Hello, thats a very informative video. Thanks a lot. However I have a question I suppose the hypothesis were set: H01: No effect of weight H02: No effect of relationship H03: No effect by the interaction. So when at the end p for the weight was not significant and thus we reject the null and say that there is an effect of weight. Whereas p for the relationship was also not significant but you have concluded that the reading for acquaintance is more than girlfriend. Ho could we conclude this when the tests all or two tailed? Shouldn't the conclusion be there is an effect of the relationship on the readings? I am just confused Thanks
Hello, thats a very informative video. Thanks a lot. However I have a question
I suppose the hypothesis were set:
H01: No effect of weight
H02: No effect of relationship
H03: No effect by the interaction.
So when at the end p for the weight was not significant and thus we reject the null and say that there is an effect of weight.
Whereas p for the relationship was also not significant but you have concluded that the reading for acquaintance is more than girlfriend. Ho could we conclude this when the tests all or two tailed? Shouldn't the conclusion be there is an effect of the relationship on the readings? I am just confused
Thanks