Great tips. These are genuinely good tips for you to understand about the company and also for them to know that you are at the top. We are not hiring a mule here, but a thinker. Surely, judge by asking clarifying questions and they will quickly answer whether these questions are becoming onerous or giving them a signal of your out of the box thinking. Thank you Ritwik 🙏🏽
That’s a fair opinion! My view is that the interviewer should ultimately be in control of the flow of time during the interview. Under that assumption, the interview would only go over if the interviewer allowed it or was engaged enough with the candidate. I totally get there might be valid reasons to stay in the allotted time though.
As an interviewer, that is a lot of bad advises. The most obvious one is that asking tech stack and culture are completely fine. I want someone I want to have a beer with instead of eagar doing something alone. If you ask clarify questions for simple screening questions that doesn't require additional details, I would get the impression you are the problem. The right way is making obvious assumption and think loud.
nonsense, asking clarifying questions only underlines that you value your time as well as the clients or whoever you work for. been there multiple times. in the end, you end up doing work which may be completely irrelevant, because you have a stakeholder who thinks differently or doesn't get technicalities as much as you think everybody should. stop shaming the idea of asking simple questions, to make sure you understand each other
I also feel that autistic people are more likely to need clarifying questions, before they can answer fully. Also you're not allowing for your interpretation to be questioned, which is normally how innovation happens - new perspective, gained from greater clarity. Also, again, if they don't live up to your notion of "going for a drink" work culture fit, you are inadvertently being abilist against autistic people, who often just want to do a great job, then go home. I'm autistic, and there's a lot of autistic people in data science - please don't exclude us
Excellent tips! Thank you!!
Glad it was helpful!
Great tips.
These are genuinely good tips for you to understand about the company and also for them to know that you are at the top. We are not hiring a mule here, but a thinker.
Surely, judge by asking clarifying questions and they will quickly answer whether these questions are becoming onerous or giving them a signal of your out of the box thinking.
Thank you Ritwik 🙏🏽
Absolutely!
As an interviewer, I strongly discourage going over time!
That’s a fair opinion! My view is that the interviewer should ultimately be in control of the flow of time during the interview. Under that assumption, the interview would only go over if the interviewer allowed it or was engaged enough with the candidate. I totally get there might be valid reasons to stay in the allotted time though.
"for now at least ", so scary
really tho
What is the pictures name at 2:05?
Hey you can find the image here: unsplash.com/photos/rope-on-hole-KXtMGheovdw
@@ritvikmath thank you!
As an interviewer, that is a lot of bad advises. The most obvious one is that asking tech stack and culture are completely fine. I want someone I want to have a beer with instead of eagar doing something alone. If you ask clarify questions for simple screening questions that doesn't require additional details, I would get the impression you are the problem. The right way is making obvious assumption and think loud.
nonsense, asking clarifying questions only underlines that you value your time as well as the clients or whoever you work for. been there multiple times. in the end, you end up doing work which may be completely irrelevant, because you have a stakeholder who thinks differently or doesn't get technicalities as much as you think everybody should. stop shaming the idea of asking simple questions, to make sure you understand each other
I also feel that autistic people are more likely to need clarifying questions, before they can answer fully. Also you're not allowing for your interpretation to be questioned, which is normally how innovation happens - new perspective, gained from greater clarity. Also, again, if they don't live up to your notion of "going for a drink" work culture fit, you are inadvertently being abilist against autistic people, who often just want to do a great job, then go home.
I'm autistic, and there's a lot of autistic people in data science - please don't exclude us
Hi ritvikmath, is there a way to get in contact with you? I may have missed it, but I could not find your email under your channel details.