Flying a DIY 3D Printed Quadcopter... Will it work?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 515

  • @NicholasRehm
    @NicholasRehm Год назад +274

    Working on the fully 3D printed flight controller now, should be ready soon!

    • @yodaco
      @yodaco Год назад +9

      just ashamed for the rest of humanity that nobody else has yet picked up on that.

    • @qwertyqwerty5018
      @qwertyqwerty5018 Год назад +1

      How much all this setup including 3d printer, instruments to check thrust costs?

  • @lynnwilliam
    @lynnwilliam Год назад +576

    I think you should reprint it all in PETG, and I think your wall thickness was 4mm, make it 3mm. Than make it all thinner, you might be able to cut down all the plastic weight by 50%. amazing job by the way, I love it

    • @ratman6417
      @ratman6417 Год назад +32

      i agree, but with how massive the print is i think we'll only be seeing that a few months down the road in a V2 that has many more upgrades

    • @skippy9214
      @skippy9214 Год назад +9

      Maybe reprint in HIPS. That stuff is less dense.

    • @blazej135
      @blazej135 Год назад +34

      PET-G has a higher density than PLA. Nylon probably is a better material for such a project. It's less rigid but more resistant to snaping. Or maybe Nylon with carbonfiber

    • @graealex
      @graealex Год назад +5

      ​@@blazej135 Yes, nylon is the way to go, ideally with CF content.

    • @theofficialczex1708
      @theofficialczex1708 Год назад +7

      PETG is denser than PLA and less rigid.

  • @CallmeSam00
    @CallmeSam00 Год назад +71

    Arguably, having a somewhat fragile retainer for the props can be a good thing. On impact, something must give, and personally, I'd prefer to make the engine's rotational force eat a small 3d printed part rather than smash the daylights out of a much more spendy prop. I'd probably say, if it's strong enough to transfer normal levels of torque, it's dimensioned correctly.

    • @Mike-oz4cv
      @Mike-oz4cv Год назад

      True, as long as it really doesn’t fail in flight at some point and cause a much more catastrophic crash.

    • @oliverer3
      @oliverer3 Год назад +2

      One of the benefits if he were to print the retainer out of PETG is that it tends to fail catastrophically with a repeatable amount of force rather than slowly and unexpectedly. Makes it useful for printing predictable mechanical fuses.

    • @candreszg
      @candreszg Год назад +1

      the thing is that you should make that easy-to-broken parts also easy to replace. It would be nice to add an easy to replace stress raiser for the arms support.

  • @BOTGRINDER
    @BOTGRINDER Год назад +13

    I was like pfft whatever i 3d print frames too, then i saw it was the ENTIRE quad, motors and all. bro this is incredible! great job.

  • @Scott.E.H
    @Scott.E.H Год назад +41

    I still think it's crazy that the motor cores are 3d printed as well.
    Also definitely print blades, it makes much more sense for the project

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes Год назад +6

      Try to print blades and you will understand why no one does it.

    • @gravymuncher6771
      @gravymuncher6771 Год назад

      @@Willy_Tepesa resin printer could easily print the blades

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes Год назад

      @@gravymuncher6771 If I had a resin printer I could do that. If I had a 3-axis milling machine I could do a lot more. Point is, resin printers are not a standard household appliance.
      And I still think the blades would suck.

    • @tyredrunner
      @tyredrunner Год назад

      @@Willy_Tepes worth a try, if you haven't seen major hardware as he prints and test fans, though its more for pc cooling benchmarking, but I think it shows that 3d printed propellers are sufficient enough

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes Год назад

      @@tyredrunner The issue is layer height and print direction, and how this affects surface finish. On a propeller this looks like wood grain and is not good for aerodynamics.

  • @davidgesell
    @davidgesell Год назад +20

    I personally have been using on shape for over 5 years now for simple CAD work and it's been amazing! It's also completely free, as long as you post your models publicly. I've compared it to other CAD programs like solidworks, fusion, 360, etc, and it holds up every time. Me and my engineering co-worker design things all the time on it, and are both able to access the file at the same time and see changes happen in real time. It's definitely my number one go to CAD program. Awesome build by the way 👍

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes Год назад

      TinkerCAD is a slimmed down online version of AutoCAD and has most of the features anyone could need, and they don't require you to post your design for free.

  • @minerharry
    @minerharry Год назад +42

    Adding random fans is a form of self-care :) Such a cool project!

  • @lukassyrovy9081
    @lukassyrovy9081 Год назад +5

    after having watched the next 9 minutes and 58 seconds I would like to see FPV and think it could be fun to watch 👍

  • @fsagasdfgasd6243
    @fsagasdfgasd6243 Год назад +193

    As the great engineers said - with a good engine, a stool can fly.
    In this case with a good battery.

    • @MysteryD
      @MysteryD Год назад +1

      The motors are the engines.

    • @PiefacePete46
      @PiefacePete46 Год назад +4

      @@MysteryD : Without a good battery, a motor (engine) is a paperweight.

    • @aerolast
      @aerolast Год назад

      let me introduce you to FliteTest

    • @Varue
      @Varue Год назад +3

      @@PiefacePete46 without a tank of gas, a car engine (motor) is a paperweight.

    • @PiefacePete46
      @PiefacePete46 Год назад

      @@Varue : Yep... should hold the paper securely too! 😜

  • @StabbyMcStabwood
    @StabbyMcStabwood Год назад +5

    PLA Pro is strong and has a matte finish. Also I'd recommend grabbing a bottle of Weld-on 4 and some pipettes. You can literally melt broken pieces back together without heat and make nearly seamless repairs to PLA projects with about 80% of its original strength after it cures.

  • @PattyASMR
    @PattyASMR Год назад +12

    Dude you are awesome, this is so impressive! I've always wanted to get in to stuff like this but don't know where to start so its really cool seeing a guy I can relate to getting out there and doing it

  • @shmericshmorter
    @shmericshmorter Год назад +2

    Love it! Adding the fans seems like asking for trouble though. Fans spin due to air and send power back to controller.

  • @hedleypepper1838
    @hedleypepper1838 10 месяцев назад +1

    Simply awsome job. Your fighting inertia of the motors

  • @Cpt_Jimmy_Jams
    @Cpt_Jimmy_Jams Год назад +1

    Finally watched this! Fantastic video, love your projects! All I can think about is how much weight you could cut just by drilling out some of the extra plastic.

  • @heavystuffs8136
    @heavystuffs8136 Год назад +1

    Great Effort i love this project. by the way congratulation for ur success flight.

  • @KriegZombie
    @KriegZombie Год назад +7

    Very cool project. I subbed to follow it. The fact that you made the engines is the most impressive part to me. These would be my suggestions based on printing... let's say load bearing parts:
    Use PLA+/PLA Pro without any further additives like silk or glow-in-the-dark.
    More walls = more stronger (usually).
    Use an infill style that gives good strength in all directions rather than a plane grid or similar.
    I hope to see you develop this drone further.

  • @Sam-dn7jk
    @Sam-dn7jk Год назад +2

    I love that you picked a Noctua fan, because noise levels are really a huge concern! (yes, I know they can have higher flow rate too)

  • @c3N3q
    @c3N3q Год назад +4

    Congrats for making this heavy thing fly so nicely. 👍
    You could try printing different blade shapes and configurations. I've seen number of people claim they have great success with toroidal propellers.
    💙 the colour scheme (and the quick release wings).

    • @reginaldbowls7180
      @reginaldbowls7180 Год назад

      Def toroidal props would be an epic video! I subbed just to see if he does this.

  • @javierborquez
    @javierborquez Год назад

    I like the touch of adding an additional fan to a thing that is basically made of fans.

  • @IndraKurniawan-vk2qb
    @IndraKurniawan-vk2qb Год назад +2

    3D Printed Torodial Props is perhaps suitable for the next modification

  • @lukassyrovy9081
    @lukassyrovy9081 Год назад +2

    after having watched 18 seconds of this video i can say its great 👍

  • @manosmic
    @manosmic Год назад

    since you got so big motors an the rpm has slow response(but probably 'sturdier' torque) , i suggest variable pitch propellers for control

  • @neodymable
    @neodymable 9 месяцев назад

    I think , this is probably most interesting and beautiful printed project .

  • @Dangineering
    @Dangineering Год назад +1

    Consider switching to using ASA as your material. It has a roughly 20% smaller density which could lower the overall weight of your quad and allow for greater flight times. ASA is also UV resistant so when you fly it outside it will be able to handle the temps and UV radiation better than PLA and won't approach the glass transition stage during flight, which needless to say, would be catastrophic. You could also potentially use foaming ASA or foaming PLA for the arms and main body if you were to provide it additional stiffness by inserting smaller diameter carbon fiber rods (this is the approach I am using on my 3D printed robot dog to reduce mass/inertia).
    PLA ~ 1.25 (g/cm^3)
    ASA ~ 1.07 (g/cm^3)
    LW ASA ~ 0.47 (g/cm^3) @ max foaming
    So if you changed to using the LW ASA at a more moderate foaming of around 0.7 (g/cm^3) you could have a roughly 45% weight reduction while gaining UV stability, greater operating temperatures, and longer flight times.
    Just some thoughts! Great work so far! Absolutely loving this project

  • @DSdvdDS
    @DSdvdDS Год назад

    Making a drone from almost purely from scratch! I love it!

  • @meanman6992
    @meanman6992 Год назад +1

    That’s very cool. I’d like to see a similar project but with weight reduction like off the shelf motors and electronics, more of a 3DP race drone with fpv.

  • @OlleMattsson
    @OlleMattsson Год назад

    Those engines are sikkkkk. Most impressive part of your build.

  • @emilien.breton
    @emilien.breton Год назад +4

    Great project! Intuitively, it feels like raising the PID $I$ gain would solve the drifting issue without needing to hard-code in the ESC or FC that a motor produces less thrust. I'd be curious to see if this idea actually works.

  • @xntumrfo9ivrnwf
    @xntumrfo9ivrnwf Год назад +5

    I did a double take at 2.5kW... insane

  • @hendrikjbboss9973
    @hendrikjbboss9973 Год назад +3

    How about using Polylight Lightweight PLA for printing?
    BTW the stories about PLA's biodegradability are exaggerated as 5 year environmental test has showed very little change in structural degradation. Only the colour faded.

  • @mikeydk
    @mikeydk Год назад +1

    What is more needed than a fan? Fan with temperature controlled speed! :)

  • @scottiusnevious5143
    @scottiusnevious5143 Год назад

    An idea i have is trying the weird new props for quiet flight. The drones that deliver food use em.

  • @HammerOfGrabthar
    @HammerOfGrabthar Год назад

    I would love to see how this runs with toroidal propellers.
    This is such a cool project, my boys and I are going to build one. Thanks for sharing your projects with the world.

  • @doc1time75
    @doc1time75 Год назад +2

    I am truly impressed by your CAD design. Nice job

  • @richiebricker
    @richiebricker Год назад +1

    Dude made his own brushless motors, WOW!

  • @jumbleblue
    @jumbleblue Год назад +24

    Really cool! I love your approach to experimentation and learning. I'd be really interested to learn about generative design and what tools to use for it. Did you do this with onshape?

    • @markkalsbeek5883
      @markkalsbeek5883 Год назад +2

      I think he did that in the generative workbench in fusion, if you're a student you get unlimited free cloud credits, which is really meaningful since normally each generative study is like 30 bucks afaik

  • @PiefacePete46
    @PiefacePete46 Год назад

    Fantastic, of course!
    At 5:03... This irrefutably confirms my hypothesis that the degree of control is the inverse of the pilot's torso angle. 😉

  • @yugalsharma13
    @yugalsharma13 Год назад

    The 3D print is deliciously amazing! ❤️😍

  • @themacbookgamer
    @themacbookgamer Год назад +3

    This guy just casually says it takes 2.5kw like it's no big deal ... I wish I was making stuff like that

  • @nakamotolikesyou
    @nakamotolikesyou Год назад +1

    Oh boy, once it is flying very well, I can see you frantically and obsessively cutting the weight of the drone in every way possible. Just like we FPV kwad hobbyists do :)

  • @DevonsWorkshop
    @DevonsWorkshop Год назад

    Awesome! Congratulations! I love the generative design of the frame, beautiful and functional. Bravo.

  • @Gixie-R
    @Gixie-R Год назад

    Oh for for the love of it!!! Your telling me the 10mm goes missing in the 3d printing hobby too. Dam it!!!!

  • @Hi---There
    @Hi---There Год назад

    Brilliant results.
    Obviously, it have to become lighter, twice lighter. A lot of exhausting CAD work to reimagine it for remove half of plastic. I, personally, prefer ABS for such task. With nozzle up from 0.8 and +/- 250°C it become strong like injection molded.
    Nylon-X stronger, but heavy.

  • @rizalardiansyah4486
    @rizalardiansyah4486 Год назад +1

    Interesting! I'd love to see it with a camera turret or some sort... But FPV is also fine!

  • @nikivan
    @nikivan Год назад +2

    Cool project, it reminds me of my journey building quads 15 years ago. :) I'd ditch the PLA and use PETG or even ABS (since you have a Bamboo Lab printer). You can also 3D print the props, but I doubt you'll get better results. There are some new cool designs for low-noise props you could try. Good luck.

  • @lukelei1086
    @lukelei1086 Год назад

    woah, this is extremely entertaining and fun to watch. It's the first time i've seen someone be this creative with a Quadcopter.

  • @hobbyrob313
    @hobbyrob313 Год назад +1

    very nice, also to see
    BUT
    seems very heavy to me
    and yet
    proof has been provided 3D printed and flying
    hats off! or... respect!

  • @ChrisParayno
    @ChrisParayno Год назад

    Things have come full circle

  • @HARSH_S29
    @HARSH_S29 Год назад +4

    Great work 🔥🔥

  • @oliverpunter7140
    @oliverpunter7140 Год назад

    you should print some toroidal props for this thing, would totally fit with the diyness and aesthetic of the frame

  • @Engineering_Science
    @Engineering_Science Год назад

    Not sure if you know, maybe try printing the motor's stator core which has iron in the filament, makes it more efficient.

  • @kampf_karotte
    @kampf_karotte Год назад

    Ey bitte weiter und mehr Videos auch abgesehen von cupra, du wirkst sehr sympathisch!

  • @ashers_workshop
    @ashers_workshop Год назад +1

    WOW!

  • @zaidabdullah7192
    @zaidabdullah7192 Год назад

    The figure for a safe landing, and you are amazing

  • @klausbrinck2137
    @klausbrinck2137 Год назад

    Please, please do some dyno-tests for your motors, like Christoph Laimer did !!! I have great interest on how far results deviate from builder to builder, efficiency-wise...

  • @alainassaf
    @alainassaf Год назад

    rule of thumb for a freestyle/racing fpv drone is 20% weight for motors, 40% weight for battery, 20 % for frame and electronics and 20% weight for the action camera (racing drone don't get the action camera so they are lighter and faster)... so my first idea would be to make much lighter motors.
    also you can swap your ESC to make sure it's your 4th motor that is weaker, that is if you didn't use the same esc for all four motors on your thrust bench test.
    I am impressed by all the hard work you did for this video... I typically assemble my drones in 1 to 3 hours, but it looks like you spent at least 100 hours on this :) I must say your result is much prettier to look at.
    Also 3D printed frames introduce a lot of vibrations making tuning much much harder than using lighter stiffer carbon. It's also way more fragile. I guess you will need to find a balance to use more carbon for better results while still finding a way to 3d print some parts to keep your sponsor happy.

  • @Karbonkage
    @Karbonkage Год назад

    Defs FPV it ! Also when you are done please send it to Joshua Bardwell to do a video ! ❤

  • @fishyerik
    @fishyerik Год назад

    With bigger batteries it should be programmable, so it can be used as an automatic leaf blower, or why not make it accelerate the melting of snow during "warm" spring days. It looked like it already needs to create a massive airflow just to stay airborne with even more mass from bigger batteries it will be even more.

  • @yuvrajsingh4190
    @yuvrajsingh4190 Год назад

    When they say "what could possibly go wrong" you know something's gonna go wrong

  • @SeanGreezy
    @SeanGreezy Год назад

    I know how enticing it is to print those prop hubs on their flats, it means you will have no supports to cut away. If you print those prop hubs like the wheels of a car on your print bed, they will be stronger because the layer lines will build in strength. Your shell is most of your strength in any print, weakest In between the slices. Printing the prop hubs on their side will make the fingers that reach around the propellers stronger

  • @mattscrapper9938
    @mattscrapper9938 Год назад

    Making the motors too. That's cool. No where near as good as what you can buy but imagine being able to make even better parts at home. That would be crazy. You'll always have to buy the bearings though.

  • @seniorcrasin5670
    @seniorcrasin5670 8 месяцев назад

    Это потрясающая работа!!! Вы большой профессионал!!!

  • @aaron9296
    @aaron9296 Год назад

    This was such a cool project

  • @rhoula
    @rhoula Год назад +1

    Couldn't find the "Subcribe" Button. I did find the "Subscribe" one and clicked it though. On a serious note, excellent videos. Thank you so much for sharing.

  • @MaxHackbarth
    @MaxHackbarth Год назад

    It worked. It finally worked

  • @danik1201
    @danik1201 Год назад +1

    How amazing turned this project out :D It would be amazing if you add FPV functionality with OSD information. Maybe you could also build a smaller drone version with FPV functionality that could land and load on top of the larger drone. Also you could made your own torodial props :)

  • @carloszuna110
    @carloszuna110 Год назад

    Add legs to your drone you getting some really hard belly flops there
    Great job overall and please keep ups the good work!!!

  • @InItForTheLoot
    @InItForTheLoot Год назад +1

    my expert advice: VHB everything together. if you move more than a square inch of 3m VHB tape, you don't have to worry about anything moving.

  • @gdanieltube
    @gdanieltube 3 месяца назад

    I know almost nothing about drones, but it seems like you should have some sort of feedback system that makes sure all the motors are rotating at the proper rpm.

  • @Entertainment_Enterprise
    @Entertainment_Enterprise Год назад

    TOTALLY AWESOME IM SO HAPPY IT WORKS!!!!! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @VERY_MAD_ALIEN
    @VERY_MAD_ALIEN Год назад

    Lightning infill might save some weight with the main body. Printed props would be cool as well.

  • @WolfA4
    @WolfA4 Год назад

    6:50 Kids, remember to always dummy-cord your 10mm wrench and socket to your work bench/tool box.

  • @MrSiciro
    @MrSiciro 8 месяцев назад

    What you should do. Use a combination of carbon fiber and 3d printed parts. You can 3d print the body and motor mounts and use CF tubes for the arms. use PETG CF for stifness

  • @SilvioNunes57
    @SilvioNunes57 Год назад

    Congratulations once again. Incredible project!

  • @Blackairaviationofficial
    @Blackairaviationofficial Год назад

    Cool quadcopter

  • @dakshtripathi4340
    @dakshtripathi4340 Год назад +1

    Great video

  • @carlosd2297
    @carlosd2297 Год назад

    Have you considered le asa filament? It has a blowing agent that makes it puff up so it is super light weight and does have impact resistance.

  • @ashcheeks1
    @ashcheeks1 Год назад +1

    love your videos micro rectum!!❤

  • @lukesmith9059
    @lukesmith9059 Год назад +4

    If you can print in ABS, that would probably be the best material for this project. ABS is one of the least dense materials available for 3d printing, and has a good balance of rigidity, toughness, and heat resistance. ABS+ from esun or Sparta3D (my personal fav) makes printing large parts in ABS with minimal warping MUCH easier.

  • @tjlee0001
    @tjlee0001 Год назад

    I think that the motor may have low power factor and low efficiency, hence low power density.
    That low efficiency makes system bigger and heavy.

  • @hardwareful
    @hardwareful Год назад +1

    Looking on the bright side (weight-wise), you could have made an underwater ROV had you gone for DIY batteries as well :D

  • @Tuur75
    @Tuur75 Год назад

    Imagine some boss at DJI said:"Nice, and now let's make it 249gr". Great vid man!

  • @joemulkerins5250
    @joemulkerins5250 Год назад

    I love putting fans on things 🤣🤣🤣 Okay? Now i love it too 🤣

  • @snjert8406
    @snjert8406 Год назад

    Glad to know I'm not the only lunatic constantly cooling unnecessary stuff with tiny fans

  • @RooMan93
    @RooMan93 Год назад

    Yeah! Science!

  • @thatoneguy99100
    @thatoneguy99100 Год назад

    Wild that you couldn't find two blade props when just a few years ago there were hundreds of options available for quad builders. I guess it's a lot less common to build big quads anymore.

  • @freedtmg16
    @freedtmg16 6 месяцев назад

    Jeeze, I thought I liked to DIY. Hat's off to you.

  • @ckfpv
    @ckfpv Год назад

    For longer battery try useing Lith-ion way heavier so youll have to revise some of the thickness in some places its a trade off

  • @m.hassanbilal3278
    @m.hassanbilal3278 Год назад +1

    Love it

  • @lavernaykevin6296
    @lavernaykevin6296 Год назад

    If you have the X1Carbon you could print the parts in nylon carbon, would be lighter but more expansive. There is also something called light PLA but I think it would be more fragile. Great video thank you.

  • @tristanlasley8030
    @tristanlasley8030 Год назад

    I wouldn't worry about your caps for holding the propeller, I'd rather break a cap, then break a blade, when you do hit something, tree or ground. 👌

  • @floppy_fingers
    @floppy_fingers Год назад

    In Quad We Thrust 🙏

  • @Sr.DudeGuy
    @Sr.DudeGuy Год назад +2

    To those who care, hello and have a good day! 👋❤

  • @patmcc19
    @patmcc19 7 месяцев назад

    And that little flight controller, PCB, ever get released anywhere? I'd like to see it more than anything else out of this project.

  • @julianthompson3768
    @julianthompson3768 Год назад

    FPV! I want to see you try to Freestyle it! COOL

  • @hugoastroalcala
    @hugoastroalcala Год назад

    As a "demostrator" for a full 3d printed drone you should go on that direction whith 3d printed blades. Imagine the global interest for printing a full drone on remote places like Mars. As ever a militar application will be found on that.

  • @secretjameser
    @secretjameser Год назад +1

    3d print the blades!

  • @SebasParedes-lw7qs
    @SebasParedes-lw7qs Год назад

    First at all. Amazing job. Should feel proud of yourself. A small suggestion. You should try to print a propellers with the toroidal shape. They seem more efficient. And some legs with springs will make the landing smoother. Take care. Great job one more time

  • @Willy_Tepes
    @Willy_Tepes Год назад

    Print orientation influences the strength of the print. And wow, that even looks heavy. The key to engineering is to use the correct material for the intended purpose. This could in fact be stronger with a simple shell construction and 5-10% infill. The outer shell is what provides most of the strength. You can achieve 3 to 1 or even 4 to 1 trust to weight ratio with better design.

  • @first-thoughtgiver-of-will2456

    I would guess you could scale this up probably by double (including prop size but maybe not double) those motors must have some serious torque that might be underutilized even with 3 blades. Awesome project thanks! I've been following the motor project since it's first upload and have been anticipating this project ever since!