As salamu alaykum. The Rafida Foundation is accepting all applications right now for volunteer work! Please apply with the following link; www.rafida.org/join
As salamu alaykum. The Rafida Foundation is accepting all applications right now for volunteer work! Please apply with the following link; www.rafida.org/join
Prophet knever defend his daughter (or stepdaughter) Zainab. She was also tortured and miscarried and sunnis narrate this incident on thier pulpits. Was Prophet a coward so not defend her. Moreover Prophet not defend Sumayya.
As salamu alaykum. The Rafida Foundation is accepting all applications right now for volunteer work! Please apply with the following link; www.rafida.org/join
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَلِيٍّ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ الْحَسَنِ، ثنا أَبُو شُعَيْبٍ الْحَرَّانِيُّ، ثنا أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ النُّفَيْلِيُّ، ثنا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ، قَالَ: بَعَثَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ الصِّدِّيقُ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ - كَمَا حَدَّثَنِي نَافِعٌ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، «عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ سَنَةَ إِحْدَى عَشْرَةَ إِلَى الْحِجَّةِ، فَأقام للناس الحج، وابتاع عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه في تلك السنة مولاه أسلم من أناس من الأشعريين، ومن مسانيد حديثه عن مولاه عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه» This is enough to prove the narration in musanaf is mursal? Because It says Umar bought aslam in the 11th yr hadithtransmitters.hawramani.com/?p=64399#b6d152 Also it says “when Umar left they (Ali and zubair) came so she said to them ‘do you know that Umar came here’” So if Aslam heard this from Umar how could he know the event that took place after Umar left? Umar had already left so when Fatima (as) told Ali (as) what happened how could Aslam know this? And if Aslam was present 1.ibn ishaaq said he wasn’t so we know that isn’t the case 2.how would he know the conversation between Ali and Fatima in the house? They wouldn’t let Aslam in the house as that house was just a gathering for people who didn’t give bayah to Abu bakr so even if Aslam was present (which he wouldn’t) it still makes no sense as to how he could know this last bit where Fatima talked to Ali 3.so the only possible option is Aslam heard from Ali now what proof is there Aslam heard from Ali?
Aslam is Umar slave, he heard it from him as all the stories he tells about him, the man was with him for a long time, he met many sahaba, almost didn't narrate from non-sahabi, very thiqa and known, he won't tell a story with a bad reputation of his beloved master that way in such situation as it's true like that except he heard it from him, especially that the nawasib claim the rafida who came decades later, and after more decades they fabricated such a thing, so from who Asalam supposed to hear it?
@@user-co8uf1mj6c did I not just refute how Aslam couldn’t have heard it from Umar? Read what I wrote again. Also it’s just an assumption that Aslam heard it from Umar so it’s mursal and scholars like ibn hazm and shafi reject mursal
@@rizzy1909 if you mean how could Umar know what happened it will be a simple assumption as everyone do, he only attributed to her passing the message + he may try to ask here and there other sahabis as any normal person would do. the others of your words are nonsense, hadith science is some good assumptions, and my argument is, it's a strong one, go read and ask why many of your scholars say it's sahih.
@@user-co8uf1mj6c if Umar heard from other sahabi then the isnaad would be from Muhammed bin bishr from ubaydallah bin Umar from zaid bin aslam from his father FROM UMAR FROM SO AND SO (whoever Umar heard it from) but the isnaad doesn’t say that
You shias have a problem with Abu bakir and umar for no reason. Ali named his sons umar and Abu bakir and Ali married his daughter to umar. And all this took place after the alleged murder of fatimah which you claim umar was responsible for. So if you love Ali you would love Abu bakir and umar. All theses claims you make against them makes no sense. And anyone who does the research will agree with me. No body in there right mind would name their son after the man who killed his first wife and unborn child and would certainly not marry his daughter to the man who killed his first wife or child. It makes no sense.
On that there was only one umar and abu bakr? Of course no there were so many abu bakr And umar and abu bakr is not a name it’s a title a nickname. Moreover imam Hassan named his son after Abdul rahman now the question is did he named his son after killed of his father imam Ali? Ofcouse no so names is just a name there were not after some ones else...
@@tvhead2463 so your saying several people had the same nickname as Abu bakir😂. Pretty sure a nickname is supposed to be unique to the person otherwise it’s not a nickname if several people are called it too. 🤣 plus you have no proof for that.
@@corpsefoot758 lol our books are not like your Shia books of lies. We have a chain of transmission in all our authentic hadith. All your books are narrated by liars. Full of takiya.
@@1995_1 What? Even Bakri books expose your own Khulafa, go carefully read Bukhari 4240-4241 once again. Why was Abu Bakr not informed of that funeral? Why does your sect have no explanation for why the only surviving child of our Prophet has a concealed burial site? Why do you not understand that if Bukhari 4240 confirms Lady Fatima’s anger at Abu Bakr, AND Bukhari 3767 warns anyone that angering the Lady Fatima means angering our Prophet, then Abu Bakr himself opposed our Holy Prophet directly? What is your explanation for Ali ibn Abi Talib calling both Abu Bakr AND Umar “treacherous sinners” in Sahih Muslim 1757c? Why do you pretend like you can make up fantasies about ALL of these Companions being “Rashidun”, without any deception between them?
May Allah guide all of us to the right path,Ameen!
Baar Umar lanatula ale beshumar!!!
May Allah guide you to right path
What a beautiful explanation.
As salamu alaykum. The Rafida Foundation is accepting all applications right now for volunteer work! Please apply with the following link; www.rafida.org/join
It’s so funny how these Bakriyyah stop by just to dislike and comment nonsense without even watching the videos their determination is hilarious 😆
Better to be Bakriyyah than Khinziriyyah.. A cow is still Halal
@@ManInDunya I mean considering the 2 are one in the same since Abu Bakr was no more than a filthy pig I don’t really get your point
As salamu alaykum. The Rafida Foundation is accepting all applications right now for volunteer work! Please apply with the following link; www.rafida.org/join
@@user-os9td9ck1p why don’t you answer the questions I’ve been asking for the past 2 weeks then we’ll talk
@@Saber23
Abu Bakar was a 'filty pig'?
Then Sayyid Ja'far had this 'pig' blood stream on his vain
❤❤❤Allahummasalli alaa Mohammad wa aali Mohammad ❤❤❤
حفظ الله شيخنا الفاضل حجة الاسلام الحاج ياســࢪ الحبيب دامت بركاته♡•
اللهم صل على محمد وال محمد وعجل فرجهم والعن اعدائهم🤲🏻
Tremendous explanation ❤
What is your proof for this story? Of Ali standing with his feet on Omar? Give some source referece if this is true
Kitab shykh al hili
We love you Umar al farooq more than ourselves you are free from the accusations of these rawafid
Earliest sunni sources too prove these accusations...
of course you love him😂😂😂😂
How did prophet's ص daughter ع died?
Prophet knever defend his daughter (or stepdaughter) Zainab. She was also tortured and miscarried and sunnis narrate this incident on thier pulpits. Was Prophet a coward so not defend her. Moreover Prophet not defend Sumayya.
Was she the woman whom Othman demanded to marry? One of Lady Khadija’s adopted daughters?
@@corpsefoot758 no she was married to Abul Aas and her daughter umamah married Imam Ali as
Hello who is this video benefiting when one can’t even read the English subtitles. ???
Apologise, can you elaborate on why you can't read the English subtitles?
@@RafidaPlus The french overlaps the english
You would need to turn off the French subtitles. Click the ‘CC’ button in the video settings to do so.
As salamu alaykum. The Rafida Foundation is accepting all applications right now for volunteer work! Please apply with the following link; www.rafida.org/join
@@RafidaPlusMake the fonts bigger a clearer ..even if it covers the speakers portrayal from the chest downwards .
Ahsant
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَلِيٍّ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ الْحَسَنِ، ثنا أَبُو شُعَيْبٍ الْحَرَّانِيُّ، ثنا أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ النُّفَيْلِيُّ، ثنا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ، قَالَ: بَعَثَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ الصِّدِّيقُ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ - كَمَا حَدَّثَنِي نَافِعٌ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، «عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ سَنَةَ إِحْدَى عَشْرَةَ إِلَى الْحِجَّةِ، فَأقام للناس الحج، وابتاع عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه في تلك السنة مولاه أسلم من أناس من الأشعريين، ومن مسانيد حديثه عن مولاه عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه»
This is enough to prove the narration in musanaf is mursal? Because It says Umar bought aslam in the 11th yr
hadithtransmitters.hawramani.com/?p=64399#b6d152
Also it says “when Umar left they (Ali and zubair) came so she said to them ‘do you know that Umar came here’”
So if Aslam heard this from Umar how could he know the event that took place after Umar left? Umar had already left so when Fatima (as) told Ali (as) what happened how could Aslam know this?
And if Aslam was present
1.ibn ishaaq said he wasn’t so we know that isn’t the case
2.how would he know the conversation between Ali and Fatima in the house? They wouldn’t let Aslam in the house as that house was just a gathering for people who didn’t give bayah to Abu bakr so even if Aslam was present (which he wouldn’t) it still makes no sense as to how he could know this last bit where Fatima talked to Ali
3.so the only possible option is Aslam heard from Ali now what proof is there Aslam heard from Ali?
Aslam is Umar slave, he heard it from him as all the stories he tells about him, the man was with him for a long time, he met many sahaba, almost didn't narrate from non-sahabi, very thiqa and known, he won't tell a story with a bad reputation of his beloved master that way in such situation as it's true like that except he heard it from him, especially that the nawasib claim the rafida who came decades later, and after more decades they fabricated such a thing, so from who Asalam supposed to hear it?
@@user-co8uf1mj6c did I not just refute how Aslam couldn’t have heard it from Umar? Read what I wrote again.
Also it’s just an assumption that Aslam heard it from Umar so it’s mursal and scholars like ibn hazm and shafi reject mursal
@@rizzy1909 if you mean how could Umar know what happened it will be a simple assumption as everyone do, he only attributed to her passing the message + he may try to ask here and there other sahabis as any normal person would do.
the others of your words are nonsense, hadith science is some good assumptions, and my argument is, it's a strong one, go read and ask why many of your scholars say it's sahih.
Silly little Bakri
@@user-co8uf1mj6c if Umar heard from other sahabi then the isnaad would be from Muhammed bin bishr from ubaydallah bin Umar from zaid bin aslam from his father FROM UMAR FROM SO AND SO (whoever Umar heard it from) but the isnaad doesn’t say that
Satan used to run away from Umar and today Hazrat Umar's name send shia satans in frenzy of madness.
Hahaa Good Story where did Sheikh Yasser Al Habib find and create this story can anybody give reference of this fairytale???
😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆
You shias have a problem with Abu bakir and umar for no reason. Ali named his sons umar and Abu bakir and Ali married his daughter to umar. And all this took place after the alleged murder of fatimah which you claim umar was responsible for. So if you love Ali you would love Abu bakir and umar. All theses claims you make against them makes no sense. And anyone who does the research will agree with me. No body in there right mind would name their son after the man who killed his first wife and unborn child and would certainly not marry his daughter to the man who killed his first wife or child. It makes no sense.
On that there was only one umar and abu bakr? Of course no there were so many abu bakr And umar and abu bakr is not a name it’s a title a nickname. Moreover imam Hassan named his son after Abdul rahman now the question is did he named his son after killed of his father imam Ali? Ofcouse no so names is just a name there were not after some ones else...
Where is your proof outside of Sunni books that Imam Ali’s daughter actually married Umar?
@@tvhead2463 so your saying several people had the same nickname as Abu bakir😂. Pretty sure a nickname is supposed to be unique to the person otherwise it’s not a nickname if several people are called it too. 🤣 plus you have no proof for that.
@@corpsefoot758 lol our books are not like your Shia books of lies. We have a chain of transmission in all our authentic hadith. All your books are narrated by liars. Full of takiya.
@@yung_ga968
So then explain your “authentic” hadith where Ayesha encourages women to breastfeed male strangers. Go ahead.
Don't spread lies
Joker clown
You are one
Shia's are lost
Learn basic English grammar first.
ruclips.net/video/V97K6KIkbzE/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/2ucBp-w7VBM/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/ElkF6wRAzbg/видео.html
Silent 🤫
Fabricated Riwayah
Prove it
No proof since last year 😃...
@@nihatkarazade07 Yes It has proof Even Shia ulemas declared it fabricated your own home declared😂
@@corpsefoot758 your own home declared it
Ask Shia ulemas they declared it fabricated abban ibn abi ayyash a kazzab rawi in it
@@1995_1
What? Even Bakri books expose your own Khulafa, go carefully read Bukhari 4240-4241 once again.
Why was Abu Bakr not informed of that funeral? Why does your sect have no explanation for why the only surviving child of our Prophet has a concealed burial site?
Why do you not understand that if Bukhari 4240 confirms Lady Fatima’s anger at Abu Bakr, AND Bukhari 3767 warns anyone that angering the Lady Fatima means angering our Prophet, then Abu Bakr himself opposed our Holy Prophet directly?
What is your explanation for Ali ibn Abi Talib calling both Abu Bakr AND Umar “treacherous sinners” in Sahih Muslim 1757c? Why do you pretend like you can make up fantasies about ALL of these Companions being “Rashidun”, without any deception between them?
Umer (RA)
LanatAllah
Allahoumma la3an Omar ibn al khatab wa Abu Baker wa Aicha wa Hafsa
naudzubillah
Correction, its Umer (RAN)
Saying such a thing for someone like Umar is a grave sin