Kaaba was acting as a magnet in the world beautiful analysis. This explain the Dua of Prophet Ibrahim pbuh for Mekka. The whole history is unfolding here. Very exciting keep it up, commendable
There is no such thing as Arab. Todays Arabia is part of Africa and the people who live there were called Ethiopians. The people who they call Arabs now are a mix of black Africans, Greeks, Romans, Indians, Persians, Mongolians and white Slavs.
No. 1st person was a Muslim(Islam ) And religion for mankind islam completed in Arabia) In Arabia they used to worshipped idols(Many idols ) But never used to burned the death
Assalamualaikum sir you din't talk about Cheraman Perumal a king from Kerala of South India,who met Rasoolullah (SA)in Makkhan period,..looking fovrward from Sir
Sonthe traders from sindh who settled in yemen were as dark as those of sudan ?!. The present sindh do not have that colour ..they r fair or light brown ... Sonaround 600ad sindh was occupied by dark skinned peoples...probably dravidians ...
@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م No it wasnt ..there were many south indian kingdoms that traded with yemen.. The word hind is a persian original word that means black slave , dog and theif .. The population of sindh did not have caucasian and scythian blood mixed in yet..the indus was inhabited by the origonal culture of india that is dravidian ..before rhe turkik and hunnic invasions.. All of history has been copy and pasted into timelines that have and r confusing the defeated tribes ... The original arabs were also black...
No, the original Arabs weren't as you say. Unless you mean the people who settled the first Arabian peninsula in prehistoric times, and got superseded later by Semitic peoples, then we can entertain that idea, but otherwise no. There is no historical, archeological, or anthropological evidence to prove it, there is plenty of evidence proving the opposite, including but not limited to Assyrian reliefs.
There is no historical, archeological, or anthropological evidence to prove it, there is plenty of evidence proving the opposite, including but not limited to Assyrian reliefs.
The words Hindu and Indian is confusing the matter those are very geographic terms. Better to say people following Vedic culture were in Arabia these people were also native Arabs. Arabs and Indians originate from Aryan people who practiced Vedic culture
@@knowyourhistory6242 My guess is R1b is for the Arabs. India R1a is most prominent. More research is required. The Yazidis is a clear example of people in the Middle East still following Vedic culture.
Arabs are not in any way related to indians. Arabs are semitic in origin. Also no indian has any aryan blood, the maximum is only 20 percent. North and South indians are genetically the same and have AASI and Iranian_N genetics.
@HASHIMAden the searah does not have chains of narration that are guaranteed as authentic, so we do not use it as an authority. However there are two references to Indians, one the prophet mentioned an Indian sword, the other he references a tribe in najran that looked Indian. But if you pay attention he also mentions many many other races, it doesn't confirm or back up your weird beliefs brother. You are Indian, be proud
Kaaba was acting as a magnet in the world beautiful analysis. This explain the Dua of Prophet Ibrahim pbuh for Mekka. The whole history is unfolding here. Very exciting keep it up, commendable
There is no such thing as Arab. Todays Arabia is part of Africa and the people who live there were called Ethiopians. The people who they call Arabs now are a mix of black Africans, Greeks, Romans, Indians, Persians, Mongolians and white Slavs.
No.
1st person was a Muslim(Islam ) And religion for mankind islam completed in Arabia)
In Arabia they used to worshipped idols(Many idols )
But never used to burned the death
In what book did الذهبي and others say those things?
Wonder if the Japanese or Korean people were in the Arabian peninsula during that period
No, but Turkic people i.e. central Asians were known and described in prophecy. Resembling Mongolians and Kazakh, not Anatolian Turks or Azeris.
Assalamualaikum sir you din't talk about Cheraman Perumal a king from Kerala of South India,who met Rasoolullah (SA)in Makkhan period,..looking fovrward from Sir
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته،
Because that was not the focus of our today’s topic. We will talk about those stories under their topics.
I am from Hindustan but my ways different due to my Deen.
Areeeee sir masha Allah masha Allah sir jii yeh tou shan hain mere Rab ki sir Subhan Allah ❤❤❤❤
All the BS you are saying is called Taqiya.
First of all when you don’t know learn.
Secondly, don’t assume. This is a Sunni channel.
Asalamualaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu❤❤❤
Walaikumassalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu❤❤❤
Sonthe traders from sindh who settled in yemen were as dark as those of sudan ?!.
The present sindh do not have that colour ..they r fair or light brown ...
Sonaround 600ad sindh was occupied by dark skinned peoples...probably dravidians ...
@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م
No it wasnt ..there were many south indian kingdoms that traded with yemen..
The word hind is a persian original word that means black slave , dog and theif ..
The population of sindh did not have caucasian and scythian blood mixed in yet..the indus was inhabited by the origonal culture of india that is dravidian ..before rhe turkik and hunnic invasions..
All of history has been copy and pasted into timelines that have and r confusing the defeated tribes ...
The original arabs were also black...
No, the original Arabs weren't as you say. Unless you mean the people who settled the first Arabian peninsula in prehistoric times, and got superseded later by Semitic peoples, then we can entertain that idea, but otherwise no. There is no historical, archeological, or anthropological evidence to prove it, there is plenty of evidence proving the opposite, including but not limited to Assyrian reliefs.
There is no historical, archeological, or anthropological evidence to prove it, there is plenty of evidence proving the opposite, including but not limited to Assyrian reliefs.
السلام عليكم و رحمت الله و بركاته
The words Hindu and Indian is confusing the matter those are very geographic terms.
Better to say people following Vedic culture were in Arabia these people were also native Arabs.
Arabs and Indians originate from Aryan people who practiced Vedic culture
What haplogroup would they have ?
@@knowyourhistory6242 My guess is R1b is for the Arabs. India R1a is most prominent. More research is required.
The Yazidis is a clear example of people in the Middle East still following Vedic culture.
Arabs are not Aryan that would be ppl from modern day north India aryavarta Land of Aryan’s
@@Sean-qy1ex There were Aryans that left Aryavarta around 5000 years ago. They settled in the Middle east and Europe
Arabs are not in any way related to indians. Arabs are semitic in origin. Also no indian has any aryan blood, the maximum is only 20 percent. North and South indians are genetically the same and have AASI and Iranian_N genetics.
there was no Indians in the Arabian peninsula during the prophets time
Then you have not even read the seerah of prophet Muhammad ﷺ
Isit possible that Al Rawi familiy in Iraq or الراوى related to Rao surname in India and happened to available in Indonesia also?
@HASHIMAden the searah does not have chains of narration that are guaranteed as authentic, so we do not use it as an authority. However there are two references to Indians, one the prophet mentioned an Indian sword, the other he references a tribe in najran that looked Indian. But if you pay attention he also mentions many many other races, it doesn't confirm or back up your weird beliefs brother. You are Indian, be proud
@@kbaa100 No.
@@Yoyo-gf3oi I also knew someone from Najran who looked very Indian, but such are rare.
please read about prophet mohammad in the current contest