in my mind. We were all amazed and excited! Look how far we've come.
John glenn to this, imagine kids who saw artemis 1 at 6 would see at your age? mars colony asteroid mining nuclear engines idk exiting stuff for sure
This is awesome on mobile, but on desktop, it's a whole new experience!!!!! This video kicks ass on desktop!!!! Play it with the volume on loud.
Thank you! I tried to make it the best launch experience possible and I’m glad it came through.
EVEN THE SONIC BOOMS OF THE RS-25 HYDROLOX ENGINE IGNITIONS ARE IMPRESSIVE ! ! !👍
THE IGNITION AND LAUNCH ASCENT IS SO VIOLENT ! ! !👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Шикарное зрелище, невероятный звук!
Wow, this is gold. Thank you very much for this video and all Artemis I videos. More videos please. Hail Artemis I, hail Artemis Program, hail NASA ❤
This is amazing. A rare treat with just the sounds of the sounds. Chills.
i mean NASA sucks, this costs millions and it's just ONE launch. Imagine them doing this over and over, it's taken them two plus years to even launch one. And it costs nearly a billion dollars per one. Gonna have to hail reusable private companies instead of this garbage government NASA program.
The sound of this launch was epic.
THOSE BEAUTIFUL IMAGES OF THE EARTH-MOON SYSTEM, REMINDS ME OF 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY ! ! !
This on my sound system was absolutely mind blowing
I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE ROCKETS, BUT THE ROCKET ENGINE SOUND IS MUSIC TO MY EARS
0:00
Woah that was so cool! Thanks for taking me on this thrilling ride!
Я столько красоты повидал в своей жизни, но настоящей красоты от запуска космического аппарата никогда не видел
Это самое лучшее,что я когда-либо видел в своей жизни
Those solid rocket boosters really take thing to another level
its a Russian comment@@awesomemcawesomeshorts9531
THE ENERGY THAT IS BEING UNLEASHED HERE IS ABSOLUTELY INSANE & MENTAL ! ! !👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
No big deal. Watch a S5 launch. That was a beast.
Starship launches with more than twice the power and its still a prototype. 😂
@DS-lk3tx Staship. LOL. Sounds like a stupid TV show. The Saturn 5 made the ground shake. I was 3 miles away. I felt my bones vibrating. The S5 lifted off slowly. These new tockets take off so fast, like a model rocket!
@@roncaruso931starship already has 2x the thrust of SV, soon to be 3x. But s5 engines are massive. Both stunning.
@VaughnLower The Saturn 5 was awesome. As I said, the ground was shaking, and buildings rattled.
Love the ultra low frequency rumble sounds you were able to deal with. A real treat for my high end headphones as they gently massaged by my skull. This took some seriously exotic and hyper expensive pro recording equipment, talent and a willingness to break a few sound tracks down in at least 10 to 20 sound tracks to tweak them and mix them back together again. Very challenging sound engineering work.
the most efficient engines and the most powerful boosters working in harmony
These are more efficient than Raptor 2/3?
yes in terms of specific impulse although there are second stage engines like the RL10 with a higher specific impulse which is impressive given that its a 1950s design
@@clementine_awesomeness I guess it’s silly to even make the comparison due to fuel differences, thrust differences and purposes
2:20 AT TOP-RIGHT HEADING STRAIGHT FOR THE MOON THAT HAS JUST COME INTO VIEW, A-W-E-S-O-M-E STUFF ! ! !👍
I have to say this is one of the best videos I have seen on this! I'm glad I was able to be apart of history ! I launched this bad boy from the firing room woo!
Whoa! Tell us more! What was it like and what did you do on the team?
i dont think i've seen a launch so cinematic and epic as this was captured. what the heck, this was amazing.
I saw it like two days before it launched, but I wasn’t there for the launch
This baby is impressive! Watching this thing blasting off like a bat of of hell.
Thanks. This is amazing. A rare treat with just the sounds of the sounds. Chills.
Amazing video! I loved the shots from the multiple camera angles.
It’s so freaking awesome it gives me goosebumps
Even though i wasn't able to see it in person, i stayed up until 2 AM to watch this beauty take off!! I'm proud to be part of the Artemis generation!!
1:18 - 1:25 SLS HOT REFUELING ? ? ? JUST CURIOUS, DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THE SLS IS BEING REFUELLED WHILE THE RS-25 ENGINES ARE UP AND RUNNING ON THE LAUNCH PAD WITH THE GROUND SUPPORT UMBILICAL'S STILL CONNECTED UNTIL SOLID ROCKET BOOSTER IGNITION AND LIFT-OFF ? ? ?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Excelent work with rocket and too with this video cut !! Perfect , hope see very fast 2. launch in a day.
There is something incredibly beautiful, almost poetic and very titanic about the launch. So much power, so much thrust, fire at over 3000C spewing out the back, perfectly engineered down to the last detail not to destroy itself from all that violent combustion as the SLS slowly starts picking up speed. I can't help but smile until my face starts to hurt.
The space race was the best thing ever to happen to humanity within the last 100 years. The fields of science and technology surged forwards in the space race. And now... with NASA and SpaceX at the top of their game... it looks like we have another space race. Watching this makes me feel optimistic about the future. Maybe we will get out sci-fi utopia after all.
Wow. Alot of this footage is the first I've seen. Excellent work
Guy in the moving car at 1:01 "shit.. it's so dark, there should I park? Oh.. Now I see the place".
Who would do that lol like bro you're missing it
AMAZING STUFF ! ! !👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Can you imagine when humans go to the Moon in this magnificent rocket. I can't wait for that moment!
I can’t imagine can you.
FANTASTIC ONBOARD P.O.V. VIEWS ! ! ! JUST WISH THERE WERE MORE ! ! !🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Putting Philip Shepard's The Launch theme over this is so cool, I recommend
0:49 U L T R A V I O L E N C E ! ! !👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
The base and engine nacelles look so cool with their markings.
SHEER BRUTE FORCE POWER ! ! ! I LOVE IT ! ! !
Great edit. Very crisp sound.
Dude I have watched pretty much every launch video and especially the pure sound., NO-ONE and I mean NO OTHER channel has come close to this level of Beautiful clear visuals combined with such throaty pure rocket sound. When those SRB Ignite .... That my friend was the money shot of ROCKET PORN .... and classy rocket porn at that. THANK YOU - THIS IS INCREDABLE !!
Man I hope the moon landing is ultra high def....it will be so epic so all humans can understand the amazing feat and beauty of space travel.
This sounds beautiful!
0:30 W-O-W ! ! ! YOU CAN HEAR THE SONIC BOOMS OF THE RS-25 HYDROLOX ENGINES AND THE DETONATION IGNITION OF THE SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS AS THEY ROAR INTO LIFE ! ! ! THE EXPELLED GASES FROM THE RS-25 ENGINES AND THE SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS ARE BEING EXPELLED AT NEARLY FOURTEEN TIMES THE SPEED OF SOUND ! ! !
Spectacular
My family and I have see a few rocket launches from Cocoa Beach. Nice touch adding the frogs in the background sound to get the ambiance of the area of Merrit Island!
Thank you for noticing that! I remembered the frogs at night at Merrit can be extremely loud, so I tried to recreate that as best I could.
@DigitalAstronaut You're welcome! We definitely noticed them when we were down there. We have them here in Charleston too. You did an AMAZING job with the whole video!
THIS IS FUCKING AWESOME ❤
Really amazing sound and light of the launch!!
i was actually suprised it launched right on my birthday
Wow! This so amazing! Nice edit!
Amazing. However, I still have to give it to the Saturn V. The 5-pack of Rocketdyne F-1 engines can't be beat for sheer brute strength. The F-1 still, to this day, stands as the most powerful single chamber rocket motor ever produced.
Apparently their was consideration of replacing the SRBs with liquid boosters using F1-B engines but got scrapped due to the use shuttle tech requirements
0:49 WHEN THOSE SOLIDS LIGHT UP YOU KNOW YOU ARE GOING SOMEWHERE & F-A-S-T ! ! !👍
Beautiful guys awesome xx
Very nice editing right here, sir. Thank you for sharing.
With content like this you should have lots more zeros on that subscriber count. I'm in
Thank you! Well I have a lot more space videos on the channel, but not a ton of rocket launches. However, there's a simple launch compilation coming out Friday morning and a cinematic Space Shuttle launch video coming out in a few months. Otherwise, most of my channel is about space exploration. Hope to see you there!
you can really see the moons egg shape in the last couple of seconds
The nicest thing about this launch was that nobody was concerned that a "rapid unscheduled disassembly" would occur at any moment!!
Proven technology from the Shuttle era is extensively utilized in the design and construction of the Artemis rocket.
The SR-25 engines are leftover from the discontinued Shuttle mission.
The foam insulation on the main fuel tank is the same concept is that on the Shuttle main fuel tank.
The solid rocket boosters design are from Shuttle.
You are a cringe boomer from the year 1979 💀💀💀
@@peterresetz1960 In no way is losing two, 2 billion space craft carelessly is ok, especially when ur company barely makes enough because it subsidized by the gov. Just like with the falcon 9, starship will fail to meet the promises Elon has made. Honestly it wouldn't even matter all that much but OUR RETURN TO THE MOON is in jeopardy because of starship. Ironic since Elon stated how in his mind SLS would be holding back our return to the moon.
And it's only flown once with no scheduled launch in the foreseeable future yet Space X launches almost weekly.
@@peterresetz1960 The "proven" technology from the Shuttle was thrown out the window once actual design work started on SLS.
1. RS-25 was heavily redesigned for SLS. Heatshields were replaced with ones that would withstand higher temperatures. Internal plumbing was redone and changed with a modern design to handle higher loads and stresses. Avionics and internal computers were completely replaced with a new design. The only thing that's the same is the nozzle.
2. The foam insulation material is different from the Shuttle one. The corestage uses a different material and is built/welded differently than the Shuttle's external tank. It is designed to handle higher loads.
3. The solid boosters only share the casings from the Shuttle. The motors, nozzle, avionics and insulation are a brand new design.
Perfect sound to listen while sleeping 😊
My grandad was there to see arch Apollo 4 takeoff (first full Saturn V test flight). No words.
Nice video. Greetings from Argentina!
GO ARTEMIS THE HUNTER ! ! ! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Dude ive known the that ever since i watched The very 1st launch in 1981! I made the reply intensity 😂
A-W-E-S-O-M-E AUDIO-VISUAL CINEMATIC EXPERIENCE ! ! !
W-O-W ! ! ! WHAT A SPECTACLE ! ! !
INCREDIBLE CINEMATOGRAPHY ! ! !👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Hoping for day launch next time.
REMARKABLE!
The sounds in space -- is that simulated or that from the vibration being transmitted thru the structure and being picked up by a microphone, e.g. by one of the GoPros attached to the end of the solar array?
It is simulated. I was going for exactly what you’re describing- what the vibration through the structure might sound like from inside the cabin. The cabin itself was pressurized, just without any of the astronauts onboard. To my knowledge, NASA hasn’t released any audio recordings from Orion- I don’t think there would have been a need for a mic on this mission
@@DigitalAstronaut Perhaps the sound of blood moving through your body.
This is it! This is the rocket that NASA intends on using to send astronauts to both the Moon and Mars.
Can't wait! Be sure to check out the updates on the Artemis program on my channel - there's a lot happening!
3:36 What is that smudge of light right in the middle of the screen? Looks like a galaxy but could be anything. Might have to switch to 2160p to see it clearly. The water deluge system is finely tuned. Nice launch.
Capsule light from the window
Even though this rocket was born dead, it still amazes me the power it has
Little bit disappointed the SRB burnout wasn't shown more.
Thank you, a very nice movie. It's a shame when you see what humanity could achieve if united.
What I've always liked about NASA. They paint the US Flag with "UNITED STATES" everywhere on the spacecraft. Bad Ass.
Those shots from orbit around the moon are the real point of Artemis/Orion. NASA knows this route already. Look at that shot at 3:38 - NO crew-rated spacecraft has ever flown this far out before. Starship fans would do well to consider this - Starship isn't even crew rated yet, and has yet to go into actual orbital flight. I wish SpaceX all the best in their endeavor, but boasting might best be reserved for after the mission has wrapped up and crews are on the ground...
2:20 MAX-Q AND GOING SUPERSONIC ! ! !👍
We've come so far as a species.
The problem is we are going backwards instead of moving forward. Even then they are having an extremely difficult time doing something that a team back in the 60’s was able to accomplish with far less technology while even building much more powerful engines.
I know the Shuttle program had its problems but the success of the Shuttle program far outweighed failures. These new space craft can’t even do half of what the Space Shuttle did. At least it was able to retrieve satellites for repair, bring them back for repair, deliver satellites and one of them even had the ability to carry a lab/science module in the cargo hold. Carried more people and was responsible for building most of the I.S.S.. They should have taken what they learned from the shuttle program and built a better more updated shuttle with stronger lighter weight materials. Between the lighter weight materials and lighter weight computers and other electronics the weight savings would have been big.
After all that implementation of much better management over the program. All that money wasted in all the previous programs that went nowhere could have been used to develop and build a newer and much more efficient engines.
Finally, launch without music and commentator... just crude sound!
Listen under Headset.. full volume.. 👌 wow
Now that’s sheer bloody power! Unfortunately, until we can leave the planet without all that fire and hells bells, regular commercial space travel similar to getting on a plane at an airport isn’t really doable
Still the BEST cinematic Launch is in Armageddon movie. ;)
Is clear that as space exploration becomes more ambitious, will b beyond any single nation's resources. There'll hafta b genuine international cooprtn outa sheer necessity .. ie; ALL of Humanity .. instead of this incessant squabbling. Imagine how much resource could b diverted away from the militaries. So exciting prospect returning 2 Moon, then onto Mars, then mining of the asteroids, then the stars! Manned Artemis 2 this yr? Art-3 in 2025?
that suddenly sound jump scared me😂
My kids have seen this a dozen times and it still gets them 😂
The biggest arrow of the goddess
Is copyright free? I want to use it 😢
Спасибо
They actually did it holy fuck 😫❤️
Tried full volume on my Beats headphones 🎧. Had to down volume a little 😢
Beautiful sound 😮
The most powerful operational rocket in the world, at time of writing.
It's much like its Saturn V forebear in that regard. The Saturn was technically not as powerful as its soviet rival, the N1. However, the N1 never flew without turning into a fireball.
EDIT: Because the meaning of the second paragraph isn't clear enough, the point I was making is that the SLS is not as powerful as the Starship. However, the Starship is not, at time of writing, an operational rocket. It's an incomplete test article that keeps dying a fiery death in the upper atmosphere.
If Starship becomes operational, _then_ SLS will no longer be the most powerful operational rocket in the world, and only then. The rocket needs to be operational to be considered the most powerful operational rocket, after all. Kinda in the name. But it's not there yet.
It WAS Until It Got ECLIPSED By STARSHIP ! ! !
@@AndrewHillis_2024 Note that I said "operational."
Starship is not operational. Starship has yet to fly without turning into a fireball. Starship is currently not even complete, it's a fuselage with engines and remote controls and cameras in it, and nothing else. That's why the launches have been referred to as "Test articles," they're not complete vehicles.
That's why I made the comparison to Saturn V and N1. The N1 was more powerful than the Saturn, but because it never actually completed a flight, the Saturn remained the winner by default.
Power is meaningless if you can't actually use it for anything.
@@AndrewHillis_2024starship is yet to actually achieve anything. Also having so many engines on a single stage seems like Soviet N1 levels of bad idea
@@dod_the_angelwe’ll have to see, nasa does appear to have faith in it though
@thomashayhurst6547 The N1 problem wasn't engine amount it was having those old computers manage 30 engines at once they couldn't handle it since they had obsolete even back then flight computers on the N1 keep in mind Falcon Heavy launches with 27 engines no problem at all
We need Nasa to be great again
Imagine if they attached an 8k per eye 3D stereo cameras there, at least in a window inside, so everyone with a VR headset would feel like being next to the Moon for real.
Call me old school but I miss the “twang.”
R u sure that you are spelling that name correctly or possibly meant something else beginning with the letter 'T' lmfao
@@GooletakesItUpItArse I am spelling it correctly. 😀
The Space Shuttle's main engines were offset from the center of mass at launch due to the addition of the giant orange fuel tank and solid rocket boosters attached to the belly of the orbiter. That offset thrust right before liftoff would push the entire launch vehicle over to the side and they would wait for it to swing back into a more vertical position before they would light the SRBs and blow the bolts that held everything down.
This lean to the side and back was nicknamed the "twang."
@bluewaterboof82 your spelling is bang on! That's my issue concerning Google LLC
which owns RUclips. There is also now easily available via RUclips, a full documentary from the two crew. Filmed both astronauts' reactions to the then-brand-new design Space Shuttle programme. One of the astronauts was #JohnYoung who had previously been on two #Apollo missions to the moon and #Gemini and the US space programmes. One of the astronauts who explained the phenomenon and gave the nickname "twang"
❤❤❤ Hare Krišna 💓🍁🦋🌍🪻🌼🪔
My sound system has 4 subwoofers connected.
Whole house shakes. 👍👌😀🚀
CGI is amazing
Still need SRB’s
Something tells me this thing is gonna be a near-first casualty when Elon and Vivek let the axe fall. Justified though they may be in doing so.
❤
You always have to give 🎉 to NASA. Space X has made it possible for USA again. NASA didn't give Space X $? For no reason!!!