Having worked for many years in ER, I know that once a patient is awake, it's standard procedure for doctors to ask if the person knows who they are, where they are and do they remember what happened. This helps the doctors determine how the patient's brain is functioning. It's also common for the doctors to relay this information during new conferences.
They won't show the survivor speaking primarily because they are still in ICU. Generally, access to ICUs is kept as essential people only and select family members. News crews are generally not permitted in the ICU as they would be considered disruptive. Each hospital determines whether or not a patient can be interviewed in ICU or even in a general room. Normally when a trauma patient regains consciousness, the staff would ask who they are, where they are and do they remember what happened. This allows the medical staff to gauge the pts LOC, level of consciousness, which in turn indicates the level of brain function. Their answers would be recorded in the patient's charts as a reference, so the staff can know if there is improvement or decline in brain function. At a press conference, the doctors would relay what the patient said to the press. I worked in ER for a number of years as a tech and we had strict protocol for press access.
You don’t know all the details. Control tower requested a runway but the pilot decided differently and chose a runway in the wrong direction. I thought it was a barrier too but the more evidence is shown there was a bit of negligence or not enough time during that chaotic and ill prepared situation.
I said the same. I was like , I’ve never seen a runway with a dead end… no pun intended but the wall killed them…. So so sad. Prayers to everyone and k hope they didn’t suffer. How horrible
The runway should have led into a field behind it without the wall, the plane would have skidded through the field to a halt, minor injuries maybe but everyone would have survived 😞 rip to the 179 poor souls who perished 💔
I find it amusing that the Korean officials try to blame it on the aircraft by inspecting all of them, instead of trying to figure out the decision makers who put a wall there.
Everyone could have survived if the landing gears were deployed! The wall did contribute to the multiple deaths.....but do you know what was beyond the wall.....and what would have happened if the wall wasn't there??
@wayneanthony1089 don't kid yourself bro. We know and you know that you are not a pilot or an aviation expert. Your just ang office employee from sales department.. even if you say that they have engine failure either one or both, even if their flaps and gear malfunction, all pilots have been trained to deal in any emergency situations and to how safely land the plane. You maybe didn't see what we see because even if you said they have no gear to land they are trained to do a belly landing of plane and as you can see the pilot executed a perfect belly landing and the plane skid and didn't burst on flame. In only burst to flame when it slammed to a mound of earth with reinforced concrete wall. Now you may say that if the wall not there what would happen. ? They would just continue to slide forward until they stop, and the plane may have break but surely would have more survivability rate. Across beyond that wall is a road and straight in a body of water so they can surely much more likely to survive. Just think even in a second and may Einstein bless you with slight of gray cell when you think of and watch the video, that did really caused the plane to burst in flame?
its because the stupid decsion was made to land on a DEPARTURE runway, not an arrival runway. the wall is to block jet funes and help with thrust for takeoff. honestly they were safer landing on water with no landing gear down, look at Sully in the hudson river- google it.
Lets put a CONCRETE wall a few feet from the end of the runway, shall we? Let's make sure nobody survives a brake failure or an emergency landing, right? My God stupidity is everywhere!
to be fair no one could have anticipated a plane going landing full speed on a runway and going off the end at such a great distance; when was the last time that happened? never. i am sure 25% of airports in the world would be closed if the requirements was to allow extreme distance clearances for such a rare incident. we should wait for the full investigation to be done before conjecturing about the right course of action.
During the landing slide you can see engine #2 (the damaged one) having the reverser deployed, while #1 (the good engine) the reverser is stowed. This makes me think they shut off the wrong engine during the go around. Panic and poor CRM did the rest.
Now what if he shut down the wrong engine....Landing gear need Engine power for the pump..Or at least 3 to 4 mins of manual pumping...You also need both engines for reverse thrusters
@@freakyflow There is no manual pumping in the 737-800. It's three handles on the floor you have to pull and the gear becomes unlocked and it deploys by gravity. Deployment time is around 15 seconds but you have to run a checklist first. If engine #2 was damaged and the #1 was shut off by mistake, then they had very limited thrust available and it would somewhat make sense that they didn't deploy landing gear or flaps to be able to glide further and reach the runway.
That runway doesn't sound like it was designed properly; a concrete wall at the end of the runway?. How about a runway safety area (RSA) it extends appropriately 1000 feet beyond the end of the runway and is free of obstacles, has smooth and clear grading, good drainage and can support the weight of rescue equipment. This is 2024 soon to be 2025 come on South Korea do better, safety should be first on the list.
It hit the concrete base of the ILS antenna (there was a wall, but it was further away). The international standard for RESA for that particular runway type is 90 meters (about 295 feet). Muan's RESA is 199 meters, so the ILS antenna was further out than the minimum requirement. However, it's construction still wasn't well-designed, because the recommended distance is 240 meters, and an ILS antenna with such a robust concrete base is not a good idea. My point is that there wasn't any laws or guidelines broken, but that's not to say that lessons can't be learned here.
@@markdudley5656 Looking at the crash scene photos and satellite photos, the ILS antennas were atop a concrete structure that looks to be about 6-10ft tall, with multiple narrow concrete ramp structures leading to the top, with dirt in-between, a very poor design indeed. And it's not just landing where an over-run can happen, I'm thinking late rejected take-offs too. As the president of Japan airlines once said, airline safety is often written in blood.
EMAS would have worked, but would be unnecessary. There was about 2500+ feet of smooth ground beyond the edge of the runaway. It's only obstruction would have been a 2 lane road.
Cabin flight crew members are seated with their backs to the front of the plane and are wearing a four-point harness to give them survivability to withstand a forward crash and aid the passenger after the crash. The extent of the injury to the flight attendant shows how violent the crash was.
Any plane coming in that fast with no landing gear no brakes no flaps no reverse thrusting, what do you expect? Show me a pilot that practices that scenario
@miket2120 It's what a pilot can only do, to prevent or limit a situation like the Jeju pilot did. Its undesired outcome is what we hopefully will prevent in future flights. Thoughts are with them
I know of another case and saw the consequences when a bomber, taking off at 300 km/h, smashed the control tower; at the end of the take off, the runway was covered with ice and the pilots were unable to control the plane. No one survived.
Rest in peace 🕊️ all beautiful soul . Y'all didn't deserve that kind of tragic dead but unfortunately it happened . And it's devastating for family members and the whole world . May god give strength to family members of dead ones . My condolences to every families who lost their loved ones . ❤❤
Why did you cut the video just before the explosion?? By doing that you are removing the _appropriate_ emotional impact of the event. The public _needs_ that emotional impact to motivate for adequate investigation and imposition of consequences on those primarily responsible for this disaster: the person(s) who made the highly malignant decision to build a horrendously ill conceived massively reinforced structure directly in the path of any aircraft that overran the runway. That highly malignant decision was made in direct defiance of on of the most fundamental tenants of flight safety: NO OBSTRUCTIONS close to the end of runways. The only conceivable motivation for such massive reinforcement is a totally depraved decision to protect the far less expensive directional antennae even if it cost the total destruction of an aircraft and the loss of lives of all (or almost all) of those aboard. What is highly critical to also address is WHY someone so massively unqualified and totally unsuitable to be in a position to make such a decision was nevertheless put there. Whoever was responsible for that should also be held fully accountable for the all too predictable results. What this incident screams is an unsustainable lack of accountability at the highest levels! That decision was so flagrantly, indisputably directly against a core principal of flight safety that whoever made it must surely have received strong objections. This decision could not remotely have been mere oversight or incompetence - it could only have resulted from a highly malignant defiance of the very concept of flight safety. Far far worse, this deadly flaw was pointed out a long time ago in the media and yet STILL went uncorrected. That suggests that the rot in South Korean politics is far deeper than just the leader who attempt to impose martial law. What it shows is that the desire to impose martial law came from an incompetence so total that the only way the leader of the country could think of to deal with problems was to mask them over by imposing total control. This totally preventable accident (that is, the preventable loss of life) was only a symptom of far deeper problems. The most important thing to watch for is not whether the deadly structure is replaced with something with appropriate design to have least resistance to impact, but what measures are or are not, taken to hold both the individual responsible for the decision to make it massively resistant to impact and, most especially, the individual(s) responsible for putting him/her into that position.
The shocking and sad part is that some brave pilots are speaking out that either they were not informed about the concrete wall, but most who saw it thought it was made out off dirt and not a 2meter high 4 meter thick wall concrete wall. 😳
Bet you a million bucks The bird strike was the first problem...The 2nd was the pilot shut down the wrong engine leaving them with both engines out This is why there is no landing gear (Engine powered pumps) And no time to do it manually This is also why the plane did not use reverse thrusters (one would of made a problem) Nor did i see flaps (too fast to set them? Or lack of The next 2 problems was He done a go around However only done a 180 And not a 360 And did not land on the runway he first tried to land on as both runways were side by side Had he landed the other end of the runway There is no ILS mount in the way
The emergency gear is effortless and works independently of the engines. Engineers are smarter than you give them credit for. The emergency process deploys the landing gear faster, about 30 seconds to manually pull the cables.
I agree with the dual engine loss of thrust, but that could also be because both engines were damaged by birds. With dual engine loss (or vastly reduced thrust), the pilots would want to set the aircraft up for best rate-of-glide. This means 'clean' (no gear/flaps to create drag). In my limited flight training, this is what pilots are taught to do. My guess is that with the emergency situation and low altitude, they just didn't have enough time to lower the gear via the emergency method. Also, they probably didn't account for the 'float time' down the runway resulting from the higher landing speed requirement for no flaps.
The bird didn’t cause the crash, it caused the emergency landing, there’s a difference. To be a reporter you need to have studied English in school. Clearly not. Other media has already covered this days ago, you’re late.
It seems a lot of aeroplanes are crashing these days. So,so sad! Hope that they're not as a result of negligence or terrorism. Condolences to loved ones 😭😭😭
The crash has absolutely nothing to do with birds or Boeing in this case. The concrete at the end of the runway is one issue. The landing gear could have still be lowered manually and thirdly, there is also the option to land safely on the water by using the tail to graze and create a braking friction.
Title is misleading, the crash did happen and two withstood the accident but what's the point of naming it that if no interview of the survivor is there? Be more accurate next time so no one doesn't recommend your channel. 😐
That was my first thought when I found out that it hit a concrete structure. Placing one there just pretty much guarantees death in an accident that could otherwise have left no fatalities.
It was definitely a bird strike that caused this. A bird strike to the engine always stop your landing gear from coming down and puts a cement wall in front of you.
Imagine the initial “relieve” the passengers onboard might have felt when the plane was on level ground ONLY for it to explode momentarily from an impact with the reinforced CONCRETE wall they didn’t know the aircraft was heading towards… It was an unfortunate chain of events that lead to this tragedy. HOWEVER, the reinforced CONCRETE WALL was the the DEFINING reason why these passengers are dead! Somebody High up there in the management hierarchy was probably trying to scrimp on money instead of evaluting the overall safety of crucial Airport infrastructures.
Now that we know the published timeline, and if it's accurate, it suggests significant mechanical problems. This aircraft touched down just 3 minutes after calling the initial bird strike and go around. That is not enough time to climb, stabilize, and reconfigure for another approach. 3 minutes suggests they could not execute a proper go around and were forced to attempt a landing. The FDR and VDR should tell us if they couldn't climb. It's also unlikely that the manual landing gear would have enough time to deploy in that situation. Under normal conditions, the gravity-based gear system takes about 2 minutes to fully deploy (after completing the go around). There was just not enough time considering it was only 3 minutes from bird strike to touchdown. If they still had thrust and the ability to climb, it would be negligent human error to attempt a landing that fast.
Cheaper CFM engines that unlike Pratt & Whittney or Rolls Royce, cannot take a bird strike. Unlike other airports, South Korea built a huge concrete base for ILS antennas that can be supported with poles. Other short off runway airports put in the EMAS system, made of cubes that sink and slow an aircraft. Seems S Korea was more worried about a few cars on freeway, instead of 200 human lives.
The plane landed intact with little damage albeit at close to 200mph. It would have come safely to a halt and all would have survived had it not hit an inexplicably placed concrete structure in the overrun section at the end of the runway.
Dont waste your time watching. No survivor speaks.
Yes, but unfortunately, I've already wasted my. Typically for big media - babbling and gabbling a lot, and say nothing at all.
Got to love how the media twist words for views
How exactly did the media twist everything.. they gave all the facts they knew
Having worked for many years in ER, I know that once a patient is awake, it's standard procedure for doctors to ask if the person knows who they are, where they are and do they remember what happened. This helps the doctors determine how the patient's brain is functioning. It's also common for the doctors to relay this information during new conferences.
Thank you! I always check the comments on videos like this for just this reason.
Why bother putting this in the title if there is no survivor speaking showing?
They won't show the survivor speaking primarily because they are still in ICU. Generally, access to ICUs is kept as essential people only and select family members. News crews are generally not permitted in the ICU as they would be considered disruptive. Each hospital determines whether or not a patient can be interviewed in ICU or even in a general room.
Normally when a trauma patient regains consciousness, the staff would ask who they are, where they are and do they remember what happened. This allows the medical staff to gauge the pts LOC, level of consciousness, which in turn indicates the level of brain function. Their answers would be recorded in the patient's charts as a reference, so the staff can know if there is improvement or decline in brain function. At a press conference, the doctors would relay what the patient said to the press.
I worked in ER for a number of years as a tech and we had strict protocol for press access.
Lol why u so dumb to think that the survivors could speak to the media appearing themself when they are still in critical condition
@@miket2120thanks u for taking the time to explain further
@@miket2120 wooshhhhh
reported the video for clickbait!!
CLICK BAIT! No survivor spoke out.
" " - the survior who spoke out
top tier clickbait
I'm also waiting for the survivor to speak out
Well the do say he woke up and said "when I woke up I was already rescued"... so he did speak out, I guess 😅
@@josephs3973”survivor wakes up and forms words with mouth and brain”
Where did the survivor speak out.
In Korea
The news spoke on behalf of the survivor.
@@nueat6LOL
1:06
In their hospital gown.
Click bait, no survivor. RUclips, do not suggest channel.
Vid definitely can be reported for Spam or misleading > Misleading text
If that concrete wall was not at the end of the runway it's possible everyone could have survived,
Yep, or killed a load on the road?
You don’t know all the details. Control tower requested a runway but the pilot decided differently and chose a runway in the wrong direction. I thought it was a barrier too but the more evidence is shown there was a bit of negligence or not enough time during that chaotic and ill prepared situation.
@@ivanidlehand9651 There IS no wrong direction, runways work in either direction.
I said the same. I was like , I’ve never seen a runway with a dead end… no pun intended but the wall killed them…. So so sad. Prayers to everyone and k hope they didn’t suffer. How horrible
The runway should have led into a field behind it without the wall, the plane would have skidded through the field to a halt, minor injuries maybe but everyone would have survived 😞 rip to the 179 poor souls who perished 💔
everyone could have survived if the wall wasn't there. so sad.
I find it amusing that the Korean officials try to blame it on the aircraft by inspecting all of them, instead of trying to figure out the decision makers who put a wall there.
Everyone could have survived if the landing gears were deployed!
The wall did contribute to the multiple deaths.....but do you know what was beyond the wall.....and what would have happened if the wall wasn't there??
True
@wayneanthony1089 don't kid yourself bro. We know and you know that you are not a pilot or an aviation expert. Your just ang office employee from sales department.. even if you say that they have engine failure either one or both, even if their flaps and gear malfunction, all pilots have been trained to deal in any emergency situations and to how safely land the plane. You maybe didn't see what we see because even if you said they have no gear to land they are trained to do a belly landing of plane and as you can see the pilot executed a perfect belly landing and the plane skid and didn't burst on flame. In only burst to flame when it slammed to a mound of earth with reinforced concrete wall. Now you may say that if the wall not there what would happen. ? They would just continue to slide forward until they stop, and the plane may have break but surely would have more survivability rate. Across beyond that wall is a road and straight in a body of water so they can surely much more likely to survive. Just think even in a second and may Einstein bless you with slight of gray cell when you think of and watch the video, that did really caused the plane to burst in flame?
its because the stupid decsion was made to land on a DEPARTURE runway, not an arrival runway. the wall is to block jet funes and help with thrust for takeoff.
honestly they were safer landing on water with no landing gear down, look at Sully in the hudson river- google it.
Lets put a CONCRETE wall a few feet from the end of the runway, shall we? Let's make sure nobody survives a brake failure or an emergency landing, right? My God stupidity is everywhere!
You need to seriously upgrade your tape measure
@@jamesbong4928 Thanks for proving my point.
@@nicolaskrinis7614 🙄
The plane landed. Most if not all would still be alive today. Its the wall that caused the destruction to the plane.
Agreed!
Beyond that berm was a cement wall, then roadway and buildings. At 150 mph? No way that is ending well.
Shouldn't have a wall on a runway.
It’s where the localizer antennas are positioned not a wall but the structure were the antennas are station shouldn’t be made out of concrete
to be fair no one could have anticipated a plane going landing full speed on a runway and going off the end at such a great distance; when was the last time that happened? never. i am sure 25% of airports in the world would be closed if the requirements was to allow extreme distance clearances for such a rare incident. we should wait for the full investigation to be done before conjecturing about the right course of action.
@@robin212212 Exactly. You don't plan around a one-in-million event.
Can you imagine the survivor's guilt they're going to feel
why? is it their fault they survived? I wouldn't!!
Alive but with big cost
@@szvqorwnpstahskypfwmp9821179 casualties. Of course they're gonna feel it do you realize how absolutely big this?
Jeez, do you actually know which way is 'up' ? 🙈
Human psychology. You are no different.@@szvqorwnpstahskypfwmp9821
What kinda shameless clickbait is this? Disgraceful.
Agreed, world media are so low
ABC should know better. agree, disgraceful.
reported the video for clickbait!!
Such a loss for the world! May they and their familes find peace
ABC Clickbait, I fixed your channel name for you. You're welcome
Bird strike has nothing to do with Landing gear and plane crash.Impossible.
During the landing slide you can see engine #2 (the damaged one) having the reverser deployed, while #1 (the good engine) the reverser is stowed. This makes me think they shut off the wrong engine during the go around. Panic and poor CRM did the rest.
It is done by intelligent of one of either England or America or both together to prevent people from traveling as they do in world Economy
Now what if he shut down the wrong engine....Landing gear need Engine power for the pump..Or at least 3 to 4 mins of manual pumping...You also need both engines for reverse thrusters
@@freakyflow There is no manual pumping in the 737-800. It's three handles on the floor you have to pull and the gear becomes unlocked and it deploys by gravity. Deployment time is around 15 seconds but you have to run a checklist first. If engine #2 was damaged and the #1 was shut off by mistake, then they had very limited thrust available and it would somewhat make sense that they didn't deploy landing gear or flaps to be able to glide further and reach the runway.
@@freakyflow It is less than 1 minute to lower the gear manually
There should be fines for clickbait
That runway doesn't sound like it was designed properly; a concrete wall at the end of the runway?. How about a runway safety area (RSA) it extends appropriately 1000 feet beyond the end of the runway and is free of obstacles, has smooth and clear grading, good drainage and can support the weight of rescue equipment. This is 2024 soon to be 2025 come on South Korea do better, safety should be first on the list.
It hit the concrete base of the ILS antenna (there was a wall, but it was further away). The international standard for RESA for that particular runway type is 90 meters (about 295 feet). Muan's RESA is 199 meters, so the ILS antenna was further out than the minimum requirement. However, it's construction still wasn't well-designed, because the recommended distance is 240 meters, and an ILS antenna with such a robust concrete base is not a good idea. My point is that there wasn't any laws or guidelines broken, but that's not to say that lessons can't be learned here.
@@markdudley5656 Looking at the crash scene photos and satellite photos, the ILS antennas were atop a concrete structure that looks to be about 6-10ft tall, with multiple narrow concrete ramp structures leading to the top, with dirt in-between, a very poor design indeed. And it's not just landing where an over-run can happen, I'm thinking late rejected take-offs too.
As the president of Japan airlines once said, airline safety is often written in blood.
Poor design short cuts to save money emas could have worked????
EMAS would have worked, but would be unnecessary. There was about 2500+ feet of smooth ground beyond the edge of the runaway. It's only obstruction would have been a 2 lane road.
🙄🙄🙄 Please get your information correct before trying to school others and spread misinformation.
ABC what does "speak out" mean to you?
I now know that ABC = Absolute Bullsht Channel.
They obviously don't care how low they go!
Vid definitely can be reported for Spam or misleading > Misleading text
They're really milking this. Just wait until the investigation is complete
Survivor speaks out? Not in this video.
Terrible tragedy. Those poor families.
You only feel it when you lose your family member
Clickbait? Really ABC? I'll be avoiding your videos in the future, great job. 👍🏿
It's abc, they lie constantly. So bad they had to pay trump 16millon.
Y’all so sensitive lol
@Theboxingtour your mom told me the exact same thing last night in bed, too.
@@Theboxingtour - you're so easily pleased.
As no aviation expert and as a kid putting a concrete wall at the end of a runaway is unforgivable rip to all that died
He didn’t speak out… but he is… Unbreakable.
almost seems like the dude was going to try to go back up into the air because he didn't slow down at all
Click Bait Title - NO SURVIVOR SPEAKS OUT!
Click Bait. This is how a channel goes this low and deceive their 18 million subscribers.
Cheating us to watch by a fake headline. Shame on you !
Vid definitely can be reported for Spam or misleading > Misleading text
Cabin flight crew members are seated with their backs to the front of the plane and are wearing a four-point harness to give them survivability to withstand a forward crash and aid the passenger after the crash. The extent of the injury to the flight attendant shows how violent the crash was.
Why is no one looking into why a concrete barrier was put at the end of the runway?
"No one"??? That would just be you. The information on it has been out for days.
Any plane coming in that fast with no landing gear no brakes no flaps no reverse thrusting, what do you expect? Show me a pilot that practices that scenario
They do practice that in full motion cockpit simulators generally every 6 months.
@miket2120 It's what a pilot can only do, to prevent or limit a situation like the Jeju pilot did. Its undesired outcome is what we hopefully will prevent in future flights. Thoughts are with them
Same thing happened in Jamaica in 2009, everyone survived.
Hey everyone. Let’s all report this video for misinformation
BS.. All I hear is the reporter speaking... DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME WATCHING THIS!!!
I know of another case and saw the consequences when a bomber, taking off at 300 km/h, smashed the control tower; at the end of the take off, the runway was covered with ice and the pilots were unable to control the plane. No one survived.
Tomorrow is not promised
People still think a plane brought down a big building
Idiots still conspiracy theorising...
It's amazing how they always have a camera nearby when a plane crash
Everyone has a phone camera now.
Rest in peace 🕊️ all beautiful soul . Y'all didn't deserve that kind of tragic dead but unfortunately it happened . And it's devastating for family members and the whole world . May god give strength to family members of dead ones . My condolences to every families who lost their loved ones . ❤❤
guys, two people survived.
Why did you cut the video just before the explosion?? By doing that you are removing the _appropriate_ emotional impact of the event. The public _needs_ that emotional impact to motivate for adequate investigation
and
imposition
of
consequences
on those primarily responsible for this disaster: the person(s) who made the highly malignant decision to build a horrendously ill conceived massively reinforced structure directly in the path of any aircraft that overran the runway.
That highly malignant decision was made in direct defiance of on of the most fundamental tenants of flight safety: NO OBSTRUCTIONS close to the end of runways.
The only conceivable motivation for such massive reinforcement is a totally depraved decision to protect the far less expensive directional antennae even if it cost the total destruction of an aircraft and the loss of lives of all (or almost all) of those aboard.
What is highly critical to also address is WHY someone so massively unqualified and totally unsuitable to be in a position to make such a decision was nevertheless put there. Whoever was responsible for that should also be held fully accountable for the all too predictable results.
What this incident screams is an unsustainable lack of accountability at the highest levels!
That decision was so flagrantly, indisputably directly against a core principal of flight safety that whoever made it must surely have received strong objections. This decision could not remotely have been mere oversight or incompetence - it could only have resulted from a highly malignant defiance of the very concept of flight safety.
Far far worse, this deadly flaw was pointed out a long time ago in the media and yet STILL went uncorrected. That suggests that the rot in South Korean politics is far deeper than just the leader who attempt to impose martial law. What it shows is that the desire to impose martial law came from an incompetence so total that the only way the leader of the country could think of to deal with problems was to mask them over by imposing total control. This totally preventable accident (that is, the preventable loss of life) was only a symptom of far deeper problems.
The most important thing to watch for is not whether the deadly structure is replaced with something with appropriate design to have least resistance to impact, but what measures are or are not, taken to hold both the individual responsible for the decision to make it massively resistant to impact and, most especially, the individual(s) responsible for putting him/her into that position.
What i want to know is, if the wall hadnt been there, was there something else beyond that the plane would have crashed into?
The shocking and sad part is that some brave pilots are speaking out that either they were not informed about the concrete wall, but most who saw it thought it was made out off dirt and not a 2meter high 4 meter thick wall concrete wall. 😳
This message is clear, pilot risk their life at work whereas those sitting in the office getting millions $$$ bounus
Bet you a million bucks The bird strike was the first problem...The 2nd was the pilot shut down the wrong engine leaving them with both engines out This is why there is no landing gear (Engine powered pumps) And no time to do it manually This is also why the plane did not use reverse thrusters (one would of made a problem) Nor did i see flaps (too fast to set them? Or lack of The next 2 problems was He done a go around However only done a 180 And not a 360 And did not land on the runway he first tried to land on as both runways were side by side Had he landed the other end of the runway There is no ILS mount in the way
The emergency gear is effortless and works independently of the engines. Engineers are smarter than you give them credit for. The emergency process deploys the landing gear faster, about 30 seconds to manually pull the cables.
I agree with the dual engine loss of thrust, but that could also be because both engines were damaged by birds. With dual engine loss (or vastly reduced thrust), the pilots would want to set the aircraft up for best rate-of-glide. This means 'clean' (no gear/flaps to create drag). In my limited flight training, this is what pilots are taught to do. My guess is that with the emergency situation and low altitude, they just didn't have enough time to lower the gear via the emergency method. Also, they probably didn't account for the 'float time' down the runway resulting from the higher landing speed requirement for no flaps.
Click Bait. Why big news like this lie to all the viewer. such a shame... No Survivor talk at all...
Misleading headline
The bird didn’t cause the crash, it caused the emergency landing, there’s a difference. To be a reporter you need to have studied English in school. Clearly not. Other media has already covered this days ago, you’re late.
where is the survivor speaks ?
why the title said one of the survivor speaks out but don't see
Survivor. What type of chronic life changing injuries are they going to live with. Tragic.
How is it possible in flight magazines come out unscathed?
It seems a lot of aeroplanes are crashing these days. So,so sad! Hope that they're not as a result of negligence or terrorism. Condolences to loved ones 😭😭😭
The crash has absolutely nothing to do with birds or Boeing in this case. The concrete at the end of the runway is one issue. The landing gear could have still be lowered manually and thirdly, there is also the option to land safely on the water by using the tail to graze and create a braking friction.
who see the heart as reflection
I didn't watch any video on this. I'm just reading, but there was 2 flight attendants that survived. Do your own homework
Title is misleading, the crash did happen and two withstood the accident but what's the point of naming it that if no interview of the survivor is there? Be more accurate next time so no one doesn't recommend your channel. 😐
That was my first thought when I found out that it hit a concrete structure. Placing one there just pretty much guarantees death in an accident that could otherwise have left no fatalities.
My condolences to the families.
Pilot error 100%
Wtf is that huge concrete barrier from the hell just right at the end of the runway?! For a real crash test or something?
Thank you for the clickbait
It was close to the end of the runway because nothing had landed without its landing gear before
Where is the news? Stop repeat stuff already known.
Waiting for survivor to speak as title suggests
The reporter lied. No survivor speaks out
It was definitely a bird strike that caused this. A bird strike to the engine always stop your landing gear from coming down and puts a cement wall in front of you.
Thinking you may not make the runway may stop you from putting the gear down and keeping the flaps up though.
Experts everywhere.
It was only a matter of time before Boeing would have a disaster like this.
how is this boeings fault?
Why did pilot not stop the moment he saw smoke coming out
Why wasn't the landing gear down and the flaps extended 3 minutes before the bird strike?
Weren't they?
I'm hopeful nobody saw it coming :( this was horrible
Bro, this is sad. RIP to those people. Also, ABC, stop clickbaiting
Plane is sooo huge but a small bird can damage it.
I hope engineers can find a solution to protect specially the engine not allowing debri to go in
thats every plane, nothing can be done
I'm wondering what's ahead of the runway block, are there houses, buildings or just open fields?
Fix the title. Be realistic to the audience.
this is the first time ever that i clicked thumbs down on a video. clickbait!!!
Imagine the initial “relieve” the passengers onboard might have felt when the plane was on level ground ONLY for it to explode momentarily from an impact with the reinforced CONCRETE wall they didn’t know the aircraft was heading towards…
It was an unfortunate chain of events that lead to this tragedy. HOWEVER, the reinforced CONCRETE WALL was the the DEFINING reason why these passengers are dead! Somebody High up there in the management hierarchy was probably trying to scrimp on money instead of evaluting the overall safety of crucial Airport infrastructures.
Well they obviously spoke for the survivor. Ppl b acting so literal
Am I deaf? Is the survivor a ghost speaking? Do we need an ouija board?
Now that we know the published timeline, and if it's accurate, it suggests significant mechanical problems. This aircraft touched down just 3 minutes after calling the initial bird strike and go around. That is not enough time to climb, stabilize, and reconfigure for another approach. 3 minutes suggests they could not execute a proper go around and were forced to attempt a landing. The FDR and VDR should tell us if they couldn't climb. It's also unlikely that the manual landing gear would have enough time to deploy in that situation. Under normal conditions, the gravity-based gear system takes about 2 minutes to fully deploy (after completing the go around). There was just not enough time considering it was only 3 minutes from bird strike to touchdown. If they still had thrust and the ability to climb, it would be negligent human error to attempt a landing that fast.
You gotta be stupid, so much stupid, to build a concrete wall at the end of a runway. For whatever reason!
I am so sorry loss. ❤ Praying for you! 기도할께요! 힘들어도 힘네세요!^^ God cares.
just report this youtube media channel for clickbait/misleading
Cant believe you guys are trying to gain views by giving fake thumb nail over such a sad incident... please have some respect
They are lying. Click Bait. Don'tt waste your time watching. No survivor speaks.
Again, click bait! Total voice of my time 🤬
Why do American news presenters and journalists sound happy when they report sad news? Their tone is so weird
Ugh, so tired of these misleading titles 🙄
They're scraping up body parts because they were all compressed together
Cheaper CFM engines that unlike Pratt & Whittney or Rolls Royce, cannot take a bird strike. Unlike other airports, South Korea built a huge concrete base for ILS antennas that can be supported with poles. Other short off runway airports put in the EMAS system, made of cubes that sink and slow an aircraft. Seems S Korea was more worried about a few cars on freeway, instead of 200 human lives.
Nice clickbait. No quote from a survivor.
Every air planes must install cameras under the air planes to monitor those tires.
what? Thats not how that works or why this accident happened
I reported this as misinformation, but they probably won’t take it down instead they’ll take down this comment that I just put
Why was there a hard wall at the end of the runway?
The plane landed intact with little damage albeit at close to 200mph. It would have come safely to a halt and all would have survived had it not hit an inexplicably placed concrete structure in the overrun section at the end of the runway.
No survivor spoke😮
1:15 They just summed up what the survivors said
Could they have survived if they landed on water?
Why they put concrete building at the end of runway?
Another worthless video, no survivor speaking, shameful