I've been playing this deck a lot lately. Can't wait for Seventh Tachyon since it should be an auto include. Also I've gotten wins lately with, of all cards, Star Cestus.
Doesn't Cross Counter have to destroy an XYX monster to activate? Either a "number" or "Battlin' Boxer" xyz, meaning you couldn't destroy glassjaw to get out another Dempsey?
good video; I would like a combo that ends with at least one of the traps and the xyz rank 5 on the field; Doesn't the deck have an efficient way of doing this?
You can do but requires you to open a extender like sparrer or start with chief second. Then go through your normal line with promoter but instead of making Dempsey, banish promoter from gy and go into the rank 5. Ends on the rank 5 + 1 counter trap❤️
@@roguetier8025 good, it makes sense; It's not difficult to open with an extra extender in this deck, so I think it's a very interesting end board, depending on the match up; thanks
Unfortunately according to master duel (and OCG rulings) the card reads as Battlin Boxer XYZ monster and Numbers XYZ monster. I also absolutely read it as battlin boxer monster or number XYZ as well
What’s your opinion on adding infernobles to the deck? I’ve seen both pure and infern versions of the deck but don’t know which one would be better structured for BB
Infernoble package could be the way to go tbh, but with isolde banned it hurt that variant a ton. Still might be worth a try :) Subscribe if you are new
I've been playing this deck a lot lately. Can't wait for Seventh Tachyon since it should be an auto include. Also I've gotten wins lately with, of all cards, Star Cestus.
Star Cestus coming in Clutch!!
The spell is so good for this deck can’t wait to get my hands on it❤️🙂
Doesn't Cross Counter have to destroy an XYX monster to activate? Either a "number" or "Battlin' Boxer" xyz, meaning you couldn't destroy glassjaw to get out another Dempsey?
Negative, any boxer or number xyz ❤️
@@roguetier8025 you are wrong buddy..
@@cendrimkajtazaj6900 wrong. Card reads “destroy 1 Battlin Boxer OR Number XYZ monster. I tested it on Duelingnexus.
good video;
I would like a combo that ends with at least one of the traps and the xyz rank 5 on the field; Doesn't the deck have an efficient way of doing this?
You can do but requires you to open a extender like sparrer or start with chief second. Then go through your normal line with promoter but instead of making Dempsey, banish promoter from gy and go into the rank 5.
Ends on the rank 5 + 1 counter trap❤️
@@roguetier8025 good, it makes sense;
It's not difficult to open with an extra extender in this deck, so I think it's a very interesting end board, depending on the match up; thanks
Unfortunately according to master duel (and OCG rulings) the card reads as Battlin Boxer XYZ monster and Numbers XYZ monster. I also absolutely read it as battlin boxer monster or number XYZ as well
What’s your opinion on adding infernobles to the deck? I’ve seen both pure and infern versions of the deck but don’t know which one would be better structured for BB
Infernoble package could be the way to go tbh, but with isolde banned it hurt that variant a ton. Still might be worth a try :)
Subscribe if you are new
Ban Dempsey
Obv he is too stronk