Sorry but he is wrong, mass is not the measurement of matter, mole is the measurement of matter, while mass is the measurement of inertia, inertia simply means, how much effort or force is needed to accelerate or alter any objects motion
Excellent video!! I look forward to watching more of such wonders of physics....😊😊 Science is not at all scary or difficult... unfortunately we indulge ourselves learning science for our school exams...we need to broaden our view of thinking n analysing things...we are all surrounded by matter ..we are a part of this universe 😊... science is really interesting...n is interconnected with every concept in our day to day lives...😊
You started off with the big bang and everything became clear afterwards. In the next video please describe "c square". c multiplied by c. Keep up the good work 👍
MORE VIDEOS PLEASE! Maybe you could do a video on the different sustainability of the different energies we use. I.e. Nat gas vs coal vs solar vs nuclear? And how they power our homes
I like this idea! I've spent a lot of time calculating the average electricity usage of my 1st world lifestyle. Don't ask why. But these things come up in books like Abundance and Bold by Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler. They're a bit older at this point, but some very cool ideas about how we can transcend scarcity and live a life of abundance.
Thank you for the clear explanation. Reading Walter Isaacson's book " Einstein His Life And Universe" and was motivated to explore what others are saying. Your little fun video is really great.😊
this video deserve more view with perfect explanation in a short time duration with understandable animation. 34K view is really low for the person who put alot of effort to create such that video.
Only watched two videos from you guys including this one and you’ve already earned a sub. I am amazed with the quality of your content, reminds me of Ted Ed animations. Keep up the great work guys 👍 👍
Reigniting my love for physics with this! Thanks for making it! Would love to learn more about extra-terrestrial life, and quantum physics, if you’re looking for video ideas 😁
We're into it! Really big on speculative biology. There was some really neat stuff in Richard Dawkins' "Ancestor's Tale" that discusses interesting ideas about why certain biological adaptations tended to evolve in different branches. And we've definitely done some research for a quantum physics video. This is a rabbit hole we've spent quite some time in; from Richard Feynman to Brian Greene.
I’d love to see a video about the history of economics so like the start of exchanging goods all the way to our digital aera and why/how we got there. also, a possible idea would be, especially nowadays, about the ways we could „secure“ ai in the future to make sure it doesn’t go rogue. again, love the content!
Well done guys. I love how you used some simplicity to demonstrate what this formula is supposed to be about. You are right in that, if the formula held any validity , a paperclip should be able to boil all the water in lake Tahoe . And since it can't , and never will , the formula is complete crap. It's that simple . PS: The speed of light is not the cosmic speed limit either . Einstein got that one wrong too. I'll wait until I reveal one day what truly is the fastest thing in the universe . Until then ... I'll be hanging out at the singularity
Could there be a geometrical aspect to Einstein’s equation, E=MC² energy equals mass times the speed of light squared? The C squared can represent light radiating out in every direction forming a sphere 4πr². We have square the radius r² of the sphere because the process is relative to the spherical surface. The interior of the sphere is naturally three-dimensional forming the three dimensions of our everyday life. If we place the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π between the energy ∆E and mass ∆M we link time within the process. The surface of the sphere can form a boundary condition or manifold for the process of energy exchange that forms our ever-changing world. We measure this process as a ‘period of time’ with the atoms of the periodic table being standing waves in time. The spontaneous absorption and emission of light photon ∆E=hf energy is forming potential photon energy into the kinetic energy of electrons. Kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy is the energy of what is actually happening. An uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future is continuously coming into existence with the exchange of photon energy.
Maybe? I would have to get Alan to check the math. But geometry definitely plays a role. Geometry and dimensions are linked. It would be true to say that dimensions have geometry, from the unfurled dimensions of spacetime to the tiny curled up dimensions that exist at the sub-atomic scale (according to string theory). Even the theories about the 'curvature' of the universe itself present some geometry. Naturally the limits of energy would seem to be bound by those dimensions, just like the speed of light is. So this relationship of C² comes from something inherent to that dimensionality.
Hi guys ! Your video is great and really well explained, I hope you'll do extra videos ! May I suggest, you can do one on Kinetic, and how it is in our daily lif, it is an interesting topic, also used in architecture to approach sustainable approaches to our buildings, our windmills, Hydropower Plants, airplanes, etc. An other idea is computer language and scripting, or teaching to AI.
The reason that (e.g. "microscopic" and "quantum" ) size scales are only physically defined as purely relative to each other, i.e. in terms of their role in emergent diversity of "structure" native to (as only possible at) these various self-relative (such as our "macroscopic") size scales is the fact that the most elementary geometry of the SUM's* self-relative motion is that of the horn toroidal fluid vortex (HTV), which is more or less spherical and circular, i.e. as a hypersphere. If we wish to construct (approximations of) other geometric structures, such as a cube or other straight-edge polyhedron, we can do so by arranging multiple (more than one) of these simple particulate HTVs into a lattice** whose outer surfaces become closer and closer approximations to perfectly straight lines and flat planes the greater the number of HTV's of a given standard baseline "size" that we incorporate into the lattice. This 'purely self-relative' function of size scale in structure is perfectly described by the Fourier Series. And this carries right down to the 'quantum mechanical' scales where the self-relative motion (accelerating/acceleration-) flow trajectories of an otherwise scale uniform medium begin to take on (i.e. non-uniform) 'structure' as such. It is at this 'wave/particle-transition' scale also that we first 'see' elementary "particulate" HTVs (a.k.a. "mass particles") "in motion" -- i.e. with-as-through the flow-geodesics of the surrounding 'empty space' SUM -- "with respect to each other" *'scale-uniform medium' -- a.k.a. "spacetime" ** NOTE - thereby "also" affecting the "network" structural principle as being "distributed - in - space - over - time"* * * * * * (thereby "also" phenomenologically manifesting "extension in space [over time]")* * * * * * * * NOTE: I also refer to this emergent [physical/phenomenological, if you will] "proliferation of structural diversity" in terms of, and by means of, the ("otherwise") SUM's self-relative motion as ""the bifurcational proliferation of complementarities". Please also check out (read carefully, tolerantly -- it's a work in progress -- and thoughtfully) my "Anthropos Cartographer" meta-philosophy (a.k.a. 'Experiential Meta-Mechanics'; a.k.a. 'The Quantum Philosophy'; a.k.a. 'Networkology' ) in the comments at "What is a Worldview" (ruclips.net/video/AVAmY1HvExI/видео.html) Unlike man's previous 'philosophies', this one explicitly recognizes, defines, and declares itself to be a human intelligence self-engineering technology. Thanks
Keep it up, love it. this was an amazing explanation. Ive been thinking of how a black hole would look like in 3d? we normally show the 2d version with a bending grid. I wonder how would that grid look in an sphere.
Math is not physics. Mass is a property of matter and energy. This equation is just the conversion factor which gives the mass of a quantity of energy. A property is not the equivalent of the thing of which it is a property. Redness is not equivalent to an apple. Mass is always conserved.
What happens to the second in c? I mean if you are saying E = M x 299,792,458 meters per second squared. If you multiply 299,792,458 times it self you still have meters squared and seconds squared. What happens to the time?
This is by far, may be, the only video about e=mc² i have understood completely... This means a lot to me guys... deeply thankful to you
Sorry but he is wrong, mass is not the measurement of matter, mole is the measurement of matter, while mass is the measurement of inertia, inertia simply means, how much effort or force is
needed to accelerate or alter any objects motion
I just finished reading David Bodani's book "E=mc2" and I have to say that your video does a better job explaining the equation in a few minutes.
a great time to be alive. such great video content that easily explains hard topics in a fun way. love them all!
Wow 🥺 I can't beleive! You guys are back after 3 years . I thought the channel was dead.
Guys, you're absolutely amazing! My 6 year old is enthralled by your vids, PLEASE make more
Excellent video!! I look forward to watching more of such wonders of physics....😊😊 Science is not at all scary or difficult... unfortunately we indulge ourselves learning science for our school exams...we need to broaden our view of thinking n analysing things...we are all surrounded by matter ..we are a part of this universe 😊... science is really interesting...n is interconnected with every concept in our day to day lives...😊
You started off with the big bang and everything became clear afterwards. In the next video please describe "c square". c multiplied by c.
Keep up the good work 👍
omggggg i just watched your first video from 4 years ago and you mention planning on making this video, i’m so happy i got here now!!!
when the world needed him most he came back
I'm so sorry you're stopped make videos. It's very interesting.
The legends themselves are back
First reply
Second reply
@@Tinyverse Thanks for all you do my boys and I love your style and using your videos to learn!!!
Fourth reply
fifth reply
THEY ARE BACK!!!
MORE VIDEOS PLEASE! Maybe you could do a video on the different sustainability of the different energies we use. I.e. Nat gas vs coal vs solar vs nuclear? And how they power our homes
I like this idea! I've spent a lot of time calculating the average electricity usage of my 1st world lifestyle. Don't ask why. But these things come up in books like Abundance and Bold by Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler. They're a bit older at this point, but some very cool ideas about how we can transcend scarcity and live a life of abundance.
The reason they out out low video cause they are small company and the animation is HD so it takes a long while
@@sy1216it wouldn’t take 3 years for 1 video
YOUR BACK :D i subscribed a while back even tho its been a while but im glad to see u making videos again ^^ keep up the good work :D
This video truly helped me wrap my head around this knowledge of energy, matter, and the universe. Thank you so much! this is so so beautiful
First time I'ver seen this explained with a real life example (a paperclip) and real numbers. That helped me understand much better.
i saw a lot of videos trying to completely understand this equation. This video gave me that knowledge. Please do more scientific videos.
The speed of light always stumped me, u cleared that up....nice
Thank you for the clear explanation. Reading Walter Isaacson's book " Einstein His Life And Universe" and was motivated to explore what others are saying. Your little fun video is really great.😊
this video deserve more view with perfect explanation in a short time duration with understandable animation. 34K view is really low for the person who put alot of
effort to create such that video.
Only watched two videos from you guys including this one and you’ve already earned a sub. I am amazed with the quality of your content, reminds me of Ted Ed animations. Keep up the great work guys 👍 👍
Guys,
Thank you so much for this impressively concise video… It is didactic in the simplest form. Congratulations…
WTF YOUR BACK I LOVE YOUR VIDS (bit late sorry)
HE IS BACK
Simplicity is the mark of a genius 🤓
Reigniting my love for physics with this! Thanks for making it! Would love to learn more about extra-terrestrial life, and quantum physics, if you’re looking for video ideas 😁
We're into it! Really big on speculative biology. There was some really neat stuff in Richard Dawkins' "Ancestor's Tale" that discusses interesting ideas about why certain biological adaptations tended to evolve in different branches. And we've definitely done some research for a quantum physics video. This is a rabbit hole we've spent quite some time in; from Richard Feynman to Brian Greene.
What is this channel? Why does it only have 20k followers? The videos are great!
God you came back, in only 3 year's i thought you would come back in 29 year's
The Return Of The King
Commenting to boost bacause i love this channel!
❤️
Please be consistent .You are doing amazing !
Man i am happy that you came back 😢 is been so long but im happy your back
Why isnt this channel blowin up?
He’s finely back where we’re you
It's not even 1 hour since I started watching your videos.Damn they're so good. I'll be waiting for your next video
Yesss they have come back!
ITS BEEN 3 YEARS! :D
Plus I’m more interested in nature type videos
Sure, 3 human-years...
@@Tinyverse yeah
I’d love to see a video about the history of economics so like the start of exchanging goods all the way to our digital aera and why/how we got there. also, a possible idea would be, especially nowadays, about the ways we could „secure“ ai in the future to make sure it doesn’t go rogue. again, love the content!
This was the fastest 8 minute in my life 😂
I love it
Time flies when you're blowin' stuff up, don't it?
Well done guys. I love how you used some simplicity to demonstrate what this formula is supposed to be about. You are right in that, if the formula held any validity , a paperclip should be able to boil all the water in lake Tahoe . And since it can't , and never will , the formula is complete crap. It's that simple .
PS: The speed of light is not the cosmic speed limit either . Einstein got that one wrong too. I'll wait until I reveal one day what truly is the fastest thing in the universe . Until then ... I'll be hanging out at the singularity
I just saw a play on Einstine. Crazy that you guys posted this right after.
Could there be a geometrical aspect to Einstein’s equation, E=MC² energy equals mass times the speed of light squared? The C squared can represent light radiating out in every direction forming a sphere 4πr². We have square the radius r² of the sphere because the process is relative to the spherical surface. The interior of the sphere is naturally three-dimensional forming the three dimensions of our everyday life. If we place the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π between the energy ∆E and mass ∆M we link time within the process. The surface of the sphere can form a boundary condition or manifold for the process of energy exchange that forms our ever-changing world. We measure this process as a ‘period of time’ with the atoms of the periodic table being standing waves in time. The spontaneous absorption and emission of light photon ∆E=hf energy is forming potential photon energy into the kinetic energy of electrons. Kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy is the energy of what is actually happening. An uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future is continuously coming into existence with the exchange of photon energy.
Maybe? I would have to get Alan to check the math. But geometry definitely plays a role. Geometry and dimensions are linked. It would be true to say that dimensions have geometry, from the unfurled dimensions of spacetime to the tiny curled up dimensions that exist at the sub-atomic scale (according to string theory). Even the theories about the 'curvature' of the universe itself present some geometry. Naturally the limits of energy would seem to be bound by those dimensions, just like the speed of light is. So this relationship of C² comes from something inherent to that dimensionality.
Hi guys ! Your video is great and really well explained, I hope you'll do extra videos ! May I suggest, you can do one on Kinetic, and how it is in our daily lif, it is an interesting topic, also used in architecture to approach sustainable approaches to our buildings, our windmills, Hydropower Plants, airplanes, etc. An other idea is computer language and scripting, or teaching to AI.
I love your videos .. So easy to understand .. Thanks ! keep creating more of them ! Pleaseeee !!!!
I’m glad you’re back.
Thanks from heart ! U r came back
Please provide great videos again
Your back!❤😂🎉😮
YOU'RE back!!
The reason that (e.g. "microscopic" and "quantum" ) size scales are only physically defined as purely relative to each other, i.e. in terms of their role in emergent diversity of "structure" native to (as only possible at) these various self-relative (such as our "macroscopic") size scales is the fact that the most elementary geometry of the SUM's* self-relative motion is that of the horn toroidal fluid vortex (HTV), which is more or less spherical and circular, i.e. as a hypersphere. If we wish to construct (approximations of) other geometric structures, such as a cube or other straight-edge polyhedron, we can do so by arranging multiple (more than one) of these simple particulate HTVs into a lattice** whose outer surfaces become closer and closer approximations to perfectly straight lines and flat planes the greater the number of HTV's of a given standard baseline "size" that we incorporate into the lattice.
This 'purely self-relative' function of size scale in structure is perfectly described by the Fourier Series. And this carries right down to the 'quantum mechanical' scales where the self-relative motion (accelerating/acceleration-) flow trajectories of an otherwise scale uniform medium begin to take on (i.e. non-uniform) 'structure' as such. It is at this 'wave/particle-transition' scale also that we first 'see' elementary "particulate" HTVs (a.k.a. "mass particles") "in motion" -- i.e. with-as-through the flow-geodesics of the surrounding 'empty space' SUM -- "with respect to each other"
*'scale-uniform medium' -- a.k.a. "spacetime"
** NOTE - thereby "also" affecting the "network" structural principle as being "distributed - in - space - over - time"* * *
* * * (thereby "also" phenomenologically manifesting "extension in space [over time]")* * * *
* * * * NOTE: I also refer to this emergent [physical/phenomenological, if you will] "proliferation of structural diversity" in terms of, and by means of, the ("otherwise") SUM's self-relative motion as ""the bifurcational proliferation of complementarities".
Please also check out (read carefully, tolerantly -- it's a work in progress -- and thoughtfully) my "Anthropos Cartographer" meta-philosophy (a.k.a. 'Experiential Meta-Mechanics'; a.k.a. 'The Quantum Philosophy'; a.k.a. 'Networkology' ) in the comments at "What is a Worldview" (ruclips.net/video/AVAmY1HvExI/видео.html) Unlike man's previous 'philosophies', this one explicitly recognizes, defines, and declares itself to be a human intelligence self-engineering technology. Thanks
Bro do more videos of topics you did before too
Yes! You’re back 🎉❤
Finally :') y'all are back 😁
Legends are back❤
Oh you're back
you're back!!
Finally someone can explain this equation thx
Can you do a video on methods of communicating thought history starting from the very beginning? I just found this channel and I need more T_T
We need more videos from you guys ❤❤❤
You need a shout out from a big RUclipsr maybe smarter everyday or something you make great video very informative
A video on plasma
Ooooh, could do. The state? Or the stuff in your blood?
Keep it up, love it. this was an amazing explanation. Ive been thinking of how a black hole would look like in 3d? we normally show the 2d version with a bending grid. I wonder how would that grid look in an sphere.
They... Came back?
GOD IS SO CREATIVE. THIS UNIVERSE IS SO AMAZINGLY MADE! IT IS SO INTELLIGENT!
This is a nice video. Thank you for the information!
Great content. Enjoy your guys' videos but it's been awhile since the last upload 😢
Why you stopped this was the most educational video and fun video ever make money ps you are a also genuis both of you
They have left us again :(
Your back
i like your videos a lott
the way you explaining is so amazing
i love these videos! please keep making them :)
The kings have returned
Great video! Can we get one on aether theories?
Make videos on bio, Chem, physics topics for high school students so everyone will learn things
Yooo this channel seems legit. Let me sub
Please keep making more videos!
pretty cool vid , and kinda underated
So much informative video. Thanks.
This comment section > 99% of the population
You guys are freaking smart! Take love ❤️
Your bacccccccc
I love you guy's videos and please make more.
Its back.
Great Work guys❤
So they are different forms... Right?
Thanks nice video a'm from India ✨
Math is not physics. Mass is a property of matter and energy. This equation is just the conversion factor which gives the mass of a quantity of energy. A property is not the equivalent of the thing of which it is a property. Redness is not equivalent to an apple. Mass is always conserved.
?Particle matter is condense/frozen light?
& I never fighured-out what exactly energy is
what unit did you use?
What happens to the second in c? I mean if you are saying E = M x 299,792,458 meters per second squared. If you multiply 299,792,458 times it self you still have meters squared and seconds squared. What happens to the time?
1 Joule = 1 kg m^2/s^2
quick question why do you post your vids years apart?
Such a great video
LIKE THE FREAKING QUALITY OF THIS CHANNEL LIKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this is at Kurzgesagt’s level, are you serious you’re a team of TWO?????
I really like this video I love your channel videos❤
❤❤❤❤
So well done.
AWESOMEEEEE - please make moree videossss
This reminds me of the cartoons that used to be on public channels like cyber chase 😊
So basically we are one of the forms of energy and if we are energy and learning about energy that means energy learns about energy?
Where did you go
This video is especially relative to anyone wanting a good understanding of Physics.
Great video thank you!
lesgooo you uploaded again