See what you're saying, as compared with say something like the role that Rutger Hauer played. I'm no movie expert but I really liked the new movie and the new "skin jobs". It must have been their revamped emotions profile.😄
I do not think Ryan Gosling gave one of his best performances in "Blade Runner: 2049" (2017). That is my only complaint towards the amazing movie. If you want to see the best of Ryan Gosling's acting in my opinion, I recommend seeing "The Ides of March" (2011). Gosling should have received an Oscar nomination for that film.
Generally, If thats the performance the director wanted, then thats what he did. To me, these latest replicants were not the same as previous, they were made to be more emotionless, backed up with the baseline test he had to perform.
1:21 - That's such a beautiful shot. The way she's flickering and ultimately goes away and reveals the people on the hill behind her. Great symbolism...
This film is criminally underrated for the few times it encompasses action. It's quick, deadly and efficient. For a film set in a sci-fi dystopia, the realism of how quickly an altercation essentially ends once someone has the deadlier weapon is very much appreciated in my eyes.
1:10 Joi was never fake. Her love for K was always real. When K sees the giant holographic Billboard he realizes his Joi was nothing like the one in the ad. She put herself at risk and helped him in an act of self sacrifice and she expected nothing in return.
That's up to interpretation. Also, is she did happen not end up being fake, is was because he freed her, I believe she was purely program and could never be free though. Unlike him.
@@DevilDogMuNky While it does in the context of his happiness within a fantasy movie, if we are debating it’s reflection of reality, then we should only accept healthy emotional situations. That unfortunately would not be one.
She was programmed to adapt to his desires (starting from the first scene with her trying to guess how to entertain him after a hard day at work, ending with the way she embraced his thoughts about being a real child - seems like he really needed that support) so I view her character as a way to reveal a big part of his character hidden behind the necessity to remain emotionless for years to survive (not being decommissioned at work as a defective replicant). He wanted that threesome so she made an appointment. He wanted to erase her from the home PC for security reasons but he also wanted HER to suggest it. The way his boss said "we all looking for something real", his desire to be a real child combined with him using an artificial pre-programmed soft that fulfills all his wishes about the perfect partner - this brings up some interesting questions and thoughts to the viewers :)
The scary reality of flying hover cars with zero lift capability. Catastrophic systems failure and you're basically falling in a 5,000 lb metal coffin.
@@sgtpaloogoo2811 Flying cars will never exist for common use because the logistics of traffic regulations would be impossible. If there were as many flying cars in the sky as cars on the road, there'd be unimaginable carnage from crashes. We're lucky to keep the average driver safe on the ground...
Thieves/scavengers always seem to speak german/cityspeak in the Blade Runner universe, just like the midgets in the first movie :D This is what I picked up from the scrapyard scene (correct me if I'm wrong, german is not my native language) :) @1:50 Scavenger: "Da ist nichts drin" / "There's nothing in it." @1:52 Scavenger: ""Ich habe es mit meine eigenen Augen gesehen" / "I have seen it with my own eyes" followed by "He was dead." @2:10 Mr. Cotton (or another scavenger): "Ergreift ihn!... Nicht stehen, vorwärts!" / "Grab him!... Don't stand, forward!"
This was as good a sequel as could be hoped for. Really visceral and engrossing film making. The dystopian future vision had been updated as we're already living the one envisioned in the original. Some outstanding ideas. Love the improvised guerilla tactics of the scrapyard people. Then how they're just blown away by the overwhelming corporate firepower.
I seen vid's where people are talking about Joi being just another program. No, she is not. You can see that she truly has emotions here and that her concern for K is genuine. On another note.. Damn Ana de Armas is stunning.
@@Toasty667 Real emotions. If Rachael could love Dekker and have a baby, I think they learned. K got angry, hopeful, sad. She was intelligent enough to know her last words were coming, and she choose to tell K she loved him and that's real fear she's expressing for his safety.
@@JaybayJay I want to believe this is true but literally EVERYTHING you just listed can be programmed. The director left this open to interpretation on purpose. In my opinion, the fact we as viewers become attached to her and trust in her emotions, shows how genius this product was. It proves the directors point which is that given the choice, we will believe what we want if it means we feel loved.
@@richardhart3442 Deckard was resistant to Rachael, but he finally got it when he listen to Roy tell his tale of sorrow, his experiences, his joys, wonders and his regrets before dying. The tears in the rain he called it. They really do feel in this universe and they're not really artificial intelligence anymore at that point, they step into the realm of true intelligence. That's why he fell in love with her. Cause he realized her emotions for him were real in turn. As Replicants, or just synthetic humans they should never have been allowed to step foot on Earth. But they evolved to the point where they could break free of their behavioral programming.
I guess I’m the only one but I love how when the cars system goes out and joi leaves before the crash, just how isolated he is once again. Then the pov shot just looking out the windshield quietly falling then comes to realization like oh shit this is happening then prepares for what’s next
The entire missile strike is a callback to the digital enhancement scene in the original BR. There, Deckard is using the computer terminal to zoom in and enhance a 3D digital photo. Here, Luv is zooming in from high altitude weapons platforms and decimating anyone obstructing her goal.
Now people do it in real life, I saw hundreds of chilling pieces of footage where people are hunted and obliterated by artillery fire and drone-dropped microbombs, hour after hour, relentlessly, in full view of the buzzing quadrotor eyes in the sky. Until they run and crawl wildly, out of their minds, before falling out of exhaustion and giving up, or too wounded to crawl, still looking skyward at their tormentors as the last grenade falls, or the kill is confirmed visually. It's fucked up.
@@ayebraine Yes, it's clearly a "nod" to long distance and drone strikes (as well as a nod to that original BR scene indeed). It's scary that such technology hasn't been science fiction for some years now.
Something I only noticed on re-watch: Gosling doesn't kill the two scavengers he shoots. He hits them in the arm and leg. It's brief, but the director seems to go out of his way to show them still alive in a subsequent shot.
I like all the rattling and things falling around inside after the moment of near silence without thrust. Has a realism to it. Not to mention the rain blowing against the windows.
At first I was very apprehensive about Gosling being cast but his performance was really great and as a sequel to a movie I love I feel they stayed true to the original but made this there own.
I agree. This is the only movie where Gosling’s complete lack of range works in his favor. And I think it was a great movie. A worthy sequel to the original.
@@reasonableskeptic5703 yes its horrid. If you take the trolley downtown you have to walk through throngs of zombies and makeshift camps before you reach any normal place. The city does their best at “hiding” the problem behind the first row of waterfront properties but the minute you step out of the “green zone” it’s hell on earth.
@@sclogse1 We need to make guns sound horrific to the ears of insecure angry young men. If the AR-15 used high-end acoustic science to imitate a 75-yearold man suffering from constipation, or angry gay sex, the shootings would stop.
@@Emaptensomeone didn't watch the first Blade Runner. The reference to Atari is because it featured in the first movie. It's to maintain continuity in the world building between the two movies. Don't comment on a movie you know fuck all about.
@@joewinfield3276 Around here basketballs can't make turns like that 0:30 The vehicle 's power is completely out and it has no aerodynamic features or control surfaces that would allow it do this (at least to my knowledge unless there isn't something in the Blade Runner lore that explains how this works)
@@Pupixario funny how you’re arguing the physics of a fictional vehicle from a movie script. Please understand the laws of physics don’t apply to movies. I suppose you also feel you can shoot around a corner by simply whipping a pistol around too? Again, it’s in the script so arguing the flight path of a CGI’d vehicle has no merit whatsoever here.
@@joewinfield3276 Bro, you are the one that started explaining it with physics. LMAO I literally said I can't explain it and it baffles me, yet you felt like you can explain with with "angular momentum coupled with velocity. Same principle applies if you toss a basketball towards a hoop."
What a cool weapon, a harpoon that leads to a wing glider. The wing glider ascends into the clouds and trigger a lighting strike to electric shock the aircraft.
The K use the same técnic of the Sulleyberg tô landing in River Hudson ;start the APU for the use the controls and make the turbines work,he otbity like RollerCoaster and on the retrorocketes,tô use the jets like hovercraft and the landing more soft.
The Captain Sully movie was also good btw, if you haven't, or anyone else hasn't seen it yet should go check it out. But yes, I get your point. You would think there would be more safety redundancy built in for flying vehicles, especially a LAPD cop car in that universe, to protect from lightning and electric shocks like a battery backup system, or ultra capacitors to give you enough time to land safely. But I digress, I know it's just a movie and the scene called for it. I just like Sci-fi mechanics/engineering 🤘.
Those pieces of scrap metal would've been picked up clean to the bare earth and rocks. Even right now in some 3rd world countries the metal scrappers break the concrete slabs in the abandoned building to get to the reinforcement rods, never mind whatever future it is.
Keep in mind that Earth in the Blade Runner universe has been totally devastated by nuclear war and biosphere collapse. Most life on Earth has been extinguished, and most industrial production (along with much of humanity) has been moved off-world, where metals are abundant. There are pockets of humanity left on Earth crammed into urban areas, yet vast areas of these cities are still depopulated wastelands. Cities are surrounded by rings of useless junk or "kipple". There wouldn't be enough demand for all the entire ruined cities worth of scrap metal left on Earth. In the Blade Runner universe, real live animals are some of the most prized and expensive things around, as most of them are extinct. Most people make do with electric pets.
Oh dear commenting on a genre you know nothing about 😂 Are you confusing the genre of Cyberpunk with Cyberpunk the game? The original Blade Runner movie is one of the first seminal classic Cyberpunk movies. The genre has existed since early 80s as form of media but the genre started earlier than that with writings of Philip K Dick in the 50s. Blade Runner is 100% Cyberpunk.
Philip K. Dick wrote some Amazing, prophetic, Sci-fi. And, as I've explored our possible Roots in Humanity, I See, parallels that SCARE ME TO THE BONE... Great stuff, nonetheless.
This movie is just great on so many levels...the story, characters and casting. The rare occasion when a sequel outdoes the original while still honouring and incorporating it.
Where's the door cut? Why on the arm extended with gun cut scene all the sudden it's pointed in a different direction? Seems to easy to get this continuity stuff right.
cinematography wise? certainly not, this movie is clearly superior. soundtrack? vangelis can't be beaten. themes, message and story? og is clearly superior, this movie has 0 soul 0 message 0 purpose
The whole idea of artificial human beings in the original Blade Runner was that their under-developed emotions started to get all screwed up after a few years - but they were far from emotionless wooden Pinocchio that Gosling is playing.
they didn't have underdeveloped emotions, have you even seen the movie? that is the whole point it tries to get across, that the replicants are as human as any "normal" human, they have feelings, fears and dreams
Anybody commenting that the new replicants should be these charismatic Jude Law types knows fuck all about Blade Runner as a franchise and has no business commenting on it.
This is the one scene that boggles my mind. You telling me, that after 33 years after the first aircraft got the CAPS system (Parachute system) that K didn't have this system installed on his vehicle so he could float down safely? Sheesh!... (I know... i know... it wasn't in the script!) LOL 😀
Did that kite cause lightning to strike that flying car? how does it work? And even if it did happen, it doesn't do damage to regular planes, why would it damage the flying car?
Luv getting her nails done while calling in a missile strike is one of the most cyberpunk things ever.
makes for a great screensaver
The feminist dream.
IKR?!!? C O L D BLOODED asF!!!
No, it's not. It is lame and superficial.
@@DaveAlexKD key word dream
People always criticizing Gosling for being "too wooden" in this role. Except he's supposed to be an emotionless bio-robot.
See what you're saying, as compared with say something like the role that Rutger Hauer played. I'm no movie expert but I really liked the new movie and the new "skin jobs". It must have been their revamped emotions profile.😄
I saw it and did'nt have high hopes. I had no problems with him at all.
I do not think Ryan Gosling gave one of his best performances in "Blade Runner: 2049" (2017). That is my only complaint towards the amazing movie. If you want to see the best of Ryan Gosling's acting in my opinion, I recommend seeing "The Ides of March" (2011). Gosling should have received an Oscar nomination for that film.
he "too wooden" in all films
Generally, If thats the performance the director wanted, then thats what he did. To me, these latest replicants were not the same as previous, they were made to be more emotionless, backed up with the baseline test he had to perform.
1:21 - That's such a beautiful shot. The way she's flickering and ultimately goes away and reveals the people on the hill behind her. Great symbolism...
Good catch
Go looking for her! I bet he does?
What symbolism though?
@@rogeliorodriguez8518 I think he probably meant great visual metaphor. It is a classy reveal though.
theres so much of that in this movie. cinematography is tremendous.
I always liked their shock when he gets out willingly instead of having to cut him out. They started to question what they got themselves into.
I thought they just cut through the locking mechanism to pop the lock and open the door automatically. They aim the saw at a part of the door.
This film is criminally underrated for the few times it encompasses action.
It's quick, deadly and efficient.
For a film set in a sci-fi dystopia, the realism of how quickly an altercation essentially ends once someone has the deadlier weapon is very much appreciated in my eyes.
1:10 Joi was never fake. Her love for K was always real. When K sees the giant holographic Billboard he realizes his Joi was nothing like the one in the ad. She put herself at risk and helped him in an act of self sacrifice and she expected nothing in return.
That's up to interpretation. Also, is she did happen not end up being fake, is was because he freed her, I believe she was purely program and could never be free though. Unlike him.
I don't think it matters what we think about their relationship, it's what K thinks. "You are real for me." That should be enough.
@@DevilDogMuNky While it does in the context of his happiness within a fantasy movie, if we are debating it’s reflection of reality, then we should only accept healthy emotional situations. That unfortunately would not be one.
Arent we all programmed somehow? Programmed to put meaning to abstract things like love
She was programmed to adapt to his desires (starting from the first scene with her trying to guess how to entertain him after a hard day at work, ending with the way she embraced his thoughts about being a real child - seems like he really needed that support) so I view her character as a way to reveal a big part of his character hidden behind the necessity to remain emotionless for years to survive (not being decommissioned at work as a defective replicant). He wanted that threesome so she made an appointment. He wanted to erase her from the home PC for security reasons but he also wanted HER to suggest it.
The way his boss said "we all looking for something real", his desire to be a real child combined with him using an artificial pre-programmed soft that fulfills all his wishes about the perfect partner - this brings up some interesting questions and thoughts to the viewers :)
I love Joi! Yes, Ana is a fox, but her character is so real and empathetic. What a great performance! Luv is also wonderful.
I love Joi too! About every couple of nights.
It was a joi to see her on-screen.
@@lunaretic3 There's always one of you commenting that has to be a perv.
@@InformantNethe made me laugh idc
@@InformantNet It's what she's designed for.
"Zoom in"
"Closer"
*camera hits Gosling*
"Too close"
1:57 that backbreacker.. I felt that
I need my back cracked like that sometimes.
@@hausman-q8d Ouch, I can't imagine feeling that
I love how there isn't much violence in this movie but when there is it's usually K being absolutely fucking brutal
I love the fact that after all the air strikes the scrapyard doesn't really look different, you can't break an already broken world lol
Gosling crushed this role, the entire cast really was just dynamite.
this movie was so good, I never understood why it was hated on at release.
It wasn’t hated. It was ignored.
I thought it was as good as the original.
Who “hated” it? 🤔
Nobody hated it, people thought it was fantastic. All three of us who bothered to go and see it.
I sort of dismissed it on first viewing and I don't know why. On repeat viewings it's one of the best sci-fi movies ever made. A real classic.
I'm pretty sure I'll still be excited to see this when it comes out in 27 years.
Might be reality by then. I mean hell it probably won't even take that long
When he broke that guy in half
It got real
Актео
The scary reality of flying hover cars with zero lift capability. Catastrophic systems failure and you're basically falling in a 5,000 lb metal coffin.
Probably why they'll never see wide spread usage. Even if they do get invented.
@@sgtpaloogoo2811 it’s called a helicopter 🚁
@@prashank they are very cool yes. But people don't drive them to work. At least most people don't anyway.
@@sgtpaloogoo2811 Flying cars will never exist for common use because the logistics of traffic regulations would be impossible. If there were as many flying cars in the sky as cars on the road, there'd be unimaginable carnage from crashes. We're lucky to keep the average driver safe on the ground...
@@tehmarok great points.
Thieves/scavengers always seem to speak german/cityspeak in the Blade Runner universe, just like the midgets in the first movie :D
This is what I picked up from the scrapyard scene (correct me if I'm wrong, german is not my native language) :)
@1:50 Scavenger: "Da ist nichts drin" / "There's nothing in it."
@1:52 Scavenger: ""Ich habe es mit meine eigenen Augen gesehen" / "I have seen it with my own eyes" followed by "He was dead."
@2:10 Mr. Cotton (or another scavenger): "Ergreift ihn!... Nicht stehen, vorwärts!" / "Grab him!... Don't stand, forward!"
This was as good a sequel as could be hoped for. Really visceral and engrossing film making. The dystopian future vision had been updated as we're already living the one envisioned in the original. Some outstanding ideas. Love the improvised guerilla tactics of the scrapyard people. Then how they're just blown away by the overwhelming corporate firepower.
How are we living in the original? Examples?
@@bertroost1675he probably meant the date and just some technology that feels similar
I seen vid's where people are talking about Joi being just another program. No, she is not. You can see that she truly has emotions here and that her concern for K is genuine.
On another note.. Damn Ana de Armas is stunning.
Simulated emotions.
@@Toasty667 Real emotions. If Rachael could love Dekker and have a baby, I think they learned. K got angry, hopeful, sad. She was intelligent enough to know her last words were coming, and she choose to tell K she loved him and that's real fear she's expressing for his safety.
@@JaybayJay I want to believe this is true but literally EVERYTHING you just listed can be programmed. The director left this open to interpretation on purpose. In my opinion, the fact we as viewers become attached to her and trust in her emotions, shows how genius this product was. It proves the directors point which is that given the choice, we will believe what we want if it means we feel loved.
@@richardhart3442 Deckard was resistant to Rachael, but he finally got it when he listen to Roy tell his tale of sorrow, his experiences, his joys, wonders and his regrets before dying. The tears in the rain he called it. They really do feel in this universe and they're not really artificial intelligence anymore at that point, they step into the realm of true intelligence. That's why he fell in love with her. Cause he realized her emotions for him were real in turn.
As Replicants, or just synthetic humans they should never have been allowed to step foot on Earth. But they evolved to the point where they could break free of their behavioral programming.
@@richardhart3442 Blade Runner 4: Return of the Joi..
Gosling is brilliant at playing emotionally constipated.
I guess I’m the only one but I love how when the cars system goes out and joi leaves before the crash, just how isolated he is once again. Then the pov shot just looking out the windshield quietly falling then comes to realization like oh shit this is happening then prepares for what’s next
The entire missile strike is a callback to the digital enhancement scene in the original BR. There, Deckard is using the computer terminal to zoom in and enhance a 3D digital photo. Here, Luv is zooming in from high altitude weapons platforms and decimating anyone obstructing her goal.
Now people do it in real life, I saw hundreds of chilling pieces of footage where people are hunted and obliterated by artillery fire and drone-dropped microbombs, hour after hour, relentlessly, in full view of the buzzing quadrotor eyes in the sky. Until they run and crawl wildly, out of their minds, before falling out of exhaustion and giving up, or too wounded to crawl, still looking skyward at their tormentors as the last grenade falls, or the kill is confirmed visually. It's fucked up.
@@ayebraine Yes, it's clearly a "nod" to long distance and drone strikes (as well as a nod to that original BR scene indeed). It's scary that such technology hasn't been science fiction for some years now.
Ryan has that dead eyed intense look DOWN PAT which is PERFECT for this character being a replicant and all!!!...
That first guy really drew the short straw lol.
0:00 aimbot, kick him.
Poor Joe, he never knew he was just seen as a tool by Luv and her employer-or at least not until everything in his life was broken or dead...
Something I only noticed on re-watch: Gosling doesn't kill the two scavengers he shoots. He hits them in the arm and leg. It's brief, but the director seems to go out of his way to show them still alive in a subsequent shot.
in 2049 airbags are so underrated
everybody gangsta until an orbital missile platform with split second firing shows up.
People got torn apart from explosions - RUclips that's ok.
F word RUclips - oh that's too much.
I love how chill he is about his AV crashing lmao
I like all the rattling and things falling around inside after the moment of near silence without thrust. Has a realism to it. Not to mention the rain blowing against the windows.
Nothing but tears in the rain, mate
missile detonations there would be even more deadly with all the rusty metals flying.
Imagine being so strong, that a plane crash is something so easily survivable. Most of us would break something.
Car windows must be made of Gorilla Glass 2049
I wish I could rewatch this movie sometime as I feel as though I didn't appreciate it enough the first time.
It's the kind of film you need to watch several times.
download it then
Love the moment with Luv.
People who disliked this movie just didn't understand it
At first I was very apprehensive about Gosling being cast but his performance was really great and as a sequel to a movie I love I feel they stayed true to the original but made this there own.
I really enjoyed this film. Excellent production
what surprises me most is how he hit a flying car with a harpoon, along a ballistic trajectory
This must have been the most natural role ever for Ryan Gosling......zero facial expression required 😆
It’s my opinion this is not a good movie. Gosling’s lack of charisma is part of that.
@@MrB00mbang True.
Cant beat the original, no matter where we are at technological speaking.
Looked worse than the original, acting was shit.
I agree. This is the only movie where Gosling’s complete lack of range works in his favor. And I think it was a great movie. A worthy sequel to the original.
@@MrB00mbang He's supposed to be a robot though, robots will never have charisma.
@@RNDM-nd7tj But he is flesh and blood so I think he wouldn't be called a robot
The nail dresser must be on edge as she's working on Luv's nails. Making any mistake would likely bring a death sentence.
This movie was underrated!
This film was a masterpiece, just like the original , love it
0:15 that's literally my gf after I take my meds
Called that shit down from orbit!!
Send the script doctor unto Philip K. Dick, you get Blade Runner. Send the script doctor unto Blade Runner, you get Blade Runner 2049.
0:14 that lightning rod trap is so fucking cool I wish it was actually possible.
It's a nice bit of real world grounding to the film, that in a world otherwise destroyed by war and pollution, San Diego remains the same.
Gosling gave us a role that is just....🥰🥰🥰
The violence in this movie always feels necessary and rough.
this movie is a masterpiece
The irony is that this is actually what San Diego looks like
Ha! Is it bad? I've never been but I heard cost of living is unsurprisingly high, as is homelessness.
@@reasonableskeptic5703 yes its horrid. If you take the trolley downtown you have to walk through throngs of zombies and makeshift camps before you reach any normal place.
The city does their best at “hiding” the problem behind the first row of waterfront properties but the minute you step out of the “green zone” it’s hell on earth.
@Kira Nah, it's just California. (We should build a wall to protect the rest of the country.)
'Are you a fighter or are you food'
With a badass lady, with badass weapons coming to the rescue.
Thor ragnarok anyone? ;-)
I wish all guns sounded like that.
How about just the flu shot?
@@sclogse1 We need to make guns sound horrific to the ears of insecure angry young men. If the AR-15 used high-end acoustic science to imitate a 75-yearold man suffering from constipation, or angry gay sex, the shootings would stop.
The most unrealistic bit of this scene is: "200 feet to the East".
Nobody with any sort of power is going to be using Imperial measures in 2049.
Or buy an Atari
@@Emaptensomeone didn't watch the first Blade Runner. The reference to Atari is because it featured in the first movie. It's to maintain continuity in the world building between the two movies. Don't comment on a movie you know fuck all about.
1:58 Do this exercise every day and your back will not hurt
Шикарный фильм, произведение исскуства.
Название?
@@РишатШ Вы просите название фильма, но вы просите без уважения.
@@РишатШ бегущий по лезвию 2017г вроде
@@ПашкаРусский-о6э 2049 не вроде а таки есть
I need that kind of CAS for when I go to Westfield.
Ohio or New Jersey?
The fact that this non-aerodynamic brick was able to glide somehow instead of dropping like a stone baffles me to this day.
I get what you’re stating but it’s called angular momentum coupled with velocity. Same principle applies if you toss a basketball towards a hoop.
@@joewinfield3276 Around here basketballs can't make turns like that 0:30
The vehicle 's power is completely out and it has no aerodynamic features or control surfaces that would allow it do this (at least to my knowledge unless there isn't something in the Blade Runner lore that explains how this works)
@@Pupixario funny how you’re arguing the physics of a fictional vehicle from a movie script. Please understand the laws of physics don’t apply to movies. I suppose you also feel you can shoot around a corner by simply whipping a pistol around too? Again, it’s in the script so arguing the flight path of a CGI’d vehicle has no merit whatsoever here.
@@joewinfield3276 Bro, you are the one that started explaining it with physics. LMAO
I literally said I can't explain it and it baffles me, yet you felt like you can explain with with "angular momentum coupled with velocity. Same principle applies if you toss a basketball towards a hoop."
What a cool weapon, a harpoon that leads to a wing glider. The wing glider ascends into the clouds and trigger a lighting strike to electric shock the aircraft.
Animated nails! I'm sure someone is working on this!
Luv made this whole movie, amazing.
Sorry, no. Chevy Luv was discontinued in 1982.
_Boro: (..faDes oUt oF eXisteNcE, pOintinG tO terrorists nearby)_
*Sieg: (Survival nOises..)*
I loved everything about this movie.
same.
The K use the same técnic of the Sulleyberg tô landing in River Hudson ;start the APU for the use the controls and make the turbines work,he otbity like RollerCoaster and on the retrorocketes,tô use the jets like hovercraft and the landing more soft.
The Captain Sully movie was also good btw, if you haven't, or anyone else hasn't seen it yet should go check it out.
But yes, I get your point. You would think there would be more safety redundancy built in for flying vehicles, especially a LAPD cop car in that universe, to protect from lightning and electric shocks like a battery backup system, or ultra capacitors to give you enough time to land safely. But I digress, I know it's just a movie and the scene called for it. I just like Sci-fi mechanics/engineering 🤘.
Amazing way to hitchhike a flying car of the future.
This film was fantastic, true kino. While the first movie is the OG! Never can be topped I personally think the sequel is better.
AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO LIKED THE PART WHERE JOI LIKE GLITCHES 1:07
The most catastrophic “Pollution Fault” I’ve ever seen…
Film is still art.
0:00 nice aim
I used to live on a planet like that
Sorry you had to end up here....
Raxus Prime?
@@atticstattic I'm going back
take me with you
Those pieces of scrap metal would've been picked up clean to the bare earth and rocks. Even right now in some 3rd world countries the metal scrappers break the concrete slabs in the abandoned building to get to the reinforcement rods, never mind whatever future it is.
Keep in mind that Earth in the Blade Runner universe has been totally devastated by nuclear war and biosphere collapse. Most life on Earth has been extinguished, and most industrial production (along with much of humanity) has been moved off-world, where metals are abundant. There are pockets of humanity left on Earth crammed into urban areas, yet vast areas of these cities are still depopulated wastelands. Cities are surrounded by rings of useless junk or "kipple". There wouldn't be enough demand for all the entire ruined cities worth of scrap metal left on Earth. In the Blade Runner universe, real live animals are some of the most prized and expensive things around, as most of them are extinct. Most people make do with electric pets.
Totally awesome movie.
The only unrealistic thing about this is that the Peugeot survived the crash
Those shades are so nice.
I hadn't seen until now that K's car is Peugeot lol
People love saying this movie is like cyberpunk even though Blade Runner existed before cyberpunk
Oh dear commenting on a genre you know nothing about 😂 Are you confusing the genre of Cyberpunk with Cyberpunk the game? The original Blade Runner movie is one of the first seminal classic Cyberpunk movies. The genre has existed since early 80s as form of media but the genre started earlier than that with writings of Philip K Dick in the 50s. Blade Runner is 100% Cyberpunk.
All I want to know is, from what material that car is made to not even dent when falling and crashing at terminal velocity.
its a peugeot, it never breaks
Plot armor.
Philip K. Dick wrote some Amazing, prophetic, Sci-fi. And, as I've explored our possible Roots in Humanity, I See, parallels that SCARE ME TO THE BONE... Great stuff, nonetheless.
This movie is the greatest sequel ever. So distant in time, so equally a masterpiece.
no. only when it comes to cinematography does it beat the og, otherwise it lacks soul and message
@@nevezetesazonossag I think I've read the word "equally" up there.
This movie is just great on so many levels...the story, characters and casting. The rare occasion when a sequel outdoes the original while still honouring and incorporating it.
The ending is a little shaky but yes, its better than the original while complimenting and even expanding the same world
This Peugeot Spinner 2031 is light armor ,is air fighter and survellience.
Luv was such a cool character
Where's the door cut? Why on the arm extended with gun cut scene all the sudden it's pointed in a different direction? Seems to easy to get this continuity stuff right.
A fantastic snene from the excellent movie
no way is this movie even in the same league as the OG
cinematography wise? certainly not, this movie is clearly superior. soundtrack? vangelis can't be beaten. themes, message and story? og is clearly superior, this movie has 0 soul 0 message 0 purpose
Bayraktar TB2 works! 2:16
Nice product placement though it being French explains the car giving up just when it almost lifted off again.
The whole idea of artificial human beings in the original Blade Runner was that their under-developed emotions started to get all screwed up after a few years - but they were far from emotionless wooden Pinocchio that Gosling is playing.
honestly if you were living his day to day life...in that dark society...you telling me you'd be all Rainbow and sunshine?
Screwed up can come in all shapes and forms. Including emotionless and wooden...
those were the older models, the newer models didn't have a 4 year lifespan and they were made to be emotionless robots
they didn't have underdeveloped emotions, have you even seen the movie? that is the whole point it tries to get across, that the replicants are as human as any "normal" human, they have feelings, fears and dreams
Anybody commenting that the new replicants should be these charismatic Jude Law types knows fuck all about Blade Runner as a franchise and has no business commenting on it.
Im pretty sure could have handled all of them without luv’s “help”
nice artillery support
This is the one scene that boggles my mind. You telling me, that after 33 years after the first aircraft got the CAPS system (Parachute system) that K didn't have this system installed on his vehicle so he could float down safely? Sheesh!... (I know... i know... it wasn't in the script!) LOL 😀
The car got him down safely even in abysmal terrain and even worked afterwards, what more do you want
Как называется фильм?
Как всегда - невозмутимый ... БРЕЕЕД!
Пацан к успеху шел. Не повезло, не подфартило...
Fire, Fire again....fire
Did that kite cause lightning to strike that flying car? how does it work?
And even if it did happen, it doesn't do damage to regular planes, why would it damage the flying car?
I think it was an EMP to kill onboard electronics
@@DrMarkGinsburg How exactly does that kite create EMP? I don't understand how that works.
Прикольно.. название фильма?
Бегущий по лезвию
@@Ge000rg спасибо 🤝