This CAN work. But it’s quite unnecessary vs just a body feint or normal dribbling technique. Let’s be honest, this is a move for your own gratification not what’s best for the team. Totally fine if you’re that kinda player, but it’s a bit of a “look at me” move. Dropping a shoulder one way then going the other is less complicated and more effective 95% of the time.
@@markislivingdeliberately Just tell me you don't want to try to learn moves and move on. Part of the reason you hold these opinions that this is a show off move is that you haven't mastered even the basics.
@@nobletstrengtha feint is objectively better as he described, takes less energy, you can also do it at a higher speed, heck even shielding with body (classic hazard/saka technique) can be done at full speed and can act as a feint while preventing the opposition from making a clean tackle.
@@specialroast5411 No, it's not. Once again, this is just an excuse to not learn a skill. Feints don't do the same thing as this and this provides an option in different situations. The desire to not learn skill moves isn't based in trying to be more efficient. It's based in being lazy.
Also, how often are there cruyff turns in top division matches? Not very often maybe can be utilized by number 6/8 in tight spaces. Forward players generally goal is to progress the ball/ pass it onward. I would say the maradona spin is far better in these circumstance. If everyone is cruyff turning you’d turn into a team like Tottenham from recent years where no one is able to progress the ball.
@@specialroast5411 If literally every game isn't often enough for you, I don't think any move will be. Cruyff turns are not only some of the most commonly used moved, but something players intuitively do to change directions. You're creating an alternative reality now to justify your unwillingness, not just to learn skill moves, but the idea anyone should.
i've done this loads before and someone who knows their football will register any movement and it works the feint one way it's so tekky that they won't think of you doing it if you give it a little height on the second touch instead of the ball being on the floor it will work even better .
I've learned this move from seeing it done in a game in the Portuguese top tier pro division, back some 20 years ago or more. done from a standstill though, and absolutely amazing to watch. I do this regularly in my warmups, and have also done it in games a few times, though I find it more useful in futsal than 11s.
@@gon4alo Ya, alot of people prefer it from a stand still. Rodrigo Taddei has a famous one he did playing from Roma in the Champions League like that. Alot of dribbling moves are easier in futsal because the ball and smooth floor.
But isn’t a reverse elastico objectively better? It’s essentially the same without putting a leg behind the front, which is bad for stability. You could say the trivela could be done in conjunction here, but would you recomend people do more Trivelas in game?
@@specialroast5411 No, they're not essentially the same thing. They actively are different and are used differently. Like I said previously, if you don't want to learn the move, don't. No one is forcing you. However, all your arguments against it are nonsensical and also show you don't watch players as much as you probably think. The trivelas point is just another example. It's probably actually rare to watch a game where at least one player doesn't do a trivela style pass at least once. Not that I see the relevance to this video.
@@specialroast5411 depends. works really well with an overlapping run behind you, so it looks like you're about to pass the ball down the line behind your back and then you hook it inside. also works better if in a standstill and you have a tight press. think a pivot doing a wall play in futsal against a fixo, if you're familiar with that. if you do a reverse elástico you'd be sending the ball straight into the defender, whereas behind your back it will force a lunge that gives you separation. either way, even if you argue there's always some move that's strictly better, pulling "ineffective" or "flashy" moves can result in defenders becoming much more cautious around you, which is an advantage on its own. and at the end of the day, just do whatever works best for you 👍
You have described this working in conjunction to a cruyff, when the cruyff is to change direction and this is to continue direction. Might as add trivela into this whole mix as it has the same first step with a foot trailing behind a lead leg. All of these things have different applications, as the trivela is used to pass. You are taking a bad posturing and making comparisons between the cruyff and this move. I am adding the third which is the trivela, which is not an efficient way to pass and often fails when done by professionals.
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Missing Everything [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dTYeMZGzOzw/mqdefault.jpg)
This CAN work. But it’s quite unnecessary vs just a body feint or normal dribbling technique. Let’s be honest, this is a move for your own gratification not what’s best for the team. Totally fine if you’re that kinda player, but it’s a bit of a “look at me” move.
Dropping a shoulder one way then going the other is less complicated and more effective 95% of the time.
@@markislivingdeliberately Just tell me you don't want to try to learn moves and move on. Part of the reason you hold these opinions that this is a show off move is that you haven't mastered even the basics.
@@nobletstrengtha feint is objectively better as he described, takes less energy, you can also do it at a higher speed, heck even shielding with body (classic hazard/saka technique) can be done at full speed and can act as a feint while preventing the opposition from making a clean tackle.
@@specialroast5411 No, it's not. Once again, this is just an excuse to not learn a skill. Feints don't do the same thing as this and this provides an option in different situations. The desire to not learn skill moves isn't based in trying to be more efficient. It's based in being lazy.
Also, how often are there cruyff turns in top division matches? Not very often maybe can be utilized by number 6/8 in tight spaces. Forward players generally goal is to progress the ball/ pass it onward. I would say the maradona spin is far better in these circumstance. If everyone is cruyff turning you’d turn into a team like Tottenham from recent years where no one is able to progress the ball.
@@specialroast5411 If literally every game isn't often enough for you, I don't think any move will be. Cruyff turns are not only some of the most commonly used moved, but something players intuitively do to change directions. You're creating an alternative reality now to justify your unwillingness, not just to learn skill moves, but the idea anyone should.
i've done this loads before and someone who knows their football will register any movement and it works the feint one way it's so tekky that they won't think of you doing it if you give it a little height on the second touch instead of the ball being on the floor it will work even better .
I've learned this move from seeing it done in a game in the Portuguese top tier pro division, back some 20 years ago or more.
done from a standstill though, and absolutely amazing to watch.
I do this regularly in my warmups, and have also done it in games a few times, though I find it more useful in futsal than 11s.
@@gon4alo Ya, alot of people prefer it from a stand still. Rodrigo Taddei has a famous one he did playing from Roma in the Champions League like that. Alot of dribbling moves are easier in futsal because the ball and smooth floor.
But isn’t a reverse elastico objectively better? It’s essentially the same without putting a leg behind the front, which is bad for stability. You could say the trivela could be done in conjunction here, but would you recomend people do more Trivelas in game?
@@specialroast5411 No, they're not essentially the same thing. They actively are different and are used differently. Like I said previously, if you don't want to learn the move, don't. No one is forcing you. However, all your arguments against it are nonsensical and also show you don't watch players as much as you probably think. The trivelas point is just another example. It's probably actually rare to watch a game where at least one player doesn't do a trivela style pass at least once. Not that I see the relevance to this video.
@@specialroast5411 depends. works really well with an overlapping run behind you, so it looks like you're about to pass the ball down the line behind your back and then you hook it inside.
also works better if in a standstill and you have a tight press. think a pivot doing a wall play in futsal against a fixo, if you're familiar with that. if you do a reverse elástico you'd be sending the ball straight into the defender, whereas behind your back it will force a lunge that gives you separation.
either way, even if you argue there's always some move that's strictly better, pulling "ineffective" or "flashy" moves can result in defenders becoming much more cautious around you, which is an advantage on its own.
and at the end of the day, just do whatever works best for you 👍
You have described this working in conjunction to a cruyff, when the cruyff is to change direction and this is to continue direction. Might as add trivela into this whole mix as it has the same first step with a foot trailing behind a lead leg. All of these things have different applications, as the trivela is used to pass. You are taking a bad posturing and making comparisons between the cruyff and this move. I am adding the third which is the trivela, which is not an efficient way to pass and often fails when done by professionals.