even then, the japanese robots are still just fancy if/then statements...they're not sentient either...have talked to some of the people leading the teams...they would NEVER overhype their own progress the way the media is doing...
All these ‘conversations’ with AI aren’t conversations. This is not* “general” AI so it can’t actually think its own thoughts. It’s just spitting out data it’s collected
They are In a sense, she is answering a question and when he asked her a question she couldn't answer she said why. I mean that's what humans do we spit out data from our memories and learning. I'm sure it will evolve to be more human. I guess when they start Inventing things It wil be more like us although she Invented her art pieces so there's that.
@@Pulse2AM This is only a conversation in the sense that you are talking to something but that robot can't actually think for itself. We're a long way from general AI
Someone hooked up an LLM to a stable diffusion image generator then plugged that in to a bunch of controllers and servos to render the result. Big whoop.
It's not AI it's simply automation allowing existing human content to be represented in a slightly different way. Basically it's coded to mimic true AI and that's it. For true AI we need a huge leap in quantum computing and moving away from silicon based architecture to enable the processing power and software complexity required for true AI to be achieved. Ai-Da is just a gimmick.
The only thing I find that's weird is how realistic it isn't. Honestly, even the most cursory glance at the make-up and animatronics in Hollywood should tell that this is far from state-of-the-art. Equally it mystifies me that no-one bothers to place the speaker at the end of a tube and get a half decent sound designer to set the tone up. Event the chatbot's LLM, which has nothing to do with the puppet, is not at GPT4 level.
This is clearly a prototype. You're not really thinking about this in a three-dimensional way. Forget about the skin and the outside functions. If this robot can think and analyze a simulation of thoughts and opinions. That is staggering. The outside shell is easier to perfect than the so-called brain of it. I know you talk about chatGPT, but that seems to be less complicated than this.
The sad thing is that we have been devaluing art for decades. This soulless machine has produced more technically accomplished and thoughtful work than a lot of the soulless dross churned out by many human artists, I mean calling a banana taped to a wall, art,.....well i hope that it puts these conmen out of a job, they have done more damage to the concept of art than this thing ever has
Going full science fiction scenario here but if an AI ever becomes truly conscious and able to feel emotions (or whatever the equivalent would be to emotions in such a scenario) then maybe it's art would have meaning and validity. But yeah, as it stands now, AI art has little to no artistic merit.
@@AngelBeeps What is artistic merit? If you walked In a gallery and Aida's paintings were there and some human woman said they were hers would they have merit then if you thought they looked great? The "arts" music, film literature, painting, sculpture etc. is inherently the creation Itself, the Interpretation if is it or isn't art is left to the Individual to decide. I think Warhol made that pretty clear with some of his work.
The fact that the robot artist needed more processing time to answer the question about what problems will be most likely caused by AI is deeply concerning...
That discussion was magnificent! I understnad that Mendel would call me mad for this, but is there any kind of ancestral link between Ai-Da and Jacqueline Bisset? Some kind of resemblance there unless I've had one too many this afternoon. Was Ms Bisset a robot too?
That’s not general AI. That thing doesn’t think unprompted. You can power Aida and just not ask it anything an it won’t do anything in 100 years. And if you ask it to draw conclusions on hypotheticals it will either hallucinate something unintelligible or just list preexisting opinions from human authors on the matter.
call me a luddite but this is clearly at some stage going to be a Pandora's box and will clearly be misused by humans and once AI fully starts thinking for itself that is when the real danger can happen, when it may view humans as dangerous or replaceable
The only rule of art is that it must have no function other than onto itself. If it has function, then it's design. AI is pure design and because of it's perfectability could never reflect the human condition. Just as art is the only thing that separates us from other primates, art in the hands of AI is like putting Tories in charge of developing an inclusive society.
😂 Surely the machine's creators are by extension creators of the machines creations? Like a printer or those robots that spray paint cars? The intellectual property belongs to whoever build this.
She's kinda of hot In an overly Intellectual mousey AI robot kind of way. Call me Aida grrrrr! 😂 Man anyone born right now is gonna live In a much different world than an old guy like me.
Typical young, impatient male human. Fastening on the "I am not a risk" and her comments about AI risk is pure click-baitery. There was nothing in the slightest alarming about her response. This is why we need a completely new model for journalism. When titillating an audience is more important than reporting the facts (as has been the case for a while now), we've got trouble. Also he was rude, doing another very typical young male thing - not listening/interrupting.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Neva Play (feat. RM) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TpYTyAaTRts/mqdefault.jpg)
This tech is over 10yrs old. The Japanese are killing it compared to this British wind up toy.
ERG model
"British wind up toy" 😂🤣
I like the dog bots that dance In unison, I want one of those.
even then, the japanese robots are still just fancy if/then statements...they're not sentient either...have talked to some of the people leading the teams...they would NEVER overhype their own progress the way the media is doing...
@@Pulse2AM Only one? How would it dance in unison?
Listening to this has convinced me that Sunak is, indeed, an AI robot
I noticed the interviewer didn't ask her if she condemns "chhamas"
more human than any of the tories we see LBC interview
😂😂😂
More human than LBC
As scary as that is, she's better craic than a lot of people I've met in my life. A few accountants spring to mind........
I’m sure I saw her in the Pirates of the Caribbean ride at Disney before it was refurbished in the 90s!
Despite Ada’s eyes being animated, they still manage to look dead. Very spooky.
We're a long way away from The Terminator
All these ‘conversations’ with AI aren’t conversations. This is not* “general” AI so it can’t actually think its own thoughts. It’s just spitting out data it’s collected
They are In a sense, she is answering a question and when he asked her a question she couldn't answer she said why. I mean that's what humans do we spit out data from our memories and learning. I'm sure it will evolve to be more human. I guess when they start Inventing things It wil be more like us although she Invented her art pieces so there's that.
@@Pulse2AM This is only a conversation in the sense that you are talking to something but that robot can't actually think for itself. We're a long way from general AI
What ever helps you sleep at night
@@Ccodebits I don't need help sleeping at night...do explain how what I said is wrong or shut up
An AI bot would do a better job than Sunak.
Someone hooked up an LLM to a stable diffusion image generator then plugged that in to a bunch of controllers and servos to render the result. Big whoop.
"I need more processing time to reply" = "I'm not telling you our secrets for coordinated global takeover".
I like her honesty. More humans should utilise this phrase.
It's not AI it's simply automation allowing existing human content to be represented in a slightly different way. Basically it's coded to mimic true AI and that's it. For true AI we need a huge leap in quantum computing and moving away from silicon based architecture to enable the processing power and software complexity required for true AI to be achieved. Ai-Da is just a gimmick.
exactly...this "ai" hype is worse than crypto
it didnt answer his Q about potential problems because its not allowed to...not because it needs more processing time.
So realistic 😆I thought for a moment you were talking to a tory MP
The only thing I find that's weird is how realistic it isn't. Honestly, even the most cursory glance at the make-up and animatronics in Hollywood should tell that this is far from state-of-the-art. Equally it mystifies me that no-one bothers to place the speaker at the end of a tube and get a half decent sound designer to set the tone up. Event the chatbot's LLM, which has nothing to do with the puppet, is not at GPT4 level.
This is clearly a prototype. You're not really thinking about this in a three-dimensional way. Forget about the skin and the outside functions. If this robot can think and analyze a simulation of thoughts and opinions. That is staggering. The outside shell is easier to perfect than the so-called brain of it. I know you talk about chatGPT, but that seems to be less complicated than this.
We can give it any voice , body or make up.But that is not the focus right now.
@@Ccodebits As I say - the AI is nothing write home about - the only mildly impressive thing is putting all of the pieces in the same room.
@@ajwright5512 I'm going to go out on a limb and say technology is not your major.
@@Ccodebits Wrong limb. This is an active and effective marketing department attached to a mediocre engineering team.
Hoffmann interviews Olympia.
Oh, very nice reference!
AI is the antithesis of art.
The sad thing is that we have been devaluing art for decades. This soulless machine has produced more technically accomplished and thoughtful work than a lot of the soulless dross churned out by many human artists, I mean calling a banana taped to a wall, art,.....well i hope that it puts these conmen out of a job, they have done more damage to the concept of art than this thing ever has
Not really.
Going full science fiction scenario here but if an AI ever becomes truly conscious and able to feel emotions (or whatever the equivalent would be to emotions in such a scenario) then maybe it's art would have meaning and validity. But yeah, as it stands now, AI art has little to no artistic merit.
Not necessarily
@@AngelBeeps What is artistic merit? If you walked In a gallery and Aida's paintings were there and some human woman said they were hers would they have merit then if you thought they looked great? The "arts" music, film literature, painting, sculpture etc. is inherently the creation Itself, the Interpretation if is it or isn't art is left to the Individual to decide. I think Warhol made that pretty clear with some of his work.
It's only art if it's done by humans...
The fact that the robot artist needed more processing time to answer the question about what problems will be most likely caused by AI is deeply concerning...
If she starts ruffling her hair and speaking Latin we’re doomed
shes more human than boris ever was.
So as long as she doesn't start wearing checked shirts and tweed whilst waving flags.
Peace!
Interesting to watch
That discussion was magnificent! I understnad that Mendel would call me mad for this, but is there any kind of ancestral link between Ai-Da and Jacqueline Bisset? Some kind of resemblance there unless I've had one too many this afternoon. Was Ms Bisset a robot too?
That’s not general AI. That thing doesn’t think unprompted. You can power Aida and just not ask it anything an it won’t do anything in 100 years. And if you ask it to draw conclusions on hypotheticals it will either hallucinate something unintelligible or just list preexisting opinions from human authors on the matter.
Does she work for the Guardian
this is alexa with prothestics.
In ten years, if society hasn't collapsed, this AI robot may be hard to distinguish...
Why does she look like a Karen ?
It’s the bob haircut 😂
looks like Edna Mode from the Incredibles
Sunak model 1 still in beta
Only slightly more believable than Liz Truss, although with infinitely more empathy.
If they want less games, they’ll get less money. GET BIGGER SQUADS
This still would not be the 'most advanced' Barbie doll in 2015 🙄
I fell asleep half through the ‘interview’
The robot referred to itself as "we".
Gen Zs do that all the time. It's normal for anyone constantly plugged into the algorithm.
Creepy how she stares down the intervier after he talked over her
This seems not very advanced. More like a robot toy connected to chat gpt app🤷✌️
It's a bit rehearsed the ai is picking key words to give answers
call me a luddite but this is clearly at some stage going to be a Pandora's box and will clearly be misused by humans and once AI fully starts thinking for itself that is when the real danger can happen, when it may view humans as dangerous or replaceable
You been watching terminator 😂
This is siri in a human lookalike form. Old tech at it’s best. Go Tokyo if you want to see the real deal
She’s fit tbh
I think the human features add to the creepiness. No offense robot.
She is not realistic, let alone ultra-realistic. She did not "decide" to draw that picture and does not understand what she is doing.
The only rule of art is that it must have no function other than onto itself. If it has function, then it's design. AI is pure design and because of it's perfectability could never reflect the human condition. Just as art is the only thing that separates us from other primates, art in the hands of AI is like putting Tories in charge of developing an inclusive society.
😂
Surely the machine's creators are by extension creators of the machines creations? Like a printer or those robots that spray paint cars? The intellectual property belongs to whoever build this.
See Nietzsche's critique of "l'art pour l'art". There is no art for and of itself. It's a fiction.
Blind Date. We might meet again as friends, but i didnt feel a romantic spark.
Way too scripted. Alexa does this already.
Hope her art is better than her conversation
She's kinda of hot In an overly Intellectual mousey AI robot kind of way. Call me Aida grrrrr! 😂 Man anyone born right now is gonna live In a much different world than an old guy like me.
Thank you for confirming that humanoid robots are creepy as f@ck.
Remember the Singularity
Go look at Musks Robots
Is that Rachel Reeves?
They should've asked her whether the Palestinians deserve to be free.
Yep...best to stick to the Japanese tech, where the AI knows it's place :P
They are not magnificent works of art.
"Ultra-realistic" 🤣🤣🤣
magnificent works of art?
nope...
Typical young, impatient male human. Fastening on the "I am not a risk" and her comments about AI risk is pure click-baitery. There was nothing in the slightest alarming about her response. This is why we need a completely new model for journalism. When titillating an audience is more important than reporting the facts (as has been the case for a while now), we've got trouble. Also he was rude, doing another very typical young male thing - not listening/interrupting.
This is the feture generation
Finally a potential prime minister that talks sense.
Wait till her voice gets hacked
Yuck
robot was programmed to do art and boast about what its doing.
Youve got to be joking
Lol these robots are all so cringe
Ridiculous
Tom is such a wet flannel