+ABMNS PRODUCTION I don't have a lot of experience with the DJI GO app myself, so I can't comment on that specifically. I am, however, an Android user so it sounds like I've got something to look forward to if/when I start flying these modern DJI ships...
we´re using this kind of camera (XT "radiometric" FLIR 640) for inspection of solarplants and windplants. It works fine. But it´s a shame that nobody has an idea which software tool is working together with the Zenmuse XT. We spend a lot of money but nobody knows the right tool for the post processing.
Since the announcement of Inspire 1, Dji left in the corner S900 and S1000 possessors... I'd like to use the same system on my S900. Why I can't?????? damn DJI!
An infrared camera generally refers to a camera which can capture near infrared light. A TV remote control uses near infrared light to send a signal to the TV. Many digital camera can see near infrared light. A near infrared camera can see heat just as a normal camera can see something glowing red hot. If an electric stove is just a little too cool to be glowing red, it will glow in the infrared. A thermal camera also sees infrared but this infrared is far infrared. Instead of needing a hot stove to produce the light which can be seen, a thermal camera can see the glow from a person's body heat. It's much much harder to make sensors and lenses which can be used with far infrared. Thermal cameras are generally much more expensive than visible light cameras and near infrared light cameras.
Thanks for the video! Any info on what's currently available/highly rated for Phantom 3 Pro's? This would be within the context of building diagnostics.
+elfaroproductions Over three years we've been flying FLIR cameras now (I looked it up), but, yeah, no mention of our work during this event. That said, I certainly can't complain -- FLIR has been wonderfully supportive of us for all of that time, letting us fly their hardware back when it was really an experimental idea, and now stepping up to sponsor our continuing efforts. I'm just glad we've been able to demonstrate the positive applications of this technology, and that FLIR and DJI are working together to make that same capability available to more people.
Such a shame that the 'standard' XT will NOT have thermal radiometric data saved to the SD card. DJI now say you have to pay thousands MORE, or buy the new 'advanced' XT rumoured to be £12,000 in the UK!!!! Crazy IMO :-(
wow! I'm going to be working for DUKE on a video project and I wanted to get the inspire and there like "NO" so I'm gana get the Phantom 3 Advanced. AND I WANT THERMAL SO BAD!!!! :()
640 by 512 is high-res in thermo imaging industry, for an average Joe, standing six feet away from a pipe, and reporting to his supervisor... not operating moving object through the air. I appreciate and understand their deal, but let's face it, that's 1980's resolution, and since flir still tries to charge an arm and a leg for their 40 year old idea (not technology), I can't help but see a very good nock-offs with made in China stickers, 2 years from this deal.
+Daniel Kuciel Based on my experience flying FLIR cameras for more than three years now, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you about the low resolution being a problem. 640x512 isn't really much different than what you're going to get out of a conventional analog FPV system anyway, and I find it perfectly acceptable for flying. Even the mid-resolution version (with about 330 horizontal pixels) is still extremely usable and flying with a low-resolution camera (160 pixels) is sub-optimal, but it's still viable. If I may make a suggestion, check out our FLIR camera resolution comparison video, to get a sense of what it looks like to fly with different resolution cameras: ruclips.net/video/WXKOqgxwp-c/видео.html
+Roswell Flight Test Crew over the weekend, I had chance using my friend's second set of goggles, with him controlling his rc indoors (forgot the model). I must say it was actually pretty good, despite having resolution of only 480 vertical lines of resolution. I still think Flir could lower their prices (more sales = better business), but with my latest experience, it could be very beneficial with their additional visual access.
I dont think this camera does temperature readings as the speaker suggested correct??
What is the difference between "invisible" and "completely invisible"?
And what does "invisuble" look like?
Thanks guys.
+Phil G Hey, Phil! You're welcome! Thanks for watching!
Nice :)
Hope they will also fix all the issues with the DJI Go app especially on Android...
Thanks for sharing and have a great weekend
+ABMNS PRODUCTION I don't have a lot of experience with the DJI GO app myself, so I can't comment on that specifically. I am, however, an Android user so it sounds like I've got something to look forward to if/when I start flying these modern DJI ships...
I haven't seen these cameras on DJI. When will they have them? I did a search for your camera on DJI and the results was nothing found.
we´re using this kind of camera (XT "radiometric" FLIR 640) for inspection of solarplants and windplants. It works fine.
But it´s a shame that nobody has an idea which software tool is working together with the Zenmuse XT. We spend a lot of money but nobody knows the right tool for the post processing.
i read that there is no radiometric ability with the XT ??
the 640x512 does
Can I use on DJI Phantom 2 vision plus, Happy New Year
Hello , what is the cost of xt zenmuse and that official Drone better ? Inspire ? or Matrice ? thanks and regards.
Since the announcement of Inspire 1, Dji left in the corner S900 and S1000 possessors...
I'd like to use the same system on my S900. Why I can't?????? damn DJI!
Can anyone answer is there a difference between a thermal camera and a infrared camera. Which fit phanto. 4????
An infrared camera generally refers to a camera which can capture near infrared light. A TV remote control uses near infrared light to send a signal to the TV. Many digital camera can see near infrared light. A near infrared camera can see heat just as a normal camera can see something glowing red hot. If an electric stove is just a little too cool to be glowing red, it will glow in the infrared.
A thermal camera also sees infrared but this infrared is far infrared. Instead of needing a hot stove to produce the light which can be seen, a thermal camera can see the glow from a person's body heat. It's much much harder to make sensors and lenses which can be used with far infrared. Thermal cameras are generally much more expensive than visible light cameras and near infrared light cameras.
Thanks for the video!
Any info on what's currently available/highly rated for Phantom 3 Pro's? This would be within the context of building diagnostics.
when and where can I buy it? price for 640 model?
They didn't mention you guys and you have being flying FLIR for some time now, I think you brought the idea to market.
+elfaroproductions Over three years we've been flying FLIR cameras now (I looked it up), but, yeah, no mention of our work during this event. That said, I certainly can't complain -- FLIR has been wonderfully supportive of us for all of that time, letting us fly their hardware back when it was really an experimental idea, and now stepping up to sponsor our continuing efforts. I'm just glad we've been able to demonstrate the positive applications of this technology, and that FLIR and DJI are working together to make that same capability available to more people.
Such a shame that the 'standard' XT will NOT have thermal radiometric data saved to the SD card. DJI now say you have to pay thousands MORE, or buy the new 'advanced' XT rumoured to be £12,000 in the UK!!!! Crazy IMO :-(
Сколько Стоит ? Хочу 640 !
wow! I'm going to be working for DUKE on a video project and I wanted to get the inspire and there like "NO" so I'm gana get the Phantom 3 Advanced. AND I WANT THERMAL SO BAD!!!! :()
Funny that such camera "experts" could not get the lighting in the auditorium right.
640 by 512 is high-res in thermo imaging industry, for an average Joe, standing six feet away from a pipe, and reporting to his supervisor... not operating moving object through the air.
I appreciate and understand their deal, but let's face it, that's 1980's resolution, and since flir still tries to charge an arm and a leg for their 40 year old idea (not technology), I can't help but see a very good nock-offs with made in China stickers, 2 years from this deal.
+Daniel Kuciel Based on my experience flying FLIR cameras for more than three years now, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you about the low resolution being a problem. 640x512 isn't really much different than what you're going to get out of a conventional analog FPV system anyway, and I find it perfectly acceptable for flying. Even the mid-resolution version (with about 330 horizontal pixels) is still extremely usable and flying with a low-resolution camera (160 pixels) is sub-optimal, but it's still viable.
If I may make a suggestion, check out our FLIR camera resolution comparison video, to get a sense of what it looks like to fly with different resolution cameras:
ruclips.net/video/WXKOqgxwp-c/видео.html
+Roswell Flight Test Crew over the weekend, I had chance using my friend's second set of goggles, with him controlling his rc indoors (forgot the model). I must say it was actually pretty good, despite having resolution of only 480 vertical lines of resolution.
I still think Flir could lower their prices (more sales = better business), but with my latest experience, it could be very beneficial with their additional visual access.