Antique Chair or Repro? How to tell the difference?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 дек 2024

Комментарии • 32

  • @johnbuston1732
    @johnbuston1732 Год назад +2

    Another informative piece, cheers David 👍

  • @skiracer
    @skiracer Год назад +3

    Dear David Harper, Nice chair! The lessons are well presented/fun to watch! Thank you

  • @AlisonLWiebe
    @AlisonLWiebe Год назад +2

    Really informative, and interesting as always. Thanks!

  • @ronmellor5951
    @ronmellor5951 Год назад +2

    Another great post David, the chair I believe to be from the aesthetic design period so 1870’ish maybe late 1880’s.

  • @tammy707
    @tammy707 8 месяцев назад

    Beautiful chair! I have a massive piece of furniture, a cabinet of some sort and I'm trying to find out if it's antique or not. I'm going to have to check out more of your videos.

  • @citywise8773
    @citywise8773 Год назад +1

    Tell you what, I prefer that mahogany chest on chest behind you! Lovely blind fretwork. Not sure about the handles and escutcheons, but a nice thing

  • @mickfromaustralia902
    @mickfromaustralia902 Год назад +1

    Some get it, some don't. I love it.

  • @OriginalNethead
    @OriginalNethead Год назад +4

    The antique hall chair had to be real. No one in their right minds would make something that uncomfortable now. (LOL) Even wooden school chairs weren't meant to keep visitors from lingering. A split in a one board seat is definiltely a good sign of age; a multi-board seat is a sign of post-WWII department store furniture.

    • @asahearts1
      @asahearts1 Год назад +2

      Coumterpoint: no one is in their right mind anymore.

    • @eodnhoj8387
      @eodnhoj8387 Год назад +1

      it looks to me
      like the legs have
      been cut down.

    • @asahearts1
      @asahearts1 Год назад +2

      @@eodnhoj8387 He said they had small casters which were removed.

    • @eodnhoj8387
      @eodnhoj8387 Год назад

      @@asahearts1
      removing the casters
      has ruined the
      aesthetics of the
      chair...chairs like this
      are so cheap to buy
      complete with
      casters...it makes me
      wonder why an
      expert and
      connoisseur of
      david's standing
      would give
      it houseroom.

    • @ronmellor5951
      @ronmellor5951 Год назад +3

      Being cut down was my first thought as well. The casters were meant to allow the chairs to be tilted and moved into place. Often the front legs would split at the caster holes. I bet that’s what happened here.

  • @lucamotor4195
    @lucamotor4195 6 месяцев назад

    I have to disagree about one observation...the holes on the bottom of the front legs are from the spigot of the lathe they were turned on. No castors on a chair such as that. Great little video though thanks sam

    • @DavidHarperAntiques
      @DavidHarperAntiques  6 месяцев назад

      Thanks Sam and I can see what you're saying and it would make sense. However, this design of chair had small castors on the front legs for ease of movement. I’ve had many of the years. Cheers, David

    • @lucamotor4195
      @lucamotor4195 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@DavidHarperAntiques Very good and a surprise to me!

  • @michaelarmstrong9617
    @michaelarmstrong9617 Год назад

    If you have to flip over a chair to see if it is an original or "dreadful, horrible" reproduction, then it must not be that dreadful or horrible of a reproduction! Also, seats are often newer on old chairs as they wear and are subject to design or color whims over 125 years.

    • @DavidHarperAntiques
      @DavidHarperAntiques  Год назад +2

      I wouldn’t need to flip the chair over because of years of experience. I’m showing tips to those that have never done it before!

  • @wystan1000
    @wystan1000 Год назад +1

    At first glance, I thought, "it's not antique, it's Victorian!" Well, you know what I mean...