PHYS 102 | Coulomb's Law 6 - Use That Unit Vector!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 мар 2017
  • You can avoid all the trigonometry if you use the definition of the unit vector. I show you how here, but you probably won't need this method for most problems.
    -----Charge! Playlist - • PHYS 102 | CHARGE!
    -----Use the channel, or take the courses at edX - www.edx.org/course?search_que...
    -----This material was produced by Rice Online - online.rice.edu

Комментарии • 13

  • @victoriachristine6039
    @victoriachristine6039 2 года назад +10

    This video blew my mind lol. I've been struggling with this topic for a couple of days because of that unit vector. Every time I search electric forces and fields, the videos I come across only discuss them in terms of magnitude, so I do not get the whole picture. It's all about components! This cleared up my main confusion in under 9 minutes. Brilliant.

  • @leonardojacometti9883
    @leonardojacometti9883 2 года назад

    You are great professor, thank you!

  • @Thunderage03
    @Thunderage03 2 года назад

    Thank you it all makes so much more sense now

  • @chaosend3815
    @chaosend3815 5 лет назад

    Thank you! This was helpful

  • @hellhound9087
    @hellhound9087 Год назад +1

    good explaination

  • @twanrietveld7194
    @twanrietveld7194 7 месяцев назад

    i dont understand? -40j would mean that the positive charges experiences a force towards the other positive charge. They repel eachother right?

  • @rjelkins
    @rjelkins 3 года назад +1

    This form seems to be the most useful if one is going to incorporate the resultant force calculation into a software program.

    • @rjelkins
      @rjelkins 3 года назад

      '''
      Coulomb's Law Force Calculations in Two Dimensions (x, y)
      '''
      import numpy as np
      # Given:
      K_SUB_E = 8.9875517923e9 # Coulomb's constant in N * m^2 / C^2
      q1 = q2 = q3 = q4 = 10.0e-6 # Four charges in C
      r21vec = np.array([0., -0.15]) # Vector r from particle 2 to particle 1 [m, m]
      r31vec = np.array([-0.6, -0.15]) # Vector r from particle 3 to particle 1 [m, m]
      r41vec = np.array([-0.6, 0.]) # Vector r from particle 4 to particle 1 [m, m]
      # 2-dimensional vector magnitude calculation:
      vecmag = lambda vec: np.sqrt(vec[0]*vec[0] + vec[1]*vec[1])
      def elec_f(arg_qpa, arg_qpb, arg_rvec):
      ''' Electrical force vector calculation:
      arg_qpa: magnitude of charge of particle A
      arg_qpb: magnitude of charge of particle B
      arg_rvec: vector from particle A to particle B
      '''
      r = vecmag(arg_rvec)
      return K_SUB_E * arg_qpa * arg_qpb * arg_rvec / (r * r * r)
      # Derivations:
      F21 = elec_f(q2, q1, r21vec)
      print('F21:', F21)
      F31 = elec_f(q3, q1, r31vec)
      print('F31:', F31)
      F41 = elec_f(q4, q1, r41vec)
      print('F41:', F41)
      F1 = F21 + F31 + F41
      print('Resulting F1:', F1)

  • @andrewjustin256
    @andrewjustin256 10 месяцев назад +1

    Professor Hefner, I would like to ask what that i and j hat even mean. Also in the last problem, you left the answer as -2.28 i hat - 0.57 j hat. Why is that so?

    • @Prof-Hafner
      @Prof-Hafner  10 месяцев назад +1

      Those are the unit vectors for the x axis (i-hat) and y (j-hat). They just mean that magnitude in x or y. I left the answer there becuase the problem is basically done at that point. A question might ask for the components or it might ask you to get the total magnitude and angle.
      Here's a bit on unit vectors
      ruclips.net/video/4lFVUoDEcYE/видео.htmlsi=VYn-y_2Vd6rIvRPM&t=324

    • @andrewjustin256
      @andrewjustin256 10 месяцев назад +2

      So, if I comprehended you correctly, i hat and j hat imply magnitude in x and y direction respectively. If they are negative like (-i hat) and (-j hat), then that mean the magnitude is in the negative x and y co-ordinator plane. In a nutshell, -2.28 i hat and -0.57 j hat mean (-2.28, -0.57), right, Mr. Hefner?

    • @Prof-Hafner
      @Prof-Hafner  10 месяцев назад

      Yes, that is correct.@@andrewjustin256

    • @andrewjustin256
      @andrewjustin256 10 месяцев назад

      @@Prof-Hafner Thank you Professor!! You have been so helpful. I love your videos !