Pat Metheny Solar Transcription

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 июн 2016
  • This is an animated transcription video I've made from a music transcription I've been working on (and off) for years from Pat Metheny's improvised solo on the Miles Davis tune, Solar. It's from the 1989 album, Question and Answer, with Pat Metheny on guitar, Dave Holland on bass, and Roy Haynes on drumset. It is one of my most favorite jazz guitar recordings of all time. I have learned so much from this and hope you enjoy it.
  • ВидеоклипыВидеоклипы

Комментарии • 62

  • @unolakoko3474
    @unolakoko3474 Год назад +1

    Absolutely outstanding work my friend. Thanks for sharing.

  • @jayeaton2055
    @jayeaton2055 4 года назад

    The hell with the tune,...............your skillsets of displaying the musical notation,, not only displaying,..............but in real fuc*ing time,..........................is not expert,...............it is absolute wizardry,,,,,,,,,,............you are a fuc*ing genius

  • @casscrichton6594
    @casscrichton6594 3 года назад

    Great work man!!! I transcribed and played this as part of a guit exam at a con 15 years ago. What a banging song, so much to learn from it. You have set guitarists up for the second half of the song.

  • @davidrollinsmusic
    @davidrollinsmusic 5 лет назад +2

    Incredible!..thank you so much.

  • @tygill5767
    @tygill5767 8 лет назад

    Really nice work. It seems music educators would find this useful at multiple levels....

  • @nogoogleplus
    @nogoogleplus 7 лет назад

    Awesome job! Thanks so much for posting

  • @andresbernal5526
    @andresbernal5526 5 лет назад

    Amazing!!!!

  • @avatacron60
    @avatacron60 7 лет назад

    Amazing job!

  • @chriskalafus3282
    @chriskalafus3282 6 лет назад

    Great transcript. I tip my hat to you!!

  • @yogavibe2516
    @yogavibe2516 3 года назад

    excellent !!

  • @andrejofak4787
    @andrejofak4787 6 лет назад

    Thanks Alan!

  • @basilikalathas5388
    @basilikalathas5388 5 лет назад

    Thats how transcriptions should look like at present time and the future.

  • @chrismcdermott7766
    @chrismcdermott7766 5 лет назад

    thank you!!

  • @bautistarecalde4182
    @bautistarecalde4182 4 года назад

    Very good

  • @jonalesjonales9079
    @jonalesjonales9079 Год назад +1

  • @kjjjjjjjj
    @kjjjjjjjj 6 лет назад +2

    Fucking amazing!!!

  • @jazzer770
    @jazzer770 6 лет назад +1

    genius solo. genius transcription.

  • @DrJokeMaker
    @DrJokeMaker 7 лет назад +4

    Great work! Do you have a PDF you could send me of this?

  • @biancuzzo-vgm451
    @biancuzzo-vgm451 Месяц назад

    Amazing work! Would you happen to still have a PDF file of the whole transcription?

  •  7 лет назад

    Muchas Gracias 19 02 2017

  • @domenicovacca3341
    @domenicovacca3341 6 лет назад

    grazie

  • @jodnova2
    @jodnova2 5 лет назад

    Well Done! Next up All the Things You Are! :-)

  • @arikotler5481
    @arikotler5481 7 лет назад +1

    Amazing transcription!! Sorry for echoing others, but is it available as a PDF anywhere?

  • @lorenzodegani6971
    @lorenzodegani6971 6 лет назад

    grazie fantastikkkkkkk ok MAESTRO OK CIAAAAAOOOOO

  • @pabzum
    @pabzum 8 лет назад +2

    Fantastic work! Congratulations.
    After doing this, I wonder what insights you may have about Metheny’s approach to soloing.

    • @agreatape
      @agreatape  6 лет назад +5

      Well... for one thing, Pat Metheny, has certain vocabulary that he has come up with on his own that is very difficult to imitate, but that is unique to him. For example, the idea he plays at or has gotten into at 2:43 here is an example of this. I would call this a Metheny lick. He plays it not only in this solo, but in a lot of other solos on various other recordings. His blazing solo on Third Wind is another solo that immediately comes to mind where he uses this lick.
      What’s interesting here to me is the way he gets into it by playing it with some syncopation as opposed to just playing it straight on the heaviest parts of the pulse. It’s basically a seventh chord without the fifth, played linearly: 3rd-7th-3rd-root, 3rd-7th-3rd-root, etc. Being that he plays it so fast, it makes it difficult to imitate, but it is a sound that I haven’t heard any other players play (well, before Metheny), and it’s a kind of a thing that lays rather nicely for the left hand on guitar. This is just one example of the licks he plays, but it seems to me that this is definitely a trait common in jazz greats. Not only do they have an impeccable sense of time, sometimes with a feel that may be slightly behind or ahead, and a tone that is readily identifiable, but the jazz greats also have certain vocabulary unique to them that’s generally technically challenging, fun to listen to, and that still somehow expands the realm of what the jazz language is. Charlie Parker had this trait, John Coltrane had this trait, Mike Stern, Michael Brecker, Thelonius Monk… it’s an important part of who they are as players and of being recognizable.
      Another interesting thing about this particular Metheny solo is the lick or idea that he begins the solo with. It starts out with two descending half steps followed by a descending minor third-the b3, 2, b2, 7 of the half-diminished ii chord and the 5, 3, root or 5, 3, #9, b9 of the dominant chord. This is probably the most repeated idea he uses in this solo. It happens at :28, (:33), :49, 1:00, 1:31, (1:42), (1:53), (3:24), (3:37) and it could be argued that it happens in a few other places in this recording. The first half of it, two descending half-steps followed by a descending minor third, is definitely a mannerism of his. My guess is that it’s a habit he picked up around the time he was playing with Ornette Coleman or just before. I guess this could be called a “lick,” but I haven’t heard it verbatim enough in other recordings of solos of his that I would call it one of his licks. Here it’s more like an idea” or a theme that he’s using on this particular song. It’s hard to tell whether this is something that he worked out when practicing, if it’s something he heard in the moment and keeps coming back to on this recording, or if it’s like a twisted up lick of his that he keeps coming back to in this recording because he’s not hearing anything else. After listening to this recording for over 20 years, I’m leaning towards it was his way of navigating this particular standard at that point in time, almost like he came up with that lick just for playing this song-maybe through practicing.
      Another lick of note, and there are others in this solo, is the idea he plays beginning at 1:47. This is the 5, 3, 2, 1 of a major chord, and he articulates it generally by slurring the 3rd to the 2nd. This is certainly one that I’ve integrated to my playing and that has helped me get by on lots of tunes when I wasn’t hearing anything. It falls really nicely on the guitar and it articulates the harmony well enough. It’s kind of like a backwards Coltrane thing during his Giant Steps changes period. Whereas Coltrane was going 1-2-3-5, 1-2-3-5, 1-2-3-5, this goes 5-3-2-1, 5-3-2-1, 5-3-2-1, etc. What’s funny is here, it doesn’t really fall within the changes. He’s just sliding the idea up the neck until the harmony resolves. Was he really hearing that?! I don’t know.

    • @davidrumpler5528
      @davidrumpler5528 3 года назад

      @@agreatape Thanks for those insights!

  • @vifa1069MW3
    @vifa1069MW3 7 лет назад

    Fantastic desde catalonia barcelona joan vive comas

  • @JeannieSargent
    @JeannieSargent 5 лет назад +3

    Chorus #5 bars 5 and 6, it's interesting how he lands right on the minor third on that Fmajor7th chord in the harmony and only touches on the A natural as a "passing tone" on the very last beat of the Fmajor7th leading to the actual Fminor in the harmony. If I were to do this i'd get dirty looks for sour notes lol. The worst part is that having heard this solo a million times it seems and never noticed that, but now I hear it every time.

    • @agreatape
      @agreatape  4 года назад +3

      Jeannie Sargent Yeah, isn’t that great? I think he gets away with it because he’s playing in a trio and there’s no harmony instrument.

    • @JeannieSargent
      @JeannieSargent 4 года назад +1

      @@agreatape it would stand to reason the bass player is playing an F at that point so not a lot to worry about there. Makes me wonder if Dave heard that and adapted immediately in his bass line - that would certainly be the mark of a top notch accompanist.

  • @jazzman5494
    @jazzman5494 7 лет назад +3

    Just to update your information , Miles Davis didn't pen Solar but appropriated ( might I say stole) the tune from guitarist Chuck Wayne. Chuck wrote the tune and named it Sonny after after a horn man he admired. Miles was known for this type of behavior throughout his career.

    • @ray66antonio
      @ray66antonio 6 лет назад

      sim miles era conhecido por isso mesmo mas mesmo assim o admiraram so mesmo no jazz isso acontece

    • @bigdawg1260
      @bigdawg1260 6 лет назад

      Know your facts Solar wasn't a RIP off.
      www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/259556/

  • @stefano8209
    @stefano8209 5 лет назад

    Amazing work! Do you have the pdf file? thanks

  • @joelhoffman1764
    @joelhoffman1764 8 лет назад +1

    Amazing. Can you tell me your process for transcribing and the software you used?

    • @agreatape
      @agreatape  8 лет назад +6

      Yeah, I basically wrote it all all out in Finale by MakeMusic and printed the transcription to a PDF. Then I used GIMP 2, a free Windows-based raster image editor, to make slides of each note from the PDF. Then, I synchronized the slides to the audio recording using Vegas Movie Studio which is now owned by Sony. I had first tried another video editing suite, but it proved too cumbersome because it didn't display an image of the audio wave forms. Thanks for your interest!

    • @yzimsx
      @yzimsx 7 лет назад +1

      So if there are, say, 300 musical events, you exported 300 individual image files from GIMP, one image file per animation frame? And then imported all those to a video track in Vegas?

    • @agreatape
      @agreatape  7 лет назад +3

      Yes. It's quite tedious and time consuming.

  • @pectenmaximus231
    @pectenmaximus231 6 лет назад +5

    (screen shots 100 times)

    • @pectenmaximus231
      @pectenmaximus231 6 лет назад

      also a joke - amazing work, thanks for a cool video!

  • @wmjritmo
    @wmjritmo 7 лет назад +2

    Just outside enough...

  • @hub-hildenbrand
    @hub-hildenbrand 3 года назад +4

    Who wants to buy my guitar?

  • @brandonmoy4569
    @brandonmoy4569 7 лет назад

    Freakin pocket.

  • @mmmmangote
    @mmmmangote 8 лет назад

    PDF?

    • @agreatape
      @agreatape  8 лет назад +6

      Adobe software's portable document format.

    • @avatacron60
      @avatacron60 7 лет назад

      Lmao!

  • @bigdawg1260
    @bigdawg1260 6 лет назад

    I here people in these comments that miles RIP off Mr. Wayne's tune and should pay royalties, if so Zoot Sims has composition credit for Butterfinger and Prospecting. That Says Mr. Wayne penned.

  • @adriancoulson
    @adriancoulson 3 года назад +3

    Who are the three idiots that disliked this?

    • @jimmythebold589
      @jimmythebold589 2 года назад

      the ones who couldn't sing along? c'mon, now, everyone singalong' doot a doot a doot duh didadidida tootootoototoot diddly dangadangadang...

  • @davewilhelm795
    @davewilhelm795 4 года назад

    Why is the Db minor?

  • @astrokratov_official
    @astrokratov_official 7 лет назад +1

    why there's no key signature? the tune is in c-minor, where're b-flat, e-flat and a-flat? why there's so many accidentals instead? Transcription is really good, but this makes it difficult to read.

    • @havokmusicinc
      @havokmusicinc 7 лет назад +6

      In bebop, it is customary to never notate key signatures. Because the piece modulates so frequently, relying on key signatures for your accidentals will result in many incorrect notes and misreads
      Instead of thinking of the entire piece as in C minor - which it isn't - the actual keys are:
      C minor for 2 bars,
      ii-V-I into F major for 4 bars,
      ii-V-I into Eb major for 3 bars,
      ii-V-I into Db major for 3 bars, then a
      ii-V turnaround in C minor to lead back to the top.
      Now do you see why we don't notate key signatures? Having to notate the key changes every couple measures is a waste of time. Learn to sightread read accidentals. The are chord symbols anyways, so those tell you all you need to know about the modulations of the piece.

    • @astrokratov_official
      @astrokratov_official 7 лет назад

      I see, thank you.

    • @astrokratov_official
      @astrokratov_official 7 лет назад +3

      I see them more as tonal centers, than the whole key change, so the whole piece is still in c-moll, but you're right, maybe it's a matter of habbit.