Excellent question... and one that I didn't think about prior to the research that we did. It would have an effect on dating methods. Even if you assume constant neutrino flux from the Sun over millions of years of history (which may not necessarily be true), the Earth is getting farther from the Sun over time. So this would mean that the Earth would have had a higher neutrino flux millions of years ago.
@@EnergyWaveTheory Good comment! It might be worth considering Safire project results, if their reports are true, plasma phenomena can also speed up the radioactive decay. That can be achieved by lightning and earthquakes for instance. Also, NASA has found electrical link between planets (e.g. Jupiter) and moons (e.g. Io), see Aurora of Jupiter. Also, see Jupiter’s polar winds counter rotations (=Birkeland’s currents)! Also, electrical link between planets (e.g. Saturn) and Sun… So, if solar system is electrical in nature, then plasma and similar electrical phenomena can be naturally expected on Earth, which by the way is made of ~59% silica that is non-polar and induces piezo-electric effect…
If your theory holds up, not only can you save Government agencies billions of radioactive waste storage cost but increase the safety for everyone. Keep doing what you are doing Terrance Howard and thank you Wave Energy Theory. I look forward to any breakthrough on applications with all of your theories.
Hi Jeff! Thank you for your work as always. On your website, you mentioned that aether granules might have a type of memory to understand their states and hold defined amounts of energy. I had been wondering if there could be a potential relation between this memory feature and the problem of standing wave particles needing a perpetual source of incoming waves to remain stable. I know I’ve read some of Dr. Milo Wolff’s thoughts on the incoming wave issue and he mentioned that incoming energy from all corners of the universe contribute to particles’ standing wave stability and that a Lenz effect might be involved in how particles resist physical disruptions, although I still have some questions about this since it would seem that the incoming waves would need to be of equal wavelength to the outgoing waves to keep the particle stable, and the chaotic nature of the aether medium/vacuum might not allow this to happen (?) I believe that in QED descriptions of the electromagnetic field, charged particles are treated as point charges where there’s a perpetual outflowing source of divergence and curl (the particle’s center) that affects the force vectors around it, so I’m wondering if perhaps aether granule memory might be affected or amplified at the moment of convergence of incoming waves to allow a sort of perpetual “excess” of potential energy to continue which constantly draws in granules around it, leading to the stability of standing waves over a long period of time. Do you have any thoughts on this, or have you found the reasoning of people like Dr. Wolff to be sufficient in explaining the stability of particle standing waves? I don’t have a very pronounced physics background so maybe I’m not fully understanding some of the explanations that have been offered. Thank you in advance!!
I'll explain the "memory" of displaced aether granules in terms of something much larger, that probably repeats the same physics. Air molecules in a room. For the purpose of this, let's assume that the walls perfectly reflect sound waves with no energy loss. With no sound, an air molecule in the room is equally separated from other air molecules. Let's say it knows this position. And at this point, there is no energy. Now, let's inject sound waves into the room. Air molecules vibrate. That individual air molecule from above is no displaced from its original position, but vibrates back-and-forth, reaching a distance (amplitude) from its preferred original position at rest. So, this is what I referred to as "memory", because it should know it's original position, and the distance it travels from this point (amplitude) is its energy (energy is proportional to the square of wave amplitude). It should know its energy and original position... if you want to call this a "memory". Explaining the constant insource of waves to create a standing wave, consider in the room that once sound wave energy is injected, if the walls to not absorb it, then it's reflected back again. That single air molecule now sees energy from other directions. When equal amplitude from opposite direction, this is a standing wave. The walls reflecting in this case can be the equivalent of other particles in the universe.
@@EnergyWaveTheoryHi Jeff, thank you for the response! The way you explained the memory makes sense, as well as the incoming wave explanation. I know that the energy radiating off particles should drop off inversely with the square of distance, which also contributes to the finite size of particles, but do you believe that the energy flowing through space is enough to maintain particle stability? I think some content on specific dynamics of energy preservation, destructive/constructive interference producing electromagnetic attraction and repulsion and maybe even some more animations on how the spherical standing waves propagate as particles move through space would be really cool to watch! Your resources and papers provide a ton of information, I think I just have a hard time visualizing it on occasion
@@anthonydeyoe1966 it is very hard to visualize particles and standing waves. I created a project to simulate with 3D visuals, with the help of computer simulations that used real physics from EWT to model it. The problem is that my computer programming skills are limited. I started it, but it needs more work (hopefully from those that have more 3D computer skills than me). To answer your other question about particles and is there enough energy in the universe to maintain particles. Yes, I do. There is an incredible amount of particles in the universe, all of which could be reflecting waves to other particles. But the next question that someone may ask, would be is it equal from all sides? Meaning are we getting more waves from one part of the universe than another part. And the answer would likely be no. But this is the cause of motion (particles move to equalize wave amplitude). So now, consider this... our galaxy is moving away from the center of the universe. Perhaps there are more particles and energy from the center (or other galaxies), such that this unequal energy/wave amplitude causes are galaxy to move away from the center.
@@EnergyWaveTheoryI see, that makes sense and is good to hear you confirm that. I’ve had an idea that the Big Bang really didn’t involve any spatial “expansion” but rather our universe has always been infinite in spatial extent, it’s just that matter eventually condensed into structures due to gravity that left a lot of space between everything, although this interpretation could always be wrong. Thank you!
@@EnergyWaveTheory Hello Jeff. Have you tried reaching out to quantum computer companies to create the software and simulate your model in their computers (ion, photonic, semi-conductor, etc)?
With this test will you try to mimic the pressure conditions of the sun as much as possible or shoot neutrinos concentrated in one direction at radioactive waste object?
WHY WOULDN’T EVERYONE ON THIS PLANET NOT WANT TO DO SOMETHING OR BE INVOLVED IN SOMETHING THAT COULD HELP OR EVEN RESTORE OUR PLANET BEAUTY N HAVE IT PROSPER??? If this can be done it should be done without question. Obviously taking the proper precautions before testing begins is a must. It must be guaranteed first prior even thinking about trying but if it can help it should be done!
You’re right. It should be guaranteed first. No one has ever guaranteed his ideas. He’s also doesn’t understand science at all, so it’s unlikely he has a workable solution
Here are people trying to do something good for ALL OF HUMANITY n somehow they’re getting vilified for it… I TRULY JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY ANYONE WOULD BE AGAINST IT!!!!
Can you provide links or resources on how Neutrino Guns work? From what I know, producing neutrinos from a "gun" is theoretical. I would love to know more about them, how they create neutrinos and which research facilities and Universities actually have Neutrino Guns. Thank you 🙏
Here's a good web article on neutrino beams: www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/november-2012/how-to-make-a-neutrino-beam. And some of the labs that have them include: Fermilab (US), J-PARC (Japan) and CERN (Switzerland).
If you can build cheaper accelerators by building cheaper impulse power supplies you can run more tests. Maybe even you can organize the bursts into controlled packets and directional beams. I have a technology which can likely help to acheive all of this, hopefully lower cost than you could ever imagine to convert electricity into ultra short impulses. I'm fully willing to open-source but its complicated to open-source this. Ideally Dr. Greer style radical disclosure. Patents wouldnt work, infact they would work against me. All I ask is I would want speak to a really smart and aultruistic project leader and if they seem legit I'll give away everything I know about science and engineering. I will ask about your values thou, as the power supply can be applied to far more than this beam for this purpose.
A hypothesis is "a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation". There is limited evidence that neutrinos may affect the rate of free neutron decay and can be a starting point of investigation to prove this hypothesis right, or prove it wrong.
This was the exact collaboration I had hoping for when I saw Terrence on Rogan!!
Is Carbon14 dating reliable considering that heat and neutrino bombardment may have varied over time?
Excellent question... and one that I didn't think about prior to the research that we did. It would have an effect on dating methods. Even if you assume constant neutrino flux from the Sun over millions of years of history (which may not necessarily be true), the Earth is getting farther from the Sun over time. So this would mean that the Earth would have had a higher neutrino flux millions of years ago.
@@EnergyWaveTheory Good comment! It might be worth considering Safire project results, if their reports are true, plasma phenomena can also speed up the radioactive decay. That can be achieved by lightning and earthquakes for instance. Also, NASA has found electrical link between planets (e.g. Jupiter) and moons (e.g. Io), see Aurora of Jupiter. Also, see Jupiter’s polar winds counter rotations (=Birkeland’s currents)! Also, electrical link between planets (e.g. Saturn) and Sun… So, if solar system is electrical in nature, then plasma and similar electrical phenomena can be naturally expected on Earth, which by the way is made of ~59% silica that is non-polar and induces piezo-electric effect…
If your theory holds up, not only can you save Government agencies billions of radioactive waste storage cost but increase the safety for everyone. Keep doing what you are doing Terrance Howard and thank you Wave Energy Theory. I look forward to any breakthrough on applications with all of your theories.
Hi Jeff! Thank you for your work as always. On your website, you mentioned that aether granules might have a type of memory to understand their states and hold defined amounts of energy. I had been wondering if there could be a potential relation between this memory feature and the problem of standing wave particles needing a perpetual source of incoming waves to remain stable.
I know I’ve read some of Dr. Milo Wolff’s thoughts on the incoming wave issue and he mentioned that incoming energy from all corners of the universe contribute to particles’ standing wave stability and that a Lenz effect might be involved in how particles resist physical disruptions, although I still have some questions about this since it would seem that the incoming waves would need to be of equal wavelength to the outgoing waves to keep the particle stable, and the chaotic nature of the aether medium/vacuum might not allow this to happen (?)
I believe that in QED descriptions of the electromagnetic field, charged particles are treated as point charges where there’s a perpetual outflowing source of divergence and curl (the particle’s center) that affects the force vectors around it, so I’m wondering if perhaps aether granule memory might be affected or amplified at the moment of convergence of incoming waves to allow a sort of perpetual “excess” of potential energy to continue which constantly draws in granules around it, leading to the stability of standing waves over a long period of time.
Do you have any thoughts on this, or have you found the reasoning of people like Dr. Wolff to be sufficient in explaining the stability of particle standing waves? I don’t have a very pronounced physics background so maybe I’m not fully understanding some of the explanations that have been offered. Thank you in advance!!
I'll explain the "memory" of displaced aether granules in terms of something much larger, that probably repeats the same physics. Air molecules in a room. For the purpose of this, let's assume that the walls perfectly reflect sound waves with no energy loss.
With no sound, an air molecule in the room is equally separated from other air molecules. Let's say it knows this position. And at this point, there is no energy.
Now, let's inject sound waves into the room. Air molecules vibrate. That individual air molecule from above is no displaced from its original position, but vibrates back-and-forth, reaching a distance (amplitude) from its preferred original position at rest. So, this is what I referred to as "memory", because it should know it's original position, and the distance it travels from this point (amplitude) is its energy (energy is proportional to the square of wave amplitude). It should know its energy and original position... if you want to call this a "memory".
Explaining the constant insource of waves to create a standing wave, consider in the room that once sound wave energy is injected, if the walls to not absorb it, then it's reflected back again. That single air molecule now sees energy from other directions. When equal amplitude from opposite direction, this is a standing wave.
The walls reflecting in this case can be the equivalent of other particles in the universe.
@@EnergyWaveTheoryHi Jeff, thank you for the response! The way you explained the memory makes sense, as well as the incoming wave explanation. I know that the energy radiating off particles should drop off inversely with the square of distance, which also contributes to the finite size of particles, but do you believe that the energy flowing through space is enough to maintain particle stability?
I think some content on specific dynamics of energy preservation, destructive/constructive interference producing electromagnetic attraction and repulsion and maybe even some more animations on how the spherical standing waves propagate as particles move through space would be really cool to watch! Your resources and papers provide a ton of information, I think I just have a hard time visualizing it on occasion
@@anthonydeyoe1966 it is very hard to visualize particles and standing waves. I created a project to simulate with 3D visuals, with the help of computer simulations that used real physics from EWT to model it. The problem is that my computer programming skills are limited. I started it, but it needs more work (hopefully from those that have more 3D computer skills than me).
To answer your other question about particles and is there enough energy in the universe to maintain particles. Yes, I do. There is an incredible amount of particles in the universe, all of which could be reflecting waves to other particles. But the next question that someone may ask, would be is it equal from all sides? Meaning are we getting more waves from one part of the universe than another part. And the answer would likely be no. But this is the cause of motion (particles move to equalize wave amplitude). So now, consider this... our galaxy is moving away from the center of the universe. Perhaps there are more particles and energy from the center (or other galaxies), such that this unequal energy/wave amplitude causes are galaxy to move away from the center.
@@EnergyWaveTheoryI see, that makes sense and is good to hear you confirm that. I’ve had an idea that the Big Bang really didn’t involve any spatial “expansion” but rather our universe has always been infinite in spatial extent, it’s just that matter eventually condensed into structures due to gravity that left a lot of space between everything, although this interpretation could always be wrong. Thank you!
@@EnergyWaveTheory Hello Jeff. Have you tried reaching out to quantum computer companies to create the software and simulate your model in their computers (ion, photonic, semi-conductor, etc)?
With this test will you try to mimic the pressure conditions of the sun as much as possible or shoot neutrinos concentrated in one direction at radioactive waste object?
Concentrated neutrinos in the direction of radioactive elements to increase the rate of decay.
Wow, I had no idea you had worked on a patent with him Jeff. I'm very interested to see how things progress
WHY WOULDN’T EVERYONE ON THIS PLANET NOT WANT TO DO SOMETHING OR BE INVOLVED IN SOMETHING THAT COULD HELP OR EVEN RESTORE OUR PLANET BEAUTY N HAVE IT PROSPER??? If this can be done it should be done without question. Obviously taking the proper precautions before testing begins is a must. It must be guaranteed first prior even thinking about trying but if it can help it should be done!
Astonishing isn't it?
You’re right. It should be guaranteed first.
No one has ever guaranteed his ideas.
He’s also doesn’t understand science at all, so it’s unlikely he has a workable solution
@@eliotnace6592 Do you think it's worth testing out? Shoot some neutrino beams at radioactive ☢️ waste?
Here are people trying to do something good for ALL OF HUMANITY n somehow they’re getting vilified for it… I TRULY JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY ANYONE WOULD BE AGAINST IT!!!!
Can you provide links or resources on how Neutrino Guns work?
From what I know, producing neutrinos from a "gun" is theoretical.
I would love to know more about them, how they create neutrinos and which research facilities and Universities actually have Neutrino Guns.
Thank you 🙏
Here's a good web article on neutrino beams: www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/november-2012/how-to-make-a-neutrino-beam. And some of the labs that have them include: Fermilab (US), J-PARC (Japan) and CERN (Switzerland).
@@EnergyWaveTheory Cool article!
I love you Terrence and Jeff
Tony Stark could build a neutrino gun with a pile of scraps in a cave!….In a loud raspy voice!
Wtf Terrence I thought you were my friend!
Who else is here in October 2025?
If you can build cheaper accelerators by building cheaper impulse power supplies you can run more tests.
Maybe even you can organize the bursts into controlled packets and directional beams. I have a technology which can likely help to acheive all of this, hopefully lower cost than you could ever imagine to convert electricity into ultra short impulses. I'm fully willing to open-source but its complicated to open-source this. Ideally Dr. Greer style radical disclosure. Patents wouldnt work, infact they would work against me.
All I ask is I would want speak to a really smart and aultruistic project leader and if they seem legit I'll give away everything I know about science and engineering. I will ask about your values thou, as the power supply can be applied to far more than this beam for this purpose.
The hypothesis is wrong
A hypothesis is "a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation". There is limited evidence that neutrinos may affect the rate of free neutron decay and can be a starting point of investigation to prove this hypothesis right, or prove it wrong.
#TerrenceHoward for president…💯