In Aramaic ALLAHA with Two L Also in Hebrew there is a word for God Besides Iloh ..it's ALAH ..and you find it in the Commentry of the first page of Socfield Bible explaining the vesrse of : in the beggining God created the Heveans and the Earth...ext _ And Allah Knows Best .
Sister the main reason the Christians translated the name Muhammad to something else was to divert the prophecy mentioned in the bible that the prophet Muhammad will be coming after Jesus (PBUH) this was clearly disingenuous on the Christians part, which was why Brother Ahmed Deedat was making the point that they (the Christians) had no right to translate people name. Because the senior Christians translated the name to something else, majority of Christians weren’t able to know about prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as that would go against their belief and the fact that prophet Jesus (PBUH) mentioned of another prophet to come after him.
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16? חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃ ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim: “His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.” The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad. The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’. Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble. Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would Deedat contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem? Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not? So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
My sister, the Hebrew language, the Aramaic language, and the Arabic language were all a single language called the Semitic language
3:23 yes, that's the same god
Hebrew : Elah (elohim/plural of respect)
Aramaic : Alaha
Arabic : Allah(ilah)
Root word: Alikah
All mean god
JazakAllah Khair. This is very interesting!
In Aramaic ALLAHA with Two L
Also in Hebrew there is a word for God Besides Iloh ..it's ALAH ..and you find it in the Commentry of the first page of Socfield Bible explaining the vesrse of : in the beggining God created the Heveans and the Earth...ext
_ And Allah Knows Best .
There is only one God one Creator God blesses and peace
Nice reaction sister, The Prophets on Judgement Day reaction sister. I hope your is growing Insha Allah. Amin.
Ameen. Thank you for the suggestion. Will add to the list 🙏🏽 blessings 💕
Arabic, Hebrew, and Aramaic are all Semitic languages
May the peace, mercy, and blessings of God be upon you. May God bless you. O God, enlighten her heart with peace.
Ma shaa Allah
Nice sister big fan from Mombasa Kenya
Thank you so much brother! Allah bless you!
Wa Aleykum sallaam our sister
😊
MachaA Allah my sister
Such a beautiful video. Thanks for your great work. I really benefited from this video. Peace from Sydney Australia.
"Allah mentioned in the bible" By mercifulservant Reaction
InshaAllah. I’ll work on it 😊
Heavan incha Allah my sister
I never knew this ❤
That Jewish Person reverted to Islam ❤
both semitic language, arabic and hebrew and aramaic, they all semitic language. meaning languages that comes from the language of Prophet Ibrahim
I think more far than Ibrahim from (Sam ibn Nooh) the son of Noah this is were the name comes from
Sister the main reason the Christians translated the name Muhammad to something else was to divert the prophecy mentioned in the bible that the prophet Muhammad will be coming after Jesus (PBUH) this was clearly disingenuous on the Christians part, which was why Brother Ahmed Deedat was making the point that they (the Christians) had no right to translate people name. Because the senior Christians translated the name to something else, majority of Christians weren’t able to know about prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as that would go against their belief and the fact that prophet Jesus (PBUH) mentioned of another prophet to come after him.
Thank you for sharing!
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would Deedat contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
yes arabic and hebrew are semitic language sister
Muhsmmad has been mantioned in Matthew chaptet 24 verse 11. Please to read it.
He isn't in the BIBLE that has already been proven over and over why is this video still coming up nonsense
Keep fighting or accept the truth.
"how is prophet muhammad (pbuh) mentioned in the 4,000 years old book of hinduism? By Toward Eternity" Reaction!